HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #421  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 7:09 PM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
i'm pretty sure that the current vag site is owned by the province and on long term lease to the city. also - the courthouse needs more space? what a shock. how about they demolish part or all of the north block of the existing structure and build something proper, meanwhile carving out a proper square on the south side of robson street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #422  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 8:38 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
This link provides a look at a modern building in stockholm which might be comparable in size to a new VAG. Most noticeable is the combination of design texture, yet clean lines. It looks rather elegant, and although some will sneer at it, it could be a drop of inspiration for a new VAG

http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbvie...635-modern-architecture-in-stockholm.jpg

It's not a big photo, but it gives an idea of blending modernity with taste, IMHO
You have my support, but we'll have to forget it. I can almost guarantee we'll get the typical PC mishmash with angst-ridden nods to every group that's ever felt marginalized, with an aboriginal overtone sure to offend the very groups meant to be deferential to.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #423  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 8:56 PM
thenorthofvan thenorthofvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thum...-stockholm.jpg

Try this, from my posting above. It only shows a part of a building in Stockholm, but you can get the general idea. It's crisp and clean, if you know what I mean. But, as with everything, some will take to it, some won't.
YIKES! This link doesn't work. Go to Post 414 if you're interested and click on the link.
i can hardly tell whats going on in that photo, let alone judge a building from how little that photo actually shows.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #424  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 9:18 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
To reply to a previous post regarding use as a Native Art Gallery, my argument is mainly that there already is a museum dedicated to the use, two would be too many. I'd rather see the Anthropology museum expanded to include more native art works than to have another museum/gallery of similar use.

And the National Portrait Gallery decision hasn't been made. There is still a need for replacement. The gallery's works have been shuffled into the Library and Archives Canada, there isn't a National Portrait Gallery in the physical sense. The government has just refused to make a real decision. The facilities of L&A Canada are not up to the task of appropriately displaying the 20,000 piece collection. There is still a chance this issue will be brought up again and we can have a real solution.

With regards to the Museum of Vancouver, I think that would be a fantastic fit, UBC/Courts, much less so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #425  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 9:33 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047
right on

Quote:
Originally Posted by awvan View Post
To reply to a previous post regarding use as a Native Art Gallery, my argument is mainly that there already is a museum dedicated to the use, two would be too many. I'd rather see the Anthropology museum expanded to include more native art works than to have another museum/gallery of similar use.

And the National Portrait Gallery decision hasn't been made. There is still a need for replacement. The gallery's works have been shuffled into the Library and Archives Canada, there isn't a National Portrait Gallery in the physical sense. The government has just refused to make a real decision. The facilities of L&A Canada are not up to the task of appropriately displaying the 20,000 piece collection. There is still a chance this issue will be brought up again and we can have a real solution.

With regards to the Museum of Vancouver, I think that would be a fantastic fit, UBC/Courts, much less so.

I'm all for the Museum of Vancouver moving in there. I looked at their website, and they have some amazing stuff: some serious and war-related, of course, some idiosyncratic, some beautiful, some like a walk down memory lane: the neon sign collection, for example, plus a respectable collection of First Nation art, material relating to early Vancouverites who made a contribution to our city like Pauline Johnson, and hundreds of fascinating photographs of the city and the ships that used to call here. No one would feel marginalized, and there would be something suitable to everybody's tastes. It would not only be a tribute to Vancouver by housing in our finest heritage building, but people would visit Vancouver, and leave talking about the fascinating museum and beautiful building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #426  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 9:46 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
We already have a major First Nations museum at UBC and it recently underwent a major $55-million expansion. There's no need for another native museum....it may not be in Downtown, but it doesn't mean we can't have build other types of museums in the city core.

A new and expanded old courthouse/current VAG for the Museum of Vancouver would be by far my first choice. Second to that would be the National Portrait Gallery of Canada. Cultural institutions belong in this space, not a university and especially not a courthouse. Ideally, I'd have UBC vacate their Robson Square space and move somewhere else so that the MOV can use it.



Meanwhile, the space centre will be moved to be part of a substantially expanded and upgraded Science World (in its current configuration, it only appeases kids - not everyone of all ages). The space that was slated for the art gallery at False Creek would be used for the new Maritime Museum and a performing arts centre. I think the current provincial government would be more inclined to properly fund the new Maritime Museum if it were to be located in Downtown.

As for the old museum building at Vanier Park, I'm not sure what you would do with it...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #427  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 10:52 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
This link provides a look at a modern building in stockholm which might be comparable in size to a new VAG. Most noticeable is the combination of design texture, yet clean lines. It looks rather elegant, and although some will sneer at it, it could be a drop of inspiration for a new VAG

http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbvie...635-modern-architecture-in-stockholm.jpg

It's not a big photo, but it gives an idea of blending modernity with taste, IMHO
It look like a bland office park building along Number 6 road.
we can do better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #428  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 11:08 PM
delboy delboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 653
all good comments - as for the proposed site for VAG being too isolated, if people can find the museum of anthropology, they can find the new VAG. I think we're forgetting how tiny the downtown core is here.

Vancouver really needs to up the cultural image of the city and needs great institutions along the lines of a great VAG and a museum, a proper one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #429  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 11:14 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
We already have a major First Nations museum at UBC and it recently underwent a major $55-million expansion. There's no need for another native museum....it may not be in Downtown, but it doesn't mean we can't have build other types of museums in the city core.

A new and expanded old courthouse/current VAG for the Museum of Vancouver would be by far my first choice. Second to that would be the National Portrait Gallery of Canada. Cultural institutions belong in this space, not a university and especially not a courthouse. Ideally, I'd have UBC vacate their Robson Square space and move somewhere else so that the MOV can use it.



Meanwhile, the space centre will be moved to be part of a substantially expanded and upgraded Science World (in its current configuration, it only appeases kids - not everyone of all ages). The space that was slated for the art gallery at False Creek would be used for the new Maritime Museum and a performing arts centre. I think the current provincial government would be more inclined to properly fund the new Maritime Museum if it were to be located in Downtown.

As for the old museum building at Vanier Park, I'm not sure what you would do with it...
If you're clearing out the building at Vanier Park that houses the Museum of Vancouver and the MacMillan Space Centre, perhaps it can be re-used as a new native museum? isn't he roof supposed to represent a salish hat?


Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_of_Vancouver


It may be appropriate since a slice of this land is still indian reserve (and I think it is part of a land claim as part of a treaty settlement)

Don't forget that the locals in Kits have been dreaming for decades of bulldozing this building in order to eliminate the crowds of tourists and tour buses that are infiltrating their enclave. if the building becomes empty, they will use that as an excuse to knock it over.

Last edited by jsbertram; May 1, 2010 at 1:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #430  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 11:27 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
+
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,575
Toronto has seen Liebeskind craft one of the greatest art galleries in modern times.

"Image removed due to lack of link"



There are perhaps only a dozen or so architecture firms out there which possess the talent to do the proposed art gallery justice, Liebeskind's studio is one of them.

"Image removed due to lack of link"

Last edited by jlousa; May 1, 2010 at 3:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #431  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 11:40 PM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,578
The Centennial Museum Building (MOV) is amazing. It's a great piece of Vancouver architecture and built for Canada's Centennial. I would hate to see it not be used by an amazing public institution. And yes, it is supposed to resemble a basket weave hat or basket from the First Nations.

I'm not sure which is bigger though? The MOV might have more exhibit space at it's current location than the VAG has.

It might be more interesting to split the museum in 2 if the VAG relocates. Make the Old Courthouse more about BC history, shown through art and pictures and models and historical artifacts, like a museum of history. The MOV has a rather large collection of historical artifacts, that I think would be well suited for display in a historical building right downtown.

While the current MOV location becomes more like a museum of Civilization, combining more recent aspects of BC and Canadian culture and industry. It can bring together First Nations history with the history of Colonization. I can sort of see something like they have in the Royal BC Museum with an emphasis on 3 dimensional displays (dioramas) and High Tech interactive displays. The Space center and a more interactive museum would be a great destination for families who are a little too grown up for Science World but a bit too immature to enjoy the finner points of BC history and art.

The old Courthouse would be more for tourists and locals to learn about our (actually very interesting) history, and the MOV location would be more about what we're like as a multi-faceted culture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #432  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 11:41 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
If you're clearing out the building at Vanier Park that houses the Museum of Vancouver and the MacMillan Space Centre, perhaps it can be re-used as a new native museum? isn't he roof supposed to represent a salish hat?



It may be appropriate since a slice of this land is still indian reserve (and I think it is part of a land claim as part of a treaty settlement)

Don't forget that the locals in Kits have been dreaming for decades of bulldozing this building in order to eliminate the crowds of tourists and tour buses that are infiltrating their enclave. if the building becomes empty, they will use that as an excuse to knock it over.
Agreed - it would make a good location for a native museum - esp. with the roof design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #433  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 11:49 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,791
i must of been to museum of vancouver several dozen times without knowing it was a museum.

i just called it "the place to watch laser light shows with the shiny crab out front"

then again.... who actually visits this place sober? that would be just weird. pink floyd and led zeppelin forever!
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #434  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2010, 11:50 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Agreed - it would make a good location for a native museum - esp. with the roof design.
it looks like a salish head wear... or hat...
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #435  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 12:23 AM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hed Kandi View Post
Toronto has seen Liebeskind craft one of the greatest art galleries in modern times.





There are perhaps only a dozen or so architecture firms out there which possess the talent to do the proposed art gallery justice, Liebeskind's studio is one of them.

...
Isn't the Royal Ontario Museum project by Daniel Libeskind already leaking? There are rumours that the Gehry-designed Art Gallery of Ontario is also leaking.

That'll have to be something to consider since we live in a RAIN FOREST.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #436  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 12:52 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
All photos must be accompanied by links to the source, otherwise they will be removed and the posters warned/disciplined.

Come on guys the rules aren't that hard to follow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #437  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 3:04 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I hate Libeskind's work and think the ROM expansion is one of the worst piece of crap I've ever seen.
Let's throw a bag of quartz crystals on the floor and spray paint it silver! It looks like a nice building collapsed.

In 30-50 years, all that junk will be hated and there will be calls from far and wide to have it torn down, just like all that brutalist garbage that was supposed to be revolutionary and "recalibrate aesthetics for ever".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #438  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 3:11 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPhil View Post
The Centennial Museum Building (MOV) is amazing. It's a great piece of Vancouver architecture and built for Canada's Centennial. I would hate to see it not be used by an amazing public institution. And yes, it is supposed to resemble a basket weave hat or basket from the First Nations.

I'm not sure which is bigger though? The MOV might have more exhibit space at it's current location than the VAG has.

It might be more interesting to split the museum in 2 if the VAG relocates. Make the Old Courthouse more about BC history, shown through art and pictures and models and historical artifacts, like a museum of history. The MOV has a rather large collection of historical artifacts, that I think would be well suited for display in a historical building right downtown.

While the current MOV location becomes more like a museum of Civilization, combining more recent aspects of BC and Canadian culture and industry. It can bring together First Nations history with the history of Colonization. I can sort of see something like they have in the Royal BC Museum with an emphasis on 3 dimensional displays (dioramas) and High Tech interactive displays. The Space center and a more interactive museum would be a great destination for families who are a little too grown up for Science World but a bit too immature to enjoy the finner points of BC history and art.

The old Courthouse would be more for tourists and locals to learn about our (actually very interesting) history, and the MOV location would be more about what we're like as a multi-faceted culture.
I like the idea of having the MOV having two facilities, one at Vanier and the other one at the old courthouse in Downtown. I think it would work quite well, and if the space centre moves out to Science World the MOV can also take up that space.

But I am certainly opposed to another First Nations museum taking up that space. The MOA at UBC is massive, and it's already the established First Nations museum. There's no need nor demand for a second one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #439  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 6:16 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,068
are you anti-native?
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #440  
Old Posted May 1, 2010, 8:39 AM
invisibleairwaves's Avatar
invisibleairwaves invisibleairwaves is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
I hate Libeskind's work and think the ROM expansion is one of the worst piece of crap I've ever seen.
Let's throw a bag of quartz crystals on the floor and spray paint it silver! It looks like a nice building collapsed.

In 30-50 years, all that junk will be hated and there will be calls from far and wide to have it torn down, just like all that brutalist garbage that was supposed to be revolutionary and "recalibrate aesthetics for ever".
I agree completely. I don't understand what anyone sees in it...it's monstrous, offensive, and doesn't bother to pay the slightest bit of respect to the architecture surrounding it, or even the very building it's tacked on to. And apparently the ROM has been having all kinds of trouble actually using the awkward space. Simply hideous. I'd rather see a Standard Issue Green Glass Tower™ over that pile of fugly. Daring does not necessarily mean good, even in a city as architecturally bland as Vancouver.
__________________
Reticulating Splines
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:47 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.