HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2009, 4:20 PM
cab cab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,450
Anyone know if the new 217 widening project is including a bike lane? It seems like they are moving a lot of dirt for 1 new lane of traffic, but then again that is what traffic engineers like to do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2009, 7:49 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,481
I dunno, but I've been commuting on the WES a lot, and lemme tell you, the train is a lot faster than traffic!

I'm completely shocked as to the amount of proposed bike lanes and boulevards for Portland. Blows me away...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2009, 4:52 PM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,793
Portland to experiment with rental bike system

http://blog.oregonlive.com/portland_impact/2009/07/portland_to_experiment_with_re/print.html

Portland to experiment with rental bike system

by Mark Larabee, The Oregonian Saturday July 04, 2009, 10:00 AM

Think of it as a Zipcar with pedals.

Need to rent a bike quick? Walk up to a kiosk, swipe a credit or membership card and ride away. Just return it there or at another station, kind of like renting a luggage cart at the airport.

That's a far cry from the now-infamous yellow bikes -- the 1990s community bike program that died because of theft and vandalism. Those were free, unreliable and mostly clunkers.

Portland transportation officials are eying about 100 high-tech bike-sharing systems worldwide to see if an investment in public bicycles could be successful in what's already considered a world-class bike city.

They hope that two demonstration projects scheduled here for August will give them a firsthand look at a few systems and help gauge public appetite.

Washington, D.C., is the only U.S. city that has installed a system. Minneapolis, Denver, San Francisco, Chicago and Albuquerque are considering or planning systems.

The nation's capital has a 100-bike project -- small in comparison to one in Paris with 21,000 bikes and 170,000 annual subscribers -- but it's popular and working well. An expansion will begin late this year to add 900 bikes.
Even so, questions remain here and across the country about which system to install, the logistics of set-up and marketing and, most importantly, about paying for them.

"This is one time we're not going to be the first out of the gate," said Steve Hoyt-McBeth, a project manager with the Portland Bureau of Transportation.

Mayor Sam Adams, after a 2006 trip to Lyon, France, as transportation commissioner, said he wanted to set up a network here with the goals of increasing the number of bike trips, enhancing the connection between bikes and mass transit and boosting the city's already bike-savvy culture.

That likely won't come until public hearings are scheduled and the City Council votes on a plan. Portland is moving deliberately slow. For one, it has no money for the project. Last year, the city narrowed in on a vendor, then canceled the project.

Different models

The systems are expensive, about $3,400 to $4,000 per bike when you figure in the cost of docking stations, tracking and payment technology and installation costs, Hoyt-McBeth said. And it's uncertain whether user fees would fully recapture operating costs, such as maintenance, theft and vandalism.

Portland has yet to do market analysis to determine who would ride the bikes. One thing complicating that question is the fact that Portland already has one of the largest bike ridership rates in the country.

The City Auditor's Office, in a survey conducted last summer, found 8 percent of commuters came into downtown on bikes and that citywide, about 18 percent of residents use bikes as either a primary or secondary mode of transportation, Hoyt-McBeth said.

"This whole idea about throwing thousands of bikes on the street is new to us in the U.S.," Hoyt-McBeth said. "To see what it does in terms of ridership in Montreal and other cities will be really instructive for Portland."

One of the companies that committed to the Portland demonstrations is called Bixi -- created by Montreal's parking authority. Montreal developed its bike-sharing system in-house, began operating it in May and plans to sell franchises to other cities as a way to recoup the estimated $13 million start-up costs and eventually become self-sufficient.

Washington, D.C., and Paris are opposite in terms of size, but their methods are the same and cost nothing for local taxpayers. Both systems were installed by private advertising companies -- Clear Channel Outdoors in Washington and JCDecaux in Paris. Not only do they pay for themselves, both systems give money to the city in exchange for advertising rights on city-owned rights of way and transit stops.

Using that funding model may be more difficult in Portland, a small advertising market where free speech rights are loose and city officials have shied away from cluttering downtown streets with advertising at the behest of the business lobby.

Minneapolis and Denver are using a nonprofit model to run the bike-sharing programs they plan to roll out next year. With outside seed money, low operating costs, tax-exempt status and corporate donations, city officials are hoping for success without dipping into taxpayer wallets.

Barcelona paid for its system through more traditional government methods. The city increased parking rates and car registrations and own the bikes.

Lessons learned


Whatever is installed and however it's paid for, Hoyt-McBeth said the city has learned valuable lessons from watching others: You need to have a rental station every four or five blocks and bikes should be available in areas where people and jobs are concentrated. European users are 70 percent commuters, he said.

Good marketing and a smooth start early also are keys to long-term success. And a progressive rate structure, one that makes it free or really cheap in the first 30 minutes, encourages shorter trips and efficiency.

In Washington, D.C., $40 buys an annual membership and a Smartcard. Subscribers must sign up online and wait for their card in the mail. The approach cuts down on theft, but prohibits on-the-spot rentals and isn't geared toward tourists, which the city hopes to change during the expansion.

"People are using it for all kinds of trips, to go to restaurants, meetings or the dentist," said Jim Sebastian, who manages the program for the district's transportation department.

There are environmental benefits as well. "We're freeing up the need for parking spaces for people's cars," Sebastian said.

He fields calls from counterparts across the country who are looking at installing similar systems.

"Almost every city has some level of interest," he said. "As long as you already have some basic bike infrastructure and culture this will work and it will help reinforce the interest in biking."

-- Mark Larabee: [email protected]

Last edited by bvpcvm; Jul 5, 2009 at 4:54 PM. Reason: formatting
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2009, 2:20 AM
Okstate's Avatar
Okstate Okstate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE PDX
Posts: 1,367
Did anyone hear how the demonstration projects turned out? I heard nothing more on this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2010, 4:21 AM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,603
Yeah! This plan should be a vehicle to get us to the next level and beyond. All policy critiques aside, as a person who spends a lot of time on my zero-emission, human-powered, winter-blues-killing machine: I'm excited.

http://bikeportland.org/2010/02/11/the-bike-plan-live-from-city-council/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2010, 10:57 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by tworivers View Post
Yeah! This plan should be a vehicle to get us to the next level and beyond. All policy critiques aside, as a person who spends a lot of time on my zero-emission, human-powered, winter-blues-killing machine: I'm excited.

http://bikeportland.org/2010/02/11/the-bike-plan-live-from-city-council/
It makes me want to construct the single speed I have been planning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2010, 7:20 PM
NJD's Avatar
NJD NJD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 632
Trolley Trail finally is on track
By Dana Tims, The Oregonian





Almost from the moment the last freight train rumbled along a rail line linking Oregon City with Portland in 1968, the calls began to convert the corridor into a pedestrian walkway.

This summer, 42 years later, construction will begin on the historic six-mile route fittingly dubbed the Trolley Trail.

When completed, in mid-2011, the $4.5million project will provide the last link in a 20-mile loop tying in the Springwater Corridor and Interstate 205 biking/hiking path.

"It's been a long time coming," said Thelma Haggenmiller, an Oak Lodge resident and leading voice of the advocacy group Friends of the Trolley Trail. "But I never thought for a minute that this day wouldn't arrive."

Support for a trail that now appears on every significant multiuse trail map in the metropolitan area has grown exponentially through the years. Gone are the days when Haggenmiller, seeing the topic pop up on one area agenda or another, burned the phone lines to mobilize her core boosters.

"I called them my troops," she said with a laugh, referring to the six other Trolley Trail die-hards who showed up anywhere, anytime the trail was being discussed. "We've been at this so long now that two of them have since died."

Any attrition, however, has been more than made up for by new supporters. Haggenmiller's Friends of the Trolley Trail e-mail list now numbers more than 300. Another 100 supporters don't have computers, but can rely on regular calls from Haggenmiller with updates.

In addition, key players at Metro, Clackamas County and the various citizens groups and special districts that serve the highly populated stretch between Milwaukie and Gladstone are now lined up solidly in support.

"All of us consider this a really critical linkage in metro-area transportation plans," said Carlotta Colette, whose Metro Council district includes the proposed trail. "The chance to complete something as special as this was far too important to even think about passing up."


Walking into the past

The route itself is steeped in history.

When the East Side Railway Co. began service in 1893 along the 16-mile stretch between Portland and Oregon City, it represented the nation's first interurban railway line.

In a key parallel development, the electricity that propelled the cars was generated by hydroelectric power at Willamette Falls. Overhead lines carried the rest of the electricity generated there into downtown Portland in what is regarded as the nation's first long-distance transmission of electrical energy.

Within two decades, the railway service had caught on, extending from Vancouver south to Eugene and Corvallis and from Gresham west to Forest Grove and McMinnville.

Before East Side Railway built its streetcar line, things couldn't have been more different. The area between Portland and Oregon City had few roads, none of them paved. Getting anywhere fast generally meant finding a boat and striking out on the Willamette for points up- or downriver.

Arrival of the streetcar, arguably, dictated how things developed from there. It's no coincidence, after all, that the communities of Milwaukie, Oak Grove and Jennings Lodge are all situated along what became the streetcar corridor.

Passenger service, because of the increasing post-World War II reliance on automobiles, ended in 1958. Freight service continued for just another decade.

Haggenmiller, who moved to Oak Grove in 1967, still remembers the huge piles of rail ties pulled up and stacked at the end of Southeast Concord Road in 1968 as the line was being decommissioned.

By the mid-1970s, much of the trail had become overgrown with weeds and brambles. Only two or three sections could even be walked.

"It was pretty clear that it was the end of an era," Haggenmiller said. "What a lot of people didn't know back then that it was also just the start of another."


Trail's end, and beginning

Trolley Trail advocates are quick to credit local-government support with getting the project this far. No one, however, claims much of anything has moved quickly.

It's going on a decade now, for example, since Metro purchased the right of way needed to build the trail. The money needed to buy the land had been approved six years before that, when the region's voters in 1995 approved a bond measure to buy new parks and open spaces.

Some of that delay resulted from local officials needing to turn to federal coffers for cash, said Michelle Healy, a senior planner with the North Clackamas Parks & Recreation District. Stringent federal regulations, calling for things such as archaeological and hazardous materials studies and wetlands-identification projects, added at least five years to the project's running time, she said.

Now-scrapped plans by Clackamas County to take advantage of Trolley Trail construction to run a new sewer line connecting Milwaukie's Kellogg Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant with the Tri-City Water Pollution Control Plant in Oregon City tacked on another two-year delay, she said.

The trail's master plan was completed in 2004. Project managers have spent the interim lining up four separate grants needed to help pay for construction.

Now the project is finally poised to move ahead, with a multiphase construction schedule. The idea is to avoid tearing up all of the six-mile line at once, only to have part of it remain that way if anything unexpected arises.

"By waiting until we had all the money in hand, we can still build it in one fell swoop," Healy said. "But we'll still do it in a prudent manner, one step at a time."

In the end, said Lynn Peterson, Clackamas County Commission chairwoman, the credit for moving the Trolley Trail from dreams to completion belongs to "the folks on the ground."

That is to say, Thelma Haggenmiller and her "troops."

Haggenmiller, for her part, is just happy to see the project finally take off.

"I dream about this trail," she said. "I wake up thinking about it. And long after I'm gone, it's still going to be a treasure for everyone to use."

— Dana Tims: 503-294-5918


Historic route

1891 — Oregon City and Southern Railway, a subsidiary of East Side Railway Co., purchases right of way and builds railroad from Oregon City to Portland.

1893 — Passenger service begins on what is the nation's first interurban railroad line.

1930 — After a number of mergers and takeovers, Portland General Electric is formed to assume the line's electric operations, including streetcars. Portland Traction Co. forms to operate the railways as a subsidiary of PGE.

1958 — Passenger service ends.

1962 — Portland Transit sells the interurban lines to Southern Pacific and Union Pacific railroads for freight operation.

1968 — Rail service is abandoned. Most rails and ties are removed.

2001 — Metro and North Clackamas Parks & Recreation District buy the right of way for a multiuse trail.

2010 — Trolley Trail construction scheduled to begin in August.

2011 -— Trail is expected to be completed by summer.

— Dana Tims, The Oregonian
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2010, 7:22 PM
NJD's Avatar
NJD NJD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 632
Oh, and if anyone is interested in the Portland 2030 Bike Plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2010, 12:01 AM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
Great news, and a long time coming. I guess this eliminates the trolley ROW as an option for extending MAX to OC. Max should stay on McLoughlin into OC anyway, IMO. More opportunities for redevelopment and additional density along McLoughlin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2010, 5:19 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,793
I'd wager the right of way along that trail isn't wide enough to handle max anyway: I'll bet it was all single-tracked.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2010, 9:27 AM
65MAX's Avatar
65MAX 65MAX is offline
Karma Police
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: People's Republic of Portland
Posts: 2,138
The trolley probably was mostly single tracked, but the ROW is 40', wide enough for double tracked MAX. The main problem is having MAX run right through so many back yards. The NIMBYs would have a field day.... they would be saying, literally, not in MY back yard.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2010, 10:18 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJD View Post
Oh, and if anyone is interested in the Portland 2030 Bike Plan
Thanks for that, I was about to do some hunting to find it because I wanted to read this all the way...though I usually support anything that involves improving the infrastructure of a city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2010, 10:54 PM
Eco_jt's Avatar
Eco_jt Eco_jt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 114
now I just have to purchase a bike...I live in the north end of the Pearl, and when I need to goto south waterfront, I know a bicycle will get me their at least twice as fast...but I still haven't broken down and bought a bike yet...

...I was interested in those fancy electric assist bicycles...lol, but they sure are pricey.

As far as the bicycle master plan, I think it's great for Portland. Hopefully, the city can invest in some more fancy bicycle traffic lights in busy intersections like in The Netherlands =)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 4:05 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eco_jt View Post
now I just have to purchase a bike...I live in the north end of the Pearl, and when I need to goto south waterfront, I know a bicycle will get me their at least twice as fast...but I still haven't broken down and bought a bike yet...

...I was interested in those fancy electric assist bicycles...lol, but they sure are pricey.

As far as the bicycle master plan, I think it's great for Portland. Hopefully, the city can invest in some more fancy bicycle traffic lights in busy intersections like in The Netherlands =)
If you want to buy a built bike, go to Rivercity Bikes on MLK near Morrison. They were amazing to me when I bought a bike from them a couple years ago. Very knowledgeable and didnt act like dicks whenever I asked them a question about biking and what I needed to know in a bike I was buying. Plus when I told them the amount of money I was looking to spend, they didnt scoff at me and tell me I should go to KMart for a bike (yeah, some asswad at the Bike Gallery actually said that to me because I didnt want to spend $1200 on a bike.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 5:16 AM
Eco_jt's Avatar
Eco_jt Eco_jt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 114


Thanks, will check them out. How much did you end up spending? out of curiosity... just so I can get an idea. Yeah, I wouldn't be thrilled about dropping over 1k on a bike. I can't believe you've been told to go to Kmart...how rude!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 5:27 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eco_jt View Post


Thanks, will check them out. How much did you end up spending? out of curiosity... just so I can get an idea. Yeah, I wouldn't be thrilled about dropping over 1k on a bike. I can't believe you've been told to go to Kmart...how rude!
The bike I went in to buy was 320 and I ended up buying a bike that was 390 because I liked it more, they were more than happy of selling me the cheaper one.

Of course, now I have been doing research with what parts I want to build my own single speed bike, which I am hoping to get started on this spring...that will be an exciting little project for me to do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 6:52 AM
Eco_jt's Avatar
Eco_jt Eco_jt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 114
sweet, well I might go check them out then for sure, ...later this weekend =P
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 7:59 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,481
I bought my Gary Fisher Wingra from River City 2 years ago for about $450. I think they went up in price, but you can get a decent commuting bike for under $500 at River City.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2010, 8:31 AM
JordanL JordanL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,004
You can get an electric assist bike with a 20 mile range for as little as $500.

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Currie+Techn...9301463.p?id=1218080799495&skuId=9301463
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted May 14, 2012, 10:44 PM
Grantenfuego's Avatar
Grantenfuego Grantenfuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 108
Portland ‘Bike Share’ Moves Forward Posted on 03 May 2012 by Jason

Quote:
A proposed ‘bike share’ system for Portland moved one step closer to reality last month when City Council authorized a request for proposals to solicit a private sector operator. The project will be funded by a federal grant, along with private sponsorships and user fees
http://naportland.com/news-briefs/portland-bike-share-moves-forward/

I'm kinda surprised that this hasn't happened yet for Portland considering the city's reputation for being cyclist friendly. Not to mention, Portland is home to Alta Bike Share which operates in cities around the world including Washington DC, Boston, Melbourne and soon to be New York and Chicago I believe. I'm assuming that if this goes forward Alta would be the company they choose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.