HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1741  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2009, 8:54 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
^ lol what's so different about the domestic terminal Milestones that makes it so much better?

Has anyone tried the Milestones after security in the international terminal?
Well I'm too lazy to get out of security and go back in... even though it's just an access card away... And yes I've been to the one post security a few times now.
     
     
  #1742  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2009, 9:18 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
^ lol, i'd love to work at the airport someday. I thought about working there last year, but the commute wasn't very practical: taking the 25 from UBC, then the 99, and then the 424 is about a 90-minute trip. But now with the Canada Line....
     
     
  #1743  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2009, 9:22 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,050
Question New US Departures Terminal .......

Does anybody have any information; plans, drawings, diagrams,, statistics, on the supposed new United States Departures and Arrivals Terminal to be built in the next ("x") number of years?

Apparently, Templeton Station is ultimately going to be renamed something like "YVR" and will serve this new terminal. This of course represents a major new phase in YVR's development.

Does anyone know anything about it, or have any links to the plans for it?
     
     
  #1744  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2009, 1:31 PM
raskal raskal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Templeton will become an employee parking lot thereby opening up the current lot east of the TB terminal for future expansion. There are plans to add a C-Line stop between Sea Island Station and YVR to accommodate an expansion of the terminal.

Here's a link for YVR 2027 Master Plan.
     
     
  #1745  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2009, 3:02 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,700
^ Thanks for posting the link.

I could not quite picture the planned expasnsion of YVR, let alone how it would relate to the North-South taxiway and "YVR-2" Canada Line station. This graphic took care of that.


Source [page 31]
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #1746  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2009, 4:32 PM
Rusty Gull's Avatar
Rusty Gull Rusty Gull is offline
Site 8 Lives
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver's North Shore
Posts: 1,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x View Post
^ lol what's so different about the domestic terminal Milestones that makes it so much better?

Has anyone tried the Milestones after security in the international terminal?
The Milestones post-security in International is just fine. Actually, it's quite comfortable and airy... nicer than some of the Milestones in the city.

My beef, however, is with the Galiano Cafe pre-security at International - absolutely awful service, food and value.
     
     
  #1747  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2009, 5:36 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
How does the Canada Line affect the North South Taxiway?
     
     
  #1748  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2009, 5:50 PM
agrant's Avatar
agrant agrant is offline
Cheers!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,869
I think the taxiway is supposed to go over top of the Canada Line at a point where it is at grade. The transition to elevated track probably happens slightly west of where they've drawn in the crossing.
     
     
  #1749  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2009, 5:51 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
^ the Line was designed for the north-south taxiway. The section that is now at-grade was originally going to be elevated, but YVR requested that it be at ground level to keep their taxiway options open.
     
     
  #1750  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2009, 5:52 PM
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth Smooth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 906
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon View Post
How does the Canada Line affect the North South Taxiway?
The Canada Line runs along the ground along that stretch to allow for the North-South taxiway to pass above.

EDIT: Wow... I thought I was replying quickly but 2 people beat me to it.
     
     
  #1751  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2009, 2:46 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,699
Looks like JAL is in trouble - hope this doesn't affect YVR's Narita service.

Japan Airlines to Cut Routes and 6,800 Jobs

By HIROKO TABUCHI
Published: September 15, 2009

TOKYO — Japan Airlines said Tuesday that it would cut 6,800 jobs, trim routes and quickly secure emergency funds from an overseas carrier, stepping up restructuring efforts amid mounting losses that threaten to pull the company under.

Delta Air Lines, the world’s biggest airline, and American Airlines are battling over a stake in Japan Airlines, which had a loss of ¥99 billion, or $1 billion, in the three months that ended in June.

Japan Airlines is also reportedly in talks with Air France-KLM and Korean Air Lines over investments amounting to several hundred million dollars, which would give the successful bidder a minority stake in the carrier.

Japan Airlines, the biggest carrier in the country, is struggling to stay afloat despite three government bailouts since 2001. It was hurt by a slump in air travel, the continuing weakness of the Japanese economy and what many analysts see as years of mismanagement.

On Tuesday, the president of Japan Airlines, Haruka Nishimatsu, said to reporters that the company would cut 6,800 jobs over three years and carry out a reorganization of its routes, many of which lose money.

He said the airline, known as JAL, aimed to conclude talks by mid-October on a tie-up with an overseas carrier, but declined to comment on a likely partner or how much JAL hoped to raise. He did not specify how many routes the airline planned to cut or change.

Japan Airlines hopes that a cash infusion from an overseas partner, as well as a drastic turnaround plan, will persuade its creditors to provide fresh capital.

The cash could also let the airline upgrade to newer, more fuel-efficient aircraft and turn around money-losing routes by teaming up with a new partner.

Meanwhile, JAL’s rivals are looking to expand abroad to tap a lucrative market in international business travel.

For Delta, a stake in JAL would add to its trans-Pacific and Asian routes and secure access to coveted berths at the busy Narita International Airport in Tokyo. But Delta is still integrating its $2.6 billion purchase of Northwest and it lost $1.05 billion in the first six months of 2009.

A Delta-JAL deal would hurt American, which could see its current code-sharing agreement with JAL canceled. American lacks a hub in Asia and is expected to bid hard to keep its ties with JAL.

An investment in Japan Airlines would be a high-stakes deal for any player in an industry exposed to wild swings in profitability. Moreover, equity ties between airlines have been rare, with carriers forging looser alliances like code sharing on flights.

An alliance with JAL could be beneficial for U.S. airlines in light of recent talks between the American and Japanese governments on a so-called “open skies” agreement that could open up trans-Pacific routes to greater competition.

Only two U.S. passenger airlines — Delta and United Airlines — are permitted to fly between Narita Airport and cities in the United States.

Despite the potential advantages for the bidders, analysts say that JAL needs to show it is serious about turning itself around if it is to ink a deal.

The company has already forecast a ¥63 billion loss for the current fiscal year, which ends next March. Although it recently secured ¥100 billion in government-backed loans, analysts say the airline needs at least ¥250 billion to get through the year.

JAL is mired in negotiations with its eight unions over staff and pay cuts, holding back the company’s restructuring efforts. The company’s holdings, which include a global hotel chain and credit card business, have also drained its resources. Meanwhile, the carrier is losing out to its rival, All Nippon Airways, on domestic routes.

“On one hand, it’s not a such an expensive purchase, considering the possible rewards,” said Yasuhiro Matsumoto, an analyst at Shinsei Securities. On the other, “nobody wants to invest in a company in such dire straits.”

Yiyi Jiang contributed to this report from Tokyo.
     
     
  #1752  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2009, 4:46 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
It would make me sad to see JAL go under. That would leave us with *ONLY* Air Canada to get to Japan, as ANA surely wouldn't start.

And that simply wouldn't do...
     
     
  #1753  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2009, 4:52 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
It would make me sad to see JAL go under. That would leave us with *ONLY* Air Canada to get to Japan, as ANA surely wouldn't start.

And that simply wouldn't do...
I would LOVE to see ANA start. Much prefer their planes... and they are headed in Osaka.
     
     
  #1754  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2009, 5:38 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
ANA will never start so long as Air Canada is alive. They are part of the same alliance and have codeshare agreements.
     
     
  #1755  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2009, 8:17 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
ANA will never start so long as Air Canada is alive. They are part of the same alliance and have codeshare agreements.
But AC doesn't fly to Osaka any more and they don't even have a presence in that airport.
     
     
  #1756  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2009, 8:18 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
But AC doesn't fly to Osaka any more and they don't even have a presence in that airport.
They most likely will when they take delivery of the 787, whenever that might be!
     
     
  #1757  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2009, 9:18 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
It looks like Air Canada should receive it's first 787 in 2012(according Wikipedia)
     
     
  #1758  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2009, 9:20 PM
Yume-sama's Avatar
Yume-sama Yume-sama is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver / Calgary / Tokyo
Posts: 7,523
Well, hopefully there is still an Air Canada in 2012. The 787's will be quite nice!
     
     
  #1759  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 2:27 AM
zahav zahav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,052
Here's some pics of the new Gateway sign. Taken by one of my co-workers




     
     
  #1760  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2009, 2:31 AM
usog usog is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yume-sama View Post
Well, hopefully there isn't an Air Canada in 2012. Flying JAL will be quite nice!
Fixed

And man it's getting dark much earlier now.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.