Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando
As much as I like that Adobe is building in Utah, I hate that all these software companies are clustering at a point between Salt Lake and Provo. Which means more damn sprawl!!!  Eagle Mountain Saratoga Springs, etc. will thrive. and the metro will continue to sprawl out instead of creating a much more dynamic and beautiful city. The core will suffer, and will always be fighting and losing out to the sprawl. We will be waiting for years for the downtown parking lots to be filled in. Pheonix is a prime example of sprawl. Phoenix metro is roughly the same population as Seattle, but Seattle is so much more urban and dynamic and beautiful. Phoenix's downtown doesn't look much bigger than Salt Lake's but it's population is a lot larger. Denver's metro population is smaller or close to Phoenix's but their core is easily twice as big, and more dynamic and energetic.
|
I actually have no problem with developing the area's between Salt Lake and Provo. It actually makes sense to fill the void between two larger cities. There is a phenomena called "Urban Echo," where two metro area's spread until they meet each other. At that point we see the development activity bounce back toward the downtown zones. It happens in natural circumstaces as well. Often time an urban sprawl will be confined by an ocean, or mountain range, and force developmental upgrades as the development cycle heads back toward the city centers.
Phoenix, and Vegas will continue to have uncontroled sprawl because of the amount of cheaper available land surrounding it. Seattle, San Francisco have already hit it's urban echo and have thus moved vertical. Dallas, Ft. Worth, have had there's, and current planning in the area is trying to keep development between the two cities.