HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1681  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 12:36 PM
kylemacmac kylemacmac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 130
Mr. Rees also completely ignores the lower cost per user of a mass transit system and talks about how we can enhance the streetscape with surface transport. Sure, enhancing the streetscape is kind of the best thing ever, but for the time being, but there is absolutely nothing louder on the road than a B-Line bus. The exhaust from a B-Line is like a ground level jet engine set on vibrate.
     
     
  #1682  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 1:08 PM
The_Henry_Man The_Henry_Man is offline
HA
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Cloud, MN/Richmond, BC
Posts: 873
Mr. Rees just wasted 60s of my life spewing nothing but streetcar propaganda. Thanks Mr. Rees.
     
     
  #1683  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 3:02 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
The B-Line as it is right now is having no problems attracting ridership. Why spend hundreds of millions getting nothing more than a B-Line on steel wheels? Little benefit in speed, little gain in ridership (we can run a B-Line a minute and improve seating configuration to get to 7200 ppphd). It's all bunk. If we're going to spend money, do it RIGHT with Skytrain even if it's just to Arbutus. Otherwise for a fraction of the cost of LRT we can build a dedicated No 3 Rd style busway down the central Broadway corridor up to Arbutus for a fraction of the price. The biggest improvement would be in the PM Peak, where it currently takes up to 50 minutes for a B-Line to get from UBC to Broadway Station, that could be slashed to 40 minutes. Remember, LRT gets stuck in traffic too.
     
     
  #1684  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 4:32 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,949
I think these LRT people also forget how narrow Broadway is. Many LRT routes are on wide avenues. In Hiroshima, Japan, there are street grade LRT systems, but the main avenues these LRTs operate on are up to 100 meters wide! That is double the width of Broadway! Of course these LRTs are only one piece of their train infrastructure, they also have heavy rail lines in the city.

Also it is interesting to note that Vancouver's skytrain system obtains much higher ridership levels than Hiroshima's system.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #1685  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 4:43 PM
djh djh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I think these LRT people also forget how narrow Broadway is. Many LRT routes are on wide avenues. In Hiroshima, Japan, there are street grade LRT systems, but the main avenues these LRTs operate on are up to 100 meters wide! That is double the width of Broadway! Of course these LRTs are only one piece of their train infrastructure, they also have heavy rail lines in the city.

Also it is interesting to note that Vancouver's skytrain system obtains much higher ridership levels than Hiroshima's system.
Do you mean 100 feet? Broadway is nowhere near 50 metres wide, more like 50 feet wide.
     
     
  #1686  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 5:03 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,949
No I mean 100 meters, these avenues in Hiroshima have 3 lanes of through vehicle traffic each way, turning lanes, dedicated rail lanes with stations and wide sidewalks with garden elements. (there are even tree beds in the roads' mediums).

my point being is that Broadway is far to narrow to even consider having at grade rail on it for such a primary artery. (if it is only 50 feet than these avenues in Hiroshima are up to 4 times wider!
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #1687  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 5:22 PM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
Whatever is built it has to be grade separated. Having it sit at a traffic light or slowing down for a traffic light would not be good. So either it will have to be up on pillars which will never happen due to there just not being enough room or underground hence forth a subway.

I also wonder if and when an underground ALRT (subway) is built. It would suddenly become possibly the quickest way to UBC. So would a majority of those who take the 49 or 25 or 33 or 41 or 43 take the Broadway subway instead. Of course for those who live along those other routes it would be pointless to go all the way to Broadway just to catch the subway. But for those coming from south of the south of the Fraser or Burnaby or Tri-Cities. It would probably be quicker to get all the way to Commercial-Broadway or Broadway-City Hall.
     
     
  #1688  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 5:29 PM
metroXpress's Avatar
metroXpress metroXpress is offline
(||||||-||||-||||||)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 2,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I think these LRT people also forget how narrow Broadway is. Many LRT routes are on wide avenues. In Hiroshima, Japan, there are street grade LRT systems, but the main avenues these LRTs operate on are up to 100 meters wide! That is double the width of Broadway! Of course these LRTs are only one piece of their train infrastructure, they also have heavy rail lines in the city.

Also it is interesting to note that Vancouver's skytrain system obtains much higher ridership levels than Hiroshima's system.
Exactly, I don't think people would want to give up the two parking lanes....
__________________
"Think simple…reduce the whole
of its parts into the simplest terms,
Getting back to first principles"


~ FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT
     
     
  #1689  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 5:41 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Read the UBC SkyTrain manifesto people, it says it all.
     
     
  #1690  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 5:45 PM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
^^ Can you post a link or point me in the right direction
     
     
  #1691  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2009, 5:45 PM
CLC CLC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen View Post
Exactly, I don't think people would want to give up the two parking lanes....
Just see this picture from Hongkong for illustration:

LRT on Broadway will become like Hongkong northwest's Yuen Long Main Road , which was a century old corridor but since late 1980s has got the light rail running through. Nowadays it is a daily congestion nightmare there.
     
     
  #1692  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 12:06 AM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,578
http://www.granvilleonline.ca/gr/blogs/e...why-do-you-want-subway-ubc#ixzz0RGYHLOjK

Quote:
One developer in London told me that he could not sell property based on “a staircase at a street corner,” which is what a subway station is. That was why we built the Docklands Light Railway first—even though we knew it would not be big enough if we were successful. And sure enough the Jubilee Line got built soon after Canary Wharf opened.
Arrrrrrrrgh!

Arguing against Skytrain under Broadway and using the London DLR as your case study?

Hello! Are you there McFly? Think will ya?!

The DLR is a fully automated, fully grade separated, medium capacity rail way. The exact same thing as Skytrain! The only difference is that the DLR stations are closer together, about 750m from each other. Which is something we could do with Skytrain if we wanted. And Skytrain has a much higher capacity and is more successful than the DLR.

I can't tell if he is arguing for or against Skytrain anymore? Or is he saying that first we spend hundreds of millions on a slow system, THEN build the subway once it is proved he is a moron for not building Skytrain first? Why not cut to the chase and build Skytrain right away, no need to build a system that will be obsolete by the time it opens.

The reason it was so cheap was because it was built in a run down industrial part of town, that was then redeveloped. And they didn't build the DLR as a first step, it was an accident it was so popular. The system was too small for a growing mega city like London, so they had to augment it with a Subway.

And the lack of developments around stations in Vancouver is the Vancouver's problem, not a Skytrain problem. The city of Vancouver is deadly slow at developing land and rezoning. It will happen eventually, especially around some Canada Line stations, but if you want to see what Skytrain can do look at New West or Metrotown or Joyce, or Guilmore/Brentwood/Holdom.

There will be development around stations on Broadway, as pieces of the land, especially on Broadway are already zoned commercial (its easier to rezone commercial to mixed use high density than low density residential to something else). Just look at all the building that HAS happened on Cambie South of Broadway, and all along the Broadway Corridor from Cambie to Burrard. There is room for much more than Skytrain can help make a reality.
     
     
  #1693  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 12:45 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
From zewisystem:


Some balance please! An independant view of the RAV/Canada line.
September 11, 2009 by zweisystem

The following Email came Zweisystem’s way today and is certainly contrary to the hype and hoopla of other blogs claiming that the RAV Line is almost at capacity. The author of the item, who wishes to remain anonymous, is a party who works in local transit planning. Yes, the RAV/Canada line is up and running, but so is RAV’s debt clock and the ludicrous number of 100,000 passengers a day, claimed by TransLink, for the RAV line to ‘break even’, doesn’t take into account apportioning fares between RAV and bus, discount fares and the U-pass.

Yes the U-Pass, sounds good but it is the taxpayer who will be left with higher taxes and fees to subsidies deep discounted student fares enabling them to use premium priced metros!

A complete transportation financial fiasco is just around the corner.

Imagine, not knowing what impacts a project you have been working on for 7 years would have on the other adjoining transit corridors. Despite an administration staff of over 350 people, TransLink and its subsidiaries still can’t run a transit system.

During the last three days I have driven from White Rock to downtown Vancouver, taken the bus/train from White Rock to downtown Vancouver and today took the train to the airport and to Brighouse from the Bridgeport Station. I did this during the am peak period.

My initial observations…it took 6 minutes longer to go from White Rock to Granville or City Centre Station with the bus/train journey (66 minutes). Prior to the summer, I took the 351 from White Rock to Granville and Seymour during the am peak and it took 60 minutes. My car trip on Wednesday took 43 minutes.

I witnessed very little congestion, unlike other Expo Line stations, and found ample room to stand, unlike the Expo Line cars during the am peak. The journey in the tunnel was as expected dull. I was looking for leaks along Cambie Street, but I guess we will have to wait for the real rains to arrive. Most of the people on the train were young and appeared to be students and most of them got off downtown. Very few passengers got off at the 49th ave station and very few got off at City Hall station. Only two people wearing suits were on board and they came on at 12th, City Hall and going downtown. Very few people got on the train in Vancouver. Some at Broadway heading downtown but the train had ample room for them.

The return journey from downtown Vancouver to Bridgeport in Richmond was very comfortable as only 1/4 of the seats were occupied…this is till during the am peak period. Two people had small bags heading to the airport.

Today, I rode into Richmond Centre or Brighouse. The line is single track after the Landsdowne Mall. Most people got off at either Aberdeen or Landsdowne Mall. Returning back to Bridgeport station we waited two minutes after boarding before beginning the journey. The problem with single track guideways. At no time were the cars full or congested and at no time did I see more than a B-Line bus load on any of the Rmd trains. The airport mainly had sightseers who were going on a round trip to and from the airport. Four people on board had luggage.

I began to wonder how Translink is going to find the $70 million it needs to pay for their portion of the debt and for what they need to pay Intransient BC (SNC Lavalin) for operating the line. Each transit user that uses the train will be subsidized a minimum of $2,000 a year based on Translink’s boarding numbers of 77,000 per day!

It is still to early to guage the performance of this line. Once the ‘tourist’ user has satisfied their curiosity and people settle into the Fall commuting season, we will see what is happening.

I have sent an email to two Vancouver councillors asking whether or not the City is going to do trip counts on all its southern entry points, Knight Street-Oak-Arthur Laing Bridges, to see if traffic is less or more than what it was in the past. The City usually conducts traffic trip counts in November. It would be good to get that data since number challenged Falcon believes the train will reduce daily vehicle trips by 200,000 or 40% of the entire am peak period vehicles commuting on our region’s roadways.

I have also contacted the taxi association to find out how the line is impacting their business. They will not know until mid October or after the Cruise Ship season. The airport passenger stats show that from January to June of this year, passenger numbers are down by 15% or 1.2 million passengers from last year. All segments, domestic, transborder and international numbers are down. However, the cruise ship numbers are up from last year, increased by 8%, despite less sailings.

When I asked one of the execs with the London Underground just who takes the tube from Heathrow to Piccadilly (London) he answered, the budget traveller.

A friend who recently took the train from YVR to get to his home near Trout Lake in Vancouver was happy that his journey took only 45 minutes. I said that if he had taken a taxi he would have been home in 20 minutes. So perhaps if we are talking about efficiency, we should have more taxis or even vans for multiple passengers taking people to their destinations like they do in a lot of other cities in the world. Perhaps fares for taxis could be subsidized, it would be cheaper.

Just one final note…my car journey into Vancouver was amazingly fast. I don’t know why that is. One thing I did notice…Granville Street was without buses, it was so quiet I thought I might be someplace else. However, the golden rule states, if there is capacity on a roadway, it will be filled.













From Radio 1130 – Cambie merchants still waiting for Canada Line business boom. Not coming? Yes, Zweisystem told you so!

September 13, 2009 by zweisystem

Well the RAV/Canada line has been open for some time now and now one wonders where is all those subway passengers that were dying to shop on Cambie St., as promised by RAVCo. and InTransit BC?

Didn’t come? Well don’t hold your breathe, they’re not. It has been found in other jurisdictions where cut-and-cover subway construction has been done that it takes ten years for businesses to recouver financially. Unlike new light-rail lines, where adjacent business see about a 10% increase in revenue, businesses on top of a subway do not. The reason is simple; on-street/at-grade LRT transit customers see local businesses and with convenient stops can access them with little interruption of their journey. All subway passengers see is dank concrete and with widely spaced stations, seldom venture forth and patronize local businesses.

Zweisystem knew this, then why didn’t Gordon Campbell, Kevin Falcon, Susan Anton, Larry Campbell, TransLink’s planners, radio talk show hosts, reporters, and the rest who vaguely promised and/or spoke of a great upsurge in local business whence the RAV/Canada Line opened?

Dave White VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) | Saturday, September 12th, 2009 1:00 pm

It’s been nearly a month since the Canada Line opened, connecting downtown with Richmond and YVR. But Cambie Street business owners are still evaluating just what the line will mean for their businesses after enduring years of construction.

Leonard Schein with the Cambie Street Business Association says so far there hasn’t been a major spike in business. “We were looking forward to it, but the city is still doing some work and school is just back, and we’ll see over time how that does happen.”

Yip says her business is more likely to be successful with a solid customer base and community advertising.

Karyee Yip, who owns Honey Gifts on Cambie, isn’t expecting a boost because a station was never built in the Cambie Village. ‘It’s kind of disappointing that we lost a lot of business to build this line but we’re not really reaping a lot of benefits once the line is built.”






Commuting is harder now – A letter to the Vancouver Sun
September 16, 2009 by zweisystem

As predicted, the RAV/Canada Line has increased journey times for many transit customers, even those who commute directly to Vancouver. Despite ‘rose coloured glasses’ style stories in the mainstream media and ‘talk radio’, longer journey times translates into less people opting to take transit.
The letter does reveal two issues:
1) What percentage or portion of a student’s U-Pass is paid to In TransitBC? How is a U-Pass apportioned between RAV/Canada Line, SkyTrain and the bus?
2) The 480 Richmond to UBC bus still offers a direct (no-transfer) service and its riders are not forced onto RAV. Strange that, when Trans Link forces all bus customers from South of the Massy Tunnel to transfer to RAV. One wonders if having Liberal MLA’s has anything to do with providing a direct bus service?


Vancouver SunSeptember 16, 2009

The new commuting patterns have added 15 to 20 minutes each way to my commute from Ladner to the University of B.C. Most of this is due to poor connections, especially to the east-west lines on 41st and King Edward. The early 480 bus to UBC is jam-packed when it arrives at Bridgeport.

As for columnist Pete McMartin’s pleasant trip from Tsawwassen to Vancouver (Commute goes smoothly – anticipated chaos fails to show, Sept. 9), he travels at rush hour, rides for almost the full length of the line and doesn’t connect outside the downtown area. His situation is perfectly suited for the train.

Unfortunately, I am resigned to that fact that a longer commute is my sacrifice on the altar of the Olympics.
     
     
  #1694  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 1:28 AM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,578
And people wonder why Translink is broke. It's because we have to cater to these cry babies who want door to door 1 seat service.

And I wish zewisystem would stop talking about subsidizing. Everything in BC is subsidized to some extent. There is no way LRT in the valley would be able to run for profit. If it could, CP, CN, BNSF or SYR would run their own passenger service between cities.

If we unsubsidized Translink, Skytrain and buses, and sold tickets for each ride (instead of an open 90 pass) and manipulated prices and schedules to try and break even, I think only 5 bus routes and possibly the Expo line would be left standing.

There is no way LRT would get built without subsidizing it's construction and operation. And people would still need to make connections with buses, as even LRT can't go down every road past everyone's house. So tickets would still be split between modes like they are now.
     
     
  #1695  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 3:21 AM
mrjauk mrjauk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
From zewisystem:


Some balance please! An independant view of the RAV/Canada line.
September 11, 2009 by zweisystem

The following Email came Zweisystem’s way today and is certainly contrary to the hype and hoopla of other blogs claiming that the RAV Line is almost at capacity. The author of the item, who wishes to remain anonymous, is a party who works in local transit planning. Yes, the RAV/Canada line is up and running, but so is RAV’s debt clock and the ludicrous number of 100,000 passengers a day, claimed by TransLink, for the RAV line to ‘break even’, doesn’t take into account apportioning fares between RAV and bus, discount fares and the U-pass.

Yes the U-Pass, sounds good but it is the taxpayer who will be left with higher taxes and fees to subsidies deep discounted student fares enabling them to use premium priced metros!

A complete transportation financial fiasco is just around the corner.

Imagine, not knowing what impacts a project you have been working on for 7 years would have on the other adjoining transit corridors. Despite an administration staff of over 350 people, TransLink and its subsidiaries still can’t run a transit system.

During the last three days I have driven from White Rock to downtown Vancouver, taken the bus/train from White Rock to downtown Vancouver and today took the train to the airport and to Brighouse from the Bridgeport Station. I did this during the am peak period.

My initial observations…it took 6 minutes longer to go from White Rock to Granville or City Centre Station with the bus/train journey (66 minutes). Prior to the summer, I took the 351 from White Rock to Granville and Seymour during the am peak and it took 60 minutes. My car trip on Wednesday took 43 minutes.

I witnessed very little congestion, unlike other Expo Line stations, and found ample room to stand, unlike the Expo Line cars during the am peak. The journey in the tunnel was as expected dull. I was looking for leaks along Cambie Street, but I guess we will have to wait for the real rains to arrive. Most of the people on the train were young and appeared to be students and most of them got off downtown. Very few passengers got off at the 49th ave station and very few got off at City Hall station. Only two people wearing suits were on board and they came on at 12th, City Hall and going downtown. Very few people got on the train in Vancouver. Some at Broadway heading downtown but the train had ample room for them.

The return journey from downtown Vancouver to Bridgeport in Richmond was very comfortable as only 1/4 of the seats were occupied…this is till during the am peak period. Two people had small bags heading to the airport.

Today, I rode into Richmond Centre or Brighouse. The line is single track after the Landsdowne Mall. Most people got off at either Aberdeen or Landsdowne Mall. Returning back to Bridgeport station we waited two minutes after boarding before beginning the journey. The problem with single track guideways. At no time were the cars full or congested and at no time did I see more than a B-Line bus load on any of the Rmd trains. The airport mainly had sightseers who were going on a round trip to and from the airport. Four people on board had luggage.

I began to wonder how Translink is going to find the $70 million it needs to pay for their portion of the debt and for what they need to pay Intransient BC (SNC Lavalin) for operating the line. Each transit user that uses the train will be subsidized a minimum of $2,000 a year based on Translink’s boarding numbers of 77,000 per day!

It is still to early to guage the performance of this line. Once the ‘tourist’ user has satisfied their curiosity and people settle into the Fall commuting season, we will see what is happening.

I have sent an email to two Vancouver councillors asking whether or not the City is going to do trip counts on all its southern entry points, Knight Street-Oak-Arthur Laing Bridges, to see if traffic is less or more than what it was in the past. The City usually conducts traffic trip counts in November. It would be good to get that data since number challenged Falcon believes the train will reduce daily vehicle trips by 200,000 or 40% of the entire am peak period vehicles commuting on our region’s roadways.

I have also contacted the taxi association to find out how the line is impacting their business. They will not know until mid October or after the Cruise Ship season. The airport passenger stats show that from January to June of this year, passenger numbers are down by 15% or 1.2 million passengers from last year. All segments, domestic, transborder and international numbers are down. However, the cruise ship numbers are up from last year, increased by 8%, despite less sailings.

When I asked one of the execs with the London Underground just who takes the tube from Heathrow to Piccadilly (London) he answered, the budget traveller.

A friend who recently took the train from YVR to get to his home near Trout Lake in Vancouver was happy that his journey took only 45 minutes. I said that if he had taken a taxi he would have been home in 20 minutes. So perhaps if we are talking about efficiency, we should have more taxis or even vans for multiple passengers taking people to their destinations like they do in a lot of other cities in the world. Perhaps fares for taxis could be subsidized, it would be cheaper.

Just one final note…my car journey into Vancouver was amazingly fast. I don’t know why that is. One thing I did notice…Granville Street was without buses, it was so quiet I thought I might be someplace else. However, the golden rule states, if there is capacity on a roadway, it will be filled.

There is so much b.s. here to respond to, that it would take me all night. I'll start with this part.

Quote:
A friend who recently took the train from YVR to get to his home near Trout Lake in Vancouver was happy that his journey took only 45 minutes. I said that if he had taken a taxi he would have been home in 20 minutes.
And that friend would have paid anywhere from 6-8 times more--$30-40 dollars for the taxi versus $5.00 for the Skytrain. Sheesh!

Last edited by mrjauk; Sep 17, 2009 at 3:22 AM. Reason: Missing word
     
     
  #1696  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 4:08 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,949
I also love how the Cambie merchants were expecting an over night spike in sales, it takes months, if not years for any new transit service to find its place in the community, and for the community to shape itself around the transit line! Gradually the customers will come in as locals return to their old habits, and people traveling on the Canada line (to previously untravelled areas for them) start discovering places along Cambie they like.

Love you BCPhil, I feel this whole city needs a "Hello! Are you there McFly? Think will ya!?"

In the words of Biff Tannin, "Putting LRT down Broadway is as bad an idea as putting a screen door on a battleship."
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #1697  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 4:59 AM
windscar windscar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver/Surrey
Posts: 82
Shouldn't that be "putting a screen door on a submarine"?

on another note I hate these whinny people, makes me wonder what's it will be like in 20 years.
     
     
  #1698  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 5:12 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,949
Quote:
Shouldn't that be "putting a screen door on a submarine"?
I wish there was an over the head emoticon. It is a line from "Back to the Future." The character Biff always screws up his phrases. You should watch it some time, great movies.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #1699  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 6:10 AM
BCPhil BCPhil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,578
Sometimes I wish the complainers would make like a tree and get outta here.
     
     
  #1700  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 6:49 AM
cabotp cabotp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,813
I think we all need to donate some cheese for these whiners .

What I would love to do is take all these idiots who moan and groan and ship them to an island and just let them moan amongst each other
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:55 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.