There might be a lot going on in Toronto right now, but most of the current developments are shorter in height, with the exception of Trump and Aura at College Park. I think Toronto deserves a supertall.
I don't think Toronto has anything to complain about regarding skyscraper construction.
^ I'm lovin those Quebec City photos. We really really don't see a lot of them on SSP. It's a sparse skyline, but certainly tall.
Will be my own job now
The skyline is sparse, that is true, but he's also on the top of a hill. And there's some others buildings just down of the hill face to this skyline in the St-Roch borough. St-foy is getting some new buildings recently too... but it is quite not easy to take 1 picture with this part of the skyline and Ste-foy.
Define tall? Tall is the last word I'd use to describe QC.
The higher building of Quebec city is 126m and 31 storeys... Not bad... also higher of eastern canada ( east of montreal )
I know that the definition of what is tall can be different for each person. Personally, up to 100m, I start to call this tall. Any cities who will get a new 100m building is something to show as a good mention I think
Mississauga and Toronto have not reached halfway to their full skyline potential for the next 5 years. These 5 years moving forward will probably be more exciting skylinewise in Mississauga moreso than Toronto. Considering the smaller base they are working with, and the existing buildings in Toronto.
IMO It would take away from the aesthetics of the skyline and take away the focal point of the skyline which is the CN tower
It doesn't have to be 2000 ft tall..
I think a 1100 footer or even a 1200 footer would look fantastic and not take away the attention from the CN. It also depends on how interesting the architecture is. I doubt a 1100 ft glass box would command attention.
Prev
Has a Los Angeles look/feel to it- seen several movie scenes of LA from a similar angle. Beautiful. 
Linear Mode
