HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #581  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2010, 6:19 PM
CoryHolmes CoryHolmes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
...but they meet the street so poorly ...
How do you define "so poorly"? The renderings look no different than D'Corize or City Pointe's parking enterences.

Speaking of, has anyone heard anything about the planned towers across the street from D'Corize? Or have those been shelved?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #582  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2010, 8:21 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Come on guys. Half the comments on this forum are about how everyone hates James Cheng style seafoam cookie cutter towers. Now that something is considerably different, the first comment is how it would stick out like a sore thumb and it would be better to have something that looks like infinity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #583  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2010, 9:48 PM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
personally i don't mind them sure they look a little retro but would still take them especially in the taller version
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #584  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2010, 11:45 PM
geoff's two cents geoff's two cents is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 504
Ugly as they are, I like that they're affordable, and think they exude a certain retro charm as well (like Vancouver's west end). What I don't like about the project is the peach/lavender color, as well as the lack of a connection to the street. The color would be less of an issue were it not for the matching early 1990s lavender complex across the street; ironically, the proposal might sit better with me if it were an island in a sea of generic Concord buildings. Street connectivity would be less problematic as well if there were townhomes incorporated into the base. Ultimately, I highly doubt council would approve the project in its present incarnation, and expect that significant design changes will have to be made.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #585  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2010, 11:52 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
The comment about it's street presence is very valid. A building that meets the street well, is worth much more to a city then a tall one. They do not need to be exclusive though. This example has height but it's terribly integrated at the ground floor. Surrey would be wise to stop projects like this and send them back to the drawing board to fix the problem. The public might not notice it much on a project to project basis but when you string together a few good buildings at street level compared to a few bad ones the difference is astounding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #586  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2010, 12:35 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
first i want to say i'm glad to see that i'm not the only one who thinks the colour could be the problem

but as for meeting the street its not like university drive is a huge shoping area and stuff this tower are located by park zone
plus looking at this picture i think it works well especially with adding the bike path between the buildings
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #587  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2010, 6:08 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Does anyone know the whole story about the empty "Asian Centre" on 104th?
I found and old article here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/2473513/Asian-Centre, and a Bankruptcy case here: http://www.telawyers.com/cacdire.htm.

I understand that it was a semi-failed project with Asian backers like Infinity, but I just don't understand why it's empty. Wouldn't whoever owns it now probably like to make money renting it out?

Here's a link to the Google Maps photo: http://maps.google.com/maps?key=ABQIAAAA...22.830059&spn=0.003253,0.010986&t=h&z=17
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #588  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2010, 6:54 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
well originally T&T market was suppose to be the main store in but its now in central so that was part of the reason why nothing happen to it.
There had been rumors of originally it was gonna be the RCMP main office. Also I've heard it as also possibly gonna be another outpatient hospital.
Haven't heard much of anything as of lately. With the new apartment and the other building on the corner being rebuilt there and that area is a set growth node area i'm sure something will happen with it soon...i hope
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #589  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2010, 8:06 PM
theQ theQ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 145
My uncle works for the company that supplied all the brick for the project. He told me that it was his understanding that an rich Asian buyer bought out all the other Asian investors for 30 cents on the dollar a couple of years ago. Because he bought it for so cheap, and because he has so much money, he's in no rush to do anything with it, and he's happy to just "sit on it" for a while.

This is all heresay from suppliers talking, but it sounds quite possible...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #590  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2010, 9:41 PM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by theQ View Post
My uncle works for the company that supplied all the brick for the project. He told me that it was his understanding that an rich Asian buyer bought out all the other Asian investors for 30 cents on the dollar a couple of years ago. Because he bought it for so cheap, and because he has so much money, he's in no rush to do anything with it, and he's happy to just "sit on it" for a while.

This is all heresay from suppliers talking, but it sounds quite possible...
that is what I heard also.......the owner is loaded and will only move on the project when he can get it ALL leased....think university or hospital or some sort of governmental usage.

until then it will sit in it's current state......
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #591  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2010, 11:50 PM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
So out of curiosity i messaged the city to see if they could share any info about future spectator arena
and hears what i've managed to find out
Quote:
City staff have been working on potential locations for a spectator arena in City Centre for the past few years. Obviously some of the information is restricted as it may involve land acquisition. Part of that process also evaluates different delivery models for such a facility.
then i asked if they could atleast share how many seats it would hold. They replied with 10,000+

good to hear they are looking to go bigger then Langley and Abbotsford
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #592  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2010, 11:26 AM
whalley13 whalley13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 210
I don't think we are gonna get a new arena in D/t Surrey for a long, especially if its' gonna be a public build....at least until city hall is built that should get Dianne Watts and Co. through a couple of elections at least lol

The other big factor is a 10,000 seat arena means a WHL team, and that might be risky in Surrey, a unproven sports market
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #593  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2010, 12:19 AM
CoryHolmes CoryHolmes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,031
Construction of the new library is proceeding nicely. It took only a few days to turn that previous medical clinic and parking lot into a flat pancake, and as of two hours ago there is a nice open pit in the ground being excavated

I may have to eat my words when I said I doubted if Dianne Watts could pull off getting that library green-lit and built inside of the Federal Government's timetable. That'll be the best meal of my life
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #594  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 12:21 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,487
^Time for a thread of it's own?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #595  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 4:32 PM
josiebug josiebug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 21
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #596  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2010, 11:59 PM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
the surrey city centre link on the surrey home page is up now
http://www.surrey.ca/Doing+Business/Surrey+City+Centre/default.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #597  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2010, 4:13 PM
Diet Butcher Diet Butcher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 159
Anyone have an update on when the SFU Residence is supposed to Break Ground and what the timeframe for completion is?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #598  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2010, 10:56 PM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
some time in 2011 i believe
its on there page some where to lazy to link right now
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #599  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2010, 2:00 AM
metroXpress's Avatar
metroXpress metroXpress is offline
(||||||-||||-||||||)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 2,220
Quote:
CITY INVESTIGATING STADIUM OPTIONS



Following the announcement that Surrey would host the 2012 BC Summer Games, dialogue began about the lack of a major stadium in the city. At the time, a number of elected officials, from all levels of government, were apparently discussing options for such a facility.

Now, information has been received that the City has continued these conversations and is studying various options for a stadium. According to staff, the City has been working out potential locations for a “spectator arena” in the City Centre. The project may involve land acquisition and they are investigating a number of delivery models for such a facility. The estimated capacity would be 10,000 people, making the arena larger than both the Langley Events Centre (5200) and the Abbotsford Entertainment and Sports Centre (7000).

The City had previously been pursuing the development of a 5500 seat spectator arena as part of the redevelopment of the Cloverdale Fairgrounds. That facility was expected to replace the existing ice arena and be part of a new trade and convention centre. The Fairgrounds plan has been left untouched since 2007. The City has since redirected its efforts and resources into building the City Centre, a site much more suitable for such a facility.
civic surrey
__________________
"Think simple…reduce the whole
of its parts into the simplest terms,
Getting back to first principles"


~ FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #600  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2010, 2:01 AM
metroXpress's Avatar
metroXpress metroXpress is offline
(||||||-||||-||||||)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 2,220
Quote:

Ultra sales restart, construction soon



Phase 3 of WestStone’s Urban Village development is set to begin shortly, with the 40 storey Ultra tower destined to become Surrey’s tallest building. Touting the new Library and City Hall as part of the development’s marketing scheme, selected pre-sales are to start in the near future, with studio units beginning at just $158,000. Price wise, new condos in Surrey City Centre have remained consistently hundreds of thousands cheaper than areas such as Brentwood, North Vancouver, and Richmond Centre. Ultra was put on hold due to the Great Recession of 2008, and following a slight restructuring of the project, is seemingly ready to start back up again.
civic surrey
__________________
"Think simple…reduce the whole
of its parts into the simplest terms,
Getting back to first principles"


~ FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:07 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.