HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #921  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 6:12 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Because the City - in its wisdom - has now created bike lanes on the busy arterial known as Cambie Street (just not through the village (because they need the parking spaces).
It reflects a change in thinking - from having cyclists on safer quieter streets (with signals at major street crossings) to having them in the midst of traffic on busy arterials (likely necessitating more segregated bike lanes).
Cambie south of King Ed is ideal for a bike route, though the city has botched even that with lanes that disappear between some blocks.

What they need to do is make the streets adjacent to Cambie (Tupper and Yukon) better cycling routes through Cambie Village. Why not ban residential parking down one side of those streets and create a dedicated bike lane North on Tupper and South on Yukon? I don't have a lot of sympathy for house residents who park their vehicles all over the street because they've decided to use their garage as storage or are too cheap to maintain it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #922  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2010, 8:20 PM
Porfiry Porfiry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
What they need to do is make the streets adjacent to Cambie (Tupper and Yukon) better cycling routes through Cambie Village.
Better how? I've never had an issue cycling on Yukon. It's a quiet residential street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #923  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2010, 10:17 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Mayor Moonbeam at work:



Burrard Bridge may get permanent cycling barriers

City to decide on changes to bike lanes

News1130 staff Jul 03, 2010 18:05:42 PM

VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - Staff at the city of Vancouver are recommending $2 million be spent to design permanent cycling barriers on the Burrard Bridge. The idea is that a permanent structure would take up less road space and would be more aesthetically compatible with the span than the current pre-cast concrete dividers. That means the temporary bike lane on the Burrard Bridge may soon become permanent, and some drivers might be disappointed. A few businesses in the area, including an art gallery, claim they have lost customers since the bike lanes went in.

The plan also calls for the widening of the existing bike lane on the west side of the historic structure. Restoration of the underside of the 78-year-old bridge is also being looked at, as nets have been placed to prevent chunks of concrete from hitting the water and ground below.

Council is expected to review the proposed changes this Thursday.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #924  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2010, 10:39 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,831
Given that chunks are falling off the bridge, it sounds like a more comprehensive review of the whole structure is needed. Why spend $2 million when you might have to re-do it all in a few years?

For the same reason Mayor Moonbeam's comments about a dedicated bike lane on Main are idiotic when over $7 million of the taxpayers money was spent on the street a couple of years ago. But then Tunnelvision Vancouver doesn't seem to care much about the taxpayer's money, do they.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #925  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2010, 11:51 PM
racc racc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Given that chunks are falling off the bridge, it sounds like a more comprehensive review of the whole structure is needed. Why spend $2 million when you might have to re-do it all in a few years?

For the same reason Mayor Moonbeam's comments about a dedicated bike lane on Main are idiotic when over $7 million of the taxpayers money was spent on the street a couple of years ago. But then Tunnelvision Vancouver doesn't seem to care much about the taxpayer's money, do they.
You obviously do not know what you are talking about. The $7 million was for seismic upgrading while the $2 million is for design work for the rehabilitation and the separation of the bike lanes. Obviously, if they find structural issues, the design work could include designing a solution to those issues.

Oh, and by the way, Vision obviously cares about taxpayer's money. They saved taxpayers $30 million dollars by reallocating lanes on the bridge instead of widening the bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #926  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 12:32 AM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,114
You know... as much as people criticize the mayor for the bike lanes... at the very least, he's adding infrastructure to the city for minimal cost.

These bikes lanes act as buffers as well between pedestrians and vehicles.

I think it's better to have a council that acts on things, instead of countless studies and getting mired in red tape.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #927  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 2:42 AM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
I think it's better to have a council that acts on things, instead of countless studies and getting mired in red tape.
You have a point there.

Although the viaducts study is typical government money-wasting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #928  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 2:43 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by racc View Post
You obviously do not know what you are talking about. The $7 million was for seismic upgrading while the $2 million is for design work for the rehabilitation and the separation of the bike lanes. Obviously, if they find structural issues, the design work could include designing a solution to those issues...
Umm, you do understand how to click on an embedded link don't you? The $7 million was the cost of the Main Street Showcase project which Moonbeam, Meggsy and the Happy Planet crew wish to rip out now for a dedicated bike lane.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #929  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 3:14 AM
racc racc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Umm, you do understand how to click on an embedded link don't you? The $7 million was the cost of the Main Street Showcase project which Moonbeam, Meggsy and the Happy Planet crew wish to rip out now for a dedicated bike lane.
Sorry, I didn't see "Main" in there.

Anyway, since you mentioned it, the so-called "Main Street Showcase" wasn't much of a showcase at all. Bus travel times were not really improved and the bike sharrows are pretty much useless. The cheap bike racks are already falling apart and the street was really not made much more attractive or pedestrian friendly. Fortunately, not much was done north of 16th so there would not be much to rip out. Yeah, south of 16 will be more challenging but the future should not be constrained by the mistakes of the past.

The council back then didn't bother providing any leadership to staff who pretty much ran the show with the predictable poor results.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #930  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 3:20 AM
racc racc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Because the City - in its wisdom - has now created bike lanes on the busy arterial known as Cambie Street (just not through the village (because they need the parking spaces).
It reflects a change in thinking - from having cyclists on safer quieter streets (with signals at major street crossings) to having them in the midst of traffic on busy arterials (likely necessitating more segregated bike lanes).
Cyclists need safe access to destinations on main streets including shops and businesses. If protected lanes aren't provided, they either end up on the road slowing down traffic and risking their lives or they cycle illegally on sidewalks which is not great for peds or cyclists for that matter.

In Copenhagen, back in the 70's, they tried to get cyclists off busy streets by building routes on quiet streets. Not surprisingly, cyclists still used the busy streets because they took them to their destinations. The city then started building separated lanes on busy commercial streets and now they are one of the best cycling cities in the world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #931  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 3:34 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by racc View Post
Sorry, I didn't see "Main" in there.

Anyway, since you mentioned it, the so-called "Main Street Showcase" wasn't much of a showcase at all. Bus travel times were not really improved and the bike sharrows are pretty much useless. The cheap bike racks are already falling apart and the street was really not made much more attractive or pedestrian friendly. Fortunately, not much was done north of 16th so there would not be much to rip out. Yeah, south of 16 will be more challenging but the future should not be constrained by the mistakes of the past.

The council back then didn't bother providing any leadership to staff who pretty much ran the show with the predictable poor results.
You must have been on a different Main Street than I was.

As to the cyclists' promised land of Copenhagen, how many people have even glanced at a topographic map of the place. Or compared average rainfall? Just sayin'...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #932  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 3:39 AM
racc racc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
You must have been on a different Main Street than I was.

As to the cyclists' promised land of Copenhagen, how many people have even glanced at a topographic map of the place. Or compared average rainfall? Just sayin'...
I've been on streets that are much nicer for walking and cycling than Main Street.

Electric bikes make quick work of hills and Copenhagen has snow and some pretty miserable weather in the winter yet 24% of people cycle to work through the winter. They were at 5% before they starting improving cycling facilities. We are at 4%.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #933  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 7:26 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
There's 1 major difference between Copenhagen and Vancouver that people always seem to forget. That difference is that cyclists in Copenhagen respect non-cyclists and road laws meaning they meld into society as just another part of the overall infrastructure picture.

The contrast is that cyclists in Vancouver for the most part feel they own the roads, can do whatever they want, and blatently ignore even the most basic of road laws that being the "stop sign." Until that changes, Vancouver can't hope to get anywhere near the cycling capacity you see in Copenhagen quite frankly because motorists AND pedestrians won't allow it.

I've been run into on the sidewalk countless times by cyclists downtown. That's me being a pedestrian just walking ON THE SIDEWALK. You ask the majority of other pedestrians about their opinions on cyclists in Vancouver and the majority feel the same way, that they are selfish punks that feel entitled to everything.

Again until that changes, this pipe-dream of Vancouver becoming Copenhagen part 2 is just that, a pipe-dream. Learn some respect for others out there and others will respect you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #934  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 7:58 PM
racc racc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
There's 1 major difference between Copenhagen and Vancouver that people always seem to forget. That difference is that cyclists in Copenhagen respect non-cyclists and road laws meaning they meld into society as just another part of the overall infrastructure picture.

The contrast is that cyclists in Vancouver for the most part feel they own the roads, can do whatever they want, and blatently ignore even the most basic of road laws that being the "stop sign." Until that changes, Vancouver can't hope to get anywhere near the cycling capacity you see in Copenhagen quite frankly because motorists AND pedestrians won't allow it.

I've been run into on the sidewalk countless times by cyclists downtown. That's me being a pedestrian just walking ON THE SIDEWALK. You ask the majority of other pedestrians about their opinions on cyclists in Vancouver and the majority feel the same way, that they are selfish punks that feel entitled to everything.

Again until that changes, this pipe-dream of Vancouver becoming Copenhagen part 2 is just that, a pipe-dream. Learn some respect for others out there and others will respect you.
Complaining about cyclists is a big distraction from the real problem which is dangerous driving. 30 pedestrians a year are killed by reckless and careless driving and hundreds more are seriously injured. Do you really expect police to do much about careless cyclists when people are dying from reckless driving.

If you ever bothered to actually observe cyclists, you would realize that the overwhelming majority of them are well-behaved, obey the laws and respect drivers and pedestrians.

The Sun's Miro Cernetig did bother and found the following:
http://www.vancouversun.com/travel/lane+their+just+start+bicycle+class/3189350/story.html
Quote:
Happily, all the bicyclists had on helmets. On the block I was surveying, all were paragons of bicycle etiquette, too, obeying the rules of the road, though the women were the most diligent -- they all stopped at the red lights, right on the white line, and a few even used their arms to properly signal where they were going.
Now downtown, couriers do have a poor reputation but they are no worse than taxi drivers. Note that they are required to take a test and they are licensed.

As Miro stated:
Quote:
The mad people were the bicycle couriers, of course. They pretty much ignored the mayor's new bike lane, preferring to ride on the streets and sidewalks, darting between pedestrians and cars on the way to their destinations.
Yes, there are a few idiots on bikes like there are a few in cars and a few walking as well. Actually, it probably the same people who misbehave regardless of whether they are in a car, walking or riding a bike.

But, just as it is unfair to judge all drivers by the actions of a few, it is also fundamentally wrong to judge all cyclists by the actions of a few. So stop it!!

The solution to sidewalk riding is separated bike lanes as some drivers are unwilling to let cyclists share the road and instead illegally or carelessly intimidate cyclists off the road. It is interesting to note that in the few places where there are separate bicycle and pedestrian paths, pedestrians are far more likely to walk in the bicycle path than cyclists ride in the pedestrian path. Usually, this is no big deal but sometimes I politely remind them that there is a nice ped path next door. Some people also seem to like to walk on the Dunsmuir bike lane. No big deal. No harm, no foul.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #935  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 8:45 PM
ozonemania ozonemania is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 678
Speaking of which, did we have a Critical Mass this past month? Not sure what the turnout would be like considering the recent commitments to bicycle-friendly infrastructure as of late.

I bring this up as well just to say that there is indeed a belligerent cycling attitude here in Vancouver, if not more than a small subset of all cyclists.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #936  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 9:23 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,699
I heard cheering and shouting from the office last Friday so I think there was something - but I didn't see the usual wave down Howe Street - I may just not have looked at the right time though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #937  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 10:12 PM
racc racc is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozonemania View Post
Speaking of which, did we have a Critical Mass this past month? Not sure what the turnout would be like considering the recent commitments to bicycle-friendly infrastructure as of late.

I bring this up as well just to say that there is indeed a belligerent cycling attitude here in Vancouver, if not more than a small subset of all cyclists.
I didn't see it but I saw lots of people cycling to it.

Take some time to observe cyclists along a busy bike route. It is really hard to spot much belligerence out there. A lot of this has been magnified by the media to sell papers and get clicks on web sites. Controversy sells.

There are a few belligerent motorists as well. One of the joys of cycling is that I can usually avoid them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #938  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 10:28 PM
crazyjoeda's Avatar
crazyjoeda crazyjoeda is offline
Mac User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 861
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
There's 1 major difference between Copenhagen and Vancouver that people always seem to forget. That difference is that cyclists in Copenhagen respect non-cyclists and road laws meaning they meld into society as just another part of the overall infrastructure picture.

The contrast is that cyclists in Vancouver for the most part feel they own the roads, can do whatever they want, and blatently ignore even the most basic of road laws that being the "stop sign." Until that changes, Vancouver can't hope to get anywhere near the cycling capacity you see in Copenhagen quite frankly because motorists AND pedestrians won't allow it.

I've been run into on the sidewalk countless times by cyclists downtown. That's me being a pedestrian just walking ON THE SIDEWALK. You ask the majority of other pedestrians about their opinions on cyclists in Vancouver and the majority feel the same way, that they are selfish punks that feel entitled to everything.

Again until that changes, this pipe-dream of Vancouver becoming Copenhagen part 2 is just that, a pipe-dream. Learn some respect for others out there and others will respect you.
I find it funny how some drivers complain about cyclist not following the rules of the road. When I'm cycling it is common for cars to speed past me at well over the posted speed limit or pass me at illegally tight distances between and I find complaints about cyclist disobeying stop signs laughable because I see drivers coasting through 4-way stops all the time.

Bad driving is a much more serious concern than ill-mannered cyclists because incompetent drivers kill people.

BTW: When I'm driving I find that many drivers act selfishly like they own the road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #939  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 10:30 PM
usog usog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 580
Racc, why is it always your tactic to redirect people questioning the etiquette of local cyclists onto that of everyone else rather than addressing the question? It's a trend I've noticed. But personally I haven't had any issues with super-cyclists as of yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #940  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2010, 11:11 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by racc View Post
The Sun's Miro Cernetig did bother and found the following:
http://www.vancouversun.com/travel/lane+their+just+start+bicycle+class/3189350/story.html
I missed that story, thanks for posting a link to it. Although I gotta say, counting bikes from 10 to 11AM at Dunsmuir and Hornby is doomed to get low numbers. If you want to see how popular the lanes are, count the cyclists entering or leaving the Dunsmuir section at Beatty street and do it during the morning or evening rush hours.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.