HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8681  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 12:47 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingofthehill View Post
Yeah, the ground level area on the Blackstone Building is done. I hope the 82 units it'll bring online will better anchor/revitalize that southern end of Broadway:

Thanks for the pic, KOTH. I've been hearing about the blackstone being prepped for lofts for quite some time. but if the bldg in your pics is supposed to be soon ready for new residents, it sure doesn't look it.

I would think a good scrub down would have been part of phase 1 & done months ago. that's even more the case if the interiors & window frames already have been renovated. IOW, I'd think the owner would have wanted to wash away yrs & yrs of grime before working on the interior.

as for the street it's on, here's some news that should remain on the record for ppl trying to figure out what broadway's future may or may not be like.


The Broadway Backslide

Once the Busiest Retail Corridor in Downtown, Key Street Now Suffers From High Vacancy and Low Rents

by Richard Guzmán
Published: Thursday, May 27, 2010

DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES - You can find just about anything for sale on Broadway. Stores, many of them small mom and pop shops, hawk everything from wedding dresses to plastic toys to opulent jewelry. In some ways, the street has barely changed in decades. On weekends in particular, Broadway is filled with activity as mostly Latino shoppers crowd the sidewalks while retailers scream out the bargains from the front of their stores.

But something else has changed drastically, and shoppers can now easily find something that used to be rare: vacant storefronts. At least 20 “For Lease” signs dot Broadway from Second to Ninth streets. On a recent weekday afternoon, dozens more street-level storefronts were shuttered.

A survey conducted by officials with Bringing Back Broadway, 14th District Councilman José Huizar’s effort to turn the street into a major, entertainment-focused destination, found that the vacancy rate is now 18%-20% on the portion of Broadway between Second Street and Olympic Boulevard. That comes at the same time that rents have tumbled.

Some blame the economy for the trend, while others attribute it to landlords unwilling to renegotiate high rental rates. Still others believe the traditional customer base has moved on to places that are catering to their needs and pocketbooks.

“The current decline seems to have started about a decade ago, when other cities like Lynwood, Baldwin Park and Huntington Park began realizing there was a big market for Latino shoppers and started catering to that market,” Huizar said in an email to Los Angeles Downtown News. “Also, a lot of those people began gravitating to high-profile malls that cater to everybody. Not only do Broadway’s businesses suffer when those customers take their dollars elsewhere, but the city misses out on tax revenues and jobs, too.”

Glory Days

The historic corridor is flanked by impressive buildings constructed in the early part of the 20th century. Broadway houses 12 historic theaters, and in the 1920s through ’40s the street was a hub of entertainment and commerce. Residents and tourists would flock to the area, where they would shop and get around via streetcar.

The area has remained active through the years, though the demographics shifted; in recent decades the focus has been on bargain shopping and the Latino consumer. In several spaces, large, swap-meet style operations have been set up. In other locations, it is inexpensive electronics.

Jessica Wethington-McLean, the executive director of Bringing Back Broadway, said a retail survey conducted last year, with information provided by local brokers, revealed the 18%-20% vacancy rate. The area holds about 155 buildings with approximately 80-90 property owners. Wethington-McLean attributes the rise in vacancy to several factors, such as shoppers heading to places like Lynwood’s Plaza Mexico, a 650,000-square-foot mall designed after Monte Alban, an ancient city near Mexico City. It offers 250 stores, restaurants and even a carousel. “They have basically an entire little village targeting the Latino shopper,” she said. “You have municipalities that are targeting our basic shoppers that have been faithful to Broadway for the last 15 years.”

Jorge Corralejo, chairman and president of the Downtown-based Latino Business Chamber of Greater Los Angeles, sees Broadway’s vacancy issues more as a result of the economy than attempts by other cities to lure Latino customers. “With the high rate of unemployment people have less money in their pockets,” he said. “It’s not just about Broadway. This is happening in a lot of places.”

Steve Needleman, a longtime Downtown stakeholder who owns the Orpheum Theatre on Broadway, along with about 1 million square feet of property in the Central City, agrees that the vacancy is the result of the economy. But he also thinks increased competition is having an effect. Needleman noted that the competition is not just coming from other cities. He also pointed to Santee Alley, the Fashion District bargain hunter’s mecca. “There is so much competition to what Broadway used to be, the main shopping thoroughfare,” Needleman said. “There’s just tons of competition from everywhere.”

Time to Negotiate

Some landlords are starting to feel the pain.

Derrick Moore, vice president of brokerage services at real estate firm CB Richard Ellis, said that in the last two years Broadway rents have dropped drastically as a result of the vacancies. He said rates under $2 per square foot are now common. That’s a far cry from the time when some small spaces commanded $7 per square foot, he said. (In fact, a common claim from the 1990s was that Broadway street-front rents were comparable to those of street-level space in Beverly Hills.)

Wethington-McLean, along with other local retail brokers, also noted that rates of about $2 per square foot are now common on Broadway.

Moore noted that sometimes, rental negotiations between tenants and landlords are contentious. “I’m seeing tenants playing hardball,” he said. “It’s a terrible game of chicken where they are saying, ‘Hey, I need you to lower the rent or we are shutting the doors,’ and you come back and doors are actually being shut.”

Moore said landlords not willing to negotiate risk adding to the vacancies along the corridor. Peklar Pilavjian, who owns about 300,000 square feet of space at the St. Vincent Jewelry Center, which partially fronts Broadway, agrees. He said his occupancy rate has remained steady, but only because he is working with tenants who are suffering.

Pilavjian said rents at his property average about $3-$4 per square foot, and while Jewelry District tenants pay slightly more than other retail merchants on the street, it is still a far cry from the past. He said that more than a decade ago he could get up to $12 per square foot. Now, he said, all the old rules are out the window, even if someone signed a contract. “If you have a tenant that signed a five-year lease and that was two years ago and he can’t pay, what do you do?” Pilavjian asked. “You hold them to their contract and make them fly the coop? No, you don’t want to do that. You want to keep them there, so you rip up the old contract and you write a new one that reflects today’s conditions.”

The feeling is shared by Ramin Saghian, who owns about 26,000 square feet of retail space at 543-547 and 437 S. Broadway. He said his rents right now average about $2 per square foot, though the range is as low as 50 cents and up to $10 per square foot for small spaces that face the street. “There is always the question of demand and supply,” he said. “In the good times demand was high and supply was low and rents were higher. Now it’s the other way around.”

Huizar said Bringing Back Broadway is offering small businesses support such as workshops on how to utilize incentives and loans. He is also hoping to reactivate the upper floors of buildings throughout the corridor. “If we do this right, Broadway will be reactivated from storefront to rooftop,” he said.

Needleman sees Broadway as an ever-changing part of Downtown. The vacancies along the corridor, he said, will eventually be filled with new businesses, even if they are different than what has occupied the street in the past. “It’s the natural change of the area, I think that’s happening now,” he said. “If you take its 80-90 year history, it’s taken different paths, and that path will again change.”
     
     
  #8682  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 6:23 PM
RAlossi RAlossi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,573
As far as Broadway, I don't think you're seeing anything other than the downturn in the general economy at large. There's a lot of competition with Huntington Park etc, but I expect it will bounce back a bit when the economy improves.

However, another factor to toss into the mix... by the time the economy does turn around, there will be four to five new residential buildings completed on Broadway: Blackstone, Broadway/Spring Arcade, Metropolitan Lofts on 5th, hopefully the Jewelry Trades on 5th, and the Chester Williams will also be underway. That's in addition to the Judson, PanAmerican Lofts, Eastern Columbia, Orpheum, Grand Central Square, SB Grand and the Chapman that got completed this round, plus a dozen-plus on Spring and Hill.

There will probably be growing pains as far as retail mix. As much as I applaud the Bringing Back Broadway program, I really don't know where the funding will come from. LA seems to be locked into a severe recession, and there's been budget problems every year since I can remember. We shall see, I guess.

Now, if you can just get f*cking Delijani to do something with his historic buildings...
     
     
  #8683  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2010, 6:15 AM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
I remember hearing about this a few months back when it was in the proposal stage... I hope this is for real!

From the Beverly Hills Courier:


Transit money for Beverly Hills and Los Angeles advanced from Washington


Posted Saturday June 5, 2010 - 10.50am

The federal government has agreed in principal to advance money to Los Angeles-area transportation agencies to speed up construction of major projects like a Wilshire Boulevard subway connection from Koreatown to Westwood, a Gold Line extension, and connect light rail service to Los Angeles International Airport.

Sen. Barbara Boxer announced that the White House has agreed to loan Los Angeles 30 years' worth of transportation sales tax revenue over the next 10 years, which will significantly advance timetables to build major transit projects.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray Lahood announced approval of the so-called 30/10 plan in Washington Friday.

The decision is a major victory for Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who proposed the 30/10 funding scheme in order to get major projects like the Wilshire Boulevard subway built on a compressed schedule.

Although 40 percent of the money will go to rail and subway construction, street repaving and bus operations will get the remainder of the money.

The mayor's proposal will use half-penny-per-dollar sales tax revenue generated by the voter-approved Measure R as collateral for federal loans.

Thirty years' worth of Measure R receipts will be lent by Washington to Los Angeles.

Los Angeles has proposed a comprehensive, long-range transportation plan and the sustainable funding stream to accomplish it,' Transportation Secretary Roy Lahood told Boxer in a letter delivered late Friday.

Among major projects that will be built sooner as a result of the federal loans are:

-- Extending the Wilshire Boulevard subway from Western Avenue through the Miracle Mile, Beverly
Hills, and Century City to Westwood. The subway might also be extended west to Santa Monica, and a leg may be built from BeverlyHills to downtown Hollywood.

-- Building the "Downtown Connector' light rail tunnels under Figueroa
Street and the City Hall area to tiethe Blue and Expo lines into the Gold
Line near Union Station.


-- Extend the Green Line south towards Torrance, and north into Los Angeles International Airport.

-- Extend the southern branch of the Gold Line from East Los Angeles to either Whittier or along the Pomona (60) Freeway.


-- Build a new light rail line from the LAX area to Mid City, via Crenshaw Boulevard.

-- Build railroad track overpasses along the "Alameda East' corridor east of Los Angeles.

-- Widen sections of Interstate 5 in the Newhall Pass and between Orange County and Norwalk.

-- Build truck lanes along sections of the Golden State (5) Freeway over the Grapevine.

-- Expand capacity of the connected interchanges along the Harbor (110) Freeway at the Gardena (91) and San Diego (405) freeways near Carson. - CNS
__________________

Nice!!!
     
     
  #8684  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2010, 4:45 PM
pesto pesto is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,546
Comments re Bway: It seems that two trends are shaping DT. The down-market Latino shoppers and businessmen have no particular connection to Bway. They are just as happy to shop and do business in Lynwood or 20 other neighborhoods, some just a few blocks away, and are moving there. The new urbanites do have a connection to DT in general and Bway in particular: the like the location, urban amenities and architecture. The city is working WITH these forces to transition to a new set of residents, who presumably will want more middle class and “hipster” retail and dining, more parks and different entertainment. This is not so much retailers being driven out by higher rents as businesses losing their customers to the suburbs and landlords trying to figure out whether it makes sense to lower rents or take advantage of the recession to change over to a new model.

It seems that the city should do more or less what it is doing: facilitating the restoration of the streets and buildings; improving transportation DT and promoting development near transit stations outside of DT proper.
     
     
  #8685  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2010, 5:26 PM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 8,103
Regarding Broadway, in my opinion that article states the obvious that has been apparent for quite some time now. Just as I noticed that the vacancy rates have been rising in the Jewelry District, I also noticed the vacancies on Broadway. Some years ago I drove through downtown Huntington Park and noticed how vibrant it was, it made sense to me that there were businesses that catered to Latinos there because Huntington Park (as well as its neighboring cities) has a high Latino population. Obviously people will shop where it's more convenient for them; the parking seemed better in downtown Huntington Park as well. It's funny that generations later, the Latinos have gone the way of their white counterparts-- that since many of them are now in the suburbs (and have been for quite a while now), the businesses have also followed.
__________________
"I guess the only time people think about injustice is when it happens to them."

~ Charles Bukowski
     
     
  #8686  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2010, 6:10 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,289
Curbed LA has an interesting article of a big plan for USC housing, retail and classrooms that will take up the now existing University Village shopping center and Century and Cardinal Gardens apartments on Jefferson, just across the street from campus. Definitely better than what's there now, and far more urban.



Reading, Writing & More Red Brick: USC's Master Plan
Friday, June 4, 2010, by Dakota

We've seen the USC put up its School of Cinematic Arts, watched as its University Gateway project wound up construction, and even caught a glimpse of those new canopies at the Expo Line stop. But all that doesn't compare to USC's Master Plan, a four-year-in-the-making Elkus Manfredi-designed housing, retail, and entertainment development that will bring numerous new buildings to the campus. A draft environmental impact report was released two weeks ago, which outlined some of what's coming and going. All the facilities are "intended to meet the needs of the University population" through 2030. Ah, future students. After the jump, the list.

Read the rest of the story here: http://la.curbed.com/archives/2010/06/se...lefontsize_9px_textalign_centerclick.php
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #8687  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 1:40 AM
SD_Phil's Avatar
SD_Phil SD_Phil is offline
Heavy User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 2,704
Any of you here members of LA Conservancy? It's close enough to DT that I figured this was the right place to put this. Apologies if it's a bit off topic. I got this e-mail and was curious what y'all thought:

Quote:
Originally Posted by email
ACTION ALERT:
The end is near for the historic North Spring St. Bridge – this is probably your last chance to support its preservation

Public Hearing Wednesday, June 9
Please attend and/or write to show your support

What: L.A. City Council Transportation Committee Meeting
Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Time: Arrive by 2 p.m.
Location: Los Angeles City Hall, 200 N. Spring St., Room 1010, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Valid photo I.D. required for entry
Parking: Los Angeles Mall (enter from N. Los Angeles Street between Aliso and Temple)
City Hall map, directions, and parking info
Meeting agenda (This is Agenda Item #7)

As you know, the city’s Bureau of Engineering (BOE) is rushing to approve a project that would destroy the 1929 North Spring Street Viaduct, a Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument and one of the iconic bridges spanning the Los Angeles River. The project would nearly double the bridge’s width, strip away all historic ornamentation, and eliminate its eligibility as a local landmark.

After years of inaction, the BOE is now scrambling for quick approval of this project in order to qualify for $5 million in state funds.

The Conservancy has been pushing for an alternative that would retrofit the historic bridge and construct a separate pedestrian-cyclist bridge alongside it.

The Conservancy, the Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission, and residents from communities on both sides of the river are protesting the project. Yet our voices have been largely excluded from the planning process.

Thanks to everyone who wrote to the Board of Public Works or attended last week’s meeting. Unfortunately, the board approved the BOE’s project, bringing the bridge one step closer to destruction.

If you’ve ever wanted to speak out in support of the historic bridges of the Los Angeles River, now is the time. Please attend the City Council Transportation Committee meeting this Wednesday, June 9 to voice your opposition to the project.

This hearing is the public’s last opportunity to voice opposition to the project before the full City Council vote next week – and there is no guarantee that the City Council will allow public comment.

It will be critical to have a large turnout of supporters, so please attend if at all possible.

Below are some talking points that you can use if you wish to address the Transportation Committee. We encourage you to state your personal opinion in addition to, or instead of, these points. If you have any questions, please contact Mike Buhler, the Conservancy's director of advocacy, at [email protected] or (213) 430-4203.

If you absolutely cannot attend the meeting, please submit your comments by email by Tuesday afternoon, June 8. Please see contact information below the talking points. Many thanks for your support.

What's At Stake

After languishing for years, the proposed widening of the North Spring Street Viaduct is suddenly on the fast track for approval. Although environmental review for the project started nearly four years ago, the project is now on an extraordinarily accelerated timeline, with the BOE rushing to receive City Council approval by June 20 in order to keep state matching funds that are about to expire.

The BOE’s primary justification for the project is to upgrade the bridge to meet “major highway standards” and to add pedestrian-bicycle lanes in both directions. In addition to stripping all existing ornamentation, the scale and dimensions of the bridge will be dramatically altered by nearly doubling its current width from 50 feet to 90 feet. No new traffic lanes will be added.

Talking Points

1) You can’t put a price tag on our heritage. After years of inaction, the BOE is now scrambling for approval of its plan in order to qualify for $5 million in state funds. Certainly, our heritage is worth more than that!

2) The BOE has never seriously considered an alternative to ruining the bridge. The environmental impact report for the project does not consider a single alternative that would maintain the bridge’s status as a Historic-Cultural Monument. With several historic Los Angeles River bridges slated for widening or replacement, we need to take a stand now, for today and for future generations.

3) Building a separate pedestrian-cyclist bridge alongside the viaduct would meet the project goals, enhance safety, and provide greater connectivity. And the BOE is already doing just that with another historic bridge.
Pedestrian and bicycle access can be provided with a stand-alone bridge alongside the North Spring Street Viaduct. The BOE says it’s not possible, even though it plans to build a pedestrian bridge next to historic Riverside-Zoo Drive Bridge.

A pedestrian-cyclist bridge would provide greater safety for children, adults, and cyclists crossing the river by separating them from vehicular traffic.

The city recently acquired six acres on the Los Angeles River next to Downey Park in Lincoln Heights. The property is slated to become a park to serve the Lincoln Heights community. A stand-alone pedestrian-cyclist bridge could connect directly to this park, enhancing connectivity for communities in Lincoln Heights and William Mead Housing. For more information, visit the Albion Park Project website.
A picture of the bridge in question:


Source

Knowing little about the issue aside from what the LAC put out it seems like a perfectly fine bridge with some nice architectural details and history. A good scrubbing up would make it look all the better though would do nothing toward handling the congestion issues.

Thoughts?
     
     
  #8688  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 4:08 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,289
^ That's most certainly on topic.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #8689  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 9:13 AM
DJM19 DJM19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,543
The MO of the city should always be to do everything in its power to maintain these amazing bridges.

I dont even want to imagine what boring crap they would replace it with.
     
     
  #8690  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 2:38 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,289
I'd like to maintain the character of the bridge as well. I'd also be interested in seeing what the alternative plan is with the separate pedestrian and bike bridge. Like how far away from the current bridge they propose it to be.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #8691  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 5:25 PM
RAlossi RAlossi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,573
What's the problem with the existing bridge? I've never seen that much traffic on it, and I have traveled on it many, many times. The pedestrian/bike access issue, I can see. What about sharrows?
     
     
  #8692  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 6:04 PM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 8,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by SD_Phil View Post
A picture of the bridge in question:


Source

Knowing little about the issue aside from what the LAC put out it seems like a perfectly fine bridge with some nice architectural details and history. A good scrubbing up would make it look all the better though would do nothing toward handling the congestion issues.

Thoughts?
That's actually a picture of the North Broadway Bridge, which was built in 1911 and restored/seismically strengthened in 2000-- at least the bridge in the foreground is. The Spring Street Bridge is the one in the background.

I wasn't even aware there were problems with the Spring Street Bridge, I know of preservationists who want to save the 6th Street Bridge, which is actually slated for demolition and replacement.
__________________
"I guess the only time people think about injustice is when it happens to them."

~ Charles Bukowski
     
     
  #8693  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 7:00 PM
RuFFy's Avatar
RuFFy RuFFy is offline
FlyyyFALiiFe
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 364
     
     
  #8694  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 8:06 PM
DJM19 DJM19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by RuFFy View Post
Id almost rather they wait for the market to pick up. To have such a dramatic drop in floor numbers...
     
     
  #8695  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 11:42 PM
DTLA's Avatar
DTLA DTLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arcata, CA
Posts: 84
^^^ Maybe it's just me, but I took the bus past that parking lot almost everyday and it's an absolute blight on that section of the neighborhood, so I would be fine with any building that would replace it, even if it it's 42 floors shorter than originally planned.
     
     
  #8696  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 11:59 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,289
^ And activates the street. Street fronting retail is a must for a neighborhood that should be reaching critical mass with 1010 Wilshire, 1100 Wilshire, and several other 6 story apartment/condo buildings within 2 blocks in any direction.

On another note, it looks like this one slipped under everyone's radar. Except CurbedLA's. Meurelo/Maddox has applied for permits for a 21-story apartment tower on the NW corner of 11th and Grand, directly across the street from Elleven and the long-stalled and most likely dead Glass Tower. And they've torn up the asphalt on the lot. Full story here:

http://la.curbed.com/archives/2010/06/ho...putting_up_a_tower_at_11th_and_grand.php
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
     
     
  #8697  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 12:31 AM
RAlossi RAlossi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,573
Re: 1027, yes, the project is 42 stories shorter than originally planned. However, there are only 50 fewer units than the 48-story tower. That means MUCH lower construction costs, which means more affordable to middle-class buyers. HOAs will also be a lot less than on a huge tower.

In the end, I actually think this is a positive development in the projcet. Those parking lots need to get filled up. Six stories of mixed use is a good height. I just hope it can get done soon.
     
     
  #8698  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 1:00 AM
Hubris Hubris is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 55
I'd meant to ask about that dirt lot north of Starbucks in South Park. I noticed it on Sunday during the Lakers game.

Just about every joint at LA Live was full on Sunday. The notable exception was The Farm, which doesn't seem to have any TVs. Big Wang's on Grand was also packed. But Rivera (not sure what time it opened), BottleRock, Corkbar, and Arashi Sushi were all a bit light on patrons.
     
     
  #8699  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 4:14 AM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,596
19 total units on 21 floors? That sounds unusual.
     
     
  #8700  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 6:30 AM
DJM19 DJM19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,543
As long as it doesnt look like this:



Ill keep my mouth shut about it.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:28 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.