Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Henry_Man
Here's mine:
- Mount Pleasant (reflects the area and much better sounding name)
|
Perhaps, but Main Street and Kingsway are important arteries where many will transfer to the buses. I think it's important that the station be named after the streets.
Quote:
|
- Laurel-Hospital District (I predict the station will be built closer to Laurel and Willow than Oak since the ER entrance and Jim Pattison Building is closer to Laurel; only locals would understand "VGH"- so "Hospital District" will be better)
|
Good point, i like that name better.
Quote:
|
- South Granville (that's what the immediate vicinity is called)
|
Awesome idea!
Preferably Arbutus.
Quote:
|
- West Point Grey (I prefer it to be designated as a future station)
|
It would be a huge mistake to not build a station at Sasamat right from the start. There's a lot of ridership potential there, you could get at least 5,000 daily riders from that stop.
Quote:
- Wesbrook-University (to reflect the current "Production Way-University" station on the M-Line)
*(Or "University of BC" and then change the current "Production Way-University" simply to "Simon Fraser University")
|
I think it's a bit different from the SFU station. Production Way-University Station is down the mountain, it's not at SFU so it would be misleading to include SFU in the station name. But with the UBC stations, you're actually at the heart of UBC...I think it would be a huge missed opportunity to not include "UBC" in the name. And I'm quite sure UBC would want "UBC" included in the station name especially if they're going to be paying for part of the station construction costs.