HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    One World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7541  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2010, 3:31 PM
evanmack evanmack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 137
So half way up they will start working on the facade and interior?
     
     
  #7542  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2010, 3:55 PM
OneWorldTradeCenter's Avatar
OneWorldTradeCenter OneWorldTradeCenter is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,201
Siginificant progress!!

I LOVE ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER
     
     
  #7543  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2010, 6:50 PM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,004
One can never blink an eye on this tower now, or else "Progress" will be missed!
     
     
  #7544  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2010, 6:52 PM
the one and only's Avatar
the one and only the one and only is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 32
i could tell..
     
     
  #7545  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2010, 10:11 PM
Continental180's Avatar
Continental180 Continental180 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 50
looks like the flooring is halfway done on the last floor.
Steel seems to be up around the other sides though!

Great Progress here.
     
     
  #7546  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2010, 2:18 AM
Duffstuff129's Avatar
Duffstuff129 Duffstuff129 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by evanmack View Post
So half way up they will start working on the facade and interior?
facade: about 30-40 more floors
interiors: around topping out of roof

these are approximate, but in short, don't get too excited yet.
     
     
  #7547  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2010, 5:47 AM
kenratboy kenratboy is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,099
I imagine the two Manitowoc's will not be there much longer?
     
     
  #7548  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2010, 1:05 PM
MadGnome MadGnome is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 260
The taper is going to be confusing to the eye.. If you look at the building one way it stays 200' the whole way up, but look at it from another angle and it goes from 280' to 140'. ( I know those aren't perfect measurements Mr. Data)
     
     
  #7549  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2010, 2:20 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadGnome View Post
The taper is going to be confusing to the eye..
I really don't see what's confusing about it. It's a lot simpler than a tower like the Sears (Willis).

_

http://lowermanhattan.info/construction/gallery/album.asp?album_id=29&position=7
     
     
  #7550  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2010, 3:01 PM
OneWorldTradeCenter's Avatar
OneWorldTradeCenter OneWorldTradeCenter is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,201
It´s simply great architecture.
     
     
  #7551  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2010, 4:20 PM
alexjon's Avatar
alexjon alexjon is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,150
Hate to be obsessive, but where's the Subway? I wanna hear more about it.
     
     
  #7552  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2010, 5:49 PM
Puzzlecraft's Avatar
Puzzlecraft Puzzlecraft is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 265
Subway Location

It is located on the west side of the north core, down a level from the top. See green rectangle. Next time the core jumps, the shipping container will be briefly visible, and the big logo will be barely visible, if at all.

     
     
  #7553  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2010, 8:30 PM
Ehrgeiz91 Ehrgeiz91 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 50
I'm not crazy about the view from the side where it tapers off from the top. Looks top-heavy, like it's overweight. Lay off the big macs FT!
     
     
  #7554  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2010, 9:23 PM
steveve's Avatar
steveve steveve is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneWorldTradeCenter View Post
It´s simply great architecture.
I agree... It's simple, modern, and effective!
     
     
  #7555  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2010, 1:02 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,285
Update from morrongiello (Feb 8)

     
     
  #7556  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2010, 3:17 AM
Domamania's Avatar
Domamania Domamania is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 240
wow the tower is allready casting its mighty shadow. great progress ^^^^
     
     
  #7557  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2010, 3:34 AM
WonderlandPark's Avatar
WonderlandPark WonderlandPark is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,127
effin' F*I*N*A*L*L*Y a tower rises. Congrats NYC! Can't wait to see this later this year.
     
     
  #7558  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2010, 12:48 PM
MadGnome MadGnome is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
I really don't see what's confusing about it. It's a lot simpler than a tower like the Sears (Willis).

_

http://lowermanhattan.info/construction/gallery/album.asp?album_id=29&position=7
That's sort of my point. If most people saw those two photos they'd think they were looking at two different buildings.
It is a little funny from the first angle like EHRGEIZ says. Because of the taper at the base it looks wider at the top than at the bottom.
     
     
  #7559  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2010, 2:42 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadGnome View Post
Because of the taper at the base it looks wider at the top than at the bottom.
I don't see that. The taper at the base isn't as great.

Anyway, surprised to see Hines in the mix here...
http://www.observer.com/2010/politics/related-durst-vornado-brookfield-hines-and-boston-vie-1-wtc

Quote:
According to multiple people familiar with the situation, the six landlords' firms—respectively: Related Cos., Vornado Realty Trust, Boston Properties, the Durst Organization, Brookfield Properties and Hines Interests—have all responded to the Port Authority's queries for a partner on the tower.

The Port Authority, the bi-state agency that has been (gradually) developing the giant office building for years, last month reached out to a small group of developers, asking if they would have interest in taking a financial stake in the tower, with a payment of at least $100 million. After giving site tours to interested developers, the six aforementioned ones pitched preliminary proposals for the tower to formally throw their hats in the race.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/re...id_on_part_of_wtc_WiaIN5UmFA1jVML3dJplfJ

Quote:

Port Authority Execu tive Director Chris Ward wasn't exaggerating when he said recently the PA would act swiftly to find a development partner for 1 World Trade Center.

Although a deal might be months off, six major real estate companies put in offers to the PA last Friday -- among them, we've confirmed Related Cos., the Durst Organization, Brookfield Properties and Vornado. Sources said that Boston Properties and Hines also submitted bids.

A source close to the talks said the PA plans to meet with each of the bidders next week to clarify aspects of their proposals.


The PA is seeking a development partner to effectively take on all aspects of completing 1 WTC, leasing it up and managing it -- "everything to bring the whole project home," as one source put it.

The PA is not in the business of marketing office space. Our source said, "Having the tower in the name of a well-known private developer will lend it instant credibility and erase any stigma over public or quasi-public owernship."
     
     
  #7560  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2010, 3:22 PM
canadate's Avatar
canadate canadate is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 152
Took these yesterday.




^ Just a reminder. lol






It's so wierd to see ground here after so many years. I remember having to stand on my toes to be able to see what was down at the bottom..now I can't see it. I love watching all of this happen!



















I know this isn't the right spot to ask about this but I saw these yesterday (check the last three pictures ^^) and I'm wondering if they're constructing a new overpass? Or is this a temporary one that's being installed so they can tear down the old one and then construct a new one. What is it? I'm probably way off. lol













     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:50 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.