HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


View Poll Results: What is the most compelling UBC project or proposal?
University Town 34 31.19%
University Boulevard 34 31.19%
Museum of Anthropology Expansion 13 11.93%
UBC Winter Sports Centre 11 10.09%
Irving K. Barber Learning Centre 7 6.42%
Sauder School of Business building redevelopment 10 9.17%
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2009, 8:12 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,487
Some cool new renderings of the UBC Faculty of Law Building.
http://www.ceiarchitecture.com/
Click on the link then go to projects>post secondary>UBC Faculty of Law
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2009, 7:35 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,079
the save on foods in that new development opened last weekend
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2009, 9:06 PM
AlexYVR's Avatar
AlexYVR AlexYVR is offline
In Love With YVRthing
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago:Vancouver
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post



UBC gets $86-million in provincial funding for new pharmaceutical science building


By Amy O'Brian, Vancouver Sun
September 4, 2009 12:02 PM

The B.C. government announced Friday it will contribute more than $86 million to a new building for the faculty of pharmaceutical science at the University of B.C., allowing the department to expand and accept more students.

An additional 72 students will be able to start the undergraduate program in 2011, graduating by 2015. The total cost of the project is $133 million and it will be built with the aim of achieving gold certification in Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Interestingly, even though the decision process for hiring PC hasn't closed yet, UBC Public Affairs already has a link to "illustrations of the building".

http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/download/

This is quite untrue, as anyone in the A&E industry - or with a sharp eye - can tell from the renderings. Also interesting that IBI has their stamp on this rendering and didn't get shortlisted for the building.
__________________
WWJJD?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2009, 10:54 PM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
Vancouver User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,460
looks great. love the way most new public buildings are marrying concrete, steel, wood, and glass.
__________________
Check out TripStyler.com {locally focused travel blog} | My instagram {Travel Photos}
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2009, 9:27 PM
Rusty Gull's Avatar
Rusty Gull Rusty Gull is offline
Site 8 Lives
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver's North Shore
Posts: 1,285
Bus loop blues

Piecing together the U-Blvd project

BY SAMANTHA JUNG
[email protected]

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9TH, 2009

1. What is the underground bus loop?

The underground bus loop is part of UBC’s plans to create a “university town” on campus, more commonly known as the “U-Blvd” project, and to replace the “temporary” bus loop on Wesbrook Mall. It was originally designed to go under a shopping mall and block of condos on University Boulevard to provide accessible transportation. According to former AMS VP Administration Tristan Markle, the university has scrapped the condo plan but is still going ahead with the $40 million bus loop project.

The AMS has been vocal about their opposition, lobbying the Board of Governors to halt construction. Students-at-large have also voiced their opinions: in April 2007 a petition was signed in opposition to the entire U-Blvd project. A protest space called Trek Park was created, which caused a number of confrontations between police and students.
In April 2008, 20 students were arrested after a “peaceful protest” turned ugly in an incident that is now known as “Knoll-Aid 2.0.” Included in those arrests was Stefanie Ratjen, who was the AMS VP external at the time.
Today, the AMS still maintains their opposition to the cost of the project, lack of capacity and inability for trolley buses to access the bus loop.

3. How the new SUB fits into it

AMS President Blake Frederick told The Ubyssey that the AMS has started planning for the underground bus loop in their plans for the $110 million SUB Renew project.
How exactly the two plans will fit together, Frederick said, is yet to be determined.

4. If you want it, get on with it

Almost seven years later, the project seems to finally be in the construction stage. The university has reevaluated the project multiple times. Students were finally granted involvement in the planning process during the 2007/2008 year, when the AMS executive pushed for inclusion.

The project has experienced many delays. In January 2006, a construction boom, combined with poor budgeting, forced the project to schedule construction in phases, which delayed its start. One of the architectural firms pulled out of the project in the summer of the same year, restarting the hiring process. Relocation of the underground utilities were complete this past summer, and the walkway by Shoppers Drug Mart was restored.

5. two part project: UBC not worried

The Board of Governors decided to separate building the actual bus loop from building the ramp and tunnel leading to it.
You could end up building a tunnel to nowhere,” students told the university when they announced the separation of the two parts of the project in 2006.
Managing Director of Infrastructure Development for UBC’s Land and Building Services John Metras said that this is not possible. “The board is very supportive of the project, so no, there’s really not a chance that one part would go ahead and the other part wouldn’t,” he said. “This [project] has gone on for quite a number of years; really at this point we’re in the implementation process.”

6. Looking ahead

The university is still committed to the project, and are waiting for TransLink to get back to them with design details and a construction schedule. They are expecting a decision from TransLink by the end of October.
Despite concerns that the bus loop is too small, John Metras, managing director of infrastructure development for UBC’s Land and Building Services, said that the university is comfortable that the facility at its current size will meet the needs of commuters, and that they’re “relying on the technical expertise of Translink.”
“We’ve heard all of the concerns,” he said, “and I think there’s been efforts to try to address some of those concerns, but ultimately…the project will go ahead.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2009, 10:48 PM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
thanks for the update. it's nice to see that the university is still stringing everyone along pretending to plan to build this sucker. one day, some school vp will shoot himself in his office and the whole snooker will come unraveled.

joking aside: the underground loop won't allow for trolley buses?? stupid. building the loops for lower rather than higher capacity? stupid. dropping the condo portion? stupid (unless that just means that the housing component will be serving some other function). good old ubes.

a further aside: i seem to recall that when the architect was selected, this thing was supposed to be done roughly in time for the olympics. funny how that goes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2009, 10:59 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,639
This is perhaps the worst transit project this province has seen for a long time. Congrats UBC!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2009, 12:51 AM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
How does a future Skytrain station tie into this plan? Does it? If not, isn't that something that should be looked at. Especially considering by the time this thing actually gets going, skytrain to UBC will only be a couple years away.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2009, 6:55 AM
cabotp cabotp is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
^ I was thinking the same thing. Considering skytrain would put a major change in the plans if it gets there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2009, 7:46 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by flight_from_kamakura View Post
thanks for the update. it's nice to see that the university is still stringing everyone along pretending to plan to build this sucker. one day, some school vp will shoot himself in his office and the whole snooker will come unraveled.

joking aside: the underground loop won't allow for trolley buses?? stupid. building the loops for lower rather than higher capacity? stupid. dropping the condo portion? stupid (unless that just means that the housing component will be serving some other function).
The worst part of the plan was the market housing. They fudged the numbers in the consultation portion of the project in order to bring it as far as they could. Putting market housing in the middle on university square would generate so many noise complaints its not funny. The idea that market housing should be above places like the pit or gallery would add just another reason for the RCMP to continue to advance the war on fun which is plaguing UBC.

In my opinion campus planning should just be disbanded and started anew. They got about 600 responses for the consultation survey of which only a handful said anything other than strongly against market housing, when presented to the UBC Board of Governors they listed market housing as one of the highest priorities as given by the consultation process.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2009, 4:34 PM
nova9 nova9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,086
Not exactly a UBC updates but it is on UEL. The new University Hill Secondary for the Vancouver School Board which is taking over the space currently held by the National Resource Council.

http://www.vsb.bc.ca/district-news/new-schools-planned-ubcuniversity-endowment-lands

For a .pdf of plans for the new highschool as well as the conversion of the old highschool into U-Hill Elementary.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2009, 7:36 PM
ravman ravman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 560
UBC Plans to Cancel Underground Bus Loop, Students Demand Accountability

UBC Plans to Cancel Underground Bus Loop, Students Demand Accountability

Oct. 27, 2009

The Alma Mater Society at UBC Vancouver (AMS) is demanding accountability now that the UBC Executive has planned to cancel the underground bus loop that is already under construction.

The decision to have one central below-grade bus terminal on campus emerged from the 2003 Campus Transit Plan—prior to any public consultation. The total cost of the project is approximately $50 million and Translink was going to provide approximately $10 million towards construction. The UBC Executive informed the AMS that if Translink could not meet their contribution, the underground bus loop at UBC would be cancelled. Translink has recently adopted a 10-year funding plan that does not include this allocation.

“Students will be furious that UBC has wasted their money for the past six years on a construction project that students opposed from the start,” said AMS President Blake Frederick. “The UBC Board of Governors decided to split the underground bus loop into two projects — the tunnel and the terminal. Students cautioned that UBC could be funding a tunnel to nowhere when they released funding for the tunnel without first securing funding for the terminal. This is exactly what has happened.”

UBC will not respond to the AMS’ request for information on how much money they have squandered on the underground bus loop, although it could be in the millions.

“UBC President Stephen Toope and the UBC Board of Governors must be held accountable for their mismanagement of UBC’s funds,” Frederick says. “This will severely damage students’ confidence in UBC’s campus planning; UBC must now partner with students to determine the revised transit plan for campus.”

http://www2.ams.ubc.ca/index.php/ams/new...bus_loop_students_demand_accountability/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2009, 8:25 PM
AlexYVR's Avatar
AlexYVR AlexYVR is offline
In Love With YVRthing
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago:Vancouver
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by ravman View Post
UBC Plans to Cancel Underground Bus Loop, Students Demand Accountability

Oct. 27, 2009

The Alma Mater Society at UBC Vancouver (AMS) is demanding accountability now that the UBC Executive has planned to cancel the underground bus loop that is already under construction.

The decision to have one central below-grade bus terminal on campus emerged from the 2003 Campus Transit Plan—prior to any public consultation. The total cost of the project is approximately $50 million and Translink was going to provide approximately $10 million towards construction. The UBC Executive informed the AMS that if Translink could not meet their contribution, the underground bus loop at UBC would be cancelled. Translink has recently adopted a 10-year funding plan that does not include this allocation.

“Students will be furious that UBC has wasted their money for the past six years on a construction project that students opposed from the start,” said AMS President Blake Frederick. “The UBC Board of Governors decided to split the underground bus loop into two projects — the tunnel and the terminal. Students cautioned that UBC could be funding a tunnel to nowhere when they released funding for the tunnel without first securing funding for the terminal. This is exactly what has happened.”

UBC will not respond to the AMS’ request for information on how much money they have squandered on the underground bus loop, although it could be in the millions.

“UBC President Stephen Toope and the UBC Board of Governors must be held accountable for their mismanagement of UBC’s funds,” Frederick says. “This will severely damage students’ confidence in UBC’s campus planning; UBC must now partner with students to determine the revised transit plan for campus.”

http://www2.ams.ubc.ca/index.php/ams/new...bus_loop_students_demand_accountability/
Just for accountability's sake, Mr. Fredrick wrote that press release. I happen to fully agree with him, but here's C&CP's side of things:

http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Oct27-09-Open-Letter.pdf
__________________
WWJJD?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2009, 8:12 AM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,204
You can't forget the relocation of all the utilities which has already occured. That in itself was a few million already. UBC has this nasty habit of breaking up things into small chunks when it comes to dealing with this whole bus loop so they can pretend that it costs less. Its easy to say that the bus loop hasn't spend anything on construction when you consider the construction of the tunnel and relocation of utilities a separate project.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2009, 8:43 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Editorial: Does Frederick deserve the benefit of the doubt?

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

A motion to censure an AMS President has not come to Council in nearly five years. That alone should tell you how serious last night’s debate was.

Make no mistake, what President Blake Frederick has done is serious. In his eight months as president, the relationship between UBC and the AMS—and therefore students—has gone seriously downhill. A poorly thought-out press release wasn’t significantly worse than anything else our president has done, but it was the cherry on top of the Sundae of Suck that has been his leadership.

When Stephen Toope, the president of UBC, sends out a letter that is so sharply worded that people say they’ve never seen him this angry and disappointed, you know things have been bungled.

Council realized this. To their credit, most all of our student leaders were worried how students would perceive this and whether the relationship between the AMS and UBC was irrevocably damaged for the rest of the year. They realized they had a public relations debacle on their hands. The vast majority realized that the press release was wrong. The question was whether a formal censure would make their disappointment clear, or would cause more problems than it would solve.

In a case like this, it would seem that a formal apology, or retraction of the press release, would be a public show of grace and humility, not to mention a compromise. It would get the message across without going to extreme measures. After all, Council forced VP External Tim Chu to pull back an overly-partisan report card that was issued on the provincial parties during the May election. They could have done much the same thing here.

But Frederick refused to issue a formal apology and refused to issue a second press release. Moreover, he said that the university should be apologizing. Council wanted him to show some formal contrition.

Instead, he said he was sorry about what happened—not formally, mind you. He said he “would take this very seriously.” He said he would change. He said: Trust me. And Council said: Okay.

Is that really wise? Because thus far, under Frederick, if the AMS has had a chance to embarrass students or damage their relations with the university, more often than not, they have.

They spent $19,000 on advertisements in 24 Hours newspaper. They’ve misled students in leaving CASA. They’ve squandered any chance of students playing a meaningful role of making sure the Olympics doesn’t cause undue disruption to this campus in February. They’ve alienated countless university officials and put into jeopardy negotiations for a new SUB. In the choice between making a political point or building up relationships for students, time and time again Frederick—and Chu—have chosen to make a political point. The bus loop was cancelled. Students had won. There was no need to thumb the university in the eye. But Blake did. Again.

A few councillors claimed that while what Blake did was very stupid, and while what he has done in the past has not been helpful, censuring the president would make the AMS look weak and divided, and damage relations with the university further.

Well you know what? The university now knows that the AMS is deeply divided, and that many councilors have no faith in their president. They also know that they let the juvenile press release stand. You think that makes the AMS look stronger?

There are the continued negotiations to build a new SUB for students. There is a possible federal election. And there are the Winter Olympics, where literally hundreds of millions of people will have their eyes on UBC, and Frederick will be in his final month as AMS President, unencumbered by having to deal with repercussions. Just saying.

There are plenty of more chances for President Frederick to embarrass the AMS and embarrass the student body. Council decided to trust him, rolling the dice just one more time. So, if Frederick makes another gaffe, it’s on you, councilors.





Frederick is the last of the hippies in the AMS. His colleagues were completely wiped out during the last election, and replaced with business-friendly and sane individuals. Chu's another nutcase as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2009, 8:45 AM
AlexYVR's Avatar
AlexYVR AlexYVR is offline
In Love With YVRthing
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago:Vancouver
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Mackinnon View Post
You can't forget the relocation of all the utilities which has already occured. That in itself was a few million already. UBC has this nasty habit of breaking up things into small chunks when it comes to dealing with this whole bus loop so they can pretend that it costs less. Its easy to say that the bus loop hasn't spend anything on construction when you consider the construction of the tunnel and relocation of utilities a separate project.
Oh, absolutely. UBC and C&CP especially are extremely proficient at covering up costs. 'Relocating utilities' will always cost more if you do it unattached to any project, not to mention the fact that all buildings (especially the SUB) to be built in the area now don't have the foundation they were promised by C&CP. . .
__________________
WWJJD?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2009, 7:44 PM
andcarne andcarne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexYVR View Post
Oh, absolutely. UBC and C&CP especially are extremely proficient at covering up costs. 'Relocating utilities' will always cost more if you do it unattached to any project, not to mention the fact that all buildings (especially the SUB) to be built in the area now don't have the foundation they were promised by C&CP. . .
For what it's worth, the answer I got from Nancy Knight (AVP Campus & Community Planning) on this point was the following:

Quote:
The University has been diligently pursuing the overall implementation of the Neighbourhood Plan. The first phase of that Neighbourhood Plan implementation was to move some below-grade utilities, which was required for effective and efficient servicing of the new building sites on University Square and on University Boulevard. The expenditure on this utility work is not associated with the tunnel or terminal. Design work focused on that, and construction over the past year or so has also been for that purpose.
I have my doubts about whether this is entirely true or not, but it does seem plausible. My bigger question right now is what they plan to do in regards to a new loop, and where they intend to put it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 6:17 AM
Locked In's Avatar
Locked In Locked In is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,977
Quote:
UBC's student council president impeached

By Tiffany Crawford, Vancouver SunJanuary 29, 2010 9:02 PM

The president of the University of British Columbia’s student council has been impeached following a backlash over his decision to launch a human rights complaint with the United Nations over rising tuition fees.

About 250 people packed the campus pub Friday night to celebrate or “drown their sorrows” after 76 per cent of UBC students voted to have Blake Frederick removed as president, said Justin McElroy, the sports editor for the university’s newspaper the Ubyssey.

“It is more of a symbolic impeachment because his term was to end two weeks from now,” said McElroy.

Council tried to impeach Frederick in December but, after consulting with a lawyer, found the move would contravene a bylaw enacted by the AMS, the university’s student society. So they passed around a petition and then had an online referendum.

McElroy estimated about 6,900 UBC students voted online.

Students for the impeachment were upset with Frederick because of an official complaint he made to United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights claiming the B.C. and federal government had violated human rights by raising tuition fees.

The complaint was not approved by council.

Those opposed to the UN complaint claim it was part of Frederick’s personal agenda and trivialized real human rights abuses such as genocide, world hunger and child prostitution.

Frederick will be replaced by Bijan Ahmadian.

[email protected]
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
Source: Vancouver Sun
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2010, 6:18 AM
Locked In's Avatar
Locked In Locked In is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,977
Funny UBC news..
Quote:
UBC's student council president impeached

By Tiffany Crawford, Vancouver SunJanuary 29, 2010 9:02 PM

The president of the University of British Columbia’s student council has been impeached following a backlash over his decision to launch a human rights complaint with the United Nations over rising tuition fees.

About 250 people packed the campus pub Friday night to celebrate or “drown their sorrows” after 76 per cent of UBC students voted to have Blake Frederick removed as president, said Justin McElroy, the sports editor for the university’s newspaper the Ubyssey.

“It is more of a symbolic impeachment because his term was to end two weeks from now,” said McElroy.

Council tried to impeach Frederick in December but, after consulting with a lawyer, found the move would contravene a bylaw enacted by the AMS, the university’s student society. So they passed around a petition and then had an online referendum.

McElroy estimated about 6,900 UBC students voted online.

Students for the impeachment were upset with Frederick because of an official complaint he made to United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights claiming the B.C. and federal government had violated human rights by raising tuition fees.

The complaint was not approved by council.

Those opposed to the UN complaint claim it was part of Frederick’s personal agenda and trivialized real human rights abuses such as genocide, world hunger and child prostitution.

Frederick will be replaced by Bijan Ahmadian.

[email protected]
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
Source: Vancouver Sun
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2010, 12:29 AM
Locked In's Avatar
Locked In Locked In is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,977
Ah, a reorganization of the output of the ballot referendum questions led to misappropriation of tabulated results. Well, that clears things up...

Quote:
UBC student council makes mistake announcing president's impeachment

January 31, 2010 4:02 PM

VANCOUVER - The University of B.C. election committee says it made a mistake Friday in announcing that student council president Blake Frederick was impeached.

A referendum question asking students if they supported the removal of Frederick did not pass as reported on Friday
, the elections committee said, in a statement.

“Reorganization of the output of the ballot referendum questions led to misappropriation of tabulated results,” said Isabel Ferreras, elections administrator.

”The elections committee regrets the error.”

Students who called for the impeachment were upset with Frederick because of an official complaint he made to United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights claiming the B.C. and federal government had violated human rights by raising tuition fees. The complaint was not approved by council.
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
Source: Vancouver Sun

Last edited by Locked In; Feb 1, 2010 at 12:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:52 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.