Quote:
Originally Posted by seamus
As you say, L.A. was definitely a trendsetter for the auto-centric city, and variations on those pictures were spread throughout the nation, a great book on the topic is 'Downtown: Its Rise and Fall'. Many of those losses are very tragic, though it always strikes me how shabby and haphazard the city looked already in the prewar period, when compared to the sepia-toned romanticism old photos often engender from other cities. It's as though the mediocrity of the civilization has remained constant even relative to its era.
|
I guess because even during the prewar period, LA's decentralization was already well under way, even though at the same time many people still went downtown to shop, see movies, conduct business, etc. I think maybe those downtown business owners didn't see the benefits of upkeep for their buildings back then, though now I would think that if they feel their area is losing business to newer parts of town, they would try to keep up and make their area look more sharp, but who knows what was going on back then. The same can be said for Pasadena; depending on old-timers you talk to, some people say that the area now known as Old Pasadena was already on the skids by the 1920s/1930s, with the new hub of commercial activity having moved east near the City Hall area, and then after WWII, it moved yet further east to South Lake Ave.