HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #461  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2009, 5:56 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Here and There
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,807
kidding

Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof View Post
The part I was asking about was the "submit a new one, whoever you are" part. I just don't know what you meant by that. Not sure what and who you were referring to.

Anyway, the SAIT parkade (which was beyond ugly, I completely agree) was torn down because a replacement one was built under the field (Martin Cohos Commons) on the other side of campus. In place of the old parkade, a new academic building will be built the "Trades and Technology Centre."

I agree, in a general sense, that it isn't exactly a sustainable practice to tear things down well before their time though.

I think that once it is built, the 69th Street Station Parkade will look much better than the old SAIT parkade. That's not exactly hard to do though. The SAIT parkade was an eyesore.
I was just saying that there needs to be a new design.... someone submit one. I have to watch how I word things I guess.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #462  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2009, 5:58 PM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,865
Nevermind.

Last edited by frinkprof; May 22, 2010 at 5:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #463  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2009, 6:27 PM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,865
Nevermind.

Last edited by frinkprof; May 22, 2010 at 5:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #464  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2009, 6:32 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by kw5150 View Post
Maybe they just got a good deal on them.... lol. I just dont want to be forced to sit across from someone who will say "what the f*&K are you looking at?? Like those subway scenes on hollywood movies. I am mostly kidding but I still dont like the new seating arrangment.
That doesn't really happen in reality. Trust me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #465  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2009, 6:42 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
Yep. Not to mention that every LRV we currently have has some form of facing seating already, whether its the front and back facing seating on the U2's or the inwards facing seating on the both the SD160's and U2's. The new design is really just taking the latter and doing it to the entire LRV, so its really nothing special.
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #466  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2009, 7:09 PM
CorporateWhore's Avatar
CorporateWhore CorporateWhore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 4,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by kw5150 View Post
Maybe they just got a good deal on them.... lol. I just dont want to be forced to sit across from someone who will say "what the f*&K are you looking at?? Like those subway scenes on hollywood movies. I am mostly kidding but I still dont like the new seating arrangment.
As someone who commutes on the world's biggest subway system, I can ensure you that most people will do whatever they can to ignore your presence entirely... especially when their face is lodged into your armpit.

Seats that go down the length of the train always seem to fit way more people than pairs placed in rows. In the midst of rush-hour you dont really care about sitting down since you probably won't get to anyway. You just want as much breathing room between you and the next guy as possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #467  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2009, 7:15 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir.Humphrey.Appleby View Post
If only they cost less than 20/k a spot... The current lots aren't full at $3 a day, they aren't going to need these at an economic to provide rate. Heck, even when parking was free there was starting to be under utilization of lots at some stations.
I have to agree, with the current $3 fee, the lot will probably be as busy as the model shows (about a dozen cars). All of the park and ride lots are near empty, and people are parking wherever they can... for free. There is a park and ride lot behind Sunterra Market near the 69th Station and ever since the fee was implemented it has been empty... BUT... the parking lot of the Sunterra has been PACKED If they really want people to ride the train, even from the wealthy areas, they are going to have to lower or eliminate the fee. You just have to decide which is more important, getting people on the train, or collecting $3 from parking.

And yes, I know, people are stupid. They will willingly pay an exorbitant price to park downtown, but, at least they will BE downtown, and not have to take the train
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #468  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2009, 7:22 PM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,865
Nevermind.

Last edited by frinkprof; May 22, 2010 at 5:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #469  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2009, 7:35 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
And this is going a bit O/T, but you can't say 'all' the lots are empty. Crowfoot is usually 90% full every weekday, and if its cold out it has been completely full on a couple occasions. Dalhousie is usually pretty full as well, not always 100% but close to it when I've been in there.
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #470  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2009, 9:37 PM
CTrainDude CTrainDude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 517
Quote:
Originally Posted by PPAR View Post
Where is the four storey office building going to be, and what is it for?
The office portions of that building are supposedly going to be Transit Offices, moved from Victoria Park second floor, including Protective Services and the Control Centre.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #471  
Old Posted Nov 27, 2009, 9:53 PM
mersar's Avatar
mersar mersar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 10,083
Wasn't the control centre supposed to be moved down to Heritage as part of the redevelopment there? Or did they decide to can those plans since they likely won't be going ahead any time soon?
__________________

Live or work in the Beltline? Check out the Official Beltline web site here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #472  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2009, 2:27 AM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,865
Nevermind.

Last edited by frinkprof; May 22, 2010 at 5:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #473  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2009, 4:22 AM
PPAR's Avatar
PPAR PPAR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 604
For the record- after today's snowfall, it took me two and a half hours to get from the intersection of Crowchild and Bow Trail, to 69th and 17 Av!

Cannot think of a better reason to get the West Leg of the LRT built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #474  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2009, 6:23 AM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by PPAR View Post
For the record- after today's snowfall, it took me two and a half hours to get from the intersection of Crowchild and Bow Trail, to 69th and 17 Av!

Cannot think of a better reason to get the West Leg of the LRT built.
Ahhh, rail transit, you are a savior. Bus transit, you suck.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #475  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2009, 7:59 PM
Mike Wilhelm Mike Wilhelm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 89
We needed to walk downtown to get to company Christmas party - no bus or cab could make the hill. LRT will be good.

As a update - nothing happening, really. Tentative construction start date is February/March, and I'm sure SNC is pretty busy getting their plan in place. Noted some geotechical work around the pedestrian overpass in the park; the demolition of the seniors home is now done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #476  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2009, 10:39 PM
mr.steevo mr.steevo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 154
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
Ahhh, rail transit, you are a savior. Bus transit, you suck.
At least you can easily hoop off a bus if it craps out. De-training without a platform looks tricky.

Still, I can't wait for this LRT extension!

s.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #477  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2009, 11:51 PM
Aegis's Avatar
Aegis Aegis is offline
Analyst, Commercial Mtgs
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bankview
Posts: 1,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof View Post
Here's some pictures of a model of the 69th Street Station Parkade:
http://www.westlrt.ca/files/Parkade%20Model%20Photographs.pdf

Shit, I knew we wouldn't get rid of that SAIT parkade for long.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #478  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2009, 11:54 PM
Wooster's Avatar
Wooster Wooster is offline
Round Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,689
This will be way, way nicer than the SAIT parkade. Large parking garages are certainly better than even larger surface parking and this one seems to have an interesting cladding. The landscape and transit plaza between it and the station also looks pretty good to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #479  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2009, 2:17 AM
The Chemist's Avatar
The Chemist The Chemist is offline
恭喜发财!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 中国上海/Shanghai
Posts: 8,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorporateWhore View Post
As someone who commutes on the world's biggest subway system, I can ensure you that most people will do whatever they can to ignore your presence entirely... especially when their face is lodged into your armpit.

Seats that go down the length of the train always seem to fit way more people than pairs placed in rows. In the midst of rush-hour you dont really care about sitting down since you probably won't get to anyway. You just want as much breathing room between you and the next guy as possible.
As someone who commutes on the soon-to-be world's biggest subway system ( ) I agree with this sentiment. Putting seats only along the walls of the train is far more efficient than having them perpendicular to the walls, and significantly increases capacity - a standing person takes up significantly less space than a sitting person does. It's no wonder that pretty much every large metro system in the world uses this form of seating, and not the perpendicular seating found on many LRT systems.
__________________
"Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature." - Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #480  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2009, 2:26 AM
frinkprof's Avatar
frinkprof frinkprof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Gary
Posts: 4,865
Nevermind.

Last edited by frinkprof; May 22, 2010 at 6:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:55 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.