Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram
The politicians giving reporters sensational quotes that sabotaged the projects' reputation all along the way didn't help, either
|
That is unfortunately true. When politics are involved the opposition will do everything they can to tear down something, even if it is to the detriment of the public, in which case losing hundreds of millions of dollars is. But, hey, it maybe helped them get 5 points in the polls. In general, though, this project is a prime example of why the market drives and controls prices, and products, and not the government. This would have been a complete failure in the pre-sale market (and it was...) which would normally force a developer to re-evaluate the project. Think Ritz Carlton~ Not so when government is involved.
And you can't even market the main selling feature of the OV that sets it apart from other developments to the Mainland Chinese. "Eco-friendly" isn't trendy in China.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreambrother808
I wonder if developers going both high end and LEED is the problem here, the infill in North Van, and elsewhere.
Is there a way to succeed in the market by doing LEED Platinum without other high end elements?
|
Perhaps. I think they way over-estimate the market of millionaires who care where their toilet water comes from. Even in Vancouver. LEED Platinum is so expensive to achieve currently that only a select few people at the top could truly afford it, and I don't think they'd like to live in a green squalor. The majority of people are just talk, anyways. Very few are willing to put hundreds of thousands of dollars behind their talk.
The only thing people REALLY care about sustaining is their money. And this was a bad investment.
Over the years the price of the technology will come down (perhaps marginally), and mostly because the government will end up forcing it upon us like the light bulbs.