Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P.
So we build a stadium with faux-Victorian ornamentation and red brick...
|
How about an old style stadium that has some of the elements of Camden Yards (Baltimore Orioles) and some elements of Stanford Stadium (US University Football). It is interesting to me that the most popular baseball stadiums are the old style Fenway Park, Wrigley Field, Camden Yards ... The first two really are old, and Camden Yards was a retro style new stadium. It has been found that the old style (retro) cozy stadiums are the most popular.
This is Camden Yards (the first retro-Ball Parks in the MLB)
(source: rdelucchi , shown at
http://www.makefive.com/categories/sports/team/top-5-mlb-baseball-stadiums/camden-yards )
This is Fenway: (source: David Tompkins -
http://dt.org/html/pics.html )
Wrigley Field (source: Dawn Mikulich at
http://chicagouncommon.com/photography/gallery/765/ )
Combine Stanford Stadium (football): (source as shown on the image)
I think that the style that would fit at the Wanderers Grounds next to the Public Gardens would be a retro style football stadium that is camouflaged with dirt berms and lots of plant life like Stanford Stadium, with any exposed walls "faux-Victorian ornamentation and red brick" as you stated. So it would blend in with that part of the city.
However, the roof will detract from the cozy feel, especially if it is a massive columnless design. So I think an old style internally supported roof will be the most cozy and least obtrusive design. But any internal supports should be done to minimize obstructed views. I think that to minimize cost and so as not to detract from the stadium that it should only cover about half of the sideline seats. In case of rain, people in the lower bowl could seek shelter in the concourse under the upper tier which would be covered with a roof.
Such a design would require a lot of thought, but I don't think that it would be a costly design. It would be cozy and fit into that part of the city.