Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave2
Yet you see so many white tower academic studies that say speed doesn't matter. Oh, bs... at the end of the [work] day I do want to be "whisked home", and usually have no interest in browsing boutiques that I may see along the way. Speed does matter, at least to those of us that actually *use* transit on a daily basis.
|
Thank you! Not all of us are tourists wishing to take the trolly for a peep. Those who use transit day in and day out only care about 1 thing, getting to work or getting home as fast as possible.
the nice thing about sky-train is it is fast and you still get a nice view!
Could you imagine what it would have been like if the expo line was built to the LRT/tram standards the "rail for the valley" people envision the Broadway extension to be?
I am betting it would be half the speed, have half the current ridership, and we would not have those amazing views.
For transit to work properly you need a strong backbone, which skytrain is.
Going to university, the vast majority of those profs live essentially in a fantasy world. There are a few smart ones though, I have one prof at SFU who teaches urban design and planning, and he fully supports the Evergreen extension as skytrain, the broadway extension as skytrain, and even the gateway program, because he understands that a growing metro region needs strong, fast, reliable transit and a decent highway system (but he also supports the rapid bus on it and the use of tolls to control volume), and it is hilarious to hear him talk about the profs at UBC, who he says live in la la land, living in their million dollar + houses near UBC and how disconnected they are from true urban life.