HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1901  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2010, 11:03 PM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,865
Disregard.
     
     
  #1902  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2010, 11:52 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radley77 View Post
The reason that some places have implemented fare differentiation is because it has resulted in productivity improvements of the public transit. By having a flat fare, you have users like myself that needlessly burden the system, and simulataneously when it is less occupied, it is also cutting other people out of accessing the service that potentially can't afford the cost. How is this a good model?

I have seen you argue before for market based pricing for parking before; why is public transit a sacred cow when there is an opportunity to improve upon the efficient use of that spare capacity?
I wasn't arguing in the last post against market based pricing for transit. I was arguing against "fixing the root problem" of a core-centric city, which I think is a good thing. If you can find an easy, simple, legible and inexpensive way to implement a differential pricing schme for transit- sure. I just see enforcement being incredibly difficult given our current system.
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #1903  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2010, 12:35 AM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is offline
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
I wasn't arguing in the last post against market based pricing for transit. I was arguing against "fixing the root problem" of a core-centric city, which I think is a good thing. If you can find an easy, simple, legible and inexpensive way to implement a differential pricing schme for transit- sure. I just see enforcement being incredibly difficult given our current system.
I think you may have misinterpreted the intent of my statements with respect to being a "problem" with core-centric. I agree that Calgary's major activity nodes, especially city centre, are key to Calgary's economic success and a good thing.

I also agree that the improvement in resource allocation would need to be greater than the cost of complexity; so it'd be important to keep it as simple as possible.
     
     
  #1904  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2010, 3:32 AM
Sean.Perrin's Avatar
Sean.Perrin Sean.Perrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramsayfarian View Post
I must of missed the part where she's crying and blaming others. All I saw was her asking for reliable and convenient transit.
She's asking people to feel sorry for her for having to travel so far. That's the part. I believe it starts at the beginning and carries on through to the end.
__________________
Sean.Perrin
www.seanperrin.ca
     
     
  #1905  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2010, 3:36 AM
Sean.Perrin's Avatar
Sean.Perrin Sean.Perrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramsayfarian View Post
I understand that. I just thought Sean.Perrin's comment was a bit over the top and void of empathy.
True. You'll have to excuse me, I just finished reading Atlas Shrugged. Lol.
__________________
Sean.Perrin
www.seanperrin.ca
     
     
  #1906  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2010, 5:15 AM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean.Perrin View Post
True. You'll have to excuse me, I just finished reading Atlas Shrugged. Lol.


OK, this is one of the funniest rejoinders I've ever read on the Internet. I'm not sure if it would be funnier if you're making an intentional joke, or if you're actually serious.
     
     
  #1907  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2010, 3:16 PM
Ramsayfarian's Avatar
Ramsayfarian Ramsayfarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean.Perrin View Post
True. You'll have to excuse me, I just finished reading Atlas Shrugged. Lol.
I guess she should be thankful that you didn't reread Mein Kampf.
     
     
  #1908  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2010, 3:19 PM
Ramsayfarian's Avatar
Ramsayfarian Ramsayfarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post


OK, this is one of the funniest rejoinders I've ever read on the Internet. I'm not sure if it would be funnier if you're making an intentional joke, or if you're actually serious.
I think the LOL at the end implies that he's making a joke.
     
     
  #1909  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2010, 7:46 AM
Sean.Perrin's Avatar
Sean.Perrin Sean.Perrin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramsayfarian View Post
I guess she should be thankful that you didn't reread Mein Kampf.
Haha... seriously though. How can you feel sympathetic to the creator of that video? It's absurd.
__________________
Sean.Perrin
www.seanperrin.ca
     
     
  #1910  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2010, 1:46 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramsayfarian View Post
I think the LOL at the end implies that he's making a joke.
Or he realizes the humour in just having read Atlas Shrugged for real, and then coming upon a video which epitomizes the very thing Rand was whining about.
     
     
  #1911  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2010, 11:50 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is offline
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,450
I had been looking at some of the public transit data from APTA for Calgary and compiled it into the graphs below.

I will prob post the data on Googledocs so can share and here is the graphs in the meantime:

I'm curious why APTA publishes this information and Calgary Transit doesn't. There may be issues with data quality as there doesn't seem to be a good fit with the ridership info and line extensions that occurred throughout the 2000's.







Data Source from American Public Transportation Association: http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/RidershipArchives.aspx
     
     
  #1912  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2010, 11:56 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Transit strike in early 2001?
     
     
  #1913  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2010, 12:51 AM
srperrycgy's Avatar
srperrycgy srperrycgy is offline
I'm the bear on the right
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary (Killarney)
Posts: 1,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
Transit strike in early 2001?
Yes there was a strike in 2001.
__________________
Stevinder.
* * * * * *
     
     
  #1914  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2010, 4:36 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is offline
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,450
Below are links to the Calgary public transit ridership data from January 1995 to September 2010 by mode (motor bus or light rail transit).

Excel Version:
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0Bypm2Je...DY4YTU0NWFm&sort=name&layout=list&num=50

Google Docs:
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aipm2JeRPPoJdEttUDczZUc2MkdaMWRYMkhYNkdwVWc&hl=en


The data source for this information is the American Public Transit Ridership Reports.

Last edited by Radley77; Dec 30, 2010 at 5:41 PM.
     
     
  #1915  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2010, 4:38 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Trains are running on 2 car consists today - is this normal during the Xmas-New Years week? I'm usually out of town so I've never seen this during a "normal" business day. Heck, even on Sundays we're almost always seeing 3 car.

That being said, it makes sense. Downtown is a ghost town and the Park and Ride lot was virtually deserted.
     
     
  #1916  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2010, 5:14 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
Trains are running on 2 car consists today - is this normal during the Xmas-New Years week? I'm usually out of town so I've never seen this during a "normal" business day. Heck, even on Sundays we're almost always seeing 3 car.

That being said, it makes sense. Downtown is a ghost town and the Park and Ride lot was virtually deserted.
It has been 2 car trains all week (yes, I have been working all week), except for Monday. IIRC, they had 3 car trains on Monday, so maybe they saw that no one was working and cut the amount of cars to 2. Or maybe I was just tired and didn't notice on Monday.
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #1917  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2010, 5:14 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
Trains are running on 2 car consists today - is this normal during the Xmas-New Years week? I'm usually out of town so I've never seen this during a "normal" business day. Heck, even on Sundays we're almost always seeing 3 car.

That being said, it makes sense. Downtown is a ghost town and the Park and Ride lot was virtually deserted.
Yep. They've been running mostly 2 LRV consists all week. They did it last year also, mostly as it gives them a chance to catch up on maintenance backlog and if they only need to clean 2/3 the LRV's they usually do it should mean they can get further ahead.
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
     
     
  #1918  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2010, 10:15 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Random question: Anybody know if any types of Low Floor Buses and Low Floor LRVs are able to share stations? I.E. are the door heights similar in order to allow buses to use stations designed for low floor LRVs?
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #1919  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2010, 10:56 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,591
Well, why would you want to ruin a perfectly good train by putting buses on it?
     
     
  #1920  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2010, 12:04 AM
UofC.engineer's Avatar
UofC.engineer UofC.engineer is offline
Laura Palmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Twin Peaks, Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,033
Nova bus has a 10.6 inch kneeling height and 14.6 inch non-kneeling height

Nova: http://www.novabus.com/documents/Spec_Sheet_FINAL.pdf

The siemens s70 requires a platform height on 14.4 inches

siemens S70: http://transportation.siemens.com/shared/data/pdf/sts_usa_internet/san_diego_s70.pdf


There is a plan for the future Inglewood/Ramsay station to share buses/streetcars with low floor trains.

I'm sure mechanics could adjust the kneeling height of a city bus tho.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.