HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4981  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2010, 3:29 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
Video (posted before i believe) of the expansion clearly showing that the current office tower is NOT part of the plan. This is very very sad news in my opinion and the only unique element of our airport. Sure the new tower will be all fancy schmancy, but it is not as simple, classic, and beautiful as the clean lines of our 50s/early 60s masterpiece.

I think it is shameful that the tower is coming down. Very unfortunate and yet another example of Edmonton having little sense of architectural awareness and preservation.

—

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/business/...nal+Airport+Expansion/3334394/story.html
     
     
  #4982  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2010, 3:40 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,645
If Edmonton wants to preserve one thing, it can preserve the muni Heritage for all, or none. Can't play it both ways. Much more history there than in an old office tower.
     
     
  #4983  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2010, 3:48 PM
s211 s211 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^what about for those of us that dont do the facebook
Sorry. Can't figure out how to directly link to the diagram.

http://www.despair.com/somevedi.html
     
     
  #4984  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2010, 3:56 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir.Humphrey.Appleby View Post
If Edmonton wants to preserve one thing, it can preserve the muni Heritage for all, or none. Can't play it both ways. Much more history there than in an old office tower.
Architecturally aspects of the muni will be preserved, but the symbol and elegance of our airport is that tower. Driving in to the airport it is so central and so gentlemanly in stature.

But no... get rid of it, make the east side of the airport bland and cold.

we do not deserve a school of architecture, perhaps 100yrs ago, but now we should be given a dunce cap and a year of C.A.L.M
     
     
  #4985  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2010, 4:04 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir.Humphrey.Appleby View Post
If Edmonton wants to preserve one thing, it can preserve the muni Heritage for all, or none. Can't play it both ways. Much more history there than in an old office tower.
in the concrete runways? let's build a little museum for the history component of ECCA and be done with it.
     
     
  #4986  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2010, 4:55 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
Edmonton City Centre Airport closes runway 16/34

Closure leaves downtown airport with one runway

BY JOURNAL STAFF, EDMONTONJOURNAL.COM AUGUST 3, 2010 10:26 AM COMMENTS (3)


STORYPHOTOS ( 1 )



The city voted in 2009 to close City Centre Airport in stages over five to 10 years.
Photograph by: Photo Ed Kaiser, The Journal, Edmonton Journal
EDMONTON — Edmonton’s City Centre Airport (ECCA) is on its way to being one runway smaller.

Crews began the complex process of closing runway 16/34 Tuesday morning at the downtown airport. The decision to close the runway was made by city council in 2009, but the work had to wait until after July’s Honda Indy. As much of the work must occur when activity at the airport is minimal, the process will last into the fall.

The closure leaves the ECCA with one lone runway.

© Copyright (c) The Edmonton Journal


Read more: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Runway+closes/3354012/story.html#ixzz0vYxTtCkI
     
     
  #4987  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2010, 5:08 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
My buddy landed on 34/16 for the last time at ECCA yesterday. He flies for AirSprint.
     
     
  #4988  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2010, 5:25 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Just was on www.flyeia.com and they have a nice new aerial on the airport on for the page header. Looks so good.
     
     
  #4989  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2010, 6:07 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,566
Link: http://bit.ly/a3ESEP

Closure of runway 16/34 at Edmonton City Centre Airport begins
Crews onsite at 0330 to begin closure process
August 3, 2010 (Edmonton, Alta.)-Edmonton Airports work crews were at Edmonton City Centre Airport (ECCA) early this morning to begin the process of closing runway 16/34.
"In order to ensure the safety of our crews and prevent disruption to operations, some of the work must happen when activity at the airport is minimal," explains Steve Maybee, Director of Airside Operations.
The work starts today with physical alterations to the airfield and runway. These alterations include placing barricades to prevent access to the runway and painting signage on the runway surface to signal clearly to pilots that the runway is closed.
"There is a protocol we must follow to close a runway," says Maybee. "This process is in place to ensure the safety of aircraft operators and tenants. It is vital that there be no ambiguity about the status of the runway once the closure process begins."
The airfield alterations will also ensure tenants have safe and clear access to the remaining runway, which is known as 12/30.
In 2009, City Council directed Edmonton Airports to close runway 16/34. The timing of closure was requested to be after Airfest (June) and the Honda Indy (July). In order to move forward on that direction, a GPS navigation system was installed on runway 12/30 (completed in June 2010). Because of post-Indy cleanup, this week is the first time Edmonton Airports has had the opportunity to begin the runway closure process. The work will continue into the fall.
-30-
Media Contacts:

Traci Bednard, Communications
c: 780 909 9554
e: [email protected]
w: www.flyeia.com
Sarah Meffen, Communications
c: 780 884 2966
e: [email protected]
w: www.flyeia.com

MEDIA BACKGROUNDER
Protocol for Runway Closure
The protocol for closing a runway consists of a number of steps to ensure safety and efficiency. The process steps fall under two main areas:
  • Notification
  • Physical alterations to airfield
Notification
  • Airport users and pilots are provided with communication about the runway closure in advance
  • Issuing of multiple Notices to Airmen (NOTAM) and updating of operational manuals
Physical Alterations
  • In order to ensure the safety of work crews and minimize disruption to air traffic at ECCA, some of the work on the physical alterations to the airfield and runway 16/34 began at 0330 on August 03, 2010.
  • The entire runway closure process, which will continue into the fall, includes the following tasks:
    • Deployment of cement barricades and orange safety barrels with lights at all access points to runway 16/34.
    • Deployment of two portable LED X signs at either end of the runway.
    • Painting of five large X's along the surface of the runway. Once these are complete, the portable signs will be removed.
    • Removal of runway directional signage.
    • NAV Canada equipment (i.e., Instrument Landing System) equipment will be powered down and removed.
    • Runway lights for 16/34 will be powered down and removed.
-30-
     
     
  #4990  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2010, 9:49 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt View Post
Dear Air Canada,

Why are there no direct flights to Kelowna from Edmonton ? Why do you expect Edmonton travellers to fly to Calgary or Vancouver, turning a 50 minute flight into a 3 hour ordeal ? I will be travelling to Kelowna several times over the summer, and I refuse to be forced to connect at another airport for such a short and straightforward flight.

Westjet offers many direct flights to Kelowna from Edmonton. In fact Westjet offers many more direct flights to more places than Air Canada does. EIA processes in excess of 6 million passengers a year and is still growing. Why do you provide Edmontonians with inferior air service ?

Thank you,

Chris Wagner
Edmonton Alberta.

Dear Mr. Wagner,

Thank you for your email. A great number of factors are taken into consideration when establishing our routes and schedules. Extensive analysis is conducted on all markets based on criteria that includes aircraft availability and positioning, flight crew commitments and ground staffing, operational requirements, and customer feedback. Please be assured that every aspect of our scheduling is thoroughly researched in an effort to meet our customers' needs. Feedback from our customers is important as it enables us to monitor the quality of our products and services. Please be assured we have documented your comments so they may be internally reviewed. We appreciate the time you have taken to write and thank you again for contacting our office.

Sincerely,

Susan
Customer Relations
     
     
  #4991  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2010, 10:41 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,566
so basically, please die in a fire, we don't care about Edmonton... Theres a non-response response if I've ever seen one.
     
     
  #4992  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2010, 10:51 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
^you should write a letter saying that "as a Calgarian we feel bad and hope some of our flights can be shifted north"
     
     
  #4993  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2010, 11:21 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,861
Its a typical form letter sent out to everyone who complains about service.

What did you expect from AC - an answer?
     
     
  #4994  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 12:43 AM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,805
Screw Air Canada - just take WestJet to Kelowna. At least WestJet doesn't use CRJ-200s, or worse, turboprops!

Last edited by CanadianCentaur; Aug 5, 2010 at 3:03 AM.
     
     
  #4995  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 2:12 AM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianCentaur View Post
Screw Air Canada - just take WestJet to Kelowna. At least WestJet doesn't use RJs or worse, turboprops!
Hey, turboprops are cool!
     
     
  #4996  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 3:51 AM
MrBigStuff MrBigStuff is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Hey, turboprops are cool!
Be nostalgic - bring back the Viscount or the Vanguard.
     
     
  #4997  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 3:53 AM
MrBigStuff MrBigStuff is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 876
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianCentaur View Post
Screw Air Canada - just take WestJet to Kelowna. At least WestJet doesn't use CRJ-200s, or worse, turboprops!
One small disagreement here - the CRJs are fun to ride in - nice and fast climbers. I would like to go Westjet though - I have yet to have an opportunity to do so.
     
     
  #4998  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 2:42 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBigStuff View Post
Be nostalgic - bring back the Viscount or the Vanguard.
Super Constellation
     
     
  #4999  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 2:43 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airboy View Post
Super Constellation
I like your style!
     
     
  #5000  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2010, 2:52 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,863
Here's one just for Bigtime.


Oh and this flight has an YEG connection.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
   
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:47 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.