^ He must have really long arms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by srperrycgy
Knew you'd ask that.  Between these two, Burrows was less of a douche than Connelly (think Plan-It). Douchiness (sp?) is hardly a quantifiable measure, but it works for me. 
|
Aside from the infamous $12000 U of C course Burrows tried to charge to his expense account, he also did a pretty poor job of representing his ward. He opposed the application for a Day Care in the Aspen area (the area is absolutely starving for child care options), and he also dropped the ball on a number of meat and potatoe issues in the Ward. For example, just a couple of weeks before the election, there were people out canvassing door to door with a petition to get a four way stop installed at 85th and Wentworth Drive because Burrows had not been able to make anything happen after two years of neighbourhood complaints about the issue. (Ironically, the stop sign went up hastily just days before the election.) The one time I ever tried contacting him about a (different) neighbourhood issue, he totally blew me off.
Connelly I'll agree seems like a bit of a douche, but I get monthly email bulletins from his office about neighbourhood issues and I get the impression that he is actually concerned about Ward issues. And you have to admit, Ward 6 has received a lot of goodies during his term... not that I credit him with that, but you can't fault him either.