HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7621  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2010, 9:12 PM
ATXboom ATXboom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,832
Participate Tomorrow

Downtown district town hall meeting Wednesday
Austin Business Journal



The city of Austin is hosting a town hall meeting Wednesday to discuss proposed Core and Waterfront District and the Northwest District plans.

The gathering begins June 2 at 5:30 p.m. at 625 E. 10th St. in the Waller Creek Center, and will be attended by city officials and Austin Downtown Commission members. The group hopes to recommend plans to council that set goals for each area, while preserving its historic landscape, identifying its best use, placement, transportation and other necessary upgrades.

The 97-block Core and Waterfront District encompasses an area recognized as Austin's original town site from Lady Bird Lake on the south to 11th Street at the foot of the Capitol Square on the north, and from Shoal Creek and Nueces Street on the west to Red River Street and the Convention Center on the east.



Read more: Downtown district town hall meeting Wednesday - Austin Business Journal
http://austin.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2010/05/31/daily3.html

Last edited by KevinFromTexas; Jun 2, 2010 at 6:53 AM. Reason: Added link to article.
     
     
  #7622  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2010, 7:01 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin<--->Birmingham<--->Atlanta
Posts: 55,831
It looks like they're starting work on the South Austin Hospital expansion. This will add 3 floors to the original building, for a total of 7. There's a large yellow crane up at the site now. I'm not sure if the crane is for the hospital tower itself, or the parking garage which was supposed to get two more levels. I'm excited about the garage getting two more floors. There's going to be some really nice views up there. That would make the garage 10 levels.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
     
     
  #7623  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 5:41 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin<--->Birmingham<--->Atlanta
Posts: 55,831
Wow. If this happens, it would be huge for the southern half of the metro. It would be South Austin's version of The Domain.

http://www.statesman.com/business/projec...nd-more-to-726453.html?srcTrk=RTR_504016
Quote:
Project could bring apartments, offices and more to southern Travis County
Demand for large-scale development along I-35 corridor is there, investment fund that bought land says, but financing may be slower.

By Shonda Novak

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Updated: 10:34 p.m. Thursday, June 3, 2010
Published: 10:26 p.m. Thursday, June 3, 2010

A Dallas-based land investment fund is proposing an ambitious mixed-use project on 599 acres in southern Travis County. Estancia Hill Country could become the largest new planned development proposed for the South Interstate 35 corridor.

Over the next 10 to 15 years, the Stratford Co. envisions nearly 10 million square feet of development at Estancia, including a 1.9-million-square-foot corporate office campus; another 1.5 million square feet of general office space; a hospital; a hotel; nearly 1,600 apartments and townhomes; and almost 277,000 square feet of shops and restaurants.

Steve Sanders, a consultant for Stratford, said 130 acres would be set aside for parks, open space and trails.

...
PDF file of the proposal.

http://alt.coxnewsweb.com/statesman/pdf/06/060410_develop.pdf



THE STRATFORD COMPANY . O'BRIEN . 505 DESIGN . LANDDESIGN
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
     
     
  #7624  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 5:53 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,807
Will not be successful. Too far into the middle of nowhere.
     
     
  #7625  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 11:31 AM
gardensoul gardensoul is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 123
That ain't the middle of nowhere...

From the Statesman... "The land is in southern Travis County at Interstate 35 and the Texas 45 Southeast toll road."
     
     
  #7626  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 12:35 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,830
How hideous
     
     
  #7627  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 1:50 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by gardensoul View Post
From the Statesman... "The land is in southern Travis County at Interstate 35 and the Texas 45 Southeast toll road."
Glad to see my former hometowns transformation from rural city to suburban hell is almost complete.
     
     
  #7628  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 4:38 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,848
I agree, its too spread out and not dense enough. I would like to see double the height of those buildings at least and not as spread out. Lets make that ammount of density that they hope for in half the space and dedicate the rest for natural open areas...
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
     
     
  #7629  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 5:40 PM
austin242 austin242 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 591
This would ruin south austin I don't want it no no no no no no make it go away make it away.
     
     
  #7630  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 7:06 PM
hookem hookem is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,565
What else would you expect to see right off I-35 ten miles outside of downtown? Would you rather have another suburban sprawl cul-de-sac style subdivision? Big Box? Or a typical, unwalkable strip mall?

What I see here is dense housing, height of 4+ stories, and no surface parking lots. Those things would be darn good for this area. Whether it gets off the ground or not is another matter... but ya'll are being unnecessarily harsh on this.
     
     
  #7631  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 9:15 PM
jowens jowens is offline
on the south side
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 601
I'm kinda with Hookem on this one. Compared to the sprawl of Southpark Meadows, this project is much more palatable. However, I don't imagine this will ever happen.
__________________
Southwest Austin
     
     
  #7632  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 9:33 PM
Nickelplate's Avatar
Nickelplate Nickelplate is offline
De Lurk Squad
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 298
Looking at the map provided by AAS this development would interfere with a possible future connection of 45 southeast and 45 southwest. I would rather have the connected tollroad than this development personnally.
     
     
  #7633  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 10:12 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickelplate View Post
Looking at the map provided by AAS this development would interfere with a possible future connection of 45 southeast and 45 southwest. I would rather have the connected tollroad than this development personnally.
Something similar happened with the portion of SH45 that runs through Round Rock. The big La Frontera development was built knowing that the toll road was coming. One of the apartment complexes in the development was cut off from the rest of the development when the Toll Road was built.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
     
     
  #7634  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2010, 11:24 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,807
Gardensoul: just because it is only a certain distance from downtown does NOT mean that it isn't in the middle of nowhere. It is in the middle of nowhere.
     
     
  #7635  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 2:28 AM
jowens jowens is offline
on the south side
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Austin
Posts: 601
It's not in the middle of nowhere!! Its at the magical junction of Southwest Onion Creek, Southeast San Leanna, West Creedmore and North Buda!!
__________________
Southwest Austin
     
     
  #7636  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 7:16 AM
austin242 austin242 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 591
Yah hookem is right its better than South Park. Gosh I wish that South Park Meadows would have been Like the Domain Instead of what it is. Hey if that land Is going to be developed I changed my mind Im glad its this.
     
     
  #7637  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 7:27 AM
austin242 austin242 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 591
I wonder If the Whole F1 deal could lead to Austin ending up with an Olympic Games.
     
     
  #7638  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 7:43 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,807
Yeah... right. Olympics? No. This city could not handle that.
     
     
  #7639  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 3:08 PM
WAustinResident's Avatar
WAustinResident WAustinResident is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 144
The only way we get an olympics is if Texas as a w,hole gets one,
     
     
  #7640  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 3:50 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickelplate View Post
Looking at the map provided by AAS this development would interfere with a possible future connection of 45 southeast and 45 southwest. I would rather have the connected tollroad than this development personnally.
I wouldn't worry too much about that. The recently approved, but still unfunded, 45 SW would benefit the developer so much, they would probably gladly adjust the south edge of the project to accommodate. Besides, the property still needs to go through annexation and zoning, and dedication of ROW will probably be a condition of approval. It might even prompt the developer to increase the height of the remaining office buildings and change some of the surface parking to structured parking.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.