HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1361  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2009, 6:38 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,575
What exactly is this wind turbine going to be powering?
     
     
  #1362  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2009, 7:20 PM
zivan56 zivan56 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,207
The ski hill in general...supplying about 1/4 of its power.
     
     
  #1363  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2009, 7:29 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,487
That is pretty f**king cool!
     
     
  #1364  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2009, 9:04 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by raggedy13 View Post
Great stuff, thanks Delirium. I've been wondering how that turbine has been progressing. I thought it was going to be an obvious feature on the mountains but I haven't even noticed it yet. I'll have to take a close look today and see if I can make it out. That observation deck is a great idea.
i noticed it yesterday for the first time - once you see it its all you can see - its pretty big
     
     
  #1365  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2009, 2:50 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,766
The view from the turbine is going to be incredible- especially at night.
     
     
  #1366  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2009, 3:18 AM
vansky vansky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
that's the cn tower of vancouver
     
     
  #1367  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2009, 3:21 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,805
pics from flickr:






























     
     
  #1368  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2009, 3:24 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,138
so does the observation deck also function as the elevator?
     
     
  #1369  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2009, 6:01 PM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
so does the observation deck also function as the elevator?
I kinda doubt it. If you look at the second last picture, the base of the tower is too thick for the observation pod to slide up and down.

I get the sense that some people's approval of this is very tentative. They're concerned that there might be more turbines put on the mountain and then where do you stop? I was on a walking tour of Strathcona yesterday with local historian James Johnstone (and a couple dozen other people) and we could all see it from Hastings St.

Incidentally, James has a fascinating blog that gives a lot of historical context to some places we are discussing:

http://househistorian.blogspot.com

Today's post is about 1033, Seymour, the old house next to the Penthouse Cabaret. Also on the tour was another historian by the name of Lani Russwurm who also has an amazing blog on some of the more colourful history of Vancouver:

http://pasttensevancouver.wordpress.com

If not for the sunshine today I would spend all afternoon sifting through these treasure troves. :-)
     
     
  #1370  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2009, 6:38 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,575
Forced green renos could make living in Vancouver more expensive
Plan put to council could add to soaring costs for Vancouver homeowners

Lena Sin

Province

Sunday, September, 27, 2009

Forcing Vancouver homeowners to do green upgrades as a condition of getting a home-renovation permit could backfire, critics caution.

The idea was brought forward to city council Tuesday as a "priority action" by the Greenest City Action Team.

"Requiring efficiency upgrades as a permit condition for renovations" was one of six priority recommendations the team wants council to adopt in a bid to make Vancouver more environmentally friendly.

But critics warn that forced green upgrades could making living in Vancouver more expensive -- at a time when housing and property taxes are already soaring.

"Trying to force people to add unaffordable upgrades to their homes could backfire. At a time when property taxes are skyrocketing, the last thing the City of Vancouver should be doing is making home ownership even less affordable," said Maureen Bader of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

The specifics of how the proposal would work -- and what the associated costs would be -- are still unclear, since city staff is just beginning to look at the issue.

The proposal, which would amend the existing building bylaw, will target single-family homes and duplexes.

David Ramslie, the city's sustainable-development program manager, said generally the required efficiency upgrades will be tied to the nature of the renovation and will be as affordable as possible.

The city is aiming to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by about 30 per cent by 2020, so energy-efficiency upgrades on heating and hot-water systems will be key areas targeted, Ramslie said.

Water conservation will also be a guiding principle. For example, a condition of issuing a permit for a bathroom renovation may be installation of a low-flow toilet, he said.

"Our key priority is to start with modest requirements that will not only help us combat against climate change, but will be very affordable -- and in the long term pay for themselves in a very short order," Ramslie said.

City staff will now compile a list of renovations and associated green upgrades that will be required as a condition of getting a permit.

Peter Simpson, CEO of the Greater Vancouver Home Builders' Association, said the proposed bylaw amendment must not make renovations unaffordable, since that could drive homeowners to work with underground contractors in a bid to avoid getting permits.

"If they make it too prescriptive, people will go to the underground industry," said Simpson.

NPA Coun. Suzanne Anton echoed similar concerns, saying a bylaw amendment must not deter people from doing renovations or, alternatively, drive homeowners to do renovations without permits.

"I wouldn't just say an outright no, that it's a bad idea, but I think the city would have to proceed extremely cautiously," said Anton.

The action team is a volunteer group put together by Mayor Gregor Robertson, whose election platform included making Vancouver the greenest city in the world by 2020. Its mandate is to recommend measures to improve the city's environmental performance.

A stakeholder meeting with contractors and renovators will be held Oct. 7, followed by public consultations. A staff report is not expected to be submitted to city council until the end of the year.

© Copyright (c) The Province
     
     
  #1371  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2009, 6:40 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,575
Suites at District - 299 E. 7th Ave., Vancouver - priced below comparable resale properties
Trendy, arty and the price is right

Lena Sin



Province

Sunday, September, 27, 2009

The Facts

What: District South Main, 103 condos in the first building. (A second building, to be released at a later date, will have 148 units.)

Where: 299 E. 7th Ave., Vancouver

Developer: Amacon

Sizes: Studio, 425 sq. ft.; one bedrooms from 544 to 616 sq. ft.; one bedroom and den from 611 to 737 sq. ft.; two bedrooms from 763 to 978 sq. ft.; two bedrooms plus den at 882 sq. ft.; and one bedroom lofts from 686 to 885 sq. ft.

Prices: Studios starting at $223,900; one bedrooms from $279,900; one bedroom plus den starting at $309,900; two bedrooms starting at $384,900; two bedroom plus den starting at $444,900; and one bedroom lofts starting at $329,900.

Open: Show suite open daily from noon to 6 p.m. at 299 E. 7th Ave. Sales start Oct. 3.

More info: www.southmaindistrict.com

It's clear Amacon did its homework before marketing its latest condo development in Mount Pleasant, one of Vancouver's oldest and most creative enclaves: The show suites are furnished with art by local artists, the brochure was produced by a design firm in the 'hood and floor plans were designed with artists in mind.

But at the end of the day, it's price that drives sales and this is likely the biggest reason why District South Main is poised to attract buyers: Amacon says its suites are priced below comparable resale properties

"We competitively priced it. We knew that we had to be realistic," said Nic Jensen, sales manager for District. "We're back to pricing pre-construction homes lower than resales. That's very reassuring; it gives the buyer confidence that there's something being left on the table for them. And that's how it was when everyone was buying five or six years ago."

Prices start at $223,900 for a studio of 425 sq. ft., while one bedrooms between 544 sq. ft. to 616 sq. ft. start at $279,900. Two bedrooms, from 763 sq. ft. to 978 sq. ft., start at $384,900 -- which Jensen notes is comparable to a one bedroom in Yaletown.

It's for this reason that the preview has been drawing prospective buyers from downtown, the suburbs and, of course, the local Main Street neighbourhood.

"The building and location itself is very trendy. There's definitely pent-up demand to live in the area," says Jensen.

Located at 299 E. 7th Avenue, just half a block off Main Street, the development is comprised of two new condo buildings plus a restored heritage building that will be turned into commercial space.

In designing District, Amacon was cognizant that it was building in a neighbourhood with a strong sense of community that values both creativity and authenticity.

As such, the restored heritage building, which once housed beer, supplies and horses for the nearby Brewery Creek, will see half its commercial space allocated to artists, be it a dance studio or art gallery. Amacon has yet to determine who will be moving into the other half.

Amacon is currently marketing the condos in the 10-storey south building, with 103 units. The second building will be nine storeys with 148 condos. There is no release date on the second phase yet.

Building on the success of its Beasley development downtown, where Amacon slashed prices by a minimum of 22 per cent in the spring in order to push sales, they've similarly kept prices down at District by negotiating lower costs on the construction side.

And in partnership with radio station Rock 101, Amacon is giving away a 630-sq.-ft. condo, as well as a $15,000 Harley Davidson, a Fuego barbeque and iMac computer package. Two hundred keys will be given out and on Nov. 6, a draw will be held and the winner announced on Rock 101.

Completion for the first building is slated for July 2012. The preview is on now with sales starting Oct. 3.

© Copyright (c) The Province
     
     
  #1372  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2009, 5:35 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,575
Metro Vancouver needs new rules for smart-growth development
Affordable-housing creation starts with overhaul of regional government

Bob Ransford

Sun

Saturday, October, 03, 2009

In my last two columns I attempted to shed some light on the less-than-impressive track record of the provincial government in addressing the important issues that affect our quality of life in urban British Columbia, especially in Metro Vancouver.

At best, provincial policies have contradicted the current government's talk about making housing more affordable and addressing urban growth's environmental impacts that are contributing to climate change.

The current provincial government has completely neglected its role in establishing effective and workable ground rules for local and regional governments when it comes to coordinating land use and transportation planning.

It is this coordinated planning and growth management that is so desperately needed to address the supply side of the housing supply-and-demand equation and keep housing prices within an affordable range. It is also this kind of regional and local planning that is required to shrink our urban ecological footprint and begin reversing the climate-change trend.

Now that I have criticized, I want to offer my view on what the provincial government can do to make housing more affordable and better address urban growth's environmental impacts.

It can start by mandating an overhaul of regional governments in B.C., starting with Metro Vancouver.

Step one would be amalgamating the Metro Vancouver and Fraser Valley regional districts so that we have one metropolitan government for the entire metropolitan area. We're one big urban area already, with one transportation spine, a shared air-shed and with common geographic constraints.

Both regional governments are toothless in managing regional planning and growth. TransLink, serving Metro Vancouver, is both severely constrained in securing the funding it needs and disconnected from the decision making around regional and local planning. TransLink needs to become part of the new amalgamated regional government.

The current regional governance structure doesn't work. It relies on consensus-based decision making by a group of politicians who spend too much time spinning their wheels grappling with problems that go far beyond their parochial interests. Collectively, the voters who live in Metro Vancouver have no way of holding these politicians responsible as they are not elected, but instead appointed to Metro Vancouver's board by their respective municipal councils.

An overhaul of regional government needs to start with a new governance structure. An effective regional government needs a board that is accountable to taxpayers. Perhaps the best model would be a hybrid model that includes half of the board members elected directly by voters in Metro Vancouver and the other half appointed by municipal councils.

An overhaul of metropolitan Vancouver's regional government needs to include new ground rules for a regional plan that clearly spells out how smart growth will be accommodated over time and allocates growth to municipalities at various density levels that reinforce smart growth and support a robust and diverse transportation network. The regional government needs authority to ensure that municipalities follow the plan and accept growth by zoning land adequate to meet growth targets.

Adequate land needs to be identified for industrial and commercial growth as well as residential growth so that we can ensure a healthy balance between jobs and homes and maintain a strong regional economy. The regional government needs to have enough clout to stop the conversion of industrial and commercial lands to residential uses.

A progressive metropolitan plan shouldn't simply focus on existing growth centres and downtowns but should also recognize that the greatest opportunity to improve urbanism and achieve real gains in quality of life is in the suburbs, especially at the metropolitan edge.

It is simply not good enough to draw an arbitrary growth boundary on paper without looking at finer design details of how we might best integrate suburban and rural areas.

Huge opportunities exist to not only preserve farmland forever but to make that farmland viable for farmers to farm.

Farming can be carried out on a more human scale with a focus on local food security.

The current approach with the Agricultural Land Reserve does little more than create a stand-off at the urban-rural interface, leaving farmland vulnerable to political whim instead of making it valued as part of our urbanism.

Real enforcement of a regional plan requires more than the current murky dispute-resolution processes that currently exist under provincial legislation. Regional governments need to be able to order compliance when a municipality fails to live up to the plan. Full compliance with the regional plan should also be a condition of receiving provincial and federal infrastructure funding as well.

A new regional government needs to be given all of the necessary powers to closely integrate land use and transportation strategies, including the taxing authority to raise the funds necessary to build transportation infrastructure.

Metro Vancouver expresses it best in one of their documents on regional growth: "land-use patterns are a key determinant of transportation demand. Transportation supply and demand measures, in turn, have an impact on land-use patterns and travel behaviour."

Only with a new more effective regional government will our governments, all of them, be successful in making housing more affordable and addressing urban growth's environmental impacts.

The ball is in the provincial government's court.

- Bob Ransford is a public affairs consultant with CounterPoint Communications Inc. He is a former real estate developer who specializes in urban land use issues. E-mail: [email protected]

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
     
     
  #1373  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2009, 5:38 PM
Hed Kandi's Avatar
Hed Kandi Hed Kandi is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,575
PINNACLE LIVING FALSE CREEK
Pinnacle campaign resumes 'private land' selling in False Creek


Sun

Saturday, October, 03, 2009





PINNACLE LIVING FALSE CREEK

Project location: Vancouver

Project size: 105 apartments and townhouses

Residence size: 1 bed; 1 + den; 2 bed; 2 + den; 3 bed, 600 sq. ft. - 1,350 sq. ft.

Prices: 1 bed, from $350,000; 2, from $560,000; 3, from $750,000

Developer: Pinnacle International Architect: IBI

Interior design: False Creek Design

Sales centre: First and Ontario

Hours: noon - 5 p.m., Sat. - Thurs.

Telephone: 604-874-8368

E-mail: [email protected]

Web: pinnacleliving.ca

Occupancy: Summer 2011

- - -

The Pinnacle Living False Creek sales and marketing campaign is not the first ''private lands'' new-home project sales and marketing campaign in southeast False Creek, but it is the first in some time.

The homes will be located a few blocks west of the Olympic Village, from the Millennium development company and located on city of Vancouver property, or "public lands."

As a document on city hall's Southeast False Creek website says: "It is important to distinguish between the city owned lands (public lands) and the privately owned lands (private lands)."

The "public lands" are located mostly between West First and False Creek; the "private lands," between West First and West Second, the latter a major east-west thoroughfare in Vancouver. The homes are located at the intersection of Second and Crowe.

All those who will make a home there, public or private lands, will ultimately reside in the city's newest residential neighbourhood, with easy access to downtown Vancouver and to the shops and services and restaurants on Cambie between the bridge and West 16th.

Certainly any destination north of city hall itself, at 12th and Cambie, is within easy walking distance of Living.

Grace Kwok of Anson-Realty is the organizer of the sales and marketing campaign. This is her first new-home project campaign launch since the spring of 2008.

She likens southeast False Creek to an earlier Yaletown.

Buyers who were sharp enough to recognize Yaletown's potential got the benefit of buying condos at considerably lower prices than what they now sell for, says Kwok, predicting the same will likely happen in southeast False Creek.

"Prices here start in the [$350,000s]. That is a very good price for a west side location," says Kwok.

"This is like Yaletown in the early stages. It is a planned community that in a year, when the Olympics are done, will have all the parks and conveniences established."

The actual Olympic Village will eventually be home to 16,000 people and offer a 45,000-square-foot community centre, three child care centres, an elementary school, community garden and plaza.

The Arthur Erickson-designed community centre will have a full-size gym, games room, arts and crafts room, dock for sailboats, 6,000 square feet of commercial/restaurant space and 10 hectares of park.

Because so many amenities will be nearby, there wasn't a need for Pinnacle Living to incorporate a huge amenity centre into its project. Instead, there will be a smaller amenity room, with a fitness centre, party room, billiard table and kitchenette.

To encourage households with children to move into the neighbourhood, Pinnacle Living is selling three-bedroom homes.

At the other end of the bedroom count, the one bedroom, the minimum 600-square-foot living space was a result of the developer making a conscious choice to provide "livable" space, says Kwok.

"We want all of the units to be totally comfortable. We've gotten feedback from buyers that affordability is important, but they still want to enjoy a comfortable indoor environment."

The six townhouses have a ground level patio entrance and a vaulted living space. The townhouses start at $699,900.

Kwok says many potential buyers are young professionals who have contacted the sales centre knowing they can move up to a larger home "in a location that is very hip and green."

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
     
     
  #1374  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2009, 10:56 PM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,319
"very hip and green". indeed.

hm. so what's the story with the sales at millenium water? if pinnacle is moving forward with this sucker without significant modification (read reduction) of unit sfootage, millenium must have come out alright, no?
     
     
  #1375  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2009, 9:15 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,138
what are they building in the parking lot of the IGA on braodway at arbutus?

its all fenced off and construction going on - is it the showcase sell house thing?
     
     
  #1376  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2009, 9:33 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,732
^ A seven- and five-storey mixed-use mid-rise with a shared podium. The base will have shops and the balance will be condos.
     
     
  #1377  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2009, 12:03 AM
johnjimbc johnjimbc is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 766
This article made me laugh out loud. Those first five paragraphs, not to mention the title and subtitle and banner quote are linguistic torture.

I even knew what they were trying to say, but after five paragraphs found myself re-reading to make sure they weren't trying to pull a fast one on whether the project was on public or private lands.

It takes one sentence to say it. Two for additional impact on the importance. But five paragraphs is pure overkill. And is it so important that it is the primary driver in your marketing campaign? Wouldn't a quote of "We feel these are a better value because they are on private land" somewhere in the article have driven the point home a bit more directly . . . after you've wowed them with the product?

Plus the banner quote for the caption was "'Different' is the Hope." That's not the phrase that quite reaches out and grabs you.

"Is that good?" is the most logical thought response. I can picture a potential buyer thinking, "But I liked those places we saw near Yaletown. These are different? Is that good? I hope it is."

That's probably not the thought process they were going after.

And yet having said all that, they look like they could be good places. It's a handsome middle scale project, and the photos of the model looked nice. Great kitchens and baths.
     
     
  #1378  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2009, 12:57 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
^ A seven- and five-storey mixed-use mid-rise with a shared podium. The base will have shops and the balance will be condos.
yes but its awfully small and made of wood
     
     
  #1379  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2009, 1:13 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Pretty sure the project at 2080 W Broadway is concrete and not wood.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.