MOSCOW | City of Capitals | 984 FT / 300 M | 77 FLOORS | T/O

malec · #1 Posted **Oct 9, 2009, 11:56 PM**

Just 300m so counts as a supertall (300m, not 1000ft so that we have only one definition of a supertall)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad

by Art-Pushka;

Питер

Москва

]

Quote:

Originally Posted by igor

03/10/09

Aleks · #2 Posted **Oct 10, 2009, 12:38 AM**

These would've complimented the Russia Tower very well

Gamma-Hamster · #3 Posted **Oct 10, 2009, 5:39 PM**

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=460209&page=87

By igor:

10/10/09

NYguy · #4 Posted **Oct 10, 2009, 10:36 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by malec

Just 300m so counts as a supertall (300m, not 1000ft so that we have only one definition of a supertall)

I don't understand what that means. Why wouldn't it be one or the other? Are we now saying 984 ft is the new supertall?

giallo · #5 Posted **Oct 11, 2009, 7:43 AM**

Fantastic supertall. My favourite skyscraper in Moscow.

5Gmuscovite · #6 Posted **Oct 24, 2009, 2:09 PM**

"Moscow" tower is the first Europe supertall and the tallest Europe building 302 m. high.
Now all 3 tallest Europe buildings are in Moscow

.
Also, "Moscow" became the second residential building in the world after Australian Q1.

5Gmuscovite · #7 Posted **Nov 4, 2009, 5:01 PM**

On the top of Europe.

«Вид Москвы с крыши дома на Мосфильмовской» на Яндекс.Фотках

Austinlee · #8 Posted **Nov 4, 2009, 7:13 PM**

This is awesome.

The North One · #9 Posted **Nov 4, 2009, 8:06 PM**

WOW, i cant believe im saying this but, Good Job Moscow!

the downtown looks really nice and i really like the design of all the towers!

maybe dubai could learn a thing or two from them.

malec · #10 Posted **Nov 8, 2009, 9:34 AM**

In Romanian the translation of the equivalent word for skyscraper is "cloud scraper".

Therse pictures are from October 31st but demonstrate this well

Quote:

Originally Posted by KAZAN RESIDENT

http://chistoprudov.livejournal.com/22939.html

5Gmuscovite · #11 Posted **Nov 10, 2009, 5:58 AM**

At night!

staff · #12 Posted **Nov 10, 2009, 8:14 AM**

Love these towers and the cluster as a whole. Very well done, Moscow!

giallo · #13 Posted **Nov 10, 2009, 8:27 AM**

This photo is unreal!

Jacques · #14 Posted **Nov 10, 2009, 11:54 PM**

that is an awesome photo, tks

5Gmuscovite · #15 Posted **Nov 11, 2009, 10:58 AM**

More photos of October 2009.

Don B. · #16 Posted **Nov 13, 2009, 4:11 PM**

This tower is hideous...not elegant at all.

However, I'd give my left nut to have ANYTHING built this tall in Phoenix.

--don

Jobohimself · #17 Posted **Nov 14, 2009, 8:44 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Don B.

This tower is hideous...not elegant at all.

However, I'd give my left nut to have ANYTHING built this tall in Phoenix.

--don

I suppose only having a crappy 70s era downtown would make me as grumpy as the poster above.

These towers, and the complex as a whole, are just awesome. Not hideous glitz like Dubai or mundane boxes like Toronto, just classy, boundary-pushing modern architecture. Props to Moscow.

rapid_business · #18 Posted **Nov 14, 2009, 2:47 PM**

Beautiful, I love it!

Spocket · #19 Posted **Nov 18, 2009, 7:19 AM**

I've got to admit that once it's complete , this new area of Moscow may well rival La Defense for not just tall buildings (which it already surpasses of course ) but as a work of boundary-pushing and beautiful architecture. To me it all looks fantastic.

5Gmuscovite · #20 Posted **Dec 21, 2009, 11:07 AM**

-20C, Photo by VitaliyR