HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2261  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 7:11 AM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
There is a reason why Vancouver is ranked so highly in every World study, no matter how silly.

Must be the charm of its residents, right?

RIGHT?
     
     
  #2262  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 7:15 AM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
There is a reason why Vancouver is ranked so highly in every World study, no matter how silly.

Must be the charm of its residents, right?

RIGHT?
no, cuz the ranking got some bias...the voters, the judges all got some connections iwth the city...

there was a mastercard study, one of the guys was from ubc...how can he put down his town..

then u go check out some other ones, such as foreign policy and gawc, there's no scene of the city...if the city was for real, how can two big studies ignore it...
     
     
  #2263  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 7:18 AM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
I don't know, the rest of the population doesn't seem to have a problem doing that.
     
     
  #2264  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 7:23 AM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
by surprise, one japanese study of global cities ranked it considerably higher than the other ones...i read that one, and they put livability really high as one of the aspects...and the city obviously took advantage...

anyways, among residents of 2 million, this place is probably the most world class
     
     
  #2265  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 9:11 AM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I think it's true that our future looks good, but it might be bad times for Seattle economically.
     
     
  #2266  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 9:34 AM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
It always seems like the grass is greener on the other side. And in some cases it might be. But sometimes we don't realize how green our grass may actually be, as we are always looking to the other side and not our side.

No pun intended in that
     
     
  #2267  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 2:21 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,625
I don't think people here under appreciate Vancouver. One of the biggest problems is the giant ego of this city... which probably comes from so many of these "studies".
     
     
  #2268  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 3:16 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
I think it's true that our future looks good, but it might be bad times for Seattle economically.
How so? In which sectors, and for what reasons?
     
     
  #2269  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 4:52 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Rod View Post
Most of the high end stores, Seattle JUST got in the last 2-4 years. In fact, we FINALLY have a true high end department store, Nieman Marcus, but it is in Bellevue and is ONLY due to Microsoft's desire to create an edge city market for recruiting purposes.
WHAT.
THE.
HELL.
ARE.
YOU.
TALKING.
ABOUT.

Nieman Marcus has been in Bellevue and Downtown Seattle for DECADES.

And your conspiracy theory that NM is in Bellevue is because of Microsoft cracking the whip? Come on.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #2270  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 6:15 PM
Hot Rod's Avatar
Hot Rod Hot Rod is offline
Big City Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle-Vancouver-Osaka-Chongqing-Chicago-OKC
Posts: 1,187
s211, you're being facetious right? NM just opened in DT Bellevue only a few months ago right before Christmas iirc. ...

well, the rest of what I said it's true.

Your federal government (and to some extent, your local city NIMBY govt) is what is holding Vancouver back from it's true potential, regardless of what guage you want to use.

I think it is time for the people of vancouver to speak up and vote those idiots out who continue to stroke Toronto at the expense of Vancouver.

Even still, Vancouver is quite a wonderful city that competes very well with cities many times bigger in "govt stated metro population"

(why do they ax off the Valley and lower Van Is from Vancouver's metro? In America, metro Vancouver would be over 3.0M and have all of those areas - for USA metro reference, see none other than the Seattle/Tacoma/Bremerton/Everett/Olympia Combined Statistical Area, aka metro Seattle 'by the media').

Last edited by Hot Rod; Jan 29, 2010 at 6:30 PM.
     
     
  #2271  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 6:22 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
How so? In which sectors, and for what reasons?
I think Hot Rod nailed most of the issues.

Also, from friends that live there, it seems like it is much harder to get a new job compared to here. Also, from what I understand, the housing sector was hit a lot harder. I could be wrong though. As for the future, I think we all agree that if Microsoft ever did go into decline, or even cease to grow like it used to, that it would affect the local economy significantly. Vancouver doesn't have too many companies that we NEED to succeed for the city to succeed.

Again, sorry if I'm exaggerating.
     
     
  #2272  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 6:24 PM
Hot Rod's Avatar
Hot Rod Hot Rod is offline
Big City Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle-Vancouver-Osaka-Chongqing-Chicago-OKC
Posts: 1,187
Im not saying the city doesn't have an ego, but I think some of it is deserved considering what Vancouver has to put up with - yet the city still thrives and is envy'd by many.

And YES - red, it is definitely not an employment utopia here, and never was unless you had CS skills. Remember, the wealth of the Eastside is tied to stock from Microsoft, Costco, and several other "seattle area hq'd" tech companies. it's not the same as wealth that Chicago and New York or SF have. ... And definitely we are getting hit hard by the recession, mostly because our market was heavily inflated and burst. But it is also because the state does not get its fair share of the 'supposed wealth' and will not until they implement state income tax (at least for earners above a certain income level.....)

Nevertheless, it is great to have two wonderful cities only 100 miles apart. ^^

OK - sorry everyone for changing the thread away from YVR discussions:
     
     
  #2273  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 7:03 PM
nova9 nova9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by vansky View Post
ya, vancouver got everything, except height and economic power

it is just a town with a high profile of service sector, and some view...

with a lot of amentities for a population this small...

becoming hk or singapore, first the govenrment needs to give the city a free economy and more political freedom...sth like protecting toronto and air canada is garbage to vancouver...
political freedom? in Hong Kong or Singapore? you kidding me? hahaha.
     
     
  #2274  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 8:08 PM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by nova9 View Post
political freedom? in Hong Kong or Singapore? you kidding me? hahaha.
hk is self governed, and singapore is its own country.
     
     
  #2275  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 9:34 PM
nova9 nova9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by vansky View Post
hk is self governed, and singapore is its own country.
I'm from HK, not really self-governed, we (well, people there) only get to elect 50% of the legislature, the other half is appointed by the Chinese government. And as for Singapore, the people tolerate a very involved level of government - how else could you end up with those strict littering and drug/alcohol laws?

My point is, without starting any political debate, is that I don't think it's the PERSONAL FREEDOM that allowed HK and Singapore to become what they are. I think it was the economic policies and it had to do with allowing the people whose responsibility it was to do their job with little interference.

Plus, both are/were city states that did only had to focus onto one viewpoint or goal rather than having to kowtow to say Toronto or take other cities into consideration.
     
     
  #2276  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2010, 11:14 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
As a polisci major (and yes I work in tech support ) I can tell you that Singapore appears to be a democracy but is classified as an authoritarian state that has demonstrably manipulated electoral results to keep the governing party in power. However, it was said that it was the only authoritarian state in the entire world that had 'legitimate' government as it has almost no corruption as is run a meritocracy. Basically the entire state is run like it's a company. Anyway the point is it is not a liberal democracy with 'freedoms' in the Canadian sense. It's more like living in your parents house when you are 14. It might be just and benevolent but you might get kicked in the ass for stepping out of line.

Not that this has anything to do with the airport.
     
     
  #2277  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 12:10 AM
NewfBC NewfBC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
WHAT.
THE.
HELL.
ARE.
YOU.
TALKING.
ABOUT.

Nieman Marcus has been in Bellevue and Downtown Seattle for DECADES.

And your conspiracy theory that NM is in Bellevue is because of Microsoft cracking the whip? Come on.
Um are you thinking about Nordstrom?

Nieman Marcus only has one location in WA state, in Bellevue.

Ron.
     
     
  #2278  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 12:11 AM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Why are we so upset about Nieman Marcus (in SEATTLE) in the YVR Airport thread? Bit of an over reaction, s211
     
     
  #2279  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 4:32 AM
seaJ seaJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Rod View Post
tro, for your information - none of those stores are in Seattle (well, Lauren might be now), and if they were they'd be empty (except for you Canadians coming down, perhaps).

You all think Vancouver is a 'show' city, but Seattle is even more so - because you all think it is so big and glamourous. But in reality, it's not. Not anywhere close to New York, Chicago, LA, SF, Miami, Dallas; not in the same ballpark.

Most of the high end stores, Seattle JUST got in the last 2-4 years. In fact, we FINALLY have a true high end department store, Nieman Marcus, but it is in Bellevue and is ONLY due to Microsoft's desire to create an edge city market for recruiting purposes. I once worked at corporate Microsoft, so I am well aware of the expansion plans we had for Lincoln Square and the Bravern development (both downtown Bellevue). The Seattle space was through acquisitions.

And yes, Seattle does have a high-tech economy with several hq's. But Boeing is based in Chicago and has been scaling back since (and soon will probably pull out altogether). Microsoft is not the place it used to be and realize they hired WAY TOO MANY people to support an industry dominated by SF bay companies.

You all have mentioned that we have many rich people here, but so do you. And the 'rich' people here are actually stock rich. That wealth RARELY flows liquid into the "seattle economy" because we don't have state income tax to coax it out. And we're just now getting stores worthy of not going down to Portland (or up to Vancouver) to shop.

Trof - you seemed surprised that Oneworld's HQ is in Vancouver; I think you and many others would be very surprised how big Van actually is in the world stage. It is Canada's 3rd largest city and market, that alone places it a significant advantage against Seattle and the much more competitive US market. Vancouver is a world player and would be even moreso if your government would let the city achieve it's destiny as the Singapore/Hong Kong of North America - but instead, your government insists on having everything in Toronto - THAT holds Vancouver back, whether it's international flights to Europe or Asia (outside the rim), corporate hq locations, or media/fashion. Vancouver is much more dominent on international trade and this will become very evident once Boeing does shift all commercial production out. Did you all ever realize, that Microsoft almost moved it's world headquarters to Vancouver?

Those office towers many of you admire so much in downtown Seattle are 30% empty (I read recently in the Seattle times) as they've overbuilt due to speculation and EVERY bank that once was headquartered here are gone. So, if it weren't for high tech and internet innovation (and sheer will of Microsoft), Seattle would have long been a ghost town - look at how Seattle lost the Sonics for example. (govt and corporate Seattle couldnt' get it together, ending up losing to an up and coming darkhorse city in Oklahoma City whose corporate/govt entities are hell bent on showcasing their town and have the cash to do it).

I know Vancouver lost the Grizz to an even worse city of Memphis, but that was the NBA's fault almost exclusively in that they really needed to seed Vancouver and make the hockey town into a basketball city; whereas the Sonics leaving was the EXCLUSIVE fault of Washington/Seattle govt and corporate/wealth you all think so much of. Now, how could 'such a prominent city' with a longstanding NBA presence - lose it's NBA team? Since we are so rich, whatever whatever.

Seattle does have one advantage over Vancouver, and that is taxation (or the lack thereof). But it's starting to catch up with us, as our state government is $2.5billion shortfall THIS YEAR ALONE (city of Seattle and King County also have huge deficits, I just forget how much) and our infrastructure is crumbling as I type. The next few years will NOT be good times for Seattle, and I for one will be relocating to a much larger much more prominent city - that is Chicago.

But I wanted to make those points, that Seattle isn't quite as well off as you all think we are. We have some advantages but we also have severe penis envy over Vancouver too. There's some things you guys dont even realize you have or advantages you have moreso than just having a subway while we dont.

I think some people need to travel a bit more, and AWAY from Toronto or Seattle - to really sense the impact Vancouver has. You can get to a lot more places worldwide right in your own front yard than you can coming down here (and would have even more if your government would let Vancouver prosper naturally, like it naturally would). Seattle's rich people mostly fly corporate jets and RARELY fly international (and when they do, they go to an international gateway city such as Vancouver or LA or SF/Chicago/NY like everybody else).

Vancouver reminds me of that fine girl who has many things hidden away but doesn't show off much - she just surprises you and continues to amaze you with the things she continually wears day to day. People worldwide love this pretty girl and want to go to bed with her and her less pretty older cousin SF. Vancouver may be quite shallow and not have much personality but damn, she sure is charming and very beautiful - so I and many men worldwide want to buy her things and amaze in her beauty (and give her gifts that her peer cities envy).

I see Seattle as the not so pretty sister of Vancouver who has a better education and somewhat better job than Vancouver, but somehow still gets left out to while her spoiled sister 100 miles north gets all of the attention from the best guys.

Just for kicks, I see Toronto as that blowhard bully trying to look the part of big city but really can't compete with the big boys show up. He wouldn't have what he has if it wasn't for his fairy god mother Ottawa who thinks the world of him and therefore thinks Toronto should have everything. Ottawa doesn't need to worry about that pretty girl on the west coast, because she is so quiet - yet Toronto is always whining when guys prefer Vancouver, so Ottawa makes up for it.

a bit of humor at the end - but it really is my take on the aformentioned cities.
Hot Rod, you seem to have a hard on for Vancouver that doesn't allow you to see things very subjectively. No one, let me repeat, no one in Seattle thinks they are anywhere near the importance of a city like New York or Los Angeles. You seem to think it's Seattleites who have a larger image of their city on the world stage than Vancouver does which I simply find not true at all. Vancouver IMO is the city reaching for glamour and attention through marketing and big showy splashes WAY more than Seattle. You have to think about how each city views itself with respect to it's country. Seattle does not think of itself as some warm paradise with palm trees, movie stars and high end shopping. In fact, it's thought of as a cold, grey and far away place with respect to the rest of the U.S.--I'm endeared by that and think that's what makes Seattle a great place. It is truly a city supplanted in the northwest and derives it character from what makes the PNW different than the rest of the world.
Vancouver is the ONLY large city on Canada's west coast and it's third largest city at that. Seattle has to compete for the resources (both human and monetary) with Portland, San Francisco, L.A. and San Diego. Even with those other cities to compete with Seattle had the ingenuity to forge an economy AND might I add an arts scene that is the envy of cities even larger. This includes Vancouver. You seem to give short shrift to what it takes for a city to give rise to ideas and innovation which allows for large companies to become what they are in the first place, and then from there move on to change the world. Now, Microsoft may not be as relevent as it once was and Boeing not as powerful, but the community of Seattle that could foster such innovation is not a thing of the past.
No one ever mentions (trofirhen exluded) about the defecit of culture between the two cities. Vancouver has built a great city with respect to infrastructure, parks, public trans on its downtown peninsula and it deserves accolades for that. But cities are more than just a collection of buildings and good urban planning decisions. It's the arts community that animates and gives a voice to the talents of it's citizens. Seattle is a powerhouse for a city its size with respect to the arts. While not a home to a major world renowned museum, Seattle has a great opera, symphony, and ballet. A huge and well respected theater scene, a music scene that has been strong since way before grunge and continues to be relevent. I could go on.
I actually think Seattle is in a better position than Vancouver. Seattle can build and become more dense. It can try to correct it's bad planning decisions in the future and I think it's headed in the right direction. The question is- Can Vancouver build a strong vibrant economy from homegrown innovation? Can Vancouver foster an arts community that truly makes the city world class? After all, what makes a city like NYC so great- is it the skyscrapers or the subway? That's part of it for sure-but to me, it's Broadway, it's Julliard, it's the Lincoln Center. It's the galleries of SOHO and the music of The Ramones and Frank Sinatra. Etc. etc. Vancouver is not totally void of the arts obviously but I wouldn't say it has much more than a city like San Diego for instance. Sorry to hijack a thread about the YVR airport here everyone but I needed to respond to this.

Last edited by seaJ; Jan 30, 2010 at 4:43 AM.
     
     
  #2280  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 5:31 AM
vansky vansky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
3 million will give u a world class place, 2030, it will come, just wait another 20 yrs...yvr's gona be like a spider by then, and downtown will sink with all the over weight skyscrapers, richmond will be close to floods due to the mid-rises, and nobody will survive an earth quake or big flood here, since sth's been predicted before 2075...
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:35 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.