Quote:
Originally Posted by hookem
Well, it would be a pretty meaningful difference IMO, because that would have meant we surpassed Ft Worth in tallest building back when 360 was completed.
|
Right. I wasn't discrediting the source by the way, just wondering if the 360 heights were from the developers, or if that source was for one of the other buildings.
This was the email response I got. He says he'll try and find out where the heights came from and let me know for sure. I'll follow up next week with another email to him to see how it's going. I'll let everyone here know of course.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Roberto Villalpando
Hi, Kevin:
My name is Roberto Villalpando and I produce print and online graphics for the Austin American-Statesman. Let me first say that I am a fan of your sites, which is why we frequently rely on your sites as sources.
The back story on the graphic is a little complicated, so I'll try to give you the short version:
I used your site as the initial source for the building heights. We ended up using the graphic when I was on vacation, so I don't know where my editors got any of the new figures. It's possible that we had different information from one of the developers, in which case I'll need to get back to you to find out from our business reporters who they talked to.
It appears that the 360 Condominiums Web site has changed locations, the only apparent "official" one I can find is this one:
http://www.360condominium.com/
But I will absolutely get back to you on the figures.
Thanks.
|