HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4541  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 3:01 PM
The Heights The Heights is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldCloverdale View Post
how about the Compass Bank location next to Chris' Hot Dogs on Dexter avenue...


c1906
Post Office
Man, it's painful to think about some of the buildings we've lost in this town. That was one of the better ones. Lost to a fire, I believe?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4542  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 3:08 PM
The Heights The Heights is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
I heard yesterday that the Lowders have been approached by Walgreens about their lot on the corner of Boultier and E. Fairview. No deal on the table or anything, but an ominous sign nonetheless.

As I understand it, the development plan produced by the OC charrette some years ago has yet to be adopted by the city council and their would be no design review or other obstacle to development of that lot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4543  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 3:26 PM
Dyingyak Dyingyak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham...and all points statewide
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Heights View Post
I heard yesterday that the Lowders have been approached by Walgreens about their lot on the corner of Boultier and E. Fairview. No deal on the table or anything, but an ominous sign nonetheless.

As I understand it, the development plan produced by the OC charrette some years ago has yet to be adopted by the city council and their would be no design review or other obstacle to development of that lot.
If my source is correct, the developer already owns the land and has been drawing up plans for development. I believe the zoning calls for the building to be built to the sidewalk edge so it won't be your typical suburban lot configuration though.
__________________
"Make no little plans. They have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized. Make big plans. Aim high in hope and work. Remembering that a noble, logical diagram once recorded will not die."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4544  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 6:12 PM
Dyingyak Dyingyak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham...and all points statewide
Posts: 126
Quote:
*removed*
Now I haven't heard that. The only thing I knew of was the Walgreen's on the opposite corner. Interesting...need throw that against the wall and see if it sticks.
__________________
"Make no little plans. They have no magic to stir men's blood and probably themselves will not be realized. Make big plans. Aim high in hope and work. Remembering that a noble, logical diagram once recorded will not die."

Last edited by Dylan Leblanc; Sep 10, 2026 at 7:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4545  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 6:52 PM
OCA REP OCA REP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montgomery (Old Cloverdale)
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Heights View Post
I heard yesterday that the Lowders have been approached by Walgreens about their lot on the corner of Boultier and E. Fairview. No deal on the table or anything, but an ominous sign nonetheless.
Your information is about as close to the truth as has been reported here. Rumors are swirling and mobilization has begun. This area is outside of the ARB approval area. A number of us within the leadership of the neighborhood are keeping a close watch to see how things develop. Stay tuned indeed!


Quote:
Originally Posted by The Heights View Post
As I understand it, the development plan produced by the OC charrette some years ago has yet to be adopted by the city council and their would be no design review or other obstacle to development of that lot.
True. Ken Groves has it on the WAY BACK burner and we will do our part to push it forward. The same goes for a master plan developed many years ago too for the Garden District. There is not a lot to protect us, as the court of public opinion can only go so far... But, a hornet's nest was really rattled the other day when these rumors started spreading. The Lowder's phones were not the only ones buzzing off the hook in opposition!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4546  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 7:19 PM
OCA REP OCA REP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montgomery (Old Cloverdale)
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyingyak View Post
Interesting...need throw that against the wall and see if it sticks.
It'll slide down the wall pretty quick. LOTS of rumors were/are swirling after the Walgreen's news "broke..."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4547  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 8:09 PM
The Heights The Heights is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
Quote:
*removed*
The block is currently owned by the Moffett Trust, a family trust that owned the old Moffett Theatres. The long-time trustee is indeed aging and at least some of the family would like to cash out. El Rey isn't part of the trust property, but Stonehenge, the Capri, Sinclairs, and Sarah Howard Stone are.

Last edited by Dylan Leblanc; Sep 10, 2026 at 7:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4548  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 9:32 PM
bystander1's Avatar
bystander1 bystander1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montgomery
Posts: 1,632
I can't believe that block is in danger of being torn down for "redevelopment"...especially with the Capri Theater being there. I thought plan for the area called for new facades on the buildings, more greenery, wider sidewalks, and a 'skinnier' street to slow traffic. What are the Lowders trying to do, redo it the way they did the other Cloverdale business district? I'll admit, that was done very well. But the rumors going around for this area concerns me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4549  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2010, 2:20 PM
The Heights The Heights is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by bystander1 View Post
I can't believe that block is in danger of being torn down for "redevelopment"...especially with the Capri Theater being there. I thought plan for the area called for new facades on the buildings, more greenery, wider sidewalks, and a 'skinnier' street to slow traffic. What are the Lowders trying to do, redo it the way they did the other Cloverdale business district? I'll admit, that was done very well. But the rumors going around for this area concerns me.
There are two different issues here, though both are exacerbated by the City's failure to act on the neighborhood plan. The Capri block is in limited danger because there's a natural inertia in a block of occupied businesses. The occupants are all successful, long term businesses and they have their own motivation to resist a teardown/redevelopment. Nor is there any indication that the Lowders want to redevelop it. It's the present owners that are interested in disposing of it.

The real danger is with the Cloverdale School corner. Because it is zoned commercial, there is nearly zero review for development. The problem is not that Walgreens is interested in putting a store there (though Richardson's pharmacy would probably take issue with me). The problem is that they could put up a cookie-cutter Walgreens that would be inconsistent with the rest of the commercial district. There's not even any guarantee that the property would be developed consistently with the much-vaunted Lowder brand of "new urbanism." You are right to be concerned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4550  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2010, 4:38 AM
mgmrebel's Avatar
mgmrebel mgmrebel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montgomery
Posts: 22
.

The real danger is with the Cloverdale School corner. Because it is zoned commercial, there is nearly zero review for development. The problem is not that Walgreens is interested in putting a store there (though Richardson's pharmacy would probably take issue with me). The problem is that they could put up a cookie-cutter Walgreens that would be inconsistent with the rest of the commercial district. There's not even any guarantee that the property would be developed consistently with the much-vaunted Lowder brand of "new urbanism." You are right to be concerned.[/QUOTE]


This is not going to happen and will not be an issue!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4551  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2010, 1:29 PM
OCA REP OCA REP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montgomery (Old Cloverdale)
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgmrebel View Post
This is not going to happen and will not be an issue!
I hope you are correct. No one wants a fight, but the number of warriors standing by to oppose ANY inappropriate development at that intersection would probably surprise you.

That being said, what I find "appropriate" for that corner may not be what my neighbor considers "appropriate." We just all pretty much agreed that a suburban drugstore, sitting in a sea of asphalt, was not going to cut it. The developers would be better off keeping everyone informed of their intentions instead of letting the rumor mill run rampant as it did a week or two back. I sense that they might have learned a lesson from this experience...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4552  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 12:16 PM
OldCloverdale's Avatar
OldCloverdale OldCloverdale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cloverdale
Posts: 505
Montgomery City Council considers mayor's $75M plan

Now that Mayor Todd Strange has pitched a $75 mil­lion construction and economic development plan, members of the Montgomery City Council must decide whether it's in the city's best interest to incur the new debt in hopes of boosting tourism, creating new jobs and spurring development.

So far, it appears that the City Council is a willing partici­pant in the mayor's plan to pur­sue a bond and bank line
of credit.

"It's basically an investment in the future of the city," said City Council President Charles Jinright. "When you look at the overall plan, it puts the city in a situation where it can attract a lot of tourism."

The proposal calls for a mul­ti-purpose sports facility, an overhaul of Cramton Bowl and the renovation of City Hall, which would include restoring the City Auditorium and return­ing the current Council Cham­ber to what it looked like when Rosa Parks was arraigned there in 1955.

The bond money could also pay for a police substation on West Fairview Avenue, a con­nector road from Ray Thoring­ton Road to Taylor Road -- an area that is expected to be the next major growth spot for the city -- and Carver Advanced Academy.

The money could also go to­ward what is mysteriously de­scribed as "other Economic De­velopment Projects" that could mean significant job growths for the city and county.

What the plan might not cover, though, is the one thing that some city officials believe to be the single most important eco­nomic development project for Montgomery -- a high school for east Montgomery.

"All of our high schools are in the west side of the city. The city has grown so much since 1968 (when the last high school was built). The people in east Montgomery just don't have a (public) high school to go to."

"Building a high school in east Montgomery is the No. 1 economic issue for me. We need it bad," Jinright said. "It would accommodate people that don't want to be in private schools. It gives them an alternative. Plus, we just overlooked it for so long."

The city offered to provide up to $25 million of the bond money to go toward building what would likely be a $35 million school, but the Montgomery County Board of Education re­jected the idea. The rest of the money needed for the school could come from school im­provement grants that the Montgomery Public School Sys­tem receives, according to school spokesman Tom Salter.

Though the school board re­jected a $25 million offer from the city to build a new high school in east Montgomery, Strange said Friday he will keep that option open.

"We're going forward with keeping $25 million as a placeholder in case there are some changes in some people's minds," Strange said. "I haven't spoken to the superintendent about it, but I've been advised I might want to wait (before per­manently removing it)."

Strange said since the board voted against the offer last week, he has received calls from board members, both explaining rea­sons for their votes or request­ing more information.

The east Montgomery high school, which could house an in­ternational baccalaureate pro­gram, could help change the ra­cial makeup of the Montgomery Public Schools, said City Coun­cil Vice President Tracy Larkin.

"I think it's important to have a diversified school sys­tem," Larkin said. "I think it just doesn't look good to have an all black school system in a city as large as ours with as many races as we have. We should be looking for ways to get the chil­dren who left the school system many years ago to come back to the school system.

"We have to do what is right, and I believe the right thing to do would be to build a high school out there," said Larkin, who represents District Three.
District Eight City Council­man Glen Pruitt, in whose dis­trict the high school would like­ly be built, said he would be supportive of the project as long as it was built as a neighborhood school. As the name implies, a neighborhood school would serve the school-aged children who live in the area around the school.

"It's time to do it properly and give the people out east a high school that they've been asking for for so long," said Pru­itt, who has two children en­rolled at Wilson Elementary School.

Currently, students living in east Montgomery can attend public schools close to home up through junior high. Then, they have to make the trip across town to attend a public high school.

According to a memo that Strange sent to members of the City Council, the following rea­sons support the move to pursue the $60 million bond issue:

•Market interest rates, both taxable and tax-exempt, are near historically low levels.

•The federal 35 percent and 45 percent subsidies available through the issuance of Build­ing America Bonds and Recov­ery Zone Bonds, respectively, provide even lower net rates. The city learned this week that it qualifies for $60 million in Re­covery Zone bonds.

•Construction costs are competitive and attractive be­cause of the state of the econo­my.

•There could be a rush later in the year as issuers try to take advantage of the Building Amer­ica Bonds and Recovery Zone Bonds, which could result in higher rates. Interest rates could also increase soon be­cause of "the deficit spending of federal government and many other economic considera­tions," according to the memo.

"So, while the market melt­down of 2008 has been painful and the recovery slow, the re­sulting extraordinarily low in­terest rates, federal subsidies and favorable construction pric­ing have created opportunities for those who are positioned to take advantage of these historic developments," Strange wrote in the memo, dated June 1.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4553  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2010, 11:57 PM
bystander1's Avatar
bystander1 bystander1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montgomery
Posts: 1,632
Two items of interest downtown

It looks like Bronner is going to move Community Newspaper Holdings Inc., along with another company that he doesn't want to name yet, into the new RSA Judicial Building when it's completed.


The "sale pending" signs on the old Amsouth Bank properties on Commerce Street have been replaced with "sold" signs. Could it be some new project in the works by a group called 130 Commerce LLC (Alley Station owners?) or maybe the Hyatt hotel developers again?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4554  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 3:32 AM
thoraudio's Avatar
thoraudio thoraudio is offline
Witty comment fail
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Prattville, Alabama
Posts: 2,902
130 Commerce, LLC was the purchaser...

FYI, according to a LLC search, the two listed members of 130 Commerce, LLC are a Mr. Beasley and Mr. Allen...

speculation? expansion? who knows....
__________________
Abandon all hope. It will help you focus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4555  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 3:46 AM
bystander1's Avatar
bystander1 bystander1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montgomery
Posts: 1,632
I wonder what they have in mind for the deck?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4556  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 5:56 PM
OCA REP OCA REP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montgomery (Old Cloverdale)
Posts: 586
Earth Fare @ Eastchase

I noticed the following snippet in the business section of today's Montgomery Advertiser:
Earth Fare, Mont­gomery’s newest natu­ral food retailer, will have a groundbreaking at its new location in EastChase at 10 a.m. to­day. The store, which is billed as “the healthy supermarket,” will break ground at the corner of Eastchase Parkway and Berryhill Road in the Dillard’s Parking lot. Earth Fare is a popu­lar natural food grocery that has stores in Ten­nessee, North and South Carolina and Georgia. The chain al­ready has two stores in Alabama, one in Hunts­ville and another in Au­burn.

— Rick Harmon
I could not locate this article in the on-line version of the paper, so I copied this from the digital edition that the paper e-mails you when your paper is not delivered during the week.

This article says the store will be built in the Dillard's parking lot. I read another article where it was mentioned that the Earth Fare in Huntsville, which was the first store in the state, was built into a former Circuit City. The company official that was quoted indicated that they like to re-use existing structures whenever possible. That being said, isn't the Linen-N-Things building still empty... or the former Bruno's out at Chantilly Parkway?

Just wondering outloud...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4557  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 2:08 AM
bystander1's Avatar
bystander1 bystander1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montgomery
Posts: 1,632
Quote:
*removed*
That would be nice. The Beasley Allen lawfirm could move there too and open up their buildings for development along lower Commerce Street.

Last edited by Dylan Leblanc; Sep 10, 2026 at 7:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4558  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2010, 3:11 PM
OldCloverdale's Avatar
OldCloverdale OldCloverdale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cloverdale
Posts: 505
from wsfa.com

Eastchase to have luxury apartments and organic food supermarket

Montgomery's Eastchase development made two significant economic announcements Tuesday.

The Watermark Residential company out of Indianapolis broke ground on 272 new luxury apartment homes. They'll be built in a wooded area across from Costco not far from Chantilly Parkway.

There will be 12, two and three story buildings, a clubhouse, garages, and swimming pool. The apartments will feature designer lighting, walk-in closets and other amenities. The new apartments are set to open next June.

And, just down the street, across from the Dillard's department store, city and business leaders broke ground on the new Earth Fare store. The location will be part of a chain of organic food supermarkets. The company's CEO, says his company has a philosophy of healthy eating.

Jack Murphy told WSFA.com, "We don't carry a single product with high fructose corn syrup." Murphy continued, "It's been absolutely scientifically proven to cause obesity."

The store should open next winter. A new Earth Fare store opens in Auburn in about two weeks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4559  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2010, 7:30 PM
bystander1's Avatar
bystander1 bystander1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montgomery
Posts: 1,632
So, is this about right:

Target is to Walmart as Earth Fare is to Whole Foods?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4560  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2010, 8:48 PM
Capital Heights's Avatar
Capital Heights Capital Heights is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 160
32 Commerce, the old Colonial Bank building just purchased by Beasley Allen, is apparantly back on the block for $495,000. It would appear that Beasley Allen only wanted the vacant lot with the parking deck across the street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:40 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.