Quote:
Originally Posted by CentralGrad258
Thanks for the kind words everyone, I'll put up more pictures when I get home from work. I hadn't been back in the 17 years since I left and didn't really know what to expect, but the city really is beautiful and very lush with trees and parks everywhere. The newer neighborhoods aren't quite as architecturally striking (bit of an understatement), but interesting in their own right, as they represent the prototypical model of Soviet urban planning from late 1960s going forward.
The Soviet Metro stations are amazing. It's hard to imagine how much it would cost to build these marble palaces so far deep underground, in today's dollars. And yes, they are absolutely spotless, not sure I can explain the reason, maybe it's the culture, maybe it's the fact that the Metro is widely used and requires constant investment (doesn't seem to matter in New York). The SEPTA subways feel positively third-world in comparison. Did I mention the system is still expanding?
|
Actually, the reason they built ornamental subway stations, buildings (whatever remains from the Stalinist period), large parks, squares, avenues etc - was to showcase Communist way of life to the people. Pretty much all publicly accessible areas of the city (subways in particular) were used as a tool to showcase the power and greatness of the Soviet government.
Kiev is beautiful in this case because it combines the above, with mideival era (and earlier) churches and other well preserved buildings.