HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #501  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2011, 8:52 PM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
...

Last edited by Loopy; Oct 30, 2012 at 8:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #502  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2011, 1:21 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 17,005
Interesting. This is Chicago, so I would not be remotely surprised if Obama was leaning on Meeks and Davis to withdraw so that the unelectable Braun would catapult Emanuel into the 5th floor.

I'd imagine that Meeks and Davis place a high value on having a black Chicagoan president, and might willingly withdraw if they were convinced that only Emanuel could deliver Illinois for Obama in 2012. But what's in it for them? A second term for Obama is not worth the tarnishing of their political careers. I dunno about Meeks, but Davis seems pretty sharp, unlike some of the flaky short-bus black politicians (Roland Burris, Dock Walls, etc).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #503  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2011, 1:59 AM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,071
Another Braun article.




http://www.theroot.com/print/49429


Carol Moseley Braun’s Quixotic Bid For Mayor Of Chicago
Posted: January 11, 2011 at 2:39 PM

The former Illinois Senator wasn’t the first choice of the black power elite to take on Rahm Emanuel in the crowded mayoral race.

Or the second.


Getting the nod as the black consensus candidate for next month's Chicago mayoral election worked like a charm for Carol Moseley Braun -- the third time around.

The first time the coalition of the Windy City's self-appointed black power elites met to bless one of the half dozen or so African Americans vying to replace the unexpectedly retiring Richard M. Daley, Braun was not the first choice, or the second. Those honors went to Rev. James Meeks, an Illinois state legislator who boasts ministering a megachurch with 20,000 faithful, and Larry R. Rogers Jr., a prominent personal injury attorney and commissioner of the Cook County Board of Review (property taxes).

Nor was Braun the first choice the second time around, after Rogers opted out, and when the reality set in that many of Chicago's white and Hispanic voters might just not be that into the anti-gay, pro-school vouchers Meeks. During round two, Congressman Danny Davis was crowned the one-who-would-mostly-get-most-of-the-black-votes.

The second decree of the coalition of aldermen, business leaders and community activists worked just fine for Davis, but Braun, not so much. Mission unaccomplished.

Finally, after a year's-end intervention with the Rev. Jesse L. Jackson summoning both candidates to a late-night meeting at Rainbow PUSH, Davis stood down on New Year's Eve, leaving Braun, who had the support of two of Chicago's most prominent business titans, John W. Rogers Jr., chairman, CEO and chief investment officer of Ariel Investments, and real estate mogul Elzie Higginbottom, as the last viable black candidate standing.

The notion that Braun, the first and only black woman to serve as a U.S. senator and a former U.S. ambassador to New Zealand, is a viable contender and the belief that a black consensus candidate was a viable strategy both lasted for about three-and-a-half days -- since then, it's been one "oops" moment after the next.

As a harbinger of missteps to come, on Dec. 29, just two days before week one of her The One campaign began, Braun got into the first of her two — matches with folks who buy their ink by the barrel.

In response to a critical column by Neil Steinberg of the Chicago Sun-Times, Braun lashed out at the columnist during a news conference to outline her public safety platform, stating that, "He is a drunk and a wife beater, and that's a matter of record. I didn't make that up. It's the truth."

Steinberg, in his column headlined, "Carol, I Miss You Already," had facetiously claimed, "part of me wishes she had a snowball's chance in hell of becoming Chicago's next mayor," because he'd have so many things to ridicule in a hypothetical Braun administration.




...

And while none of Chicago's other black mayoral wannabes come close to matching Braun's resume, it's understandable why she wasn't the coalition's first choice. In a Tribune/WGN poll conducted last month, former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel was backed by 32 percent of voters, followed by 30 percent undecided. Gery Chico, a Hispanic who is former schools chief, and Rep. Davis each had nine percent and Rev. Meeks seven percent. Braun polled at six percent.

Even Braun's support among the city's black power elites mirrors her recent polling. Mellody Hobson, the president of John Rogers' Ariel Investments, has signed on as the co-chair of Emanuel's mayoral campaign. And former White House Social Secretary Desiree Rogers, John Rogers' ex-wife and the mother of his daughter, hosted a sell-out fundraiser Tuesday night for Emanuel, featuring Jennifer Hudson, at Chicago's House of Blues.

...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #504  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2011, 4:36 AM
Chicago103's Avatar
Chicago103 Chicago103 is offline
Future Mayor of Chicago
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,062
Only six candidates remain on the ballot after three candidates (Tyrone Carter, Howard Ray and Fredrick K White) were knocked off the ballot today. This is for the best IMO because it got rid of the dead weight and now there is no reason for polls to not include all six candidates. The big questions remaning I think is will Patricia Van Pelt Watkins and William Walls be able to take signifcant votes away from Carol Moseley Braun in the black community and will Miguel Del Valle be pressured to drop out and support Chico by the Hispanic community. I don't have any hard poll data but my hunch is that the white community is split between north siders leaning towards Emmanuel and south side white ethnics leaning towards Chico.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/elect...mayor-race-0112-20110111,0,4723074.story

Six candidates for mayor on February ballot

Six candidates will be on the Feb. 22 mayoral ballot — down from a field of 20 who filed for the city's top job in November.

Some one-time candidates left voluntarily, such as U.S. Rep. Danny Davis and state Sen. James Meeks. Others had their candidacies challenged and were removed from the ballot by the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, including three who were knocked off Tuesday.

The remaining candidates on the ballot are (in order): Rahm Emanuel, Miguel del Valle, Carol Moseley Braun, Gery Chico, Patricia Van Pelt Watkins and William Walls. Emanuel didn't win the top spot in December when contenders' names were drawn in a candidate lottery, but he moved up as others were removed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #505  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2011, 5:39 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 50,586
Transit is a sleeper issue in race for Chicago mayor


January 17, 2011

By Jon Hilkevitch



Read More: http://www.chicagotribune.com/classified...ng-around-0117-20110117,0,4965446.column

Quote:
The candidates in the Chicago mayoral race talk a lot about jobs, crime, education and city finances, sometimes doing so while shaking hands with potential voters at CTA rail stations. Yet with the Feb. 22 election coming up, none of the candidates has had much to say about transportation, whether it's the Chicago Transit Authority's perennial funding crisis or the financial challenge to rescue the troubled plan for new runways at O'Hare International Airport.

Transportation issues are not raised on the candidates' campaign Web pages, and no one has put together a position paper. But a new public-opinion poll on mass-transit issues found that the Chicago electorate cares greatly about CTA service, extending even to individuals who don't ride the system.

Do you see a disconnect between the politicians and the public? The results suggest that mass transit is a big untapped issue that could play a key role in attracting votes, including among voters who consider themselves undecided in the mayor's race, according to the pollster who was commissioned to conduct the survey for the Amalgamated Transit Union, which represents most CTA employees.

"Transit is kind of a sleeper issue in the race," said pollster Vic Fingerhut, who heads a polling firm based in Alexandria, Va. "You'd expect at least one of the campaigns to call for no more service cuts or fare hikes." The CTA cut 18 percent of bus service and 9 percent of rail service in 2010. The state is already behind in providing public subsidies to the CTA, Metra and Pace in fiscal 2011, according to the Regional Transportation Authority.

Eighty-two percent of likely voters who participated in the poll responded that the availability of good mass transit is an "important concern" that Chicago's next mayor "should address immediately upon taking office." Among undecided voters, 80 percent were on board with that opinion, the poll found.

.....



Union's poll shows public interest, but candidates aren't addressing pressing issues with buses, trains and O'Hare expansion

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #506  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2011, 6:58 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,129
Quote:
Bill Clinton to Campaign in Chicago for Emanuel
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: January 17, 2011

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago mayoral candidate Rahm Emanuel is getting a high-profile boost from one of his old bosses, former President Bill Clinton.

Clinton is scheduled to appear Tuesday at a rally for Emanuel in Chicago. A former top Clinton aide, Emanuel is one of six candidates vying to replace the retiring Mayor Richard Daley.

...
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2011/01/17/us/AP-US-Chicago-Mayor-Clinton.html?hp


Isn't the election basically a formality now (and not because of Clinton)?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #507  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2011, 9:56 PM
Chicago103's Avatar
Chicago103 Chicago103 is offline
Future Mayor of Chicago
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
Isn't the election basically a formality now (and not because of Clinton)?
Negative, the February 22nd race certainly is not and who gets in the runoff will determine if the April 5th race is a formality.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #508  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2011, 11:40 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 17,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
Isn't the election basically a formality now (and not because of Clinton)?
I'm fairly confident that Emanuel will be the biggest vote-getter, but he will not win a majority. That means the runoff will depend on who wins second-place in the general.

If Braun wins second-place, then Emanuel will win the runoff hands-down. But if Chico wins second-place, then the runoff will be very competitive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #509  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2011, 11:45 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,528
^ and according to the last poll, emamuel was out in front with a strong 42%, and braun in a solid second place with 26%, with chico and del valle bring in the rear at 10% and 7% respectively.

unless something major changes, it looks like an eventual emanuel/braun runoff in april, and i would agree that she has zero chance of defeating him city wide in a 2 horse race.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #510  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 1:06 AM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,129
Well if that's the case then let's hope the race-baiting doesn't get too out of control. The city may not be governable after an Emanuel/Braun showdown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #511  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 4:11 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,423
^^^ Naw, trust me Rahm "— retards" Emmanuel will make Chicago governable regardless of whether the constituents or aldermen like it. In Chicago if you can knock some heads together then you become a monarch. If you can't beat the — out of those who oppose you, you fail. Rahm will have no trouble steamrolling out-of-line aldermen and is therefore the natural successor to controls of the Chicago machine. Hes no Jayne Byrne or Harold Washington. Rahm believes in crushing the opposition and clearly knows how to after spending the last two years herding democats in congress. I'm sure someone who has forced through some of the most controversial legislation in history on the extremely open and competitive national level will have no problem squelching dissent while at the helm of an orderly machine like city hall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #512  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 6:24 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,528
Clinton endorses Emanuel, fires back at critics
Posted by Rick Pearson, Kristen Mack and John Byrne; last updated at 12:17 p.m. with Chico comments


Former President Bill Clinton endorsed Rahm Emanuel for Chicago mayor today and chastised critics who have sought to label the mayoral contender an outsider from Washington.

“We all knew where his heart was,” Clinton said of Emanuel’s love for Chicago while serving his presidential administration. “But we were glad to have his mind.”

Clinton recounted how he first met Emanuel while running for the White House and later tapped him to serve in a top strategic policy role. The former president called Emanuel “fearlessly honest” while acknowledging the candidate sometimes uses “extremely colorful language.” He credited Emanuel’s “skill set and values and sheer raw energy and determination and love” for the jobs he was assigned.


full article: http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clou...igning-in-chicago-for-emanuel-today.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #513  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 10:05 PM
Mr Roboto Mr Roboto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chi 60616
Posts: 3,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
Union's poll shows public interest, but candidates aren't addressing pressing issues with buses, trains and O'Hare expansion
It bothers me that I have heard next to nothing from any of the candidates on this issue. And building TODs in this day and age is a must as far as Im concerned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #514  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2011, 1:09 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 17,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
^ and according to the last poll, emamuel was out in front with a strong 42%, and braun in a solid second place with 26%, with chico and del valle bring in the rear at 10% and 7% respectively.
If del Valle drops out, that would kick his Hispanic base to Chico. At that point, you'd start worrying about voter turnout as being the deciding factor between Braun and Chico.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
^^^ Naw, trust me Rahm "— retards" Emmanuel will make Chicago governable regardless of whether the constituents or aldermen like it. In Chicago if you can knock some heads together then you become a monarch. If you can't beat the — out of those who oppose you, you fail.
Remember that Daley (either one) wasn't a hugely aggressive guy, at least not in-your-face like Emanuel. The Daleys held onto power by having an extremely acute and shrewd sense of what buttons to push to influence each person, and backing that up with an incredible memory for details. There are stories about how good Dad's memory was, that he remembered the names of thousands of individual voters once he had been introduced once. Of course, neither of them ever had much sense of loyalty to others, either, once they were at the top, and were not afraid to turn on former allies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #515  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2011, 7:59 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,528
here's some mayoral campaign news of particular interest to many on this forum



Emanuel pitches Red Line extension, renovations
Posted by Kristen Mack at 1:19 p.m.

Chicago mayoral candidate Rahm Emanuel today said his first transportation priority is an expansion of CTA’s Red Line, “the backbone” of the city's rail system.

He wants to secure federal funding to rebuild deteriorating tracks south to 95th Street, extend the line to 130th and renovate and modernize lines north of Belmont.

In August 2009, the Chicago Transit Authority's board voted to extend the Red Line by more than 5 miles. Its plan would expand the train line southeast from the end of the line at 95th Street on the Dan Ryan Expressway to the Interstate 57 median and finally to 130th Street, using Union Pacific railroad right of way.

source: http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clou...ches-red-line-extension-renovations.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #516  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2011, 2:54 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,528
New Poll


Poll: Emanuel closing in on majority vote
Front-runner has 44%; Braun next with 21%

By Hal Dardick, Tribune reporter
8:19 p.m. CST, January 20, 2011


Rahm Emanuel is closing in on the majority he needs to end the mayor's race next month and avoid a one-on-one runoff, a new Tribune/WGN poll shows.

The former White House chief of staff had the support of 44 percent of those surveyed. Emanuel enjoys a wide lead among women and white voters and has substantial support among African-American and Latino voters.

Former U.S. Sen. Carol Moseley Braun and onetime Chicago Board of Education President Gery Chico are battling for second place in hopes of advancing to an April runoff. But they also must stop Emanuel from getting more than 50 percent and winning outright on Feb. 22.


full article: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/elect...or-race-0121mdv-20110120,0,7220283.story




source: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/elect...or-race-tab-bw20110120,0,5001281.graphic

Last edited by Steely Dan; Jan 21, 2011 at 6:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #517  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2011, 3:32 PM
ametz's Avatar
ametz ametz is offline
ParanoidAndroid
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 252
I'm a little nervous about the dearth of transit talk from the candidates so far too, but I think talk of extending the red line is a good start. The (Republican) governor of OK City and the (Democractic) governor of Charlotte were interviewed on PBS last night, and the OK City governor talked at length about how the federal government needs to help cities with infrastructure $$. He talked about the investement that other countries make in transit/roads/rail and about how American cities desperately need to catch up. This from a governor in a sprawl state with low gas prices....very refreshing.

Anyhoo, there's an article in the Trib today citing strong support among blacks, latinos, and women for Rahm, and how he's widening his lead to the point that a run off is no longer a sure bet. I still think Chico can force a runoff if he ramps up his tv ads and DelValle (whom I really like) drops out. Incidentally, I ran into a latino friend-of-a-friend over the weekend who's hosting a post-debate party next week at his house. He lives in McKinley Park (Chico's home turf), but he's a big Rahm supporter. I asked if he's alone down there, and he said there's a surprising number of latinos supporting Rahm. I was surprised, but the numbers cited in the Trib article seem to bear that out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #518  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2011, 11:00 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
If Rahmbo could get the Red Line work done as Mayor, that's all the more reason I would support him.

Seems like he's the only person who has even talked about transit.

A few weeks ago he also talked about transit, saying that it deserved better funding. He also said that as Mayor, he would use transit from time to time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #519  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2011, 11:01 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,528
this graphic is really interesting, and it seems to me that it shows that if chico is to get past braun for the run-off, del valle needs to stand aside.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #520  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2011, 2:06 AM
Zerton's Avatar
Zerton Zerton is offline
Ω
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,608
Ok, not to sound like a —, but does extending the red line to 130th mean anything to anyone's life on this forum? I personally never go that far south. A loop line would be a hell of a lot more beneficial to people living closer to the core of the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:09 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.