HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2010, 4:30 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase Unperson View Post
Here is the NYT's breakdown and analysis of the change in house seats.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/22/us....html?_r=1&hpw

What are the states in the south and west doing that's making them more successful and getting people to move there. How are they able to provide better job opportunities (which obviously is the main reason someone would move).
Quality of life is a huge part of it. That might be a mix of weather, cheap housing, strong inner cities, great scenery, etc. With quality of life, people will show up before they get jobs, and then look, vs. finding a job and then moving. Also, companies will relocate to your city without "incentives."

In the case of Washington, one of the "misc" factors is the military factor -- not just the bases themselves, which are growing on average, but also the fact that many people stationed here decide to come back later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2010, 4:29 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
almost 30 million people in 10 years? :O

thats almost the population of Canada damn we are slow up here
We grew 9.5% between 1996 and 2006, and we'll probably see a growth rate of about 11% for the period between 2001 and 2011 when our census results come out in 2012. Our estimates are usually about a million over the census count.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 1:32 AM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 16,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
almost 30 million people in 10 years? :O

thats almost the population of Canada damn we are slow up here
and some people say its 3rd worlders procreate like rabbits

Brazil gained only 10 million people in the last 10 years. The US is an island in a sea (actually a small lake) of first world nations with declining growth rates.
__________________
________________________________________
Easy, Tychus. This ain´t science fiction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 1:58 AM
dimondpark's Avatar
dimondpark dimondpark is offline
Pay it Forward
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Piedmont, California
Posts: 7,965
Compiled by DANNY@C-D


Combined Statistical Areas, 2010 Census

- Los Angeles CSA: 17,877,506 (Officially Completed)
- Chicago CSA: 9,686,021 (Officially Completed)
- New York CSA: 8,864,330 (Uncompleted until NY (State) release)NEXT WEEK.
- Washington DC/Baltimore CSA: 8,639,239 (Uncompleted until WV release)
- Boston CSA: 7,559,060 (Officially Completed)
- Bay Area CSA: 7,468,390 (Officially Completed)
- Dallas/Fort Worth CSA: 6,610,530 (Officially Completed)
- Philadelphia CSA: 6,533,683 (Officially Completed)
- Houston CSA: 6,051,363 (Officially Completed)
- Atlanta CSA: 5,639,649 (Officially Completed)
- Detroit CSA: 5,218,852 (Officially Completed)
- Seattle CSA: 4,199,312 (Officially Completed)
- Minneapolis/Saint Paul CSA: 3,577,451 (Officially Completed)
- Denver CSA: 3,090,874 (Officially Completed)
- Cleveland CSA: 2,881,937 (Officially Completed)
- Saint Louis CSA: 2,845,298 (Officially Completed)
- Orlando CSA: 2,818,120 (Officially Completed)
- Sacramento CSA: 2,461,780 (Officially Completed)
- Pittsburgh CSA: 2,447,393 (Officially Completed)
- Charlotte CSA: 2,258,314 (Uncompleted until SC release)
- Cincinnati CSA: 2,172,191 (Officially Completed)
- Kansas City CSA: 2,105,217 (Officially Completed)
- Indianapolis CSA: 2,080,782 (Officially Completed)
- Columbus CSA: 2,071,052 (Officially Completed)
- Las Vegas CSA: 1,995,215 (Officially Completed)
- Austin CSA: 1,759,039 (Officially Completed)
- Milwaukee CSA: 1,751,316 (Officially Completed)
- Raleigh/Durham CSA: 1,749,525 (Officially Completed)
- Salt Lake City CSA: 1,744,886 (Officially Completed)
- Nashville CSA: 1,670,890 (Officially Completed)
- Louisville CSA: 1,427,483 (Officially Completed)
- Oklahoma City CSA: 1,322,429 (Officially Completed)
- Grand Rapids CSA: 1,321,557(Officially Completed)
- New Orleans CSA: 1,214,932 (Officially Completed)
- Birmingham CSA: 1,208,452 (Officially Completed)
- Tulsa CSA: 988,454 (Officially Completed)
- Omaha CSA: 901,041 (Officially Completed)
__________________

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference."-Robert Frost
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 2:01 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
Compiled by DANNY@C-D


Combined Statistical Areas, 2010 Census

- Los Angeles CSA: 17,877,506 (Officially Completed)
- Chicago CSA: 9,686,021 (Officially Completed)
- New York CSA: 8,864,330 (Uncompleted until NY (State) release)NEXT WEEK.
- Washington DC/Baltimore CSA: 8,639,239 (Uncompleted until WV release)
- Boston CSA: 7,559,060 (Officially Completed)
- Bay Area CSA: 7,468,390 (Officially Completed)
- Dallas/Fort Worth CSA: 6,610,530 (Officially Completed)
- Philadelphia CSA: 6,533,683 (Officially Completed)
- Houston CSA: 6,051,363 (Officially Completed)
- Atlanta CSA: 5,639,649 (Officially Completed)
- Detroit CSA: 5,218,852 (Officially Completed)
- Seattle CSA: 4,199,312 (Officially Completed)
- Minneapolis/Saint Paul CSA: 3,577,451 (Officially Completed)
- Denver CSA: 3,090,874 (Officially Completed)
- Cleveland CSA: 2,881,937 (Officially Completed)
- Saint Louis CSA: 2,845,298 (Officially Completed)
- Orlando CSA: 2,818,120 (Officially Completed)
- Sacramento CSA: 2,461,780 (Officially Completed)
- Pittsburgh CSA: 2,447,393 (Officially Completed)
- Charlotte CSA: 2,258,314 (Uncompleted until SC release)
- Cincinnati CSA: 2,172,191 (Officially Completed)
- Kansas City CSA: 2,105,217 (Officially Completed)
- Indianapolis CSA: 2,080,782 (Officially Completed)
- Columbus CSA: 2,071,052 (Officially Completed)
- Las Vegas CSA: 1,995,215 (Officially Completed)
- Austin CSA: 1,759,039 (Officially Completed)
- Milwaukee CSA: 1,751,316 (Officially Completed)
- Raleigh/Durham CSA: 1,749,525 (Officially Completed)
- Salt Lake City CSA: 1,744,886 (Officially Completed)
- Nashville CSA: 1,670,890 (Officially Completed)
- Louisville CSA: 1,427,483 (Officially Completed)
- Oklahoma City CSA: 1,322,429 (Officially Completed)
- New Orleans CSA: 1,214,932 (Officially Completed)
- Birmingham CSA: 1,208,452 (Officially Completed)
- Tulsa CSA: 988,454 (Officially Completed)
- Omaha CSA: 901,041 (Officially Completed)
He forgot Grand Rapids, MI CSA. I've calculated it to be 1,321,557 (5.0% increasing from 2000).
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 2:02 AM
dimondpark's Avatar
dimondpark dimondpark is offline
Pay it Forward
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Piedmont, California
Posts: 7,965
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMich View Post
He forgot Grand Rapids, MI CSA. I've calculated it to be 1,321,557 (5.0% increasing from 2000).
Thanks! I'll change it.
__________________

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference."-Robert Frost
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 4:46 AM
ColDayMan's Avatar
ColDayMan ColDayMan is offline
B!tchslapping Since 1998
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Columbus
Posts: 20,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
Compiled by DANNY@C-D


Combined Statistical Areas, 2010 Census

- Los Angeles CSA: 17,877,506 (Officially Completed)
- Chicago CSA: 9,686,021 (Officially Completed)
- New York CSA: 8,864,330 (Uncompleted until NY (State) release)NEXT WEEK.
- Washington DC/Baltimore CSA: 8,639,239 (Uncompleted until WV release)
- Boston CSA: 7,559,060 (Officially Completed)
- Bay Area CSA: 7,468,390 (Officially Completed)
- Dallas/Fort Worth CSA: 6,610,530 (Officially Completed)
- Philadelphia CSA: 6,533,683 (Officially Completed)
- Houston CSA: 6,051,363 (Officially Completed)
- Atlanta CSA: 5,639,649 (Officially Completed)
- Detroit CSA: 5,218,852 (Officially Completed)
- Seattle CSA: 4,199,312 (Officially Completed)
- Minneapolis/Saint Paul CSA: 3,577,451 (Officially Completed)
- Denver CSA: 3,090,874 (Officially Completed)
- Cleveland CSA: 2,881,937 (Officially Completed)
- Saint Louis CSA: 2,845,298 (Officially Completed)
- Orlando CSA: 2,818,120 (Officially Completed)
- Sacramento CSA: 2,461,780 (Officially Completed)
- Pittsburgh CSA: 2,447,393 (Officially Completed)
- Charlotte CSA: 2,258,314 (Uncompleted until SC release)
- Cincinnati CSA: 2,172,191 (Officially Completed)
- Kansas City CSA: 2,105,217 (Officially Completed)
- Indianapolis CSA: 2,080,782 (Officially Completed)
- Columbus CSA: 2,071,052 (Officially Completed)
- Las Vegas CSA: 1,995,215 (Officially Completed)
- Austin CSA: 1,759,039 (Officially Completed)
- Milwaukee CSA: 1,751,316 (Officially Completed)
- Raleigh/Durham CSA: 1,749,525 (Officially Completed)
- Salt Lake City CSA: 1,744,886 (Officially Completed)
- Nashville CSA: 1,670,890 (Officially Completed)
- Louisville CSA: 1,427,483 (Officially Completed)
- Oklahoma City CSA: 1,322,429 (Officially Completed)
- Grand Rapids CSA: 1,321,557(Officially Completed)
- New Orleans CSA: 1,214,932 (Officially Completed)
- Birmingham CSA: 1,208,452 (Officially Completed)
- Tulsa CSA: 988,454 (Officially Completed)
- Omaha CSA: 901,041 (Officially Completed)
He forgot - Dayton CSA: 1,072,891 (Officially Completed)
__________________
Click the x: _ _ X _ _!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 4:49 AM
dimondpark's Avatar
dimondpark dimondpark is offline
Pay it Forward
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Piedmont, California
Posts: 7,965
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColDayMan View Post
He forgot - Dayton CSA: 1,072,891 (Officially Completed)
He also forgot Fresno. Im starting to think that he didnt all CSAs.
__________________

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference."-Robert Frost
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 4:58 AM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,728
Unless everyone in West Virginia disappeared for the census (always possible... many caves...), DC's growth was very extensive this decade and, numerically, similar to Phoenix and Atlanta's (and that is a major wow when you think about it; I never considered DC to be such a boom town this past decade). I think the strong #s for Washington have very much to do with the recession's relatively minimal effects on the region, compared to economies like Phoenix and Atlanta. The 2000 population of DC/Baltimore's CSA was 7,572,647 FWIW.

Basically DC's CSA is now (likely) less than one million from approaching Chicago's CSA, which added fewer than half as many residents as DC. While current trends may not continue, DC could be roughly comparable in size to Chicago by 2030 or so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 4:59 AM
lawfin lawfin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
Compiled by DANNY@C-D


Combined Statistical Areas, 2010 Census

- Los Angeles CSA: 17,877,506 (Officially Completed)
- Chicago CSA: 9,686,021 (Officially Completed)
- New York CSA: 8,864,330 (Uncompleted until NY (State) release)NEXT WEEK.
- Washington DC/Baltimore CSA: 8,639,239 (Uncompleted until WV release)
- Boston CSA: 7,559,060 (Officially Completed)
- Bay Area CSA: 7,468,390 (Officially Completed)
- Dallas/Fort Worth CSA: 6,610,530 (Officially Completed)
- Philadelphia CSA: 6,533,683 (Officially Completed)
- Houston CSA: 6,051,363 (Officially Completed)
- Atlanta CSA: 5,639,649 (Officially Completed)
- Detroit CSA: 5,218,852 (Officially Completed)
- Seattle CSA: 4,199,312 (Officially Completed)
- Minneapolis/Saint Paul CSA: 3,577,451 (Officially Completed)
- Denver CSA: 3,090,874 (Officially Completed)
- Cleveland CSA: 2,881,937 (Officially Completed)
- Saint Louis CSA: 2,845,298 (Officially Completed)
- Orlando CSA: 2,818,120 (Officially Completed)
- Sacramento CSA: 2,461,780 (Officially Completed)
- Pittsburgh CSA: 2,447,393 (Officially Completed)
- Charlotte CSA: 2,258,314 (Uncompleted until SC release)
- Cincinnati CSA: 2,172,191 (Officially Completed)
- Kansas City CSA: 2,105,217 (Officially Completed)
- Indianapolis CSA: 2,080,782 (Officially Completed)
- Columbus CSA: 2,071,052 (Officially Completed)
- Las Vegas CSA: 1,995,215 (Officially Completed)
- Austin CSA: 1,759,039 (Officially Completed)
- Milwaukee CSA: 1,751,316 (Officially Completed)
- Raleigh/Durham CSA: 1,749,525 (Officially Completed)
- Salt Lake City CSA: 1,744,886 (Officially Completed)
- Nashville CSA: 1,670,890 (Officially Completed)
- Louisville CSA: 1,427,483 (Officially Completed)
- Oklahoma City CSA: 1,322,429 (Officially Completed)
- Grand Rapids CSA: 1,321,557(Officially Completed)
- New Orleans CSA: 1,214,932 (Officially Completed)
- Birmingham CSA: 1,208,452 (Officially Completed)
- Tulsa CSA: 988,454 (Officially Completed)
- Omaha CSA: 901,041 (Officially Completed)
Perhaps I am misunderstanding the officially completed designation you have provided. It seems to me that the CSA'a you are using are based on 2003 designation. Don't we have to wait until OMB releases the updated CSA to really have a designation of 'officially completed'?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 5:16 AM
dimondpark's Avatar
dimondpark dimondpark is offline
Pay it Forward
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Piedmont, California
Posts: 7,965
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawfin View Post
Perhaps I am misunderstanding the officially completed designation you have provided. It seems to me that the CSA'a you are using are based on 2003 designation. Don't we have to wait until OMB releases the updated CSA to really have a designation of 'officially completed'?
True, but these are the CSA populations as of the Census date.

The OMB will make its changes later but we can still add them up based on their current boundaries.

Also, there are updates made every year. Austin for example became a CSA a few years ago but we can still manually look up the components and add them up.
__________________

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference."-Robert Frost
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 1:46 PM
fleonzo fleonzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 909
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
Compiled by DANNY@C-D


Combined Statistical Areas, 2010 Census

- Los Angeles CSA: 17,877,506 (Officially Completed)
- Chicago CSA: 9,686,021 (Officially Completed)
- New York CSA: 8,864,330 (Uncompleted until NY (State) release)NEXT WEEK.
- Washington DC/Baltimore CSA: 8,639,239 (Uncompleted until WV release)
- Boston CSA: 7,559,060 (Officially Completed)
- Bay Area CSA: 7,468,390 (Officially Completed)
- Dallas/Fort Worth CSA: 6,610,530 (Officially Completed)
- Philadelphia CSA: 6,533,683 (Officially Completed)
- Houston CSA: 6,051,363 (Officially Completed)
- Atlanta CSA: 5,639,649 (Officially Completed)
- Detroit CSA: 5,218,852 (Officially Completed)
- Seattle CSA: 4,199,312 (Officially Completed)
- Minneapolis/Saint Paul CSA: 3,577,451 (Officially Completed)
- Denver CSA: 3,090,874 (Officially Completed)
- Cleveland CSA: 2,881,937 (Officially Completed)
- Saint Louis CSA: 2,845,298 (Officially Completed)
- Orlando CSA: 2,818,120 (Officially Completed)
- Sacramento CSA: 2,461,780 (Officially Completed)
- Pittsburgh CSA: 2,447,393 (Officially Completed)
- Charlotte CSA: 2,258,314 (Uncompleted until SC release)
- Cincinnati CSA: 2,172,191 (Officially Completed)
- Kansas City CSA: 2,105,217 (Officially Completed)
- Indianapolis CSA: 2,080,782 (Officially Completed)
- Columbus CSA: 2,071,052 (Officially Completed)
- Las Vegas CSA: 1,995,215 (Officially Completed)
- Austin CSA: 1,759,039 (Officially Completed)
- Milwaukee CSA: 1,751,316 (Officially Completed)
- Raleigh/Durham CSA: 1,749,525 (Officially Completed)
- Salt Lake City CSA: 1,744,886 (Officially Completed)
- Nashville CSA: 1,670,890 (Officially Completed)
- Louisville CSA: 1,427,483 (Officially Completed)
- Oklahoma City CSA: 1,322,429 (Officially Completed)
- Grand Rapids CSA: 1,321,557(Officially Completed)
- New Orleans CSA: 1,214,932 (Officially Completed)
- Birmingham CSA: 1,208,452 (Officially Completed)
- Tulsa CSA: 988,454 (Officially Completed)
- Omaha CSA: 901,041 (Officially Completed)
Hey Diamond Park- I hope you were kidding in listing the NYC's Metro CSA numbers? If not, you're off by about 13 MILLION people and in case you didn't already know it... NYC Metro's CSA will be way ahead at number one at over 22 Million (about 19.5 Million for MSA).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_o...tistical_Areas
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2011, 1:50 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleonzo View Post
Hey Diamond Park- I hope you were kidding in listing the NYC's Metro CSA numbers? If not, you're off by about 13 MILLION people and in case you didn't already know it... NYC Metro's CSA will be way ahead at number one at over 22 Million (about 19.5 Million for MSA).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_o...tistical_Areas
That's because the Census Bureau has not released New York's numbers yet (and seems to be saving it to be the very last state). New York is on there mostly as a placeholder value: a good way to show that the New Jersey and Connecticut suburbs alone are nearly as populous as Chicagoland.
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 6:36 AM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is offline
Go Beavs! Go Niners!
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 6,198
The Top 5 by numerical increase (2000->2010) by ethnicity, race & tribe alone (not mixed or part-something) & Hispanic or Latino group that we have data for so far for each State.

The percentage to the right is the percent of the Total State population increase each group represented.

Alabama
1 Black or African American alone: 95,381 28.67%
2 Mexican: 78,389 23.57%
3 Guatemalan: 11,829 3.56%
4 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 6,136 1.84%
5 Puerto Rican: 5,903 1.77%
Total Population Increase: 332,636

California
1 Mexican: 2,967,220 87.73%
2 Salvadoran: 300,957 8.90%
3 Filipino alone: 276,902 8.19%
4 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 231,881 6.86%
5 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 213,357 6.31%
Total Population Increase: 3,382,308

*If you're wondering why the numbers exceed the total growth if you add them up -- my best guess is that there were decreases in other ethnic or racial groups (outmigration, death vs births, etc) & that Hispanic or Latino groups can be of any race. I'd imagine there's some logical explanation?

Delaware
1 Black or African American alone: 41,148 35.99%
2 Mexican: 17,297 15.13%
3 Puerto Rican: 8,528 7.46%
4 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 6,144 5.37%
5 Guatemalan: 3,569 3.12%
Total Population Increase: 114,334

Hawaii
1 Filipino alone: 26,862 18.06%
2 Mexican: 15,595 10.48%
3 Puerto Rican: 14,111 9.49%
4 **Marshallese alone: 6,316 4.25%
5 Spaniard or Spanish: 5,824 3.91%
Total Population Increase: 148,764

**There's no data available from the 2000 Census in regards to the Marshallese population for Hawaii so I'm not entirely sure of the actual numerical increase at the moment. However, there was a Census of various Micronesian groups in 2003 funded by the Department of the Interior’s Office of Insular Affairs (OIA) which numerated the population at 2,931 for that year (& I think it included those that were mixed unlike the figure I posted).

Kansas
1 Mexican: 99,027 60.13%
2 Black or African American alone: 13,666 8.30%
3 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 5,695 3.46%
4 Guatemalan: 4,458 2.71%
5 Puerto Rican: 4,010 2.43%
Total Population Increase: 164,700

Pennsylvania
1 Black or African American alone: 153,077 36.33%
2 Puerto Rican: 137,525 32.64%
3 Mexican: 74,390 17.66%
4 Dominican: 50,162 11.91%
5 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 45,785 10.87%
Total Population Increase: 421,325

Wyoming
1 Mexican: 17,756 25.42%
2 Spaniard or Spanish: 1,045 1.50%
3 Black or African American alone: 1,026 1.47%
4 Arapaho alone: 653 0.93%
5 Puerto Rican: 451 0.65%
Total Population Increase: 69,844

Last edited by Urbanguy; Jun 25, 2011 at 8:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2011, 10:45 AM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is offline
Go Beavs! Go Niners!
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 6,198
This is a ((( Census Flashback ))) -- we're flashing back 100 years ago to the 1910 Census for the states that I have posted data for so far & one bonus state thrown in to be released next week.


Note: The White Population of Mexican Origin for the 1910 Census was published in the 1930 Census.

Alabama 1910
1 White: 1,228,832
2 Black or African American: 908,282
3 American Indian or Alaska Native: 909
4 Chinese: 62
5 White Population of Mexican Origin: 43
6 Japanese: 4
7 Filipino: 4
8 Hindu (Indian): 0
9 Korean: 0
Total Population: 2,138,093

California 1910
1 White: 2,259,672
2 White Population of Mexican Origin: 48,391
3 Japanese: 41,356
4 Chinese: 36,248
5 Black or African American: 21,645
6 American Indian or Alaska Native: 16,371
7 Hindu (Indian): 1,948
8 Korean: 304
9 Filipino: 5
Total Population: 2,377,549 *35,000,000 people ago!!!!

Delaware 1910
1 White: 171,102
2 Black or African American: 31,181
3 Chinese: 30
4 American Indian or Alaska Native: 5
5 Japanese: 4
6 White Population of Mexican Origin: 2
7 Hindu (Indian): 0
8 Korean: 0
9 Filipino: 0
Total Population: 202,322

*The 1910 Census for Hawaii & Alaska was a lot more detailed than the all the other states. Hopefully, i'll stumble across more detailed information for the other 48.

Hawaii 1910
1 Japanese: 79,675
2 Native Hawaiian (Kānaka Maoli): 38,547
3 Portuguese: 22,301
4 Chinese: 21,674
5 Caucasian (excluding Portuguese): 14,867
6 Puerto Rican: 4,890
7 Korean: 4,533
8 Filipino: 2,361
9 Spaniard or Spanish: 1,990
10 Black or African American: 695
Total Population: 191,909

*Believe it or not Hawaii had the largest Puerto Rican population outside of Puerto Rico until the 1910 Census when New York just edged pass it.

Kansas 1910
1 White: 1,634,352
2 Black or African American: 54,030
3 White Population of Mexican Origin: 8,597
4 American Indian or Alaska Native: 2,444
5 Japanese: 107
6 Chinese: 16
7 Hindu (Indian): 0
8 Korean: 0
9 Filipino: 0
Total Population: 1,690,949

Pennsylvania 1910
1 White: 7,467,713
2 Black or African American: 193,919
3 Chinese: 1,784
4 American Indian or Alaska Native: 1,503
5 Japanese: 190
6 White Population of Mexican Origin: 177
7 Hindu (Indian): 2
8 Korean: 0
9 Filipino: 0
Total Population: 7,665,111

Wyoming 1910
1 White: 140,318
2 Black or African American: 2,235
3 Japanese: 1,596
4 American Indian or Alaska Native: 1,486
5 White Population of Mexican Origin: 328
6 Chinese: 246
7 Korean: 72
8 Hindu (Indian): 11
9 Filipino: 1
Total Population: 145,965

*Bonus flashback since there was more detailed data for the state like Hawaii.

Alaska 1910
1 White: 36,400
2 Eskimo: 12,636
3 American Indian: 11,244
4 Aleut: 1,451
5 Chinese: 1,209
6 Japanese: 913
7 Filipino: 246
8 Black or African American: 209
9 Native Hawaiian (Kānaka Maoli): 35
10 Korean: 13
Total Population: 64,356

Boy, have we come a long way over the last 100 years (for the most part)!

Source: Historical Census Statistics on Population Totals By Race, 1790 to 1990, and By Hispanic Origin, 1970 to 1990, For The United States, Regions, Divisions, and States

by Campbell Gibson and Kay Jung
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2011, 2:45 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,168
US Household Shifts Could Impact Housing Recovery


http://www.cnbc.com/id/43687637

Quote:
.....

The report, from John Burns Real Estate Consulting's Chris Porter, is titled simply, "Tremendous Demographic Shift." And the numbers are pretty tremendous.

"The number of non-family households—people living alone or households that do not have any members related to the householder—has increased nearly five times in the last 50 years, from 7.9 million to 39.2 million. At the same time, the number of family households has increased by just 1.7 times, from 45.1 million to 77.5 million," according to Porter.

In addition, married couples have dropped to less than half of all US households from 75 percent in 1960.

So let's think about the current housing stock, much of which is more than 50 years old. We've recently seen a downsizing trend for several reasons, namely the weak economy and builders constructing cheaper homes to meet the demand but also the environmental movement and the high cost of energy.

But this comes right after the "McMansion" era when oversized homes were all the rage. Those homes, of course, still exist in vast quantities, despite the fact that there are, according to this report, fewer big family households and therefore less need for large square footage.

We've also talked a lot about the surge in renting; we've blamed it on the housing crash, fear of buying into a depreciating market and the tight credit conditions that are pricing many potential buyers out.

.....



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2011, 3:38 AM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is offline
Go Beavs! Go Niners!
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 6,198
...and another round...

NOTE: There's no data for Arab/Middle Eastern, European, West Indian or Subsaharan African groups with this release. CSAs that extend into other States are not complete until all States have been released. Also the data is for ethnic, tribe or racial group alone (not mixed) with the exception of Hispanic or Latino groups which can be of mixed race (e.g., Mestizo).

This week we have Arizona, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Oklahoma and Vermont.

*Over 10,000 for AZ

Arizona
1 Mexican: 1,657,668
2 Black or African American alone: 259,008
3 Navajo alone: 131,367
4 Spanish or Spaniard: 38,110
5 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 36,047
6 Filipino alone: 35,013
7 Puerto Rican: 34,787
8 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 30,688
9 Apache alone: 24,987
10 Vietnamese alone: 24,216
11 Pima alone: 19,455
12 Tohono O'Odham alone: 16,829
13 Korean alone: 15,022
14 Yaqui alone: 14,215
15 Guatemalan: 13,426
16 Salvadoran: 12,225
17 Cuban: 10,692
Total Population: 6,392,017

*Over 5,000 for MN

Minnesota
1 Black or African American alone: 274,412
2 Mexican: 176,007
3 Hmong (Mong) alone: 63,619
4 Chippewa alone: 33,165
5 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 33,031
6 Vietnamese alone: 23,544
7 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 23,482
8 Korean alone: 14,982
9 Puerto Rican: 10,807
10 Laotian alone: 10,065
11 Filipino alone: 9,464
12 Cambodian (Khmer) alone: 7,850
13 Ecuadorian: 7,290
14 Salvadoran: 7,175
15 Guatemalan: 6,754
16 Spanish or Spaniard: 5,492
17 Sioux alone: 5,418
Total Population: 5,303,925

*Over 1,000 for MT

Montana
1 Mexican: 20,048
2 Blackfeet (Blackfoot) alone: 11,210
3 Crow alone: 7,949
4 Cheyenne alone: 5,232
5 Black or African American alone: 4,027
6 Chippewa alone: 2,528
7 Spanish or Spaniard: 2,422
8 Sioux alone: 1,809
9 Puerto Rican: 1,491
10 Filipino alone: 1,383
11 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 1,227
Total Population: 989,415

*Over 10,000 for NY

New York
1 Black or African American alone: 3,073,800
2 Puerto Rican: 1,070,558
3 Dominican (Dominican Republic): 674,787
4 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 559,516
5 Mexican: 457,288
6 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 313,620
7 Ecuadorian: 228,216
8 Salvadoran: 152,130
9 Colombian: 141,879
10 Korean alone: 140,994
11 Filipino alone: 104,287
12 Guatemalan: 73,806
13 Honduran: 71,919
14 Cuban: 70,803
15 Peruvian: 66,318
16 Pakistani alone: 63,696
17 Spanish or Spaniard: 60,626
18 Bangladeshi alone: 57,761
19 Japanese alone: 37,780
20 Vietnamese alone: 28,764
21 Panamanian: 28,200
22 Argentinean: 24,969
23 Iroquois alone: 16,957
24 Taiwanese alone: 16,023
25 Chilean: 15,050
26 Venezuelan: 13,910
27 Nicaraguan: 13,006
28 Costa Rican: 11,576
29 Burmese alone: 11,214
Total Population: 19,378,102

*Over 5,000 for OK

Oklahoma
1 Black or African American alone: 277,644
2 Mexican: 267,016
3 Cherokee (Tsalagi) alone: 114,533
4 Choctaw alone: 51,431
5 Creek alone: 28,364
6 Chickasaw alone: 16,826
7 Vietnamese alone: 16,258
8 Puerto Rican: 12,223
9 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 11,906
10 Spanish or Spaniard: 9,116
11 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 8,616
12 Guatemalan: 7,960
13 Seminole alone: 7,429
14 Comanche alone: 6,413
15 Korean alone: 5,949
16 Filipino alone: 5,901
17 Kiowa alone: 5,724
18 Potawatomi alone: 5,428
Total Population: 3,751,351

*Over 1,000 for VT

Vermont
1 Black or African American alone: 6,277
2 Mexican: 2,534
3 Puerto Rican: 2,261
4 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 2,207
5 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 1,359
6 Vietnamese alone: 1,019
7 Spanish or Spaniard: 1,015
Total Population: 625,741

*Over 5,000 for Phoenix

Phoenix, AZ MSA
1 Mexican: 1,068,227
2 Black or African American alone: 207,734
3 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 31,203
4 Filipino alone: 27,117
5 Spanish or Spaniard: 25,207
6 Puerto Rican: 24,423
7 Navajo alone: 23,104
8 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 23,053
9 Vietnamese alone: 19,792
10 Pima alone: 18,435
11 Guatemalan: 11,702
12 Korean alone: 10,956
13 Salvadoran: 9,840
14 Cuban: 7,995
15 Yaqui alone: 6,316
16 Japanese alone: 6,056
17 Colombian: 5,159
Total Population: 4,192,887

*Over 1,000 for Tucson

Tucson, AZ MSA
1 Mexican: 301,715
2 Black or African American alone: 34,674
3 Tohono O'Odham alone: 11,380
4 Yaqui alone: 7,352
5 Spanish or Spaniard: 6,084
6 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 5,975
7 Puerto Rican: 5,708
8 Filipino alone: 4,276
9 Vietnamese alone: 3,439
10 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 3,392
11 Korean alone: 2,535
12 Navajo alone: 2,269
13 Japanese alone: 1,793
14 Cuban: 1,674
15 Salvadoran: 1,248
16 Colombian: 1,015
17 Guatemalan: 1,013
Total Population: 980,263

*Over 4,000 for Minneapolis

Minneapolis, MN CSA (excl. WI component)
1 Black or African American alone: 250,753
2 Mexican: 129,111
3 Hmong (Mong) alone: 61,830
4 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 29,960
5 Vietnamese alone: 21,181
6 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 20,532
7 Korean alone: 12,573
8 Chippewa alone: 8,707
9 Puerto Rican: 8,662
10 Laotian alone: 7,786
11 Filipino alone: 7,733
12 Ecuadorian: 7,105
13 Cambodian (Khmer) alone: 6,248
14 Salvadoran: 5,972
15 Guatemalan: 4,502
16 Spanish or Spaniard: 4,078
Total Population: 3,490,538

*Over 10,000 for NYC

New York, NY CSA (excl. NJ component)
1 Black or African American alone: 2,819,802
2 Puerto Rican: 1,052,773
3 Dominican (Dominican Republic): 680,228
4 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 545,558
5 Mexican: 460,151
6 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 305,147
7 Ecuadorian: 246,809
8 Salvadoran: 153,431
9 Colombian: 152,101
10 Korean alone: 132,095
11 Filipino alone: 103,807
12 Guatemalan: 85,594
13 Honduran: 74,935
14 Peruvian: 72,272
15 Cuban: 66,512
16 Pakistani alone: 60,987
17 Spanish or Spaniard: 58,457
18 Bangladeshi alone: 57,730
19 Japanese alone: 36,659
20 Panamanian: 27,118
21 Argentinean: 26,070
22 Vietnamese alone: 21,892
23 Chilean: 15,687
24 Taiwanese alone: 14,969
25 Venezuelan: 14,428
26 Nicaraguan: 13,450
27 Costa Rican: 12,956
Total Population: 15,247,921

*Over 1,000 for Buffalo

Buffalo, NY CSA
1 Black or African American alone: 139,806
2 Puerto Rican: 32,353
3 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 7,638
4 Iroquois alone: 6,540
5 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 5,434
6 Mexican: 5,407
7 Korean alone: 2,608
8 Burmese alone: 2,326
9 Vietnamese alone: 2,171
10 Spanish or Spaniard: 1,689
11 Cuban: 1,415
12 Dominican (Dominican Republic): 1,327
13 Pakistani alone: 1,177
14 Filipino alone: 1,122
Total Population: 1,215,826

*Over 2,000 for OKC

Oklahoma City, OK CSA
1 Black or African American alone: 132,611
2 Mexican: 116,293
3 Vietnamese alone: 12,081
4 Choctaw alone: 10,665
5 Cherokee (Tsalagi) alone: 9,014
6 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 6,608
7 Guatemalan: 5,002
8 Chickasaw alone: 4,914
9 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 4,604
10 Puerto Rican: 4,347
11 Creek alone: 4,157
12 Spanish or Spaniard: 3,650
13 Potawatomi alone: 3,298
14 Korean alone: 2,794
15 Seminole alone: 2,713
16 Filipino alone: 2,690
Total Population: 1,322,429

*Over 1,000 for Tulsa

Tulsa, OK CSA
1 Black or African American alone: 80,159
2 Mexican: 64,068
3 Cherokee (Tsalagi) alone: 37,858
4 Creek alone: 14,639
5 Choctaw alone: 5,522
6 Osage alone: 3,505
7 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 3,158
8 Vietnamese alone: 2,964
9 Puerto Rican: 2,936
10 Hmong (Mong) alone: 2,358
11 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 2,184
12 Spanish or Spaniard: 2,110
13 Guatemalan: 1,657
14 Korean alone: 1,389
15 Filipino alone: 1,351
16 Chickasaw alone: 1,279
17 Honduran: 1,002
Total Population: 988,454

*Over 1,000 for Lincoln

Lincoln, NE MSA
1 Mexican: 12,595
2 Black or African American alone: 9,980
3 Vietnamese alone: 4,797
4 Chinese (except Taiwanese) alone: 1,520
5 Asian Indian or East Indian alone: 1,128
Total Population: 302,157

**Data for Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico and Virginia will be released late next week**
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2011, 10:03 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,168
In downtown, new kids on the block


Read More: http://www.startribune.com/local/min...125692778.html

Quote:
A new form of transportation has joined the car, bus, bike and light-rail train in downtown Minneapolis. The stroller. The number of kids under age 5 living in downtown neighborhoods has tripled since 2000, according to newly released U.S. census figures. The 2010 census counted 444 small children in the area from the Mill District through downtown and along the Mississippi River to Plymouth Avenue.

The rapid growth, coupled with increases in older children as well, is the most telling evidence to date that downtown's swelling population is much more than young professionals and empty nesters. Since 2000, the population of the Downtown East, Downtown West and North Loop neighborhoods has risen to more than 11,000 people, up 82 percent.

The growth, which has converted some condo hallways into the downtown equivalent of suburban cul-de-sacs, promises to reshape the area as developers, businesses and even the city cater to urban tots, urban studies experts say. The depth of the trend will depend largely on whether parents can cope with the lack of nearby schools and other conveniences as their kids age.

"It shows that parents are willing to have kids downtown," said David Frank, who moved downtown six years ago with his wife and daughter, now 14. Until recently, Frank worked for a developer who built hundreds of condo units in neighborhood along the Mississippi. Now he's in charge of helping to promote transit-oriented development for the city.

.....
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2011, 10:29 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,168
The State of Metropolitan America: Suburbs and the 2010 Census


PDF: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Fil...esentation.pdf

Quote:
.....

First, the initial results from the 2010 Census signal a continuing demographic convergence within U.S. metropolitan areas, one that is blurring the lines that have long separated cities and suburbs.


Second, this convergence results from a complicated mix of economic, social, and physical changes in metro areas, and raises a host of consequences for suburban communities at the front lines of change.


And third, in light of these growing and shared challenges, we must adopt a metropolitan approach to managing and making the most of demographic change in an increasingly metropolitan world.

.....
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2011, 5:57 PM
pesto pesto is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
The State of Metropolitan America: Suburbs and the 2010 Census


PDF: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Fil...esentation.pdf
Isn't this something that everyone has known for several hundred years? Hardly something that comes from reviewing the new census.

A better way of putting it might be that some things should be more localized and some things more regionalized. This is area by area, depending on the particular city, county or other district involved and what right or wrong decisions have been made in the past.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.