Quote:
Originally Posted by awvan
To reply to a previous post regarding use as a Native Art Gallery, my argument is mainly that there already is a museum dedicated to the use, two would be too many. I'd rather see the Anthropology museum expanded to include more native art works than to have another museum/gallery of similar use.
And the National Portrait Gallery decision hasn't been made. There is still a need for replacement. The gallery's works have been shuffled into the Library and Archives Canada, there isn't a National Portrait Gallery in the physical sense. The government has just refused to make a real decision. The facilities of L&A Canada are not up to the task of appropriately displaying the 20,000 piece collection. There is still a chance this issue will be brought up again and we can have a real solution.
With regards to the Museum of Vancouver, I think that would be a fantastic fit, UBC/Courts, much less so.
|
I'm all for the Museum of Vancouver moving in there. I looked at their website, and they have some amazing stuff: some serious and war-related, of course, some idiosyncratic, some beautiful, some like a walk down memory lane: the neon sign collection, for example, plus a respectable collection of First Nation art, material relating to early Vancouverites who made a contribution to our city like Pauline Johnson, and hundreds of fascinating photographs of the city and the ships that used to call here. No one would feel marginalized, and there would be something suitable to everybody's tastes. It would not only be a tribute to Vancouver by housing in our finest heritage building, but people would visit Vancouver, and leave talking about the fascinating museum and beautiful building.