HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #861  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2010, 8:41 PM
Aegis's Avatar
Aegis Aegis is offline
Analyst, Commercial Mtgs
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bankview
Posts: 1,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need A Thneed View Post
If other cities don't have problems with the AC malfunctioning, then why do we? Most other cities don't have openable window in their train cars at all. Pretty much all of those cities have a lot greater risk of overwhelming heat than we do.
How do you know it isn't a problem? I've been on busses, trains, and planes where the A/C didn't work, and it wasn't fun! Of course it will be a problem, eventually.. everything needs to be fixed at some point.
     
     
  #862  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2010, 10:22 PM
MichaelS's Avatar
MichaelS MichaelS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aegis View Post
The simple solution is, just leave the window functionalty! That way, you have the best of both worlds. Most people would understand that when the A/C works, you close the windows so that you get maximum benefit.
I see your point Aegis, and do agree with it for the most part. However, the part that I have quoted, I think I disagree with. Perhaps you have more faith in your fellow man than I do, but as Freeweed mentioned in a post on the previous page, he watched a woman struggle to open a window, in a car that had (I assume, as he didn't say otherwise) a perfectly functioning A/C.

Perhaps most people understand not to open it, but it only takes a few who don't to lose the benefit. And unfortunately it is this minority that you need to design for.
     
     
  #863  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2010, 11:03 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
I'm back in Calgary for the summer and over the past weekend, while using Calgary Transit, I discovered one simple design aspect that CT could learn from TfL; bus stop information. However, after doing some brief research I've found out that it isn't so simple and a lot of thought goes into it. Anyway, I was walking from my sister's house in Brentwood toward Brentwood Station and seeing as how I had both my sister's bus pass and night-life attire on, I though I'd catch a bus along the way to prevent any unnecessary sweating. Unfortunately I take longer than most girls to get ready for a night-out so I didn't get to check CT's website for local route information and I only have a social data pack on my Berry so I couldn't check it on the way. This was a wee bit problematic as when I reached the first bus stop and took a look at the pole, there was a very minimal amount of information on where the busses were going and if any of them were going to Brentwood Station. As I was in a bit of a hurry I decided to walk it, it wasn't a great inconvenience but with a little bit of urban design it could have been avoided. How? With these:


Source: designworkplan.com

These maps are simple and straight forward but extremely helpful! On the maps and tables are: timetables for the routes; and linear route maps that display the previous stops, upcoming stops, estimated time of travel to the next stops, and if these stops have interchange facilities. As the next image shows, they don't even require that much infrastructure.


Source: designworkplan.com
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
     
     
  #864  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2010, 11:43 PM
The Chemist's Avatar
The Chemist The Chemist is offline
恭喜发财!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 中国上海/Shanghai
Posts: 8,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riise View Post
I'm back in Calgary for the summer and over the past weekend, while using Calgary Transit, I discovered one simple design aspect that CT could learn from TfL; bus stop information. However, after doing some brief research I've found out that it isn't so simple and a lot of thought goes into it. Anyway, I was walking from my sister's house in Brentwood toward Brentwood Station and seeing as how I had both my sister's bus pass and night-life attire on, I though I'd catch a bus along the way to prevent any unnecessary sweating. Unfortunately I take longer than most girls to get ready for a night-out so I didn't get to check CT's website for local route information and I only have a social data pack on my Berry so I couldn't check it on the way. This was a wee bit problematic as when I reached the first bus stop and took a look at the pole, there was a very minimal amount of information on where the busses were going and if any of them were going to Brentwood Station. As I was in a bit of a hurry I decided to walk it, it wasn't a great inconvenience but with a little bit of urban design it could have been avoided. How? With these:


Source: designworkplan.com

These maps are simple and straight forward but extremely helpful! On the maps and tables are: timetables for the routes; and linear route maps that display the previous stops, upcoming stops, estimated time of travel to the next stops, and if these stops have interchange facilities. As the next image shows, they don't even require that much infrastructure.


Source: designworkplan.com
I agree. Calgary bus information is severely lacking at the bus stops. Here in Shanghai they have something like the ones you've posted from London (although the information is all in Chinese, so unless you can read (as I can to some extent), the information won't be of much use to you. Knowing where buses go from a particular stop, especially if you're not familiar with the routes or the city, is quite important, IMO.

As for the AC argument, here in Shanghai the windows on the trains don't open either. And I've never been stuck on a train in summertime when the AC was broken (thankfully). I'd imagine that if the AC breaks on a train in Shanghai in summer, it's immediately taken out of service, considering how hot the summers are here.

The other thing that they do to trains here that run above ground is they tint AND put a mirror-like coating on the windows to reduce the amount of sunlight that enters the carriages, keeping the interiors at least somewhat cooler.
__________________
"Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature." - Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
     
     
  #865  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2010, 4:08 AM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelS View Post
I see your point Aegis, and do agree with it for the most part. However, the part that I have quoted, I think I disagree with. Perhaps you have more faith in your fellow man than I do, but as Freeweed mentioned in a post on the previous page, he watched a woman struggle to open a window, in a car that had (I assume, as he didn't say otherwise) a perfectly functioning A/C.

Perhaps most people understand not to open it, but it only takes a few who don't to lose the benefit. And unfortunately it is this minority that you need to design for.
Yeah. I can't properly explain just how funny this was, but let me try anyway. She got on on 7th Ave and departed at around Brentwood or so. At every single station, once the train came to a stop, she stood up and struggled with the window until the train started moving. She'd then sit down, frustrated, until the next stop. She did this at least 5 times. She didn't look particularly stupid or even mentally handicapped, just your average person who's used to opening windows on transit out of habit. And stubborn.

And it was noticeably colder on the train than outside, clearly obvious there was A/C running - but some people just want that fresh flowing air I guess. Maybe when it's 30C outside it would have been more noticeable.

This was the very first air conditioned LRT car I had ever been on in Calgary. I haven't seen a repeat of this behaviour, but like I said they've now got stickers on the windows so maybe people are slowly figuring it out.

Long story short, people WILL open windows unless you keep them nailed shut, regardless of interior/exterior conditions. It's the same reason so many newer hotels have windows that don't open - it seriously messes up the HVAC in hotter times.

That being said, I'm NOT looking forward to the first time the A/C breaks and it's 30C outside. I can barely stand breathing on the C-Train on the way home as it is, so I'll probably be the guy vomitting in the corner thanks to everyone's BO. What would be nice is to have windows that are by default locked electronically, but have some way for the driver to trigger them openable if the A/C dies. I could whip up a magnetic lock myself but who knows if it's feasible en masse.
     
     
  #866  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2010, 5:16 AM
DarkKeyo DarkKeyo is offline
Transit/Cartography Geek
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 332
Toronto and Vancouver have bus schedules on display at most of their stops. Maps too sometimes. But they have simpler straighter routes that carry more passengers than ours. We have a lot of (infrequent) suburban feeder routes, and community shuttles, and they have a lot of grid roads with buses running along them. We also change our schedules fairly often, cutting them back, adding onto them.

That said, it wouldn't be too hard to put a piece of paper schedule in a plastic case on the bus signposts, with times and the destination of the bus.

I'd also like to see Teleride add a texting feature; you text to them the bus stop number and it texts back (automatically) the next few departure times.

Regarding A/C, having the windows locked is ok with me, I figured out pretty fast that they didn't open. But if they had some way to unlock the windows if the A/C failed, that would be good too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by outoftheice View Post
"I’m proposing that we get maximum value by starting at-grade downtown and going as far as we can get with the money available," Hawkesworth told reporters in a lobby of a new 10th Avenue S.E. building, near where the train would stop.
I hope he is referring to stopping the train at 4 St SE and not having it at grade west of there. We really should e-mail the candidates and tell them we think cut and cover to Calgary Tower station, Mersar's idea originally I believe, is better. And that Douglasdale isn't far enough, and that it can't cost that much more to extend a mostly surface line to Mckenzie Towne.
     
     
  #867  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2010, 2:54 PM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
Construction Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Castleridge, NE Calgary
Posts: 5,892
NE Photo Updates: (Taken with my iPhone this morning)

Martindale Station Outbound Platform:


Inbound Platform:


Tunnel under 64th Ave:



Pedestrian Bridge by McKnight Westwinds:




Whitehorn Station:


Sorry about the poor quality.
     
     
  #868  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2010, 3:16 PM
mooky mooky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 482
Calgary Transit had a crew out at Franklin station last night around 8:00 pm with jackhammers in the vicinity of what I can only imagine is the old piles for the extension to station for a 4 car setup. Must have been 5 or 6 guys. I was going by on Memorial eastbound so I didn't get too good a look, but they were jack-hammering something.
     
     
  #869  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2010, 8:22 PM
srperrycgy's Avatar
srperrycgy srperrycgy is offline
I'm the bear on the right
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary (Killarney)
Posts: 1,669
Thanks for posting the pics, YNAT.

I've edited my previous Stampede CTrain Tips and added it to my website:

http://members.shaw.ca/LRTinCalgary/Stampede.html

I edited out the Twitterspeak for the old guys like Freeweed (j/k). Thanks for the suggestions folks.
__________________
Stevinder.
* * * * * *
     
     
  #870  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2010, 9:27 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by srperrycgy View Post
I edited out the Twitterspeak for the old guys like Freeweed (j/k).
Remember: it's not that I'm old, it's that I'm crotchety and willingly refuse to adapt.

I should run for the WRA or something. *cymbal crash*
     
     
  #871  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2010, 3:39 AM
greg_a greg_a is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 446
Funding for Alberta Transit
Posted on 06 July 2010

This week, Alberta announced that funding it promised to its municipalities two years ago for transit is finally about to flow. Through the Green Transit Incentives Program (GreenTRIP), Edmonton and Calgary will each get $800 million, with another $400 million going to smaller municipalities.
Edmonton recently opened its South LRT and new funding could mean the 3.1-kilometer corridor expansion planned to reach the northeast of the city will go ahead as scheduled. The line is scheduled for completion in 2014.
Calgary’s West LRT is already under construction, but the new funding could go towards its $1.6-billion Southeast LRT or a regional commuter rail—though it won’t go very far.
Beyond this funding, Alberta recently announced it’s putting together a 40-year transportation plan, looking into future demands on roads, airports and public transit, including LRT. The Calgary Herald reports the study should be complete by December.

http://renewcanada.net/2010/funding-for-alberta-transit/
     
     
  #872  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2010, 7:11 PM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Dear Alberta gov't: please, for the love of all that is holy, stop promoting exurban sprawl with this regional transit nonsense. Instead spend the money on expanding Edmonton and Calgary's LRT systems. You'll see 10-50x the ridership and will encourage some actual densification.

Thank you.
     
     
  #873  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2010, 7:27 PM
DarkKeyo DarkKeyo is offline
Transit/Cartography Geek
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkKeyo View Post
I'd also like to see Teleride add a texting feature; you text to them the bus stop number and it texts back (automatically) the next few departure times.
I found out through a blog that as of today, Toronto has started doing this, for some routes.
     
     
  #874  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2010, 10:28 PM
srperrycgy's Avatar
srperrycgy srperrycgy is offline
I'm the bear on the right
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary (Killarney)
Posts: 1,669
That could work very well here. I like this one.
__________________
Stevinder.
* * * * * *
     
     
  #875  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2010, 12:19 AM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkKeyo View Post
I'd also like to see Teleride add a texting feature; you text to them the bus stop number and it texts back (automatically) the next few departure times.
This is something that I think would be really helpful and I actually approached my brother-in-law, who is a programmer, about pursuing it as a business idea we could take to TfL. I was reading an article about how some transit agencies are providing free access to their GPS data so programmers can use them in Next Arrival apps for smart phones. It's rather brilliant as it costs the agencies nothing yet improves their service. Nonetheless, I prefer the SMS/text option as not everyone has a smart phone and/or data.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
     
     
  #876  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2010, 5:18 AM
freeweed's Avatar
freeweed freeweed is offline
Home of Hyperchange
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dynamic City, Alberta
Posts: 17,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riise View Post
Nonetheless, I prefer the SMS/text option as not everyone has a smart phone and/or data.
Knowing the time it would take to develop/test/implement something like this, I'd just as soon they not waste their time and money on an SMS option. By the time CT actually rolls it out, damn near everyone will have a data plan.

Kinda like how people 10 years ago would have said "I hope they make it a call-in service and not SMS, because not everyone has an SMS-enabled phone". Once it's on the Internets, it'll be available forever to thousands of apps in the future. SMS-bound, it's just a pain in the ass stuck on the flavour of the month technology.

I've been waiting for realtime, GPS-driven, Internet-available transit scheduling since the mid 90s or so. I even helped prototype one years and years ago (and a second system in 2003), but with the slowness of transit agencies we're JUST staring to see this being discussed seriously. It's about freaking time.
     
     
  #877  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2010, 6:08 AM
DarkKeyo DarkKeyo is offline
Transit/Cartography Geek
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeweed View Post
Dear Alberta gov't: please, for the love of all that is holy, stop promoting exurban sprawl with this regional transit nonsense. Instead spend the money on expanding Edmonton and Calgary's LRT systems. You'll see 10-50x the ridership and will encourage some actual densification.

Thank you.
I agree. I think the regional transit buses are fine, but I would never want them to even consider putting regional commuter rail before any of the LRT expansions.

Quote:
Knowing the time it would take to develop/test/implement something like this, I'd just as soon they not waste their time and money on an SMS option. By the time CT actually rolls it out, damn near everyone will have a data plan.

Kinda like how people 10 years ago would have said "I hope they make it a call-in service and not SMS, because not everyone has an SMS-enabled phone". Once it's on the Internets, it'll be available forever to thousands of apps in the future. SMS-bound, it's just a pain in the ass stuck on the flavour of the month technology.

I've been waiting for realtime, GPS-driven, Internet-available transit scheduling since the mid 90s or so. I even helped prototype one years and years ago (and a second system in 2003), but with the slowness of transit agencies we're JUST staring to see this being discussed seriously. It's about freaking time.
Well, maybe everyone will have smartphones by then, but it shouldn't take 10 years to implement a SMS service. Although I would like to see realtime GPS driven transit scheduling... But that seems a bit unrealistic at this point. SMS is more realistic. At least for now. It's more permanent than a flavour of the month technology, and data plans need a LOT of development before they're really workable. Unless you can find me one that is, I've been looking and there isn't much good out there.
     
     
  #878  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2010, 6:11 AM
youngregina's Avatar
youngregina youngregina is offline
Edan
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Victoria Park, Calgary
Posts: 986
It's kind of neat. Regina has now numbered all of our bus stops. We just text to the number on the stop, and it tells us what time the next bus comes. We also now have a gps based website that shows where buses are in real time. The transit live ( http://transitlive.com/ ) is just a pilot project and there are plans to expand it to all buses.
__________________
#YYC
     
     
  #879  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2010, 2:56 PM
TransitSupporter TransitSupporter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by youngregina View Post
It's kind of neat. Regina has now numbered all of our bus stops. We just text to the number on the stop, and it tells us what time the next bus comes. We also now have a gps based website that shows where buses are in real time. The transit live ( http://transitlive.com/ ) is just a pilot project and there are plans to expand it to all buses.
That transit live is very cool. Wish we had something like it in Calgary.
     
     
  #880  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2010, 4:10 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,592
Quote:
City studying bus-only lane on International Avenue

$248M plan pitched for Inglewood area


Read more
Plan includes:
17th Avenue transit lanes - $94 million
Busway to connect 17th Ave SE with SE LRT in Inglewood - $153 million, plus land purchases

I was wondering - why go to the SE LRT? Why not up to Barlow/Maxbell? The route is shorter, doesn't need the SE LRT (which might not get all the way downtown in the first phase), and likely much cheaper to shore up a hill side that to buld bridges over a rail yard, freeway, canal and river.

Orange = SE LRT
Red = NE LRT
Yellow = Barlow Maxbell 17th BRT connector
Blue = 17th BRT and Inglewood Transitway
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.