Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili
Moot point. Parking is expensive and will be for a long time. There isn't any space to build new surface parking lots downtown (and they are not permitted anyways) and the price of underground parking construction will keep prices high regardless of supply.
I know there is a lot being said about the City artificially inflating parking costs through restricting the amount that developers can build in the downtown (which is happening of course), but a huge reason why parking is expensive downtown is the sheer density of offices in Calgary's downtown. That is what people like Connelly fail to realize (not saying you don't), bringing down parking prices in the downtown is fighting against reality.
|
It's not a moot point, it's my entire point. Calgary is nowhere near as dense as Manhattan, and yet we have similar parking rates. It's entirely because the city has consciously limited parking for several decades now. We could easily have had a 6 storey parkade beneath every office tower, and thousands more parking spots.
I'm not disagreeing with the City's strategy, and I'm not trying to claim there's any way to actually reduce parking costs TODAY. All I was saying is that the reason the C-Train is so popular is because parking is so expensive, and that's something the city worked towards a long time ago.
Which gets back to my original question (and point): do people here honestly believe we'd have even half the LRT ridership if parking was 1/3 what it is now? If so, what makes Calgarians so different from the rest of the continent?
Given enough time most people have adapted and generally don't actually mind riding the train - but from watching it firsthand (and hearing lots of stories about the past), I think a lot of people here initially felt "forced" to move to public transit. Hence my hyperbole earlier about "kicking and screaming".