HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2121  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 1:36 AM
Boiseguy's Avatar
Boiseguy Boiseguy is offline
Always running Late
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: BOISE
Posts: 1,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCdude View Post
Does anyone know the tax rates of Salt Lake City and unincorporated townships such as Millcreek and Magna? I'm interested in seeing the difference, if there is one.
I found this about property tax rates

http://www.treasurer.slco.org/html/utahPropertyTaxes/SLCoTaxRates.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2122  
Old Posted May 28, 2010, 1:43 AM
TonyAnderson's Avatar
TonyAnderson TonyAnderson is offline
.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Salt Lake City | Utah
Posts: 2,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLCdude View Post
If Salt Lake wants to annex unincorporated land it looks like the only options are Magna, Millcreek, and maybe emigration canyon and kearns. Excuse me if i get some facts wrong, but Millcreek already pays for county services such as the Salt Lake County Police, right? so how is it different to pay for city services county services?

Also, why is there such rapid growth in St. George and where will growth happen? It looks to me like there's a lot of steep landscape within the city boundaries that would prevent outward growth.
There's a lot of land it has annexed recently, which aided in their huge growth predictions. There's many mesas there, but open land in between them. Check this out on Google Maps

Notice all the undeveloped farmland to the East? That's mostly, if not all, of St. George's.
__________________
Instagram | Twitter

www.UtahProjects.info
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2123  
Old Posted May 29, 2010, 2:28 AM
SLCdude's Avatar
SLCdude SLCdude is offline
Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boiseguy View Post
Thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyAnderson View Post
There's a lot of land it has annexed recently, which aided in their huge growth predictions. There's many mesas there, but open land in between them. Check this out on Google Maps

Notice all the undeveloped farmland to the East? That's mostly, if not all, of St. George's.
I see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2124  
Old Posted May 30, 2010, 12:54 AM
Reachforthesky Reachforthesky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 207
After talking to some people from Boise, Its my understanding that Boise has annexed land in the past decade. Which has also contributed to their population growing the way it has.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2125  
Old Posted May 30, 2010, 5:21 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reachforthesky View Post
After talking to some people from Boise, Its my understanding that Boise has annexed land in the past decade. Which has also contributed to their population growing the way it has.

That's what Salt Lake City needs to do.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2126  
Old Posted May 31, 2010, 12:31 AM
TonyAnderson's Avatar
TonyAnderson TonyAnderson is offline
.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Salt Lake City | Utah
Posts: 2,788
I think the difference is the Boise surrounding has more open space to develop. Many times annexing is just a developer who buys up some land and asks a city to annex it, before they even build.
__________________
Instagram | Twitter

www.UtahProjects.info
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2127  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2010, 10:36 PM
SLCdude's Avatar
SLCdude SLCdude is offline
Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 836
A new diverging diamond interchange, or "DDI", is coming to American fork.
http://www.udot.utah.gov/pioneer/ddi.php?utm_source=FB&utm_medium=Sketch&utm_campaign=DDI2010
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2128  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2010, 10:51 PM
SLCdude's Avatar
SLCdude SLCdude is offline
Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 836
Also, I recently read in an article from 2008 that there was a law (HB40) in place that would protect Millcreek's borders from annexation until sometime in the year 2010. Does anyone know if this law has expired, and if so has Millcreek decided to remain a township?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2129  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2010, 11:54 PM
John Martin's Avatar
John Martin John Martin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,195
I'll be interested to see that interchange when it's finished. When described, it sounds pretty weird, but it looks pretty simple.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2130  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 10:38 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,505
Snowbird proposing second tram, expansion into back side gulch - Recreation » The resort would build a new tram if feds approve its planned expansion.

By Mike Gorrell
The Salt Lake Tribune


Snowbird is seeking U.S. Forest Service approval to expand into another canyon off its back side -- Mary Ellen Gulch, adjacent to Mineral Basin.

Providing access: A new tram would run from Hidden Peak to the West Twin of American Fork Twin Peaks.



Tribune file photo by Photo by Francisco Kjolseth Maine tourists Katie King and Trevor McVey get a majestic view from Snowbird's Hidden Peak. Even broader views could be had from the West Twin of American Fork Twin Peaks, which is 500 feet higher, if Snowbird receives Forest Service approval of its expansion proposal. (Francisco Kjolseth)

"That will be a pretty dramatic ride," Snowbird Ski & Summer Resort President Bob Bonar said of vistas from the tram, which would rise from 11,000 feet to the West Twin's 11,489-foot summit.

Bonar submitted a proposed master plan amendment last month to the Forest Service's Salt Lake Ranger District.

District Ranger Cathy Kahlow said her staff is evaluating the proposal and will decide by late summer or early fall whether to accept it. If accepted, she noted,

expansion portions will require a full-blown environmental impact statement and changes to the Wasatch-Cache-Uinta National Forest plan.



That process seems certain to spark considerable interest, from the protectors of Salt Lake City's watershed to the conservationists who support Save Our Canyons, which is generally opposed to resort expansion in the Wasatch.

"It's another ski area expansion where resorts take public lands and give up nothing in return," said Save Our Canyons Executive Director Carl Fisher.

The envisioned expansion would add 780 acres of Mary Ellen Gulch into the resort's boundary. Bonar said Snowbird owns about half of the land already through the acquisition of mining claims; the Forest Service manages the rest.

Under U.S. Rep. Jim Matheson's Wasatch Mountain wilderness proposal, Snowbird could acquire even more lands in Mary Ellen Gulch in exchange for resort-owned parcels on the north side of Little Cottonwood Canyon, on mounts Flagstaff and Superior.

The top of the gulch offers "more of the same great powder terrain Snowbird already has for advanced skiers and boarders," said Bonar.


Tribune file photo by Chris Detrick In this file photo, Rex and Opal Fielder of West Memphis, Ark. walk up a slope toward Snowbird's Tram on Hidden Peak, which the resort's new master plan proposal describes as the jumping off point for a new tram to the top of American Fork Twins Peak and access to 780 acres of skiing on the resort's back side.

Mary Ellen Gulch's terrain also seems well-suited to spring skiing, important to a resort whose last day this season is June 20, said Snowbird spokesman Jared Ishkanian. It also is not used extensively by backcountry skiers, minimizing a flash point of controversy over use of the Wasatch Range, he added.

From the bottom of Mary Ellen, a proposed lift would carry skiers and boarders to "Sinners Pass" ridge, where they can descend into Mineral Basin. Snowbird wants to lengthen the Mineral Basin Express chairlift by about 50 percent to pick up these riders and to add about 1,000 feet of intermediate-to-beginner slope at the bottom.

The extended Express lift would take riders back to Hidden Peak, completing a loop.


Snow blankets the hillside and a chairlift at Snowbird Ski and Summer Resort, which received 4 inches at the base and 8 inches atop Hidden Peak on Monday. Photo credits should go to Matt Crawley/Snowbird Ski & Summer Resort.

While experts will benefit from that expansion, Snowbird also wants to improve its opportunities for beginners. It is asking to put a lift up a gently sloping hill on the north side of Little Cottonwood Creek, directly across from Baby Thunder Lift, on the resort's down-canyon end. A bridge over the creek would connect the new beginner area to Baby Thunder.

Nine of Snowbird's 13 proposals address projects currently in the resort, such as adding night skiing along Gadzoom lift, adding onto the Mid-Gad and Gad Valley day lodges and developing new bike trails and service roads.

Save Our Canyons' Fisher was disappointed Snowbird submitted the plan now, while wilderness bill talks are in the early stages. "This master plan amendment is not really holding up the end of the deal we thought we had worked on with Snowbird," he said.

Jeff Niermeyer, Salt Lake City's director of public utilities, said he was pleased that most new activity is proposed for outside of the Salt Lake Valley's prime watershed. But he pledged to watch the proposal closely to ensure water quality is not affected.

Longtime backcountry skier Bob Athey said the main reason he doesn't ski Mary Ellen Gulch is that access was cut off by Snowbird's development of Mineral Basin. "Snowbird has no purpose and no need," he said. "Ask Bob Bonar, 'When is enough enough?' "

[email protected]

What is Snowbird's 10-year master plan?
Boundary expansion in Mary Ellen Gulch and Mineral Basin

A tram from Hidden Peak to the West Twin of American Fork Twin Peaks

A new chairlift in Mary Ellen Gulch, extension of the Mineral Basin Lift

Development of a beginner skier area, with a lift, below resort's lower entry

Creation of more mountain biking trails

Installation of night skiing along Gadzoom Lift

Making Gad II a high-speed detachable lift

Renovations to the Mid-Gad and Gad Valley day lodges, General Gritts store

Expansion of lift maintenance, disabled skiing offices

Addition of yurt to Baby Thunder area

Source » Snowbird Ski & Summer Resort
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2131  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 10:46 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,505

Looking South from Am. Fork's Twin Peaks vantage.


Snowbasin also seeking to expand -- for lodging
-
Ski » Resort plans a retail center, town homes, among other developments.

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=118277&page=30

.

Last edited by delts145; Jun 5, 2010 at 11:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2132  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2010, 11:40 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,505
Main Street, Park City - Al fresco all over: more Main Street restaurants plan dining decks
Eateries predict the option to eat outdoors will be popular

http://www.parkrecord.com/ci_15229313

More restaurants indicated this week they want to build sidewalk dining decks on Main Street, a trend that could further reshape the look of the street as the eateries bid to attract customers with an option for al fresco dining.

City Hall said there had not been additional applications filed by midmorning Friday, but restaurateurs said in interviews they were preparing plans for their own decks.

They would follow after the debut of the first two, built on the street outside the Stephen McComb-owned Cisero's and Bistro 412. McComb anticipated opening the Bistro 412 deck for lunch on Friday while the Cisero's deck was slated for a dinnertime opening on Friday...


.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2133  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2010, 5:59 AM
SLCdude's Avatar
SLCdude SLCdude is offline
Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 836
In case you haven't heard yet, there's been a flood in Murray.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=11071017
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2134  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 1:31 AM
nickfreakingrules's Avatar
nickfreakingrules nickfreakingrules is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: S.L.U.T. (the good part)
Posts: 41
One thing I always liked about the E Center was that it wasn't named after a company... At least its still a better name than the Energy Solutions Arena

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=11095393
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2135  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 1:50 AM
John Martin's Avatar
John Martin John Martin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,195
Interesting. I've always liked Maverik and I'm much happier that this is being named after a local company rather than a national one.

It is kind of surprising though. Has anyone else ever noticed this?:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2136  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 3:53 AM
TonyAnderson's Avatar
TonyAnderson TonyAnderson is offline
.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Salt Lake City | Utah
Posts: 2,788
Yeah I don't mind naming rights. It helps keep the arenas alive, and many times the funds to build them. At least it's not something like 'Quicken Loans arena'.
__________________
Instagram | Twitter

www.UtahProjects.info
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2137  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 6:29 AM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Why does it say "United" on top of the E-Center? As far as I can remember it's always been the E-Center.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976

Last edited by SLC Projects; Jun 9, 2010 at 5:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2138  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 2:27 PM
cololi cololi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
United leased the rooftop for signage, but they did not want to pay for the naming rights.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2139  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 2:36 PM
arkhitektor arkhitektor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearfield, UT
Posts: 1,784
Lots of flights approaching SLC fly over the area, so they just used it as a giant billboard.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2140  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2010, 5:17 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by cololi View Post
United leased the rooftop for signage, but they did not want to pay for the naming rights.

Oh wow, I didn't know companies can buy the naming rights for just the roof top of buildings and still not sign the naming rights for the rest of the building. I always thought the naming rights were for the whole building, roof top and all.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.