HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #441  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 5:27 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/nati...t-of-electrified-go-line/article1883297/

Ontario to fund environmental assessment of electrified GO line




The province is one step closer to electrifying GO Transit's busiest corridors, an upgrade that could eventually cost as much as $1.8-billion.

The Ministry of Transportation announced Wednesday that it would fund an environmental assessment for electrifying the new express rail line to Pearson airport, the first route recommended for electrification by Metrolinx, whose board voted unanimously in favour of electrification Wednesday.
“This is a significant step forward,” said Bruce McCuaig, the president of Metrolinx, after the vote.

Staff at the province's regional transportation authority released a $4-million study earlier this month recommending that GO Transit, a division of Metrolinx, electrify the air-rail link and the busy Lakeshore and Georgetown corridors over the next 20 years.

However, Metrolinx says the air-rail link can't be upgraded from diesel to electric trains in time for its opening in 2015.

     
     
  #442  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2011, 1:53 AM
PoscStudent's Avatar
PoscStudent PoscStudent is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. John's
Posts: 3,817
Public Transit will be rolling again in St. John's after nearly 3 months.
     
     
  #443  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2011, 6:41 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Architect View Post
It wouldn't be full like Tokyo subways but it'd be better to serve the number of riders that would be using the line, even for years in the future.

And strawman argument? Seriously? I was saying subways aren't needed on the Eglinton route.. but Rob "Gravy Train" Ford says that he wanted to replace Transit City with subways, which implies he means all of the lines. Then he acts all surprised when it'd "found out" that it would cost 3x as much, and would completely go against his entire campaign.. Even though they knew that years ago.
Uh no, the only subways he proposed are the Sheppard and Danforth extensions to SCC, which are not part of Transit City.

Again, strawman argument.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Architect View Post
No serious proposals have been made because it is a ridiculous thing to suggest anyways. The main argument I was responding to was the one where it was said Eglinton needed a subway instead of an LRT, which isn't true at all.
Subway IS needed on LRT. A large portion of the proposed Eglinton LRT is underground after all.
     
     
  #444  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2011, 1:18 AM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
Uh no, the only subways he proposed are the Sheppard and Danforth extensions to SCC, which are not part of Transit City.

Again, strawman argument.



Subway IS needed on LRT. A large portion of the proposed Eglinton LRT is underground after all.
You're hopeless. He also talked about how Eglinton needed a subway, which isn't true, and was proven.
The Sheppard and Danforth extensions he proposed are wastes of money as well, and will be as empty as the bus lines he is currently trying to cut.
Not strawman.
__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
     
     
  #445  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2011, 2:09 AM
Alexcaban's Avatar
Alexcaban Alexcaban is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal/Vancouver
Posts: 606
Côte-Vertu Metro 3:30PM

     
     
  #446  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2011, 3:33 AM
BretttheRiderFan's Avatar
BretttheRiderFan BretttheRiderFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,667
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Restoring+cars+could+save+Calgary+millions/4193981/story.html


Restoring old LRT cars could save Calgary millions



CALGARY — As the city debates how the initial instalment of provincial transit cash will be spent, a new option is being floated that might salvage a significant number of LRT vehicles heading for retirement, leaving a larger pot of money to develop southeast transit.

Last week, Bombardier Transportation met with a number of council members, and two aldermen say the company pitched the idea of refurbishing old LRT vehicles that are ending their service years.

If the option does prove worthwhile, it could add 15 years to the life of the aging Siemens U2 vehicles, and cost a fraction of the price to purchase new cars.

Bombardier is currently refurbishing some of Edmonton’s LRT vehicles for about $1 million each, according to the two aldermen, although it is acknowledged Calgary cars are more corroded and have seen more use over the years.

Still, even if the cost is 50 per cent higher, it’s worth a close look, says Ald. Shane Keating.

It would be cheaper than buying new vehicles, which would last longer but cost $3.5 million or more.

If five or six vehicles were refurbished every year, the cost could be included in the city budget, allowing more Green Trip provincial transit funds to go to improving rapid transit in the southeast, said Keating.


Two weeks ago, city administration recommended to a council committee that Calgary use most of the first instalment of Green Trip money — about $225 million — to buy 50 new light rail vehicles for roughly $200 million.

Transit right now has 154 LRT vehicles, with another 38 arriving. But the current inventory includes

82 Siemens U2s that need to be ­retired over the next 10 years.

In a report, administration said 50 new vehicles were needed to accommodate transit’s move to four-car trains and to deal with growing transit travel in the region. But the committee balked at the recommendation, with a cadre of aldermen proposing purchasing fewer vehicles and diverting $73.4 million for a southeast transitway. At the same meeting, Mayor Naheed Nenshi criticized administration for not justifying the need for 50 new vehicles.



Bombardier is currently overhauling 37 old LRT vehicles in Edmonton under a five-year contract.

The cost for that work is slightly less than $1 million per car, according to Dave Geake, the director of LRT in Edmonton. But some additional work is also being done, bringing the total cost to $1.4 million per vehicle.
     
     
  #447  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2011, 8:33 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,075
Feds kick in extra $25M for NAIT LRT line

Additional funds will buy 10 more cars for Edmonton train

BY GORDON KENT, EDMONTONJOURNAL.COM FEBRUARY 8, 2011 1:10 PM BE THE FIRST TO POST A COMMENT


STORYPHOTOS ( 1 )



City transportation staff are presenting the final southeast LRT concept plan to council’s transportation committee Wednesday.
Photograph by: Brian Gavriloff, edmontonjournal.com
EDMONTON - The federal government is putting an extra $25 million into construction of the NAIT LRT line, Mayor Stephen Mandel says.

The federal Tories had committed $75 million to the project, but Mandel said Tuesday that Public Works Minister Rona Ambrose announced at last week’s Edmonton Chamber of Commerce ball the funding will be $100 million.



Read more: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Feds+kick+extra+NAIT+line/4245402/story.html#ixzz1DOxSVzwT
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #448  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2011, 9:11 PM
MikeOnt's Avatar
MikeOnt MikeOnt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London, Ontario.
Posts: 38
the london plan goes to uwo, it dosnt go in it but right by it on richmond. and who knows, i bet it will go in a bit.
     
     
  #449  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2011, 2:18 AM
Alexcaban's Avatar
Alexcaban Alexcaban is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal/Vancouver
Posts: 606
Some photos of the metro I took today.



     
     
  #450  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2011, 2:25 AM
BretttheRiderFan's Avatar
BretttheRiderFan BretttheRiderFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,667
The Subway stations in Montreal are like mini-Art galleries, very aesthetically pleasing, far better than the Toronto stations (at least when I was there last anyway)
     
     
  #451  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2011, 2:30 AM
BretttheRiderFan's Avatar
BretttheRiderFan BretttheRiderFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,667
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2011/02/08/edmonton-lrt-funding.html

Quote:
Officials have learned the city will likely get most of the $800 million earmarked for the greater Edmonton region from the province's Green Trip fund.

"From the Capital region, we have seen a recommendation to the province that out of the $800 million, that $732 million come to the City of Edmonton associated with LRT projects," the city's chief financial officer, Lorna Rosen, told council's transportation and public works committee.

More details are expected when the province releases its budget on Feb. 24, Rosen said.

At the same meeting, Mayor Stephen Mandel revealed Ottawa is giving the new LRT line to NAIT another $25 million.

The federal government has already committed $75 million to the project. But last week, Edmonton-area MP and Public Works Minister Rona Ambrose told a Chamber of Commerce function that amount was $100 million, Mandel said.

"She spoke about it in public ... that there was $100 million allocated to the LRT."

The extra money will cover an $30 million increase in the cost of the NAIT route, which is now estimated at $755 million.

Council has been asked to approved the purchase of an additional 10 LRT cars because the introduction of a U-Pass for NAIT students has led to an increase in projected ridership numbers for the new line.



The NAIT LRT line is scheduled to open in 2014. It will take trains from downtown to Grant McEwan University, Kingsway Mall and NAIT.



Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2011/02/08/edmonton-lrt-funding.html#ixzz1DnncFuDj


Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2011/02/08/edmonton-lrt-funding.html#ixzz1DnnX3Nhh
     
     
  #452  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2011, 2:33 AM
Alexcaban's Avatar
Alexcaban Alexcaban is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal/Vancouver
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by BretttheRiderFan View Post
The Subway stations in Montreal are like mini-Art galleries, very aesthetically pleasing, far better than the Toronto stations (at least when I was there last anyway)
Montreal has some pretty ugly stations also like Beaudry, Frontenac, Laurier and Guy-Concordia.
     
     
  #453  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2011, 4:22 PM
Ayreonaut's Avatar
Ayreonaut Ayreonaut is offline
EVDS MPlan Grad
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 11,113
Not Canadian, but I love DC's stations.


(my pic)
     
     
  #454  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2011, 5:11 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
That is neat. Remind me of how this scene could be nice on a movie.
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #455  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2011, 6:29 PM
le calmar's Avatar
le calmar le calmar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 5,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by BretttheRiderFan View Post
The Subway stations in Montreal are like mini-Art galleries, very aesthetically pleasing, far better than the Toronto stations (at least when I was there last anyway)
The stations in Laval look nice and contemporan. Not sure about the rest though, with their late 60's - early 70's look. Some stations still manage to be nice (Place-des-Arts just to name one)
     
     
  #456  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2011, 6:30 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by le calmar View Post
The stations in Laval look nice and contemporan. Not sure about the rest though, with their late 60's - early 70's look.
Some of them got some serious improvements recently. Just think about Henri-Bourassa station.
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #457  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2011, 10:52 PM
Dwils01's Avatar
Dwils01 Dwils01 is offline
Urban Fanactic
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 3,283
I think Toronto's nicest subway station is museum.


http://joeclark.org/appearances/atypi/2007/TTC/inscribed/

The nicest subway stations I've seen are in Moscow.


http://www.flickr.com/photos/yeowatzup/149193238/
     
     
  #458  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2011, 4:44 AM
tkoe's Avatar
tkoe tkoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: EDM
Posts: 224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexcaban View Post
Montreal has some pretty ugly stations also like Beaudry, Frontenac, Laurier and Guy-Concordia.
After seeing New York's subway stations, Montreal's look glorious in comparison...
     
     
  #459  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2011, 6:28 AM
Alexcaban's Avatar
Alexcaban Alexcaban is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal/Vancouver
Posts: 606
Here are Montreal's ugliest stations

Beaudry

Guy-Concordia

Frontenac
     
     
  #460  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2011, 7:40 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,288
I personally find the 60s/70s style quite charming. It really reminds me of the exuberance and optimism that Montreal was experiencing during that era.

As far as Toronto, I wish more of the stations were as bright as the Museum one posted. The couple I was in seemed a bit dark and depressing.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:06 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.