HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1701  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2010, 1:37 AM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanboy View Post
I don't mean to burst your optimistic bubble , but I'm pretty certain the earth has been fully explored. the Sadi Arabian peninsula, which had the largest oil reserve, has already moved to off shore drilling. Off shore drilling is a very risky and expensive process. It is a 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵; most of the time this type of drilling is not cost effective. Having so much faith in the unknown seems a little irresponsible.
I hate to burst a pessimistic bubble (j/k ) but there are 130 years worth of oil (current consumption) in the sands out by Vernal.

Not a great option. Certainly not a cheap option. But it is an option. And honestly, we'll all be dead before the Middle East quits pumping oil.
__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1702  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2010, 1:41 AM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120

After you watch "Collapse," you might rethink your position.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1703  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2010, 2:41 AM
poodledoodledude's Avatar
poodledoodledude poodledoodledude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottharding View Post
Taken me a couple of days to check in again. I know the conversation has steered away, but I want to rebuttle. Not to argue, but to clarify.

I don't see where from my post you got the notion that I think Salt Lake county is in much better shape than Utah county. Nor did I ever call Utah County folk rednecks. I said they have a suburban mentality. That doesn't make them back-woods hicks, it makes them typical of the demographic that dominates Utah County's population.
I'm very familiar with Utah County. I am well aware that the largest dinoraur museum as at Thanksgiving Point. I'm aware of what Point of the Mountain offers. It's interesting that you mention the Sucker Fish of Utah Lake in the midst of the debate over a bridge running over Utah Lake.
yes, I know that Utah County has some good things. I mentioned in my post that I think Downtown Provo and the UVU area are both very nice places. But my point was that, like so many cities that sprawled over the last several decades, there are areas that are poorly planned and very undesirable, despite being the centers of a populated area. State Street and Center street in Orem are optimum examples. Utah County is going to continue to grow at a pace that is way ahead of the national average, no doubt. And with that growth coming, why not improve the cities that exist, rather than continue to sprawl out in all directions, at the cost of the beauty of the area. I think Utah Lake is Utah Counties defining natural characteristic, and to run a bridge over it and build neighborhoods on all sides is a mistake.
My opinion.
Salt Lake City (not the county) despite it's many flaws, has developed a mentality of becoming better from within. It aspires to be a world-class city, however far from that it may be at this time. I think that's a good thing, a notion that citizens can rally around and participate in. But it requires recognizing the difference between smart growth and sprawl.
scott--
i'm glad you clarified your position on this. although, now you can see why ole poodledoodledude takes offense when i hear comments like: utah county is a 🞵🞵🞵🞵 hole of a place to live, work, and play.
um...that cuts deep sometimes to those of us that DO live, work, and play down here. maybe i'm taking this a bit too personally, but yeah, i live, work and play down here and i like it...so, in your eyes, that must mean, that poodledoodledude likes living and working and playing in a 🞵🞵🞵🞵 hole. if you DO think that: fine. but i disagree with it on SO many levels. are there things in utah county i would LOVE to change: YES!!!!!!! LOTS OF THINGS!!! but, i also have to look at the positive and build from there. i may be getting a bit too "polyannish" on you, but it's still my little county, and i feel like i have to defend it in some ways. i also like to think that utah county still has a sense of "ownership" for me, and since i and am involved with all sorts of community events/goings on, and i feel like i can see the bigger picture for what it IS, rather than what it is NOT.

again, i totally see your point about development. but in your previous comment, all the things mentioned about utah valley, you could EASILY replace with salt lake valley--or any other bigger valley in utah...i just got defensive because you singled out utah county, and not others. hence, ole poodledoodledude came to the defense of "gods little acre" (as my mother would say....ugh )

but, yes, from a development standpoint, i'd say DOWNTOWN salt lake is feeling a bit urbanized. but that happens over time: as cities grow and run out of land, they have to go up and think 'outside' the box for ideas on development, etc.

do i think my little salt lake valley is a WORLD CLASS CITY?! absolutely NOT. to me, a world class city is one that is really developed and LOTS of things going on: paris, rome, london, tokyo, sydney, new york, chicago, miami, las vegas. salt lake is NOT one of those, and to compare them with THOSE cities, is being VERY generous. that's like comparing provo to denver, seattle, or atlanta. pppffftt....

do i think that salt lake city COULD become a WORLD CLASS CITY: absolutely!!! over time, it will get better. the Olympics helped. but it has a ways to go still. to me, salt lake is an important city to the intermountain region, just like provo is important for utah.

k, off my soapbox.

poodledoodledude
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1704  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2010, 5:37 PM
scottharding scottharding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,681
PoodleDoodleDude,
I don't blame you for coming out so defense because I came out so aggressive. Yeah, I used words like "🞵🞵🞵🞵-hole" because I'm infuriated by the notion of that bridge. I was rash. You're right, Utah County has much to offer people. Anyplace that has grown so rapidly does. I tend to be a regimented idealist when it comes to my feelings on sprawl. I wish people shared my strong opinions unanimously and invested in denser, better planned cities and spared green space and agriculture. Of course, I know it's not that simple.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1705  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2010, 5:59 PM
Wasatch_One's Avatar
Wasatch_One Wasatch_One is offline
Wen Lambo
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,326
In reality, look in your own backyard. SW SL county and the west side of SL county are sprawling every bit as much (or more) as Utah County, we just have more room to grow so it may appear worse.

This said, in general Utah doesn't sprawl nearly as much as other similarly sized metros because of natural physical boundaries (lakes, mountains)

I like Denver a lot and I am out there 4 or 5 times a year, however, that place sprawls like you wouldn't believe. Vegas, PHX, S. California and many mid-west cities are in much worse shape than us because of the freeway expansion of the 50's and 60's. We have a very basic freeway system here in comparison. Because of this, I think the Wasatch Front is in a much better shape than many of these other areas. Available land is almost gone and we will be forced to grow upward, rather than outward sooner rather than later
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1706  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2010, 6:40 PM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120


You're right, the sprawl is just as bad up here. But I'm against the sprawl up here too. This isn't a my county is better than yours thing, this is: what can we do to curb sprawl in general so we can sustain ourselves both by being able to grow our own food, and not implementing more infrastructure than we have means to maintain. Since we are expected to see a large influx of people over the next couple of decades, it is very important that rather than spreading out with an overwhelming amount of infrastructure to maintain, that we instead focus on infil and smart growth, improving our existing infrastructure and making it more efficient and sophisticated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1707  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2010, 6:56 PM
poodledoodledude's Avatar
poodledoodledude poodledoodledude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottharding View Post
PoodleDoodleDude,
I don't blame you for coming out so defense because I came out so aggressive. Yeah, I used words like "🞵🞵🞵🞵-hole" because I'm infuriated by the notion of that bridge. I was rash. You're right, Utah County has much to offer people. Anyplace that has grown so rapidly does. I tend to be a regimented idealist when it comes to my feelings on sprawl. I wish people shared my strong opinions unanimously and invested in denser, better planned cities and spared green space and agriculture. Of course, I know it's not that simple.
Scott-- the more I think about it, the more uncomfortable I am about the bridge as well....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1708  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2010, 7:55 PM
scottharding scottharding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,681
Yeah, I think that Utah Lake is an awesome natural asset. It's the largest fresh water lake in the state, and it's situated between the two largest metros in the state, Salt Lake Metro to the North, and the Provo metro to the South and East. That leaves it one shore that isn't completely developed. Do we really want to run a bridge across it, all but ruining the lake itself, and then encourageing rapid suburban growth on the other side.
It's sad to me that just as people are getting serious about cleaning the lake, this becomes an issue. We think that Lake is polluted now? Just wait until it's completely encased by development, and a non-stop congestion of vehicles runs through the center of it.
Or imagine that Utah County simply said No. "Those of us who ALREADY live here aren't letting that happen to our home. No bridge, and no more sprawling neighborhoods on the other side. We'll develop the Eastern shore, and we'll do it smart. Denser neighborhoods, utilizing the shoreline. Restaurants share the shore with docks, parks and maybe a few entertainment venues. People hop off a trolley and grap lunch, shop, whatever. Salt Lakers take the front runner down, go sailing perhaps. And on the other side of the Lake, nothing. Nothing but vegetation and wildlife on preserved land. One can hop in a canoe and leave the bustle of the city and be out in the vastness of nature. That's the best of both worlds."
Yeah, probably a long shot for the most part, but even a fraction of that beats the alternative. Pheonix or Vegas, as Wasatch One pointed out. If we don't attempt to avoid that, it'll happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1709  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2010, 9:13 PM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,132
Utah sprawl vs. Vancouver

Do you guys realize that the metro population of Vancouver is only 2 million? vs. the 2+ million of the wasatch front? Yet, their city skyline kicks Salt Lake's, Ogden's, & Provos'(almost not even significant) skyline's combined, trash!! Guess why?? SPRAWL!!! Utah sprawls. We have freeways. Vancouver doesn't. That is an interesting correlation. Also, Canada is much more socialistic, ie. subsidized housing. Therefore, more density, etc. The government has more of a say on land development up there. There is less of a carbon footprint,there. Whereas, us conservative yahoos develop and live wherever the heck we want. Thus, our problems with pollution and lack of connection via sprawl.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1710  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2010, 1:18 AM
Future Mayor's Avatar
Future Mayor Future Mayor is offline
Vote for me in 2019!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Do you guys realize that the metro population of Vancouver is only 2 million? vs. the 2+ million of the wasatch front? Yet, their city skyline kicks Salt Lake's, Ogden's, & Provos'(almost not even significant) skyline's combined, trash!! Guess why?? SPRAWL!!! Utah sprawls. We have freeways. Vancouver doesn't. That is an interesting correlation. Also, Canada is much more socialistic, ie. subsidized housing. Therefore, more density, etc. The government has more of a say on land development up there. There is less of a carbon footprint,there. Whereas, us conservative yahoos develop and live wherever the heck we want. Thus, our problems with pollution and lack of connection via sprawl.
One of the issues is that Vancover proper has over 600,000 people in 44 sq miles. Thus the much larger skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1711  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 7:35 AM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Like it or not here it comes....

Ok guys, like it or not it sounds like the Utah Lake bridge is coming.



Utah Lake bridge developer says project a go

Troubled waters » He calls skeptics 'tree huggers and squirrel squeezers.'

Provo » A businessman says he's only months away from starting construction on a toll bridge across Utah Lake.

Leon Harward said the bridge will cost $300 million, but didn't say where he will get the money.

Harward, a partner for a private outfit called Utah Crossing Inc., is rejecting calls from skeptics to take out an insurance bond for the bridge's removal in case the project sours.

Harward insists the venture will be well-funded and won't fail, and that a bond isn't necessary. The bridge is meant to connect booming bedroom communities on the west side of Utah Lake with the Provo-Orem metropolitan area on the east.

Promoters have said it will serve a booming population that could reach a half-billion in 20 years.

Harward said that even in the worst-case scenario -- he builds a bridge and for some reason has to walk away -- the state will be left owning the bridge at no cost to taxpayers.

The group Utah Valley Earth Forum says Harward won't find a demand for bridge travel.

The history of toll roads and bridges in the U.S. is bleak, says Jim Westwater, chairman of the skeptics' group.

"Many of the toll roads and bridges that have been built around the country have failed financially," Westwater wrote Feb. 15 to 🞵🞵🞵🞵 Buehler, director of the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands.

That agency controls Utah Lake.

"Given the current
Advertisement
lack of need for such a bridge, it seems likely that this toll bridge could suffer the same fate," Westwater said.

He added, "Consequently, we ask that the state ... require the developers to provide full proof of funding for both construction and initial operating costs before finalizing any permits (and) require a full bond from the developer and any successors to provide for the complete removal of the bridge should it prove financially infeasible, or other causes render it dead in the water."

Harward said he was familiar with "the same diatribe" from skeptics he discounted as "tree huggers and squirrel squeezers." He asserted his most vocal critics want to return to the days of the horse and buggy.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1712  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 2:57 PM
arkhitektor arkhitektor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearfield, UT
Posts: 1,784
Half a billion people in 20 years? That's half the population of China living in western Utah county.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1713  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 5:09 PM
Erector Erector is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by arkhitektor View Post
Half a billion people in 20 years? That's half the population of China living in western Utah county.
Cracked me up after reading that as well. Talk about breeding like rabbits out there. As for the bridge. The state, which actually owns the land underneath the bridge, has said that they have only had limited conversation with Harward about the bridge. Obviously the state will require a long dialog, engineering studies, and as I found out in 1998, while in some discussion regarding an island proposed to be built in the lake, the Army corp of engineers have a big say in what is to be built in and around the lake. This alone can take several years. This guy is just testing the political waters with comments like the ones he has stated. He has a long way to go before even a drilling rig used for core sampling gets near the water.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1714  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 5:14 PM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by arkhitektor View Post
Half a billion people in 20 years? That's half the population of China living in western Utah county.

I'm not attacking the Mormon church, but for Utah County to reach half a billion people in 20 all the young married LDS couples will have to start popping out kids at the age of 18 and keep popping out kids till about 50. All these families will have to have at least 30+ kids in each family. And even with that I still don't think UC will reach a Billion. Yea,,,,I think who ever wrote this meant to put a "M"....not a "B" in illion.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1715  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 5:31 PM
Future Mayor's Avatar
Future Mayor Future Mayor is offline
Vote for me in 2019!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,803
That is going to be a very lofty accomplishment, western Utah County having about 1.5 million more people than the entire US has right now. WOW

At least it will be very densely populated, with a major core and a lot of high rises.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1716  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2010, 1:37 AM
TonyAnderson's Avatar
TonyAnderson TonyAnderson is offline
.
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Salt Lake City | Utah
Posts: 2,788
'We're gonna need a bigger bridge' -Roy Scheider (after reading that article)
__________________
Instagram | Twitter

www.UtahProjects.info
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1717  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2010, 3:50 AM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanboy View Post

After you watch "Collapse," you might rethink your position.
Let me guess: Was it as good as "The End of Suburbia?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by arkhitektor View Post
Half a billion people in 20 years? That's half the population of China living in western Utah county.
It's gotta be a tpyo. Half a million seems about right.
__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1718  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2010, 2:15 PM
shakman's Avatar
shakman shakman is offline
Chairman
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: PRMD - People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 2,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyAnderson View Post
'We're gonna need a bigger bridge' -Roy Scheider (after reading that article)
I am for development and density however I love to see natural beauty. Hence why I take trips out West.

I live 2,000 miles away, yet I can imagine the destruction of such natural beauty due to a bridge. I can see it as if I live next to lake.

What a horrific decision. Was there any feasbility study performed to determine if the use of vehicular ferries and /or a tunnel can be utilized in lieu of this bridge?

I know tunnels are quite expensive, however ferries can generate revenue. If there is such a strong demand to build some sort of connection between both points, the use of a ferry(ies) would preserve the natural beauty of Lake Utah and generate revenue.
__________________
"I measure the value of life not by how much I have, instead by what I have done.

-sb
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1719  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2010, 3:39 PM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,494


Ferries work great along rivers, like the Willamette south of Portland. There's no way on earth they could pay for a tunnel.

I like the bridge idea because I think it will reduce air pollution. The sprawl can not be stopped. That's a difficult concept for anti-sprawl advocates to swallow. But the fact is Utah is one of the most libertarian states when it comes to property rights. The state legislature will never pass any bills restricting property rights. Utah has high fertility and migration numbers. Do the math: Sprawl.

It's gonna happen. Somebody is willing to pay for the bridge w/o using taxpayer dollars. Let's do it. Otherwise we'll have half a million people out there, they'll demand a bridge 15 years from now, and we'll have to spend taxpayer dollars.
__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1720  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2010, 4:20 PM
Erector Erector is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyAnderson View Post
'We're gonna need a bigger bridge' -Roy Scheider (after reading that article)
Classic. Don't tell Urban Boy or he will say, "building a bigger bridge is like loosening your belt to cure obesity."

Last edited by Erector; Feb 23, 2010 at 9:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:13 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.