HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #821  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2010, 9:47 PM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,952
This fire is a bit suspicious to me, considering the plans for that property... I would like to see these brick units converted back into residential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #822  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2010, 10:11 PM
kph06's Avatar
kph06 kph06 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,096
Its hard to imagine it would be arson, seems like that would be such a huge risk to the owner. The Brick buildings are owned by Tony Metlej (5552 Kaye Street owner), the Taj Maha building is a separate developer, but I believe they have worked together in the past.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #823  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2010, 3:15 PM
miesh111 miesh111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by kph06 View Post
Its hard to imagine it would be arson, seems like that would be such a huge risk to the owner. The Brick buildings are owned by Tony Metlej (5552 Kaye Street owner), the Taj Maha building is a separate developer, but I believe they have worked together in the past.
Different Tony Metlej. Tony Metlege (yes different spelling and all) is building 5552 Kaye Street, has built the Fairmount condo's, and another building up off of Kearney Lake Road in Wedgewood.

Anthony (Tony) Metlej, owns the old Tupper House, a few houses in the west and south ends, the Chianti Building, and the Southhampton on Hollis Street. His Son is Elias Metlej (who is the guy wearing the black touqe in the last picture) and is a laywer with Blois Nickerson.

Quote:
Originally Posted by worldlyhaligonian View Post
This fire is a bit suspicious to me, considering the plans for that property... I would like to see these brick units converted back into residential.
I don't think it was arson. Anthony Metlej burried his father on Monday. He was pretty torn up. Doesn't seem to me like burning down a profitable building was top of his mind...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #824  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2010, 6:12 PM
kph06's Avatar
kph06 kph06 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by miesh111 View Post
Different Tony Metlej. Tony Metlege (yes different spelling and all) is building 5552 Kaye Street, has built the Fairmount condo's, and another building up off of Kearney Lake Road in Wedgewood.

Anthony (Tony) Metlej, owns the old Tupper House, a few houses in the west and south ends, the Chianti Building, and the Southhampton on Hollis Street. His Son is Elias Metlej (who is the guy wearing the black touqe in the last picture) and is a laywer with Blois Nickerson.
Haha, my mistake, I though I was getting a handle on who owned what, but I checked things again and you are right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #825  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2010, 10:30 PM
alps's Avatar
alps alps is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,574
Entrance to the new Keating Emergency and Trauma Centre at the QEII:

Video tour of the facility...looks very nice and modern.



New-ish renovations at the shopping centre


Last edited by alps; Jan 14, 2010 at 5:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #826  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2010, 8:00 PM
spaustin's Avatar
spaustin spaustin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Downtown Dartmouth
Posts: 706
Article in today's Herald. Not much new in it, basically just an interview with Andy Filmore. There was one little nugget though. In listing projects on the go or in the planning phase Filmore referenced a condo project for the Green Lantern Building on Barrington. Up until now I hadn't heard of any plans for that building. If true, that would be a big plus as the Green Lantern is a beautiful building, but it's in real bad shape and from what I gather has been really under used ever since Hurricane Juan took the roof off.


Bringing people back downtown, by design
HRM strategy involves revitalizing peninsular Halifax while maintaining the 260-year-old city’s historic character
By BRUCE ERSKINE Business Reporter
Sun. Jan 17 - 4:45 AM


PLANNED AND PROPOSED downtown developments will bring Halifax into the 21st century while retaining the city’s historic character, says the municipality’s urban design project manager.

"We’re looking at downtown as the next suburb," Andy Fillmore said Tuesday in an interview.

Mr. Fillmore led the Halifax by Design process, which streamlined development applications in Halifax Regional Municipality and established a precinct mechanism to manage downtown projects.

He said developments on the books or in the works will bring people back to the downtown to work, live and play.

"If you accept the premise, as I do and as (municipal) council did, that there aren’t enough people living and working downtown to make it viable, I’ve got to say this is fantastic," Mr. Fillmore said.

He said the population of peninsular Halifax shrank by 34 per cent, from 92,511 to 60,628, between 1961 and 2006.

A number of developments underway or planned for downtown focus on Barrington Street, which recently was designated a heritage precinct under Halifax by Design.

The designation offers building owners in the area matching financial incentives of up to $100,000 and tax breaks of 15 per cent for expenditures above $100,000 to maintain the historic facades of their properties.

Developments on Barrington include: rebuilding the Roy Building and adding a tower above it; transforming the Sam the Record Man and adjacent Granite Brewery properties into retail and commercial space; turning the Green Lantern building into condominiums; converting the National Film Board building into apartments; renovating the former Revenue Canada building; adding an apartment or office tower to the Discovery Centre; expanding the TD Bank; and turning the Freemason’s building into offices.

Rob Landry, property manager for Starfish Properties, which owns the Roy, Sam and Granite Brewery properties, said in a recent interview that the Barrington Street heritage designation and associated incentives would be an "important consideration" for any property owner.

Other planned or projected downtown developments include: a convention centre on Argyle Street; a central library on Queen Street at Spring Garden Road; a condominium tower at the old Keith’s Brewery; the Twisted Sisters towers at Hollis and Sackville streets; expansion of Fenwick Tower and City Centre Atlantic; Armour Group’s Waterside Centre and Queen’s Landing projects; Dexel Developments’ residential-commercial project at Morris and Hollis streets; Centennial Properties’ waterfront hotel project; and ECL Properties’ 22-storey office tower at the end of Granville Mall.

While there are no set timelines for many of the projects, Mr. Fillmore said there is a market for downtown apartments and condominiums that aren’t high-end, while office developers are taking an "if they build, people will come" approach.

"I see a lot of the projects moving ahead," he said.

Mr. Fillmore suggested that the only office developer who may hesitate is Sobey-controlled ECL, which would likely need a 60 per cent occupancy guarantee before proceeding.

Halifax by Design, which includes non-negotiable downtown building height limits ranging from 16.5 metres to 64.5 metres to address harbour view planes from Citadel Hill, replaces an outdated planning strategy that didn’t capitalize on the city’s strengths, said Mr. Fillmore.

"The community vision is a city that balances heritage and dynamic change and growth."

He said increasing downtown population density is environmentally sound and saves on expensive suburban infrastructure costs.

Christine Macy, dean of the faculty of architecture at Dalhousie University, said Halifax by Design is similar to planning strategies used successfully in cities like Boston. "The model is tested."

Ms. Macy said building skyward while maintaining pedestrian friendly streetscapes is a sensible way to balance the community’s desire for livable space with business demands for large floor plans.

"Halifax is catching up with the last part of the 20th century," she said, calling the municipality’s old planning strategy "scattershot" and subject to political pressures.

( [email protected])
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #827  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2010, 11:35 PM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,952
Cedar Street townhouses:

http://www.halifax.ca/planning/Case01248Details.html



Does anybody know the status of the lands right next to Atlantica Hotel?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #828  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2010, 12:29 AM
sdm sdm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by worldlyhaligonian View Post
Cedar Street townhouses:

http://www.halifax.ca/planning/Case01248Details.html



Does anybody know the status of the lands right next to Atlantica Hotel?
nope not those lands.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #829  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2010, 12:31 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,767
Today I heard Bev Miller interviewed on CBC Radio's Mainstreet. She was appearing in her role as co-chair of the "Friends of the Halifax Common" group, and the purpose of the item was to hype a meeting they were holding tonight to decry the proposed changes to the Common. Now, I'm not sure that spending $2.6 mil on some of these things is a smart move either. But I could not get past the unrelenting negativity of this woman, and the total vacuity of her arguments against them. She was saying dumb things like how open space contributes to better community health levels -- even though nobody is proposing building anything that would take that away -- and trying to make the case that allowing concerts to be held on the Common was somehow allowing a private business to make money off it. When asked what her group would like to see instead, all she could come up with were (get this) picnic tables and more benches. So having the thing covered with ball diamonds and soccer fields is OK, and you can make all the money you want off those, but bring along a musical instrument and somehow you're evil. This woman just needs to go away, quietly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #830  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2010, 1:35 AM
Halifax Hillbilly Halifax Hillbilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 708
I went to the first meeting of Friends of the Halifax Common and was very dissapointed. They're starting argument is the Commons are only 1/3 of their original size and go from there to demand amazing amounts of green space, despite the fact that most of the Common is underutilized most of the year and so empty at times it is downright dangerous. Central Halifax's problem is not lack of green space, rather what to do with a surplus of underutilized green space. I like some of the ideas presented; as with most HRM projects I'll wait to see how well they actually follow through.


From the interview with Andy Fillmore:

Quote:
"We’re looking at downtown as the next suburb," Andy Fillmore said Tuesday in an interview.
Maybe not the best quote Andy could have given, maybe it would make more sense with some context.

Quote:
"If you accept the premise, as I do and as (municipal) council did, that there aren’t enough people living and working downtown to make it viable, I’ve got to say this is fantastic," Mr. Fillmore said.
Downtown isn't viable? In what way? Despite its shortcomings many neighbourhoods on the peninsula are in demand places to live and offer a lot of amenities and small city urbanity within a reasonable walk. Not living up to potential, absolutely - not viable is an exaggeration.

Quote:
Christine Macy, dean of the faculty of architecture at Dalhousie University, said Halifax by Design is similar to planning strategies used successfully in cities like Boston. "The model is tested."
A quote from the architecture school, not Phil Pacey. Well done, lets see more of this.

Great article Mr. Austin. Whether these developments happen, and how quickly, will test our theory that Barrington's recent hard times are a blip, at least partially caused by the wait for the new Heritage District and associated financial incentives.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #831  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2010, 3:34 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halifax Hillbilly View Post
Great article Mr. Austin. Whether these developments happen, and how quickly, will test our theory that Barrington's recent hard times are a blip, at least partially caused by the wait for the new Heritage District and associated financial incentives.
I really hope these projects happen, because Barrington Street is currently a disaster. I suspect that some of them will happen because the approval process has improved and the economy is doing well. Just doing something like renovating the NFB, Sam, and Green Lantern buildings would be huge, but I think the street also needs some larger new buildings with significant numbers of residents. Basically, it needs to be like Spring Garden Road, which probably has a few thousand people living right there within a block or two.

It's really unfortunate that the United Gulf towers never materialized, because they would have been a good starting point.

As for the Commons, the claim about how they've shrunk by 2/3 is true but it's very ignorant to expect that they should have stayed the same. Originally they were semi-rural lands meant for farmers to graze cattle on, etc. It was not a vast expanse of 18th century picnic tables and benches, it was undeveloped deforested land at the edge of the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #832  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2010, 5:59 AM
alps's Avatar
alps alps is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by worldlyhaligonian View Post
Does anybody know the status of the lands right next to Atlantica Hotel?
I remember watching the old houses there being demolished like, 12 years ago. IIRC at some point since then there was a 10-20 storey building proposed for the site but it was shot down by NIMBYS. I'd like to see high density development there eventually...it'd be neat if Robie was more of a transit corridor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #833  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2010, 11:00 AM
kph06's Avatar
kph06 kph06 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by alps View Post
I remember watching the old houses there being demolished like, 12 years ago. IIRC at some point since then there was a 10-20 storey building proposed for the site but it was shot down by NIMBYS. I'd like to see high density development there eventually...it'd be neat if Robie was more of a transit corridor.
Peter Delefes used to, and may still live right beside this lot, so I'm sure he brought in the cavalry on that one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #834  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2010, 5:42 PM
worldlyhaligonian worldlyhaligonian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by alps View Post
I remember watching the old houses there being demolished like, 12 years ago. IIRC at some point since then there was a 10-20 storey building proposed for the site but it was shot down by NIMBYS. I'd like to see high density development there eventually...it'd be neat if Robie was more of a transit corridor.
I think that a 12 story tower (closer to the robie side) with townhouses on the two street sides and retail and groundfloor on the robie side would be amazing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #835  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2010, 1:06 AM
Wishblade's Avatar
Wishblade Wishblade is offline
You talkin' to me?
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,322
I found this little blurb within an article that had nothing to do development whatsoever (in true chronicle herald form):
Quote:
Council approved a seven-storey extension to an apartment building on Anchor Drive in Halifax. After a public hearing, council gave the thumbs-up to a 22-unit structure that is to be built on a vacant lot and connected to the older building.

The planned development now goes to Chebucto community council.

Also, council approved the expansion of Burnside Park in Dartmouth after a public hearing on zoning and other changes needed under the Regional Municipal Planning Strategy. Planning staff said about 103.6 hectares of land west of Lake Charles is earmarked for Burnside’s growth.

No speakers came forward during the hearing to support or oppose the planning amendments.
The new land earmarked for Burnside would effectively fill in the entire area from Victoria rd to Hwy 118, and from the Circ all the way to Akerley blvd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #836  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2010, 1:23 AM
alps's Avatar
alps alps is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishblade View Post

The new land earmarked for Burnside would effectively fill in the entire area from Victoria rd to Hwy 118, and from the Circ all the way to Akerley blvd.
Had I known about the hearing beforehand I might have spoken on it. I understand we need new industrial land to grow the economy and I'm no irrational treehugger or whatever people would accuse me of for saying this, but the way they are doing it out that way is criminal. It's like our own little slice of Houston in Nova Scotia. I despise Dartmouth Crossing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #837  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2010, 5:19 AM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by worldlyhaligonian View Post
Those townhouses look O.K. if that is real brick. W.M. Fares group know how to design.

Attachment B Sheet A1....http://www.halifax.ca/council/agendasc/documents/090428ca1113.pdf
__________________
Salty Town
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #838  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2010, 6:05 AM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishblade View Post
The new land earmarked for Burnside would effectively fill in the entire area from Victoria rd to Hwy 118, and from the Circ all the way to Akerley blvd.
Yay?

Has anyobdy been out to the new section of Burnside between the City of Lakes BP and Dartmouth Crossing BP? It's a completely empty yet the municipality wants to spend money expanding Burnside further.

Industrial lands are valuable I realize to the city but when you start filling out more when dozens, if not hundreds, of acres of serviced lands have not been developed it seems pointless. I have no problem with the older sections of Burnside where buildings are adajcent to each other and is actually a very dense community however I am disliking the new method of half-assing the protection of forest by having narrow strips of parkland cutting lots apart and not actually having a forest or wilderness area. It is much better to have a dense area of lots concentrated on the main roads (ie Wright Ave) then it is too have them isolated and connected by pointlessly wide roads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #839  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2010, 1:20 PM
beyeas beyeas is offline
Fizzix geek
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South End, Hali
Posts: 1,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by alps View Post
Had I known about the hearing beforehand I might have spoken on it. I understand we need new industrial land to grow the economy and I'm no irrational treehugger or whatever people would accuse me of for saying this, but the way they are doing it out that way is criminal. It's like our own little slice of Houston in Nova Scotia. I despise Dartmouth Crossing.
I agree. All Dartmouth Crossing achieved was a further hollowing out of urban areas, and even more so, used up what should have been industrial land to put shopping (at which point they used they presence of the shopping to then justify residential zoning in an industrial area, which just even further increases the suburban spread). The whole damn thing is just so completely counter to the sort of urban planning that results in livable cities, and feeds into the urban sprawl car culture.

(I know I sound like an irrational tree hugger here too, which I'm not. I just think that this is the wrong side of the balance sheet).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #840  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2010, 1:26 PM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by beyeas View Post
I agree. All Dartmouth Crossing achieved was a further hollowing out of urban areas, and even more so, used up what should have been industrial land to put shopping (at which point they used they presence of the shopping to then justify residential zoning in an industrial area, which just even further increases the suburban spread). The whole damn thing is just so completely counter to the sort of urban planning that results in livable cities, and feeds into the urban sprawl car culture.

(I know I sound like an irrational tree hugger here too, which I'm not. I just think that this is the wrong side of the balance sheet).
They should try a highrise node in the new section of Burnside...perhaps 10 acres. Four buildings at a min of 30fl. with ample green space etc. A metrolink would go downtown and other buses would service Burnside.
__________________
Salty Town
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:58 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.