The US Census Bureau thread - Page 30

alex1 · #**581** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 3:17 AM**

I'm starting to think that NYC will come in much lower then current estimates.

ChiSoxRox · #**582** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 3:24 AM**

Connecticut, Ohio, Pennsylvania

ChiSoxRox · #**583** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 4:11 AM**

Los Angeles city, CA: 3,792,621 (+97,801)
San Diego city, CA: 1,307,402 (+84,002)
San Jose city, CA: 945,942 (+50,999)
San Francisco city, CA: 805,235 (+28,502)
Fresno city, CA: 494,665 (+67,013)
Sacramento city, CA: 466,488 (+59,470)
Long Beach city, CA: 462,257 (+735)
Oakland city, CA: 390,724 (-8,760)
Bakersfield city, CA: 347,483 (+100,426)
Anaheim city, CA: 336,265 (+8,251)
Santa Ana city, CA: 324,528 (-13,449)
Riverside city, CA: 303,871 (+48,705)
Stockton city, CA: 291,707 (+47,936)
Chula Vista city, CA: 243,916 (+70,360)
Fremont city, CA: 214,089 (+10,676)
Irvine city, CA: 212,375 (+69,303)
San Bernardino city, CA: 209,924 (+24,523)
Modesto city, CA: 201,165 (+12,309)
Oxnard city, CA: 197,899 (+27,541)
Fontana city, CA: 196,069 (+67,140)
Moreno Valley city, CA: 193,365 (+50,984)
Glendale city, CA: 191,719 (-3,254)
Huntington Beach city, CA: 189,992 (+398)
Santa Clarita city, CA: 176,320 (+25,232)
Garden Grove city, CA: 170,883 (+5,687)
Santa Rosa city, CA: 167,815 (+20,220)
Oceanside city, CA: 167,086 (+6,057)
Rancho Cucamonga city, CA: 165,269 (+37,526)
Ontario city, CA: 163,924 (+5,917)
Lancaster city, CA: 156,633 (+37,915)
Elk Grove city, CA: 153,015 (+93,031)
Palmdale city, CA: 152,750 (+36,080)
Corona city, CA: 152,374 (+27,378)
Salinas city, CA: 150,441 (-619)
Pomona city, CA: 149,058 (-415)
Torrance city, CA: 145,438 (+7,492)
Hayward city, CA: 144,186 (+4,156)
Escondido city, CA: 143,911 (+10,352)
Sunnyvale city, CA: 140,081 (+8,321)
Pasadena city, CA: 137,122 (+3,186)
Orange city, CA: 136,416 (+7,595)
Fullerton city, CA: 135,161 (+9,158)
Thousand Oaks city, CA: 126,683 (+9,678)
East Los Angeles CDP, CA: 126,496 (+2,213)
Visalia city, CA: 124,442 (+32,877)
Simi Valley city, CA: 124,237 (+12,886)
Concord city, CA: 122,067 (+287)
Roseville city, CA: 118,788 (+38,867)
Santa Clara city, CA: 116,468 (+14,107)
Vallejo city, CA: 115,942 (-818)
Victorville city, CA: 115,903 (+51,873)
El Monte city, CA: 113,475 (-2,490)
Berkeley city, CA: 112,580 (+9,758)
Downey city, CA: 111,772 (+4,449)
Costa Mesa city, CA: 109,960 (+1,236)
Inglewood city, CA: 109,673 (-2,907)
Ventura city, CA: 106,433 (+5,517)
West Covina city, CA: 106,098 (+1,018)
Norwalk city, CA: 105,549 (+2,251)
Carlsbad city, CA: 105,328 (+27,081)
Fairfield city, CA: 105,321 (+9,143)
Richmond city, CA: 103,701 (+4,485)
Murrieta city, CA: 103,466 (+59,184)
Burbank city, CA: 103,340 (+3,024)
Antioch city, CA: 102,372 (+11,840)
Daly City city, CA: 101,123 (-2,498)
Temecula city, CA: 100,097 (+42,381)

68 cities in all.

babybackribs2314 · #**584** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 5:44 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by alex1

I'm starting to think that NYC will come in much lower then current estimates.

Disagree, I think NYC will do similar to SF-DC (modest growth). I think Brooklyn's population may come in somewhat lower than expected while Manhattan's comes in higher (rapid gentrification in Brooklyn & tons of new construction/infill in Manhattan). The Bronx may show a somewhat large decline.

Ch.G, Ch.G · #**585** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 10:10 AM**

Per the New York Times, both California's black and white population declined over the last decade, with most of the loss coming from coastal cities. Asians and Latinos continued making big gains.

Chase Unperson · #**586** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 12:07 PM**

Just read in the times that cali's white population dropped 5% while the black population dropped 1%. So it looks like the whole reverse great migration may not apply to western states. And it looks like possibly there could be a reverse migration of whites back to Oklahoma now that the dust bowl is finally over.

Quixote · #**587** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 12:55 PM**

California is losing whites at such an alarming rate.

bnk · #**588** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 1:52 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chase Unperson

Just read in the times that cali's white population dropped 5% while the black population dropped 1%. So it looks like the whole reverse great migration may not apply to western states. And it looks like possibly there could be a reverse migration of whites back to Oklahoma now that the dust bowl is finally over.

I just got a bit of a chuckel out of this one. I am not saying you are wrong but if true it is a bit funny to think about.

The old Grapes of Wrath in reverse so to speak.

Gees I am getting old

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Gees-Im-Getting-Old/112893308724744

if you do not feel it now... you will someday. Well today I feel old.[bnk]

To make it even more dramatic I think that everyone involved in this masterpiece is already passed on due to old age, if I am wrong than state it...

Otherwise I wish a long good life upon them and my current ...

• Video Link

PS an old history lesson [ not related to the Grapes but fun nontheless ]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iYY2FQHFwE

Chase Unperson · #**589** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 1:55 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Westsidelife

California is losing whites at such an alarming rate.

Yes. It is true, and it all happened in the last year. The Whites heard that the Great Recession is over so they are all going back to the prairie states.

J_M_Tungsten · #**590** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 4:20 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chase Unperson

Yes. It is true, and it all happened in the last year. The Whites heard that the Great Recession is over so they are all going back to the prairie states.

seriously, where are they all going?

northbay · #**591** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 5:39 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten

seriously, where are they all going?

texas

sonoma county's white population shrunk 6% while our hispanic population grew 52%!

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/201...9548/1350?Title=Latino-population-jumps-

Chase Unperson · #**592** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 5:41 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten

seriously, where are they all going?

Back to their farms.

dave8721 · #**593** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 5:59 PM**

That and they are dying and are not being replaced by new White children.

Thundertubs · #**594** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 6:20 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten

seriously, where are they all going?

Denver, Boise, Portland, Reno, Albuquerque, Bend, Flagstaff, Bozeman...

It's a pretty common lament in western states that all the Californians coming in are driving home/land prices up.

Heck, even Jacksonville, FL is reputed to have a lot of California transplants.

J_M_Tungsten · #**595** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 6:34 PM**

It sounds like more and more cities are becoming more and more segregated. Is the "Melting Pot" boiling over?

themaguffin · #**596** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 6:36 PM**

Pennsylvania
The complete data wasn't available yet, but the top line statement was...

Quote:

Data for Pennsylvania show that the five most populous cities or townships and their 2010 Census counts are
Philadelphia, 1,526,006;
Pittsburgh, 305,704;
Allentown, 118,032;
Erie, 101,786; and
Reading, 88,082.

Philadelphia grew by 0.6 percent since the 2000 Census. Pittsburgh decreased by 8.6 percent, Allentown grew by 10.7 percent, Erie decreased by 1.9 percent, and Reading grew by 8.5 percent.

The largest county is Philadelphia, with a population of 1,526,006. Its population grew by 0.6 percent since 2000. The other counties in the top five include

Allegheny, with a population of 1,223,348 (decrease of 4.6 percent); Montgomery, 799,874 (increase of 6.6 percent);
Bucks, 625,249 (increase of 4.6 percent); and
Delaware, 558,979 (increase of 1.5 percent). (Philadelphia city and county cover the same geographic area.)

The redistricting file consists of five detailed tables: the first shows the population by race, including six single race groups and 57 multiple race groups (63 total race categories); the second shows the Hispanic or Latino population as well as the non-Hispanic or Latino population cross-tabulated by the 63 race categories. These tabulations are repeated in the third and fourth tables for the population 18 years and over and are for the resident population of the United States. The fifth table provides counts of housing units and their occupancy status.

ColDayMan · #**597** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 6:45 PM**

Ohio

Data for Ohio show that the five most populous incorporated places and their 2010 Census counts are:

Columbus, 787,033
Cleveland, 396,815
Cincinnati, 296,943
Toledo, 287,208
Akron, 199,110

Columbus grew by 10.6 percent since the 2000 Census. Cleveland decreased by 17.1 percent, Cincinnati decreased by 10.4 percent, Toledo decreased by 8.4 percent, and Akron decreased by 8.3 percent.

The largest county is Cuyahoga, with a population of 1,280,122. Its population decreased by 8.2 percent since 2000. The other counties in the top five include Franklin, with a population of 1,163,414 (increase of 8.8 percent); Hamilton, 802,374 (decrease of 5.1 percent); Summit, 541,781 (decrease of 0.2 percent); and Montgomery, 535,153 (decrease of 4.3 percent).

ColDayMan · #**598** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 6:49 PM**

None of those cities on the Ohio list surprise me. All were expected to do exactly that. Cincinnati bottomed out and just started turning around in population around 2008-ish so that makes sense it lost a ton of folks on the westside to outer suburban counties. Cleveland, Dayton (Montgomery County), Toledo, Akron, and Columbus, no surprises.

Gordo · #**599** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 6:50 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten

It sounds like more and more cities are becoming more and more segregated. Is the "Melting Pot" boiling over?

How are you drawing the "more segregated" conclusion?

sofresh808 · #**600** Posted **Mar 9, 2011, 6:52 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten

It sounds like more and more cities are becoming more and more segregated. Is the "Melting Pot" boiling over?

I think the big story of this census is the growing diversity of the suburbs, as Blacks leave traditionally segregated inner city neighborhoods for the burbs, along with Latino and Asian immigrants bypassing tradtional gateway urban areas for the suburbs as well.