HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


    Sutton Place Nova Centre in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Halifax Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #521  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2010, 12:30 PM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
I like this one just the way that it is. I personally don't have anything against precast cement and I don't really characterise this as being faux heritage. I feel that the architect simply made good use of a combination of cement and glass. When I first saw this, I thought that aesthetically it looked very good.

Over the past few decades I have seen one development after another held up and sometimes stopped in the HRM for little reason. There is a price to pay by stifling growth in the HRM; that being that Nova Scotians are forced to move elsewhere to find work. The only reason that I can see for stopping a development is if a significant heritage building is going to be destroyed. Viewplanes bylaws and needless opposition to tall buildings has, in my opinion, forced many Nova Scotians to move elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #522  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2010, 1:38 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by planarchy View Post
I'm not talking about design preference but of building for context.
But what is the context for this site? Two ugly red-brick faux-Victorian replicas on the south, Neptune and the Marriott; a totally unremarkable red brick lump to the north in the Prince George; a faux-Victorian condo building to the west on Market, with a handful of legitimate 2-story red-brick or stucco clad buildings scattered elsewhere around the perimeter. I see no context at all that would let this be designed in a notable way.

Redoing the Herald building really makes little sense from a construction viewpoint. If it had remarkable architecture in its own right, possibly, but it did not. Keep in mind that the north end of that block was not built as the Herald building at all, but was the Argyle Garage, a gas station and parking structure. Hardly worth getting excited about.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #523  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2010, 3:40 PM
Jonovision's Avatar
Jonovision Jonovision is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post
I like this one just the way that it is. I personally don't have anything against precast cement and I don't really characterise this as being faux heritage. I feel that the architect simply made good use of a combination of cement and glass. When I first saw this, I thought that aesthetically it looked very good.
I agree with you. I think good precast mixed with glass can look extremely attractive. Especially where its acting as a sort of podium for the towers. I think if this was built as is it would surprise a lot of people. These renderings aren't the best ever made and they do not show the building in its context. I think it will look great. And the entire thing interacts at street level. There will be retail around the entire thing, including within the covered street. And also the one blank wall that did exist in the design (On Prince Street) has been altered.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #524  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2010, 8:13 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,769
The current design is very mediocre but it could be improved dramatically with a little work. It would look much nicer if the bottom floors were opened up a bit with more glass and had more retail. Hopefully those will be the sorts of recommendations to come from the city.

I would prefer smaller scale construction on these blocks, but we should be realistic; the Midtown proposal for this site was torpedoed and these blocks have been underdeveloped for many decades. This development will be around for a long time if constructed, but so was the ugly and uninviting Herald Building and the large derelict lot behind it. The idea that a nicer proposal will come along if only we wait a couple more years is highly suspect; I hope this gets a slight facelift to make it more modern looking and then moves forward as soon as possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #525  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2010, 10:10 PM
Barrington south's Avatar
Barrington south Barrington south is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 580
major demo occurring on the back side of the building today, involving full size excavator with jaws-of-life device
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #526  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2010, 10:54 PM
Barrington south's Avatar
Barrington south Barrington south is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by planarchy View Post
Rank would have been better off renovating the herald building.
]
the herald building was garbage and would have made for terrible retail at grade, which is key to utilizing this site to fullest potential along with the increase in people. Also please be nice to Haligonia she has good idea's
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #527  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2010, 11:12 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,769
The Herald Building was somewhat old but had all of the same problems that buildings like the Cambridge Suites do, and was arguably much worse. It took up the whole block, it had a mostly blank ground floor (plus loading bays, etc.), and was just a very unattractive building overall. It's really nothing like the Tip Top Tailors warehouse in Toronto, and it's not in the same sort of area.

As for the convention centre discussion, this seems like a reasonable scale of project for Halifax, and I think it is important to see some new office tower construction downtown. I do not ascribe to the "if you build it they will come" theory, but part of the cost will be recouped and there is additional value in terms of having the amenity in the city and the additional events that it will draw.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #528  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2010, 11:58 PM
-Harlington-'s Avatar
-Harlington- -Harlington- is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Halifax-Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,097
Demolishing Process:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #529  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2010, 12:04 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Harlington- View Post
Demolishing Process:
This puts renovation out of the question (fortunately). No offense to Planarchy but I am happy to see it go.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #530  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2010, 12:09 AM
haligonia's Avatar
haligonia haligonia is offline
Urban Thinker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrington south View Post
Also please be nice to Haligonia she has good idea's
Thank you, Barrington south.

P.S. I am male
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #531  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2010, 12:43 AM
planarchy's Avatar
planarchy planarchy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post
This puts renovation out of the question (fortunately). No offense to Planarchy but I am happy to see it go.
As I said, I just sort of just throw this out there as an alternative, without much reflection.

But thankfully all of you were nice enough to point out how ill-conceived an idea it was Thanks

Quote:
The current design is very mediocre but it could be improved dramatically with a little work. It would look much nicer if the bottom floors were opened up a bit with more glass and had more retail. Hopefully those will be the sorts of recommendations to come from the city.
I agree with this - let's hope it at least gets a few modifications before the final design is approved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #532  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2010, 1:27 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by planarchy View Post
As I said, I just sort of just throw this out there as an alternative, without much reflection.

But thankfully all of you were nice enough to point out how ill-conceived an idea it was Thanks
I appreciate your opinions Planarchy, it is just that I and some others want to see a major development go forward in the downtown area. I am hoping for many more major developments and real prosperity for the HRM in the future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #533  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2010, 2:08 AM
Halifax Hillbilly Halifax Hillbilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
The current design is very mediocre but it could be improved dramatically with a little work. It would look much nicer if the bottom floors were opened up a bit with more glass and had more retail. Hopefully those will be the sorts of recommendations to come from the city.
I'm not sure how much improvement can be made when there is guaranteed to be two huge podiums in an area that already has some over-sized footprints.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #534  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2010, 2:28 AM
sdm sdm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
The Herald Building was somewhat old but had all of the same problems that buildings like the Cambridge Suites do, and was arguably much worse. It took up the whole block, it had a mostly blank ground floor (plus loading bays, etc.), and was just a very unattractive building overall. It's really nothing like the Tip Top Tailors warehouse in Toronto, and it's not in the same sort of area.

As for the convention centre discussion, this seems like a reasonable scale of project for Halifax, and I think it is important to see some new office tower construction downtown. I do not ascribe to the "if you build it they will come" theory, but part of the cost will be recouped and there is additional value in terms of having the amenity in the city and the additional events that it will draw.
I've seen some renderings of possible plan"b", well was plan "a" before the request for proposals for a new convention centre came out. The plan "b" is superior to plan "A" IMO, albeit its without a convention centre. The plan was a lot of office and residential, which is what the downtown needs.

The best thing the city could do would be to hold on to the plans to do a convention centre for a few years, allow the developer to build "plan b" and get people living in the core. This to me would start us on the road to recovery in our downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #535  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2010, 2:29 AM
sdm sdm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by planarchy View Post
As I said, I just sort of just throw this out there as an alternative, without much reflection.

But thankfully all of you were nice enough to point out how ill-conceived an idea it was Thanks



I agree with this - let's hope it at least gets a few modifications before the final design is approved.
isn't the design wavied from HRM by design guidelines?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #536  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2010, 7:54 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdm View Post
The best thing the city could do would be to hold on to the plans to do a convention centre for a few years, allow the developer to build "plan b" and get people living in the core. This to me would start us on the road to recovery in our downtown.
Back when this was first introduced I preferred the idea of just having the residential/office/retail on the Herald site and then later having a major redevelopment of the Metro Centre and the Cogswell lands. I doubt there's enough direction, money, and leadership to make something like that happen, however. It's really too bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #537  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2010, 7:58 AM
Barrington south's Avatar
Barrington south Barrington south is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 580
that was my ideal preference too
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #538  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2010, 8:51 AM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,977
(Credit: deanbouchard on Flickr)

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #539  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2010, 9:05 AM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,977
That view would be spectacular with the towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #540  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2010, 11:29 AM
sdm sdm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,895
allnovascotia is reporting there is a delay in approval, april is now the date.

Best part of the article is Mayor Kelly is unaware of how much money the city will be responsible for of the projected 400 million dollar cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:51 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.