Quote:
Originally Posted by racc
|
That's a rather interesting presentation.
Quote:
Operations & Maintenance budget = $82.7M (60% labour, 11% power, remainder inventory and overhead)
•
73.5 M passengers = $1.12 / cost per passenger
•
35.4 M revenue car-kms = $2.34 / cost per rev car-km
•
Average vehicle kms per car per year = 177,000 kms
•
92% of fleet is operated for daily peak service
•
~100% O&M cost recovery based on allocated fare revenue
|
Even if you're like zweisystem and disagree with Translinks fare revenue allocation, $1.12 cost per passenger is an amazing achievement. $82.7M for an operating budget is really low, I don't see how LRT could be any cheaper on the route.
If Skytrain were regular LRT and could actually operate at that budget, it would have a much higher cost per passenger, as fewer people would bother riding a slower system.
Phoenix is spending about $37 million a year on operating its LRT. Yes, amount wise that is a lot less than in Vancouver. But they will carry around 12 million people a year at their current pace. That's a cost of $3 per passenger.
In Denver, a metro area with a population of almost 3 million, they have an LRT system of almost equal length to all of Skytrain. Their estimated budget for 2009 is $30 million for O&M of the LRT system with 17 million annual boardings. That's a cost of $1.75 per passenger. That's better, but LRT still only attracts an average of 55K weekday boardings.
Sure, every system is different, but this just proves that LRT isn't a magic bullet that can be applied to any situation with amazing results.
Skytrain might have a much higher capital costs, but that pays off in the long term with orders of magnitude lower operating cost per passenger. As well, Skytrain has successfully attracted many times more people to Transit than LRT has in MOST other markets.