HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 6:39 PM
rocket9561 rocket9561 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
Nashville suburb votes to get rid of Trailer Parks

Lakewood is located in Northeastern Davidson Co across Old Hickory Lake from Hendersonville. (Yes, not ALL of Davidson Co is Nashville City Limits) Locally, the city is known for its strict police force and 1950s suburban homes.

Trailer park evictions may leave residents in the cold
By BRAD SCHRADE
Staff Writer


Decision aids Lakewood's effort to get rid of homes

The old white mobile home with faded black shutters isn't much, but Ina K. Deering thought it was a place where she could die in peace.

The 44-year-old woman has drifted for much of her adult life. So when an opportunity arose last year to buy the single-wide at 108 Pitts Ave., Lot 4 in Lakewood, Deering scraped together $1,800 from her back-payment disability checks and bought her first home.

''A $20 million mansion wouldn't have made me any happier when I got this money to buy this little place,'' Deering said. ''It was finally a place of mine so nobody could tell me to get out � I thought my ship hadn't come in, but at least it was a rowboat.''

Her happy residency was disturbed, however, when Odell Binkley Jr., the man who owns the land on which Deering and her neighbors' trailers sit, ordered that the 18 or so mobile home residences be removed by Feb. 1. In an eviction letter dated Nov. 4, Binkley blamed Lakewood city government and its ''present attitude'' for putting him in a ''very deep hole'' with no way out but to have everyone leave the mobile home park.

The tiny town near Old Hickory passed an ordinance last April beginning to rid itself of mobile homes over the next five years. City Manager R.C. White said Lakewood may pass a second ordinance to round out the plan.

Binkley had hoped to expand the park from about 20 lots to 40 when he bought the property February. He said 40 trailer spots made sense financially.

But that plan quickly encountered problems, he said, when the city wouldn't sign off on it and began citing him with codes violations. It didn't help that the trailer park is next to city hall and easily visible across the lawn.

There were so many codes violations � approximately 115 � that Binkley eventually struck a deal with White. He agreed to have the 5-acre mobile home park shut down by Feb. 1 and decided to pursue plans to have the land rezoned for commercial use.

The decision came down to simple business, he said, as it made no sense to fight city hall and make officials mad at him.

''That hasn't really torn me up,'' Binkley said of his decision. ''I don't want to fight city hall over it. My thought was, it would be in my best interest to give the tenants ample notice.''

Binkley gave residents three months notice in November � a time of year in which family budgets often are pinched and the $1,300 cost of relocating a mobile home was tough to come by for some on fixed incomes.

Deering's left leg is amputated above the knee. The amputation stems from a rare cancer and her doctors say she may not live another year, she said. She spends most of her days in bed, too weak to move around except for her monthly visit to the doctor. She fears she will end up back on the streets, homeless, unless she can find a lot to place her mobile home.

''This just slams the door back in my face. ... As bad as my circulation is, I wouldn't survive a week no matter how many blankets I had wrapped around me,'' she added.

Other residents, such as Charlie Ward Sr., are seniors on fixed incomes. He is 94 and has lived with his wife, Gladys, 86, in the mobile home park for about 12 years. They have been paying the $250-a-month rent for the lot from their $1,300-a-month Social Security stipend.

Ward's wife gets around with a walker. Both are nervous about their move and what the future holds. Their 71-year-old son lives in the trailer next door. The family is planning to move the two mobile homes to a trailer park in nearby Old Hickory.

''I try not to get upset, but I've got to move,'' Ward said. ''I've been here a good while.''

Asked how he's going to pay for the move, he said, ''When you're 94, you just listen. I'm letting the kids figure it out. I can't finance it.''

White said the city's new policy on mobile homes was an effort to ''clean up'' Lakewood. The city has about 50 mobile homes, he said, and areas such as Binkley's park have been crime magnets.

The cleanup coincides with plans in Lakewood to attract new retail establishments and higher-priced homes, some possibly in the $1 million range, White said.

As for Binkley's park, it was his decision to either fix the codes problems or close it, White said.

''As far as the residents, that hurts me that they're going to have to move,'' White said. ''But you also can't allow them to live in a place that's not up to codes. It's not the city that's doing it. We don't have anything against the residents that live there. They are just as important as a person that lives in a million-dollar house. It's the codes violations.''

State law does little to help people who live in mobile homes, said Drake Holliday with the Legal Aid Society. They have no more rights under the law than someone in an apartment, he said, yet the cost of their move is much greater and the logistics more complicated.

Holliday said landlords could evict tenants such as Deering and Ward, who don't have leases, by giving a 30-day notice.

''Moving a mobile home is an enormous undertaking and costly. The going rate is about $2,000,'' Holliday said. ''To expect working folks to be able to cough up that on short notice is pretty harsh.''
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 6:56 PM
Sulley's Avatar
Sulley Sulley is offline
Trendy.
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Trendier than yours.
Posts: 13,330
That's total crap.

As much as I hate trailerparks, they were there first, so instead of just eviciting them, why not just wait a few years and gradually phase them out?

Why did you post this in the first place? Was it to prove that a Nashville suburb wants to be so great that it would do anything to say that they didn't have a trailerpark?


I think the reaction to this here will be to the contrary of what you expected.
__________________
Celebrating 12 years of DallasTexan!

DallasTexan-Boomer-DhallassTecksanne-Disceaux Fantasia-Sulley-Optimus Prime-Gloria Estefan

...and others I've surely forgotten...

Last edited by Sulley; Jan 20, 2004 at 7:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 7:05 PM
Style's Avatar
Style Style is offline
King of the Queen
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 433
Man! Everything that is posted on Nashville you attack. Just let it go!
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 7:08 PM
Sulley's Avatar
Sulley Sulley is offline
Trendy.
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Trendier than yours.
Posts: 13,330
You agree with evicting people who can't afford any better... especially in an area that isn't that nice to begin with?
__________________
Celebrating 12 years of DallasTexan!

DallasTexan-Boomer-DhallassTecksanne-Disceaux Fantasia-Sulley-Optimus Prime-Gloria Estefan

...and others I've surely forgotten...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 7:08 PM
Style's Avatar
Style Style is offline
King of the Queen
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 433
What I said had nothing to do with that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 7:10 PM
rocket9561 rocket9561 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
I also think this is wrong. I know other Nashville suburbs have restrictions against new trailer parks but do not shut down old ones. Just wanted to see what others' opinion on the subject might be...

It is nice that a place like Lakeview has ambitions to become a hot real estate location for 1 million dollar homes though. Northeast Davidson Co is really reinventing itself.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 7:16 PM
metroboi's Avatar
metroboi metroboi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,044
I've seen some really excellent photography from Justin on Nashville (actually some of the best photos of Nashville posted here) and as a resident of the place, he is certainly entitled to his opinion. Surrel Nashville, and the photos of New Years eve are two that I remember putting Nashville in a really positive light. I appreciate Justin for posting both the positives and negatives.

I think everyone here should be allowed to express their opinion on development matters even when they think the wrong decisions are being made.
__________________
Gibberish Groupie

UrbanPlanet.org
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 7:21 PM
ncvwgtiboi ncvwgtiboi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 2,228
Isn't that what a forum is for...discussion and debate?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 7:25 PM
Style's Avatar
Style Style is offline
King of the Queen
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 433
As I also expressed my opinoin. I am glad you cleared the way for me guys.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 8:22 PM
LSyd's Avatar
LSyd LSyd is offline
Red October standing by
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbia/Sumter, SC
Posts: 16,922
Tennessee seems to have a problem with mixed-value housing. this is terrible.

-
__________________
"The vapors! The fainting couch! Those heartless elitists are burning down the plantation with their logic and arithmetic!"

-fflint
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2004, 11:49 PM
Rural King's Avatar
Rural King Rural King is offline
King of all things Rural
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 3,173
The war on poor people continues. "Hey your in the way and aren't pretty, so we'll cite and fine you until you move out and/or we condemn your property"!!! If the city wants this gone, they should pay for the trailers to be moved to a new location IMO. Its the right and moral thing to do.

Paducah,Ky is doing this smae sort of thing near its Downtown. It is planning to set up a Artisan District with studios, restored housing, restuarants, etc. in a old downtown housing district.
The area has alot of drugs and crack houses, but then on the other side it has poor working class people too. The city is using building code violations (now suddenly strongly enforced) to condemn properties and sell them off for redevelopment. So on one side they are cleaning up downtown, but are ruining lives in the process by seizing homes of people too poor to get their old large (yet cheap) homes up to code. Why the city won't let the natural market system buy out these residents natually over time, as the legitament "bad" houses are cleaned up and restored vy the city (thus raising the demand for the "good" properties in bad shape); I don't know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2004, 12:02 AM
metroboi's Avatar
metroboi metroboi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,044
Trailer parks are not necessarly bad, in fact they usually are not. So I agree it is not the best move in the world. Many trailer park residents own their trailers and generally are good people. So I hate to see blanket moves such as this.
__________________
Gibberish Groupie

UrbanPlanet.org
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2004, 3:28 AM
Lexy's Avatar
Lexy Lexy is offline
I'm Back!
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 4,259
What about increased property values that allow for more higher priced developments???? If the value of the property that these people sit on is increased greatly, how could they afford to live there in the first place??? Just playing Devils Advocate here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2004, 3:49 AM
Sulley's Avatar
Sulley Sulley is offline
Trendy.
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Trendier than yours.
Posts: 13,330
Well, due to Tennessee's super mega fun low property taxes, no one has to worry about that

Actually, in all seriousness, I don't think the property will be spiking in value anytime soon. It would only do so if the trailers were removed.
__________________
Celebrating 12 years of DallasTexan!

DallasTexan-Boomer-DhallassTecksanne-Disceaux Fantasia-Sulley-Optimus Prime-Gloria Estefan

...and others I've surely forgotten...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2004, 12:18 PM
Pride's Avatar
Pride Pride is offline
Is Here To Stay. . .
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,569
I think it's a crock. Lakewood is no Brentwood or Franklin, nor will it ever be in my lifetime. Evicting people from their homes, is down right ignorant, IMO. Are people in trailer parks considered "lower" than the people in the upscale homes? I think not. . .No one is better than anyone else. Besides, trailer parks are usually more dense, than a subdivision.

I'm not saying I am Pro-Manufactured Homes. I just like fairness between the issues, and this is one case that I don't agree with. :tdown:

Besides, I figured you would be so happy about this Justin.
__________________
Nashville's Photo Gallery
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2004, 2:13 PM
Sulley's Avatar
Sulley Sulley is offline
Trendy.
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Trendier than yours.
Posts: 13,330
No, I'm not. As I said, I don't care for trailer parks at all, but this is just plain wrong.
__________________
Celebrating 12 years of DallasTexan!

DallasTexan-Boomer-DhallassTecksanne-Disceaux Fantasia-Sulley-Optimus Prime-Gloria Estefan

...and others I've surely forgotten...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2004, 3:58 PM
BnaBreaker's Avatar
BnaBreaker BnaBreaker is offline
Resist Fascism
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago/Nashville
Posts: 20,090
Unless the community plans on building the evicted families new homes, then this is just outrageous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2004, 9:22 PM
metroboi's Avatar
metroboi metroboi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,044
I agree. If they were pushing down crack houses I would support it, but this is different.
__________________
Gibberish Groupie

UrbanPlanet.org
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2004, 2:01 AM
Lexy's Avatar
Lexy Lexy is offline
I'm Back!
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 4,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by BnaBreaker
Unless the community plans on building the evicted families new homes, then this is just outrageous.
Absolutely! I agree with you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2004, 6:54 PM
Kheldane's Avatar
Kheldane Kheldane is offline
[edidted for content]
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: [edited for content]
Posts: 505
This (article) doesn't suprise me, nashville has a history of persicuting poor people to make the city look better. Look at the emissions testing cars have to go through. "OH, that helps the environment" "I am so annoyed by cars that put out a lot of smoke" "Old cars are dangerous, I'm glad they're off the road". You will hear all of these bullshit responses when discussing this issue, but the bottom line is this: Middle-class and especially upper-class nashvillians (like people almost everywhere) will use any government power at their disposal to remove poor people from their sight. If there's one thing my fellow co-workers hate/fear, it's nashville's ghettos. I would love the sweet irony if brentwood/franklin was hit by a meteor and everyone had to re-locate to Jo Johnston St. and Dickerson Rd! But seriously, some people can't afford cars with efficient tail-pipes, so what's metro govt's response? Refuse to issue a liscense. WTF? What's a poor person to do? Just die? I was working at the Davidson County tax assessor when Bredesen made the arena and stadium deals, the county assessor was marveling at all the tax sales following Bredesen's prop.tax rate hike. As you know, it's always the marginal producer driven out of the market when govt raises taxes/regulations. Poor, or old fixed income, those are the people who had to sell their houses and move out of county or to a trailer. Why? So Fucking Brentwooders, Belle Meaders and out--of-county suburbanites could have their football and hockey....
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:25 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.