Unbelievable:
http://ilind.net/2010/03/03/responses-show-rail-a-very-hot-topic/
Zweisystem // Mar 4, 2010 at 9:26 am
I see my good friends Voony and Mezzanine are posting, just to let friends in Hawaii know,
they are professional SkyTrain shills, that either work for the BC government or TransLink.
The try to pervert our transit issues to always end in a pro SkyTrain stance. Much of what they say is to taken with a grain of salt here as locals know well their questionable ways.
Vancouver’s SkyTrain is big business and the huge monies spent on the metro are filtered down to many government friends working in the engineering, planning, construction fields, thus is one reason why we continually build with this thing. SkyTrain is a massive Pork Barrel, for friends of the government.
As for Zweisystem, we are trying to promote an economical ‘rail’ solution for the Fraser Valley, by reinstating an old interurban line. SkyTrain with costs starting at about $100 million/km. (approx USD$135 million/mile), is extremely expensive and unworkable for the over 90 km. (about 60 miles) distance.
Just do the math!
Rail for the Valley, promoting economic transit, has engaged consultants to independently find economic ‘rail’ solutions for regional public transit.
We are promoting a Diesel LRT Vancouver to Chilliwack LRT service, using existing railways lines, with costs ranging from $3.5 million/km. to $5.5 million/km. Compare this with SkyTrain with costs exceeding $100 million/km.!
All the information in the Debunking SkyTrain series come from established transit consultants, planners, and academia. Facts pertaining to LRT come from revenue operation on various light rail lines around the world. There is no disinformation as claimed by Voony (most likely a government PAB) as most info on LRT is available in the public domain.
The problem with SkyTrain in Vancouver, it has bankrupted the transit system and TransLink is on life support.
One can build with all the elevated metro one wants, but there is a price to be paid for operation and the fewer customers for a metro, the higher the subsidies.
What I have seen and read about your project is that the taxpayer had better be prepared for a tax shock to pay for your metro.
I will leave you with this gem by noted American transit specialist Gerald Fox about Vancouver’s SkyTrain Evergreen Line.
Zweisystem // Mar 4, 2010 at 9:38 am
Quote:
“As a Vancouver, I’m familiar with that ‘Canadian group critical of Vancouver’s SkyTrain’. Unfortunately, they tend to compare people with different opinions to Joeseph Goebbels.”
Did no such thing, Mezzaine and you’re telling ever bigger fibs and I am very sad you carry your questionable tactics here.
All I was alluding to is that you tell a lie enough times, people tend to believe it is fact and when the state does it and you disagree, you become an enemy of the state.
Here lies the modus operandi of the SkyTrain Lobby: repeat half truths, untruths and pure lies often enough, people will believe you and steam roll over anyone who doesn’t beleive you!
<insert mirror>
If anyone has cared to read what I have said, if ridership on a transit line exceeds 15,000 pphpd, a case can be made for a metro! Even in Vancouver TransLink found it too expensive to build with SkyTrain and built with a generic metro instead on the RAV/Canada line. Both RAV and the Canada Line are incompatible with each other and can’t operate on each others tracks!
What the SkyTrain lobby rejects is an honest and truthful debate between LRT and SkyTrain, where this has happened, SkyTrain lost.
This CLOWN deserves a big shiner. And he needs to be rebutted every single time he posts. While most local government officials are wise enough to not listen to any of this nonsense, the local public here in Vancouver and elsewhere are not.