Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramsayfarian
I don't have the numbers to back this up, but I've been hearing that crime has increased in Bridgeland since the Cecil closed.
|
I guess this hasn't been my experience. When the Cecil was open, there was more problems with open air drug dealing that begot more crime like theft from vehichle and assaults. Since removing of some of the drugdealing element and alcohol addiction, it hasn't only migrated but disappeared.
The following is a comparison of numbers pre and post Cecil closure (Cecil was closed in December 2008 -
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2008/12/09/cecil-hotel-licence-pulled.html ).
Bridgeland Crime Data from early 2008:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080629212909/www.calgarypolice.ca/crimestats/99G0-B.html
Bridgeland Crime Data from early 2010:
http://www.calgarypolice.ca/pdf/CommunityCrimeStats_June2010.xls
From January to April 2008 (pre Cecil closure) compared to January to April 2010 (post Cecil closure):
Assault: 19 down to 11 (down 42%)
Street Robberies: 5 to 3 (down 40%)
Commercial Robberies: 1 to 1 (flat)
Break & Enter - House: 3 to 5 (up 67%)
Break & Enter - Shop: 5 to 3 (down 40%
Break & Enter - Other: 1 to 1 (flat)
Theft of Vehichle: 28 to 3 (down 89%)
Theft from Vehichle: 26 to 9 (down 65%)
Mischief: 14 to 18 (up 29%)
Total: 102 to 54 (down 47%)
Some of the crimes that I think some of the druggie addicts are more likely to pull off is the theft from vehichle and assaults. Things like break and enter for houses or theft of vehichles might require a more sophisticated kind of criminal. My anecdotal experience as a Bridgeland resident, also what I have seen from monitoring the Calgary Police Service crime statistics is reasons why I think increasing buffers between liquor establishments and homeless shelter is an effective tool at not displacing, but stopping crime.