HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2001  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2010, 1:39 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Decks facing Cambie Bridge would actually provide some shade on the west side for th suites and mitigate people being able to look directly into a suite (like you can at the one Cooper's Park building) if the resident puts some planters or other "stuff" on the balcony.
Everyone knows balcony overhangs are useless for shade on the west side of a building =)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2002  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2010, 6:57 PM
Micky Luv Micky Luv is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 19
Nanaimo confirms suit against downtown developer



Nanaimo city council members have decided to sue Millennium Development and Suro Development for failure to complete a downtown hotel.

The city announced early yesterday it will take legal action to recover more than $3 million.

The city paid about $800,000 for project management fees and another $2 million in project development fees, which was expected to be returned to the city once the agreement expired.

Mayor John Ruttan said he sent a letter to Millennium asking for the money, but the company's lawyer responded, saying Millennium has upheld its end of the agreement.

The hotel component of the $75-million Port of Nanaimo Centre was supposed to be completed in 2008, just after the conference centre had opened its doors for the first time. The city started paying $71,500 a month in project development fees and $20,000 a month in September of 2004, which was supposed to continue until project completion.

Millennium has been dogged by its inability to secure financing for the project, but even more so for the difficulties it had finding investors to build the athlete's village for 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver.
© Copyright (c) The Victoria Times Colonist

Read more: http://www.timescolonist.com/sports/Nana...veloper/3160440/story.html#ixzz0r2mvGoEg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2003  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2010, 9:49 PM
djh djh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,979
^Seems like a stupid move for a developer to get into a serious legal dispute with the authority that allows it to do business within it's boundaries...I guess they don't plan on any more developments within Nanaimo?

Last edited by djh; Jun 17, 2010 at 2:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2004  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2010, 10:33 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,139
isn't the devloper washed up anyway? their name is mud in the area
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2005  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2010, 11:12 PM
Micky Luv Micky Luv is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 19
Law suit

no kidding eh...

I'm more concerned about the impact this news will bring to the Olympic Village... what a nightmare!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2006  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2010, 4:25 AM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,734
Bi-weekly SEFC update | June 16th 2010

Maynards Block

Taken by SFUVancouver, June 16th, 2010.

Pinnacle Living False Creek

Taken by SFUVancouver, June 16th, 2010.

First and Main social housing

Taken by SFUVancouver, June 16th, 2010.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2007  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2010, 6:31 PM
igeneer igeneer is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 55
Does anyone know when people start moving into Parcel 10 (1633 Ontario St)??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2008  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2010, 1:47 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
WCFC is the first to apply to add 2 additional penthouse floors to their project, the policy hasn't even been approved by council yet but no one has any doubt it won't sail thru. Seems like Wall is no longer entertaining it being a STIR project, it appears to be back to market condos.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2009  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2010, 1:54 AM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,594
That's no surprise about it being market, but good news that they are already anticipating the additional two floors of penthouses. Especially for WCFC being right behind the OV.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2010  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2010, 2:48 AM
hanko hanko is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
WCFC is the first to apply to add 2 additional penthouse floors to their project, the policy hasn't even been approved by council yet but no one has any doubt it won't sail thru. Seems like Wall is no longer entertaining it being a STIR project, it appears to be back to market condos.
Here is an excerpt from Bob Rennie's recent UDI speech:

“PETER WALL ALSO WENT TO THE SIDELINES RETURNING 100+ DEPOSITS IN EARLY 2009 IN THE 1ST PHASE OF HIS 400 UNIT -WALL CENTER FALSE CREEK DEVELOPMENT. TODAY IT IS REDESIGNED FROM 400 CONDOMINIUM TO A 500 CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ON SCHEDULE TO COME BACK TO MARKET THIS SUMMER“

http://forms.rennie.com/articles/2010_UDI_SPEECH.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2011  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2010, 4:13 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Acutally they are proposing 562units if anyone is counting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2012  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2010, 11:39 PM
Micky Luv Micky Luv is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 19
12 Athletes Way

Anyone here purchased any units in 12 Athletes way?
Has anyone got the confirmation on the completion day?

Mine is set on 28th but I heard that the developer still hasn't got city's occupancy permit + Land title...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2013  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2010, 1:28 AM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,594
Site work has begun on the James at 288 West 1st. Excavation starts in July.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2014  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2010, 3:26 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,432
nice!! I couldnt wait to see that make shift park get torn up
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2015  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2010, 4:16 AM
entheosfog's Avatar
entheosfog entheosfog is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by awvan View Post
Site work has begun on the James at 288 West 1st. Excavation starts in July.
I thought James was going where Busters towing is currently? There's a rendering for James on that building. I could be wrong though!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2016  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2010, 4:35 AM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,460
^just an advert.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2017  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 3:24 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,139
I watched the CBC report - the one couple who bought a unit weren't overly happy but they said they would move in - they rated their unit a 6 out of 10 - thats pretty bad

11 Olympic Village condo buyers want out

Several pre-sale buyers of condominiums at the city-financed Olympic Athletes' Village site on Vancouver's False Creek don't like their new homes and want to back out of their deals, CBC News has learned.

A lawyer representing 11 buyers said the City of Vancouver — which had to step in to finance the project when the original developer ran out of money — has not delivered on what was promised for the condominium units.

"They've lost faith in the developer," said Bryan Baynham. "They've lost faith in the city.


"Give us our money back and sell them to someone else who wants to live there. My people don't want to live there."

The buyers are unhappy that there's a parking lot where there was supposed to be a park, that washers and dryers have not been installed in their units and that their $5,000 fireplaces are defective, said Baynham.

He said the buyers wonder what else might be wrong.

The alleged deficiencies amount to a breach of contract, said Baynham, and his clients want their deposits back, with interest.

Pre-sale buyers Barbara and Harold Thuringer were asked how they would rate their unit on a scale of one to 10.

"I would say a six," said Barbara.

"Pretty low," said her husband.

The City of Vancouver stepped in to finance the Millennium Water condo project when the Millennium Development Corp. could no longer get financing.



Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbi...-millennium-pre-sales.html#ixzz0rpceUPmX

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbi...-millennium-pre-sales.html#ixzz0rpcYMwgH
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2018  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 4:46 AM
TwoFace's Avatar
TwoFace TwoFace is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 956
Had another look at the Village today, with my camera this time.
Couldn’t help but think that it resembled an empty movie set with only the ever-present security guards milling about.
Canada House being the Development star, here are my photographic highlights (not for commercial use)



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2019  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 6:03 AM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
The buyers are unhappy that there's a parking lot where there was supposed to be a park, that washers and dryers have not been installed in their units and that their $5,000 fireplaces are defective, said Baynham.
Uh, let's see here...

Step 1: Install the washer/dryer, problem solved.
Step 2: Fix or replace the fireplaces.
Step 3: Tell the buyers they are retards for thinking a piece of land outside of the development would be guaranteed to be anything.

I really don't see how there could be lawsuit or breach of contract based on those things.

edit: Great shots btw Twoface. I'm not a big fan of the Erikson buildings but I love your first shot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2020  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2010, 7:05 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,139
theres 36 sold - and 11 want out so that means of the nearly 500 units only 25 will be occupied? for the foreseeable future... sales seem pretty slow
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:30 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.