HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #961  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2010, 8:40 PM
LFRENCH's Avatar
LFRENCH LFRENCH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aegis View Post
Why the change? and what is the Calgary Regional Partnership?
"We are the Calgary Regional Partnership -- CRP. The CRP is a strong coalition of municipalities that understands the synergistic relationship of local governments in the region. We have recently been taking a proactive approach to regional growth and planning issues. "

http://www.calgaryregion.ca/crp/AboutUs.aspx
     
     
  #962  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2010, 9:05 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aegis View Post
Why the change? and what is the Calgary Regional Partnership?
http://www.calgaryregion.ca/crp/AboutUs.aspx
     
     
  #963  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2010, 10:27 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aegis View Post
Why the change? and what is the Calgary Regional Partnership?

Essentially because the province's terms for the green trip money say its to be shared within the region, and this is just the city playing nice. Likely if the city went alone and proposed using up a significant amount of the funding without the CRP's agreement the province would say no. So someone realized this and decided we'd better reword the request to make sure the CRP is involved.
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
     
     
  #964  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2010, 10:50 PM
Aegis's Avatar
Aegis Aegis is offline
Analyst, Commercial Mtgs
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bankview
Posts: 1,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFRENCH View Post
"We are the Calgary Regional Partnership -- CRP. The CRP is a strong coalition of municipalities that understands the synergistic relationship of local governments in the region. We have recently been taking a proactive approach to regional growth and planning issues. "

http://www.calgaryregion.ca/crp/AboutUs.aspx
I now understand why the change was made, but it seems unnecessary. What business is it of these small towns how our LRT is aligned? Seems like unnecessary red tape.
     
     
  #965  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2010, 11:25 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aegis View Post
I now understand why the change was made, but it seems unnecessary. What business is it of these small towns how our LRT is aligned? Seems like unnecessary red tape.
The strings are quiet necessary though. Its not so much that they are saying where the LRT runs, rather they are saying they are OK with Calgary spending X of the Y dollars in the Calgary regions share of the funding.
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
     
     
  #966  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2010, 5:45 AM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by mersar View Post
The strings are quiet necessary though. Its not so much that they are saying where the LRT runs, rather they are saying they are OK with Calgary spending X of the Y dollars in the Calgary regions share of the funding.
While I see the importance of regional planning, I think we might be putting the horse before the cart if we go too far in terms of regional transit before the LRT system is implemented. The LRT system should come first, and then regional transit. I hope the CRP sees it this way too.
     
     
  #967  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2010, 8:02 AM
Policy Wonk's Avatar
Policy Wonk Policy Wonk is offline
Inflatable Hippo
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Suburban Las Vegas
Posts: 4,015
I don't think it is an either-or and it will come sooner than most people would even imagine. Once the ridiculous Blue 22 project is killed for good in Toronto SNC-Lavalin is going to take the show on the road and launch a commuter service in Calgary using the refurbished Budd RDC's that would have been used for Blue 22.
__________________
Public Administration 101: Keep your mouth shut until obligated otherwise and don't get in public debates with housewives.
     
     
  #968  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2010, 1:14 PM
Me&You Me&You is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
While I see the importance of regional planning, I think we might be putting the horse before the cart if we go too far in terms of regional transit before the LRT system is implemented. The LRT system should come first, and then regional transit. I hope the CRP sees it this way too.
It's not that they're planning for regional transit, but that they are using regional money for Calgary transit... so it needs the approval of the region.
     
     
  #969  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2010, 1:18 PM
jeffwhit's Avatar
jeffwhit jeffwhit is offline
effete latte-lifter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Aalborg, DK
Posts: 3,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by Policy Wonk
I don't think it is an either-or and it will come sooner than most people would even imagine. Once the ridiculous Blue 22 project is killed for good in Toronto SNC-Lavalin is going to take the show on the road and launch a commuter service in Calgary using the refurbished Budd RDC's that would have been used for Blue 22.
Really? Do you think commuter rail is that close?
__________________
Arts!: Click to listen
     
     
  #970  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2010, 2:52 PM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
Construction Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Castleridge, NE Calgary
Posts: 5,892
Saddletowne Station:



Whitehorn Station:


MKWW Pedestrian Bridge:


Sorry, iPhone quality.
     
     
  #971  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2010, 4:31 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Me&You View Post
It's not that they're planning for regional transit, but that they are using regional money for Calgary transit... so it needs the approval of the region.
No, I understand that. It just might be a problem tying money for Calgary transit improvements to a regional decision process. What if the CRP says no?
     
     
  #972  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2010, 5:53 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
A regional rail system is difficult to implement when rail has competing interests. CP can easily say no; they are under no obligation to say yes at all.

But there can be political pressure put on them to say yes.

This is the same issue that Halifax is having with the regional rail debate there and with CN. For years, Peter Kelly (then mayor of the town of Bedford and now HRM mayor) wanted regional rail to service Bedford and Sackville to get people out of cars and into trains to the downtown station and then bus routes to ferry people onto the major employment centres and the downtown core (Halifax's train station is on the extreme south side of downtown and not in the actual core).

The problem has been CN and the control of the rail line through Halifax. It was originally dual track; but because CN realigned it's routing system - they reduced the number of freight trains out of Halifax to 1 per day. So they removed the second track from the south end out into the rail yard in Rockingham - really putting a kink into regional rail. They've also never been too happy with the idea and have placed insane conditions on the operation like they have to be the ones doing all the train maintenance and be the ones to pick the train cars that operate. I can see them saying they would do the maintenance of the track - but picking the car? Come on.

Right now; sitting in a rail yard in Moncton are about 24 BUDD RDC cars (the self propelled) owned by Via rail (much the same trains that operate on the Victoria rail line). They have replaced the engines with high efficency ones and redone the inside of the cars for regional rail use - mainly because HRM had interest. Because of CN's delays; they have never been bought and just sit there.

If the Calgary Region wanted the implement a regional rail system - those 24 cars are sitting there; ready to go. It's not much; but it's a start and they could easily service a route up to Banff during peak tourist season. Plus since they have their own engines, they don't need the big engines at the front!
     
     
  #973  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 2:13 AM
Ferreth Ferreth is offline
IMHO
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 882
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
[...]
If the Calgary Region wanted the implement a regional rail system - those 24 cars are sitting there; ready to go. It's not much; but it's a start and they could easily service a route up to Banff during peak tourist season. Plus since they have their own engines, they don't need the big engines at the front!
I would pay good money to Ride a Budd car to Banff in the summer, and I'm not even a tourist!
__________________
---
My Flickr account
My Ratsofrass blog
     
     
  #974  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 4:10 AM
Bassic Lab Bassic Lab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
No, I understand that. It just might be a problem tying money for Calgary transit improvements to a regional decision process. What if the CRP says no?
Blame the PCs. Making Green Trip funds regional might make sense in Edmonton but it does not make sense in Calgary. Well it might make sense politically but not practically. 800 million spent on transit in Calgary can seriously reduce traffic congestion and get a lot of people out of cars; it is adding essential infrastructure while benefitting the environment which is the entire point of the program. Busses to the bedroom towns really just makes sprawl marginally more attractive while allowing the province to look like it is accomplishing something for the voters outside of the cities.
     
     
  #975  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 4:22 AM
DarkKeyo DarkKeyo is offline
Transit/Cartography Geek
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by mersar View Post
Small note on the SE LRT from council meeting tonight, a minor amendment was made to the request from council for administration to undertake the pre-study work for the SE LRT, with the amendment now requiring both the Calgary Regional Partnership and the province to sign on, before it was just the city and the province.
Good to see that they're doing the pre-study work. Glad to see it get started. After that, I assume it will go through a design process similar to the West LRT? Where various groups and people can have their input? I'm not expecting something like BestWestLRT and their horde of zombies, since the route follows a rail line through Inglewood and Ogden... but I would like to make my argument that making the line just a bit longer, to Calgary Tower and to McKenzie Towne, has a big payoff in ridership and in not having to funnel bus routes and park-and-riders from all over the SE to the end of half of the line. I'd also like to see a detailed set of route plans, since all I've seen have been route options.

As for Regional Rail, let's do the regional buses first and see if anyone uses them. No sense in spending money on commuter trains till after that.
     
     
  #976  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 5:34 AM
Vascilli Vascilli is offline
Hare Expert
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calgary, Toronto
Posts: 1,053
So what happened to those Nova buses that the City ordered?
     
     
  #977  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 5:44 AM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkKeyo View Post
Good to see that they're doing the pre-study work. Glad to see it get started. After that, I assume it will go through a design process similar to the West LRT? Where various groups and people can have their input? I'm not expecting something like BestWestLRT and their horde of zombies, since the route follows a rail line through Inglewood and Ogden... but I would like to make my argument that making the line just a bit longer, to Calgary Tower and to McKenzie Towne, has a big payoff in ridership and in not having to funnel bus routes and park-and-riders from all over the SE to the end of half of the line. I'd also like to see a detailed set of route plans, since all I've seen have been route options.

As for Regional Rail, let's do the regional buses first and see if anyone uses them. No sense in spending money on commuter trains till after that.
The BUDD RDC cars I mentioned earlier (in Moncton) at last check were going for 2 Million a piece. So buses would be cheaper to start off with...but still 24 cars @ 2 million - 48 isn't too bad?
     
     
  #978  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 6:33 AM
SubwayRev's Avatar
SubwayRev SubwayRev is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassic Lab View Post
Blame the PCs. Making Green Trip funds regional might make sense in Edmonton but it does not make sense in Calgary. Well it might make sense politically but not practically. 800 million spent on transit in Calgary can seriously reduce traffic congestion and get a lot of people out of cars; it is adding essential infrastructure while benefitting the environment which is the entire point of the program. Busses to the bedroom towns really just makes sprawl marginally more attractive while allowing the province to look like it is accomplishing something for the voters outside of the cities.
Couldn't agree more. It's disgusting that two cities which make up 65% of the population are needing the approval of tiny, rural communities to spend transportation monies.
     
     
  #979  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 12:58 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Policy Wonk View Post
I don't think it is an either-or and it will come sooner than most people would even imagine. Once the ridiculous Blue 22 project is killed for good in Toronto SNC-Lavalin is going to take the show on the road and launch a commuter service in Calgary using the refurbished Budd RDC's that would have been used for Blue 22.
That project isn't going anywhere - the SC Lavalin contract I am not sure really exists anymore however.


Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxboyns View Post
A regional rail system is difficult to implement when rail has competing interests. CP can easily say no; they are under no obligation to say yes at all.

But there can be political pressure put on them to say yes.

This is the same issue that Halifax is having with the regional rail debate there and with CN. For years, Peter Kelly (then mayor of the town of Bedford and now HRM mayor) wanted regional rail to service Bedford and Sackville to get people out of cars and into trains to the downtown station and then bus routes to ferry people onto the major employment centres and the downtown core (Halifax's train station is on the extreme south side of downtown and not in the actual core).

The problem has been CN and the control of the rail line through Halifax. It was originally dual track; but because CN realigned it's routing system - they reduced the number of freight trains out of Halifax to 1 per day. So they removed the second track from the south end out into the rail yard in Rockingham - really putting a kink into regional rail. They've also never been too happy with the idea and have placed insane conditions on the operation like they have to be the ones doing all the train maintenance and be the ones to pick the train cars that operate. I can see them saying they would do the maintenance of the track - but picking the car? Come on.

Right now; sitting in a rail yard in Moncton are about 24 BUDD RDC cars (the self propelled) owned by Via rail (much the same trains that operate on the Victoria rail line). They have replaced the engines with high efficency ones and redone the inside of the cars for regional rail use - mainly because HRM had interest. Because of CN's delays; they have never been bought and just sit there.

If the Calgary Region wanted the implement a regional rail system - those 24 cars are sitting there; ready to go. It's not much; but it's a start and they could easily service a route up to Banff during peak tourist season. Plus since they have their own engines, they don't need the big engines at the front!
CP has already said if there is enough money to increase track capacity so that freight operations are minimally impaired they are fine with regional rail. Spending $500 million on rail upgrades to run peak commuter like service to Cochrane doesn't seem like the wisest thing however - to justify the cost I would guess you would need 30 minute headways at least.
     
     
  #980  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2010, 9:45 PM
halifaxboyns halifaxboyns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir.Humphrey.Appleby View Post
That project isn't going anywhere - the SC Lavalin contract I am not sure really exists anymore however.




CP has already said if there is enough money to increase track capacity so that freight operations are minimally impaired they are fine with regional rail. Spending $500 million on rail upgrades to run peak commuter like service to Cochrane doesn't seem like the wisest thing however - to justify the cost I would guess you would need 30 minute headways at least.
$500 million seems a bit much for upgrades? I mean yes, you would need platforms at some locations and the RDC cars I mentioned are 2 mil a pop - but even with the upgrades it would cost that much? That must have to do with more of their freight operation than a regional transit system.

I'd also suggest that on some days it extend to Banff as a tourist train.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:47 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.