HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3901  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2009, 10:05 PM
Majin's Avatar
Majin Majin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Downtown Sacramento
Posts: 2,221
I love pork
__________________
Majin Crew: jsf8278, wburg, daverave
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3902  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2009, 6:51 AM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 7,758
Hey, if we're gonna spend money, why not have Sacramento get in on the action too.
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3903  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2009, 2:08 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088
Friday, April 10, 2009
State office growth staying centralized
Plans to double space over next 40 years
Sacramento Business Journal - by Michael Shaw Staff writer

The state of California will need to nearly double its office space over the next 40 years and will look to fill remaining vacant spots in Sacramento’s central core, including The Railyards, but will also consider other areas such as suburban office campuses and the West Sacramento riverfront.



Those are the findings of a much-anticipated study released today that could mean opportunities for landlords and developers. Local government leaders, anxious about the state’s long-term goals, have also been eager to hear the findings and for the most part were relieved to hear the results.

The Sacramento Region State Office Planning Study estimates a need for another 13.7 million square feet in the capital region, far more than currently controlled by state government in the downtown core.

Consequently, officials will look to the most promising ready-to-develop sites to accommodate the state’s growing office needs.

The study, commissioned by the Department of General Services, is the first major update to an obsolete 1960s-era plan that envisioned state offices occupying a monolithic chunk of downtown encompassing 62 blocks south of the Capitol.

“A really long-term focus like this hasn’t been done in probably 40 years,” said Doug Button, deputy director of General Services.

The study determined several sites in Sacramento and West Sacramento that could be the best short-term solutions for expanding office needs, based on proximity to public transit, compliance with environmental and floodplain considerations and several other state requirements.

But the study is not a “target list” of parcels that the state plans to locate, Button cautioned, noting that the optimum sites could change over time.

“If a new bus line goes in, it could change things next year,” he said.

And given the economy and the state’s budget problems, the study’s not likely to immediately affect the regional office market or development trends.

A consultant team led by Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum Inc., an international planning firm better known as HOK, studied available office opportunities in a 15-mile radius of downtown Sacramento. The team examined 48 different sites within that area, some on state-owned land and others entitled or planned for office developments. Consultants met with officials from Sacramento, West Sacramento, Sacramento County, the Sacramento Regional Transit District and the Sacramento Area Council of Governments to examine growth areas and determine which parcels are best outfitted for office developments.

Although it falls within the 15-mile radius, the city of Davis was the only jurisdiction that declined to participate, officials said.

The study determined eight of the 48 sites are “optimum” destinations for new state office buildings over the next five years. One of the big winners could be West Sacramento, which has two optimum sites — the area formerly called the “Triangle” that has been renamed “The Bridge District,” and the Washington area to the north of that district.

West Sacramento Mayor Christopher Cabaldon welcomed the possible arrival of state offices.

“It’s the right strategic fit for what we’re trying to accomplish,” he said. “It’s keeping these types of developments within the urban core, so it fits with regional strategies.”

West Sacramento is already transforming industrial districts into housing and office developments, but it still needs to build critical fiber-optic lines, sewer connections and other infrastructure to ensure that transformation, Cabaldon said.

The state’s consultants concluded there could be about 4 million square feet of usable space in West Sacramento. But the city says the Bridge District alone could accommodate as much as 7 million square feet.

Sacramento city officials also welcomed the study because it highlights remaining downtown sites and several others within the city as optimum for near-term development.

“This takes the angst out of it,” Sacramento City Manager Ray Kerridge said of the study. “In the past, when the state was looking at facilities, there had been a competitive aspect. We saw that with the West End project.”

Developers with sites on both sides of the Sacramento River competed for the huge West End project, which would have housed the California Resources Agency. Elected officials became advocates for specific sites before the state ultimately put the project on hold due to budget constraints. To read more click here...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3904  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2009, 4:35 AM
Pistola916 Pistola916 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SAN FRANCISCO/SACRAMENTO
Posts: 634
Maybe they'll bring back the Golden State tower proposal back or something similar.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3905  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2009, 5:35 PM
Sactorleans's Avatar
Sactorleans Sactorleans is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Midtown Sacramento
Posts: 39
Empty Lot on F Street Between 11th and 12th

They are currently excavating the empty lot on F Street between 11th and 12th Street (between Three Women & an Armoire and Dominoes).

Anyone know what the plan is for that location?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3906  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2009, 7:48 PM
Phillip Phillip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 562
re: post 3903 (State needs more office space)

Quote:
The Sacramento Region State Office Planning Study estimates a need for another 13.7 million square feet in the capital region, far more than currently controlled by state government in the downtown core.
This week's Sac Business Journal says Sacramento's office vacancy rate is 19.6% for offices 10,000 s.f. and larger.

Can anyone translate a 19.6% vacancy rate into square feet available?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3907  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2009, 4:30 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088
Friday, April 17, 2009

Lofts lender asks to foreclose on unsold units
Sales have stalled at high-profile L Street Lofts project in midtown

Sacramento Business Journal - by Michael Shaw

Developer Sotiris Kolokotronis built the L Street Lofts in a partnership venture with Resmark Equity Partners of Los Angeles.

The L Street Lofts had been hailed as a revitalizing project for midtown Sacramento but a protracted dispute has left sales offices closed and the high-profile project in danger of foreclosure due to an unpaid $25 million construction loan.

La Jolla Bank, which loaned the money to build L Street Lofts, filed suit April 3 in Sacramento, claiming that only 22 of the 92 condos have sold. The bank is asking a judge to appoint a receiver to take control of the property and allow the bank to foreclose on the remaining unsold units.


Developer Sotiris Kolokotronis, who built the L Street lofts in a partnership venture, had not seen the lawsuit and, through a lawyer, declined to comment.

The Rancho Sante Fe-based bank made a short-term construction loan for $33 million in 2006, later increasing the total to $35 million. The bank claims to have distributed $24.9 million of that total.

It claims L Street Lofts LLC has “refused and continues to fail and refuse to pay any of the delinquent sums,” according to the lawsuit. It is also seeking about $1 million held in escrow from condo sales.

The L Street Lofts were built in part with equity from Resmark Equity Partners LLC of Los Angeles, which places funds into real estate projects for the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and other investors.

The sides had appeared to negotiate a settlement several months ago, but condo sales have remained halted. According to a source, there have been no condo sales since last summer.

When suburban home and gas prices soared, the Lofts project was praised as a viable alternative and a sign that central city housing was desirable. But with home prices plummeting region-wide, there’s fewer inducements for suburbanites to relocate into pricey condos, said Kathryn Boyce, an executive with new home analyst Hanley Wood Market Intelligence. Even without financial pressure, the outlook for top-of-the-line infill projects may be troubled as foreclosures on existing homes and new-home projects lower housing prices, she said.

“There is probably a lot of demand from people who want to live there,” she said of the Lofts project. “But even that pool of people has shrunk.”

She said that borrowers who want to get into the L Street Lofts, where prices originally ranged between $398,000 for the smallest units and penthouses starting at $750,000, could need so-called “jumbo loans.”

Lending restrictions on those and conventional loans have tightened considerably with the recession, leaving some borrowers without means to relocate into new loft projects.

Many developers say Kolokotronis was hit with bad timing.

“He built a beautiful project,” said developer Mark Friedman, who has developed property in midtown and has been keenly aware of the effect of the recession on housing. “It’s like a beautiful yacht that got swamped by a tsunami.”

http://sacramento.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2009/04/20/story7.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3908  
Old Posted May 6, 2009, 8:07 PM
brandon12 brandon12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 998
45-story condo tower on Lot X? Developer eyes possibilities
ShareThisBy Bob Shallit
[email protected]
Published: Wednesday, May. 6, 2009 - 11:52 am
The national development company offering to build a "university village" on the Sacramento State campus is contemplating another eye-catching proposal: a downtown condo tower.

Clark Realty Capital of Arlington, Va., is considering the possibility of a lofty condo/hotel project on "Lot X," the 2.6-acre, city-owned parcel at the southwest corner of Third and Capitol Mall.

Clark development executive William Hamilton says the company's interest is very preliminary. "We haven't talked to architects or run any numbers," he says.

But Hamilton calls the vacant land "one of the premier lots on the West Coast." If it pencilled out, the company would build a "signature building" that "lets people know they are entering a grand city."

Hamilton, a Roseville native now working out of Clark's San Diego office, says one possibility is a 45-to-55-story tower with 100 condo units, a 200-room hotel and perhaps some office space.

Assistant City Manager John Dangberg says he hasn't seen specific proposals for Lot X from Clark or its local representatives at CB Richard Ellis.

But he says he'd be intrigued if Clark is willing to pay market value for what he says is "arguably one of the most valuable and important properties downtown."

"Anytime you have interest from a national developer, it's very exciting," he says. "We're hoping to do a lot of business with Clark in Sacramento."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3909  
Old Posted May 6, 2009, 8:49 PM
arod74's Avatar
arod74 arod74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: east Sac
Posts: 358
After what happened with the Towers, until they are capping the 55th floor, I'm not getting excited. I would be mildly surprised if it got to the rendering stage. And due to being on the edge of downtown I am not so sure how "premier" the lot is for the condo/hotel possibility. As an office tower sure but there are other more central locations that I would consider better suited for the condo/hotel aspect. If anything maybe it can awaken CIM/CalPers from its slumber and get them to make good on their plans for an epic project they mentioned after strong arming Saca for the Towers lot 2 years ago. You wouldn't think they would want to allow themselves to get beaten to the punch if there was another viable project progressing across the street targeted for the same potential customers.
__________________
Damn you Robert Horry!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3910  
Old Posted May 6, 2009, 9:40 PM
econgrad econgrad is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by arod74 View Post
After what happened with the Towers, until they are capping the 55th floor, I'm not getting excited. I would be mildly surprised if it got to the rendering stage. And due to being on the edge of downtown I am not so sure how "premier" the lot is for the condo/hotel possibility. As an office tower sure but there are other more central locations that I would consider better suited for the condo/hotel aspect. If anything maybe it can awaken CIM/CalPers from its slumber and get them to make good on their plans for an epic project they mentioned after strong arming Saca for the Towers lot 2 years ago. You wouldn't think they would want to allow themselves to get beaten to the punch if there was another viable project progressing across the street targeted for the same potential customers.
Ditto.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3911  
Old Posted May 6, 2009, 10:02 PM
travis bickle travis bickle is offline
silly slackergeek
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by arod74 View Post
After what happened with the Towers, until they are capping the 55th floor, I'm not getting excited. I would be mildly surprised if it got to the rendering stage. And due to being on the edge of downtown I am not so sure how "premier" the lot is for the condo/hotel possibility. As an office tower sure but there are other more central locations that I would consider better suited for the condo/hotel aspect. If anything maybe it can awaken CIM/CalPers from its slumber and get them to make good on their plans for an epic project they mentioned after strong arming Saca for the Towers lot 2 years ago. You wouldn't think they would want to allow themselves to get beaten to the punch if there was another viable project progressing across the street targeted for the same potential customers.
I can tell you on very good authority that at this point there is nothing to get too excited about. I know that there is another legitamate firm very interested in the Lot X site and I wouldn't be surprised if part of the idea here was to get them motivated to act. Certainly wouldn't be the first time that scenario has played out. There have been no direct talks between the City and Clark and absolutely no firm ideas on what might work best there. I understand that Clark has been looking at the site with great interest and undoubtedly would want something that would raise the bar for Sacramento, but the concept mentioned is but one of many possibilities.

Still a long way to go on this and the parties are clearly at a phase where most projects go nowhere. The Sac State concept has a much greater chance of getting built, and even it is still at a place where most concepts fail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3912  
Old Posted May 7, 2009, 1:10 AM
Pistola916 Pistola916 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SAN FRANCISCO/SACRAMENTO
Posts: 634
(yawn)


Quote:
Originally Posted by brandon12 View Post
45-story condo tower on Lot X? Developer eyes possibilities
ShareThisBy Bob Shallit
[email protected]
Published: Wednesday, May. 6, 2009 - 11:52 am
The national development company offering to build a "university village" on the Sacramento State campus is contemplating another eye-catching proposal: a downtown condo tower.

Clark Realty Capital of Arlington, Va., is considering the possibility of a lofty condo/hotel project on "Lot X," the 2.6-acre, city-owned parcel at the southwest corner of Third and Capitol Mall.

Clark development executive William Hamilton says the company's interest is very preliminary. "We haven't talked to architects or run any numbers," he says.

But Hamilton calls the vacant land "one of the premier lots on the West Coast." If it pencilled out, the company would build a "signature building" that "lets people know they are entering a grand city."

Hamilton, a Roseville native now working out of Clark's San Diego office, says one possibility is a 45-to-55-story tower with 100 condo units, a 200-room hotel and perhaps some office space.

Assistant City Manager John Dangberg says he hasn't seen specific proposals for Lot X from Clark or its local representatives at CB Richard Ellis.

But he says he'd be intrigued if Clark is willing to pay market value for what he says is "arguably one of the most valuable and important properties downtown."

"Anytime you have interest from a national developer, it's very exciting," he says. "We're hoping to do a lot of business with Clark in Sacramento."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3913  
Old Posted May 7, 2009, 5:22 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088
Travis, is the other firm the one that proposed the 9 story hotel that included
the city giving them the land plus $30 million in subsidies?

Do you know if Clark is also asking for any incentives from the city to help this
project get off the ground? I would not blame them if they did ask for something
in return, it seems like nothing gets built these days downtown unless
subsidies are included to sweeten the deal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3914  
Old Posted May 7, 2009, 1:27 PM
travis bickle travis bickle is offline
silly slackergeek
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by innov8 View Post
Travis, is the other firm the one that proposed the 9 story hotel that included
the city giving them the land plus $30 million in subsidies?

Do you know if Clark is also asking for any incentives from the city to help this
project get off the ground? I would not blame them if they did ask for something
in return, it seems like nothing gets built these days downtown unless
subsidies are included to sweeten the deal.
My understanding is that they are different firms. I am told that the City was very disappointed with the nine story hotel proposal that was the result of months of negotiations.

The story in the Bee was very premature. There have been no discussions of any type of subsidies or anything like that, so it's hard to say what Clark would need to make deal work. But the city is broke: hard to subsidize anything when you have no money.

Even with the best of intentions by everyone involved, this will be a very difficult deal to pull-off. The article probably makes things even harder. At the same time, it's hard for Clark to complain about free publicity. A month ago, very few people in Sacramento knew who Clark was. The more I think about it, the more I think the purpose of this piece was to motivate other development firms into action both at Lot X and across the street at 301 CM.

Certainly ACM Dangberg wants the local development community to know there is a new player in town. I very much hope he is proved right.

Last edited by travis bickle; May 7, 2009 at 1:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3915  
Old Posted May 7, 2009, 5:57 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis bickle View Post
But the city is broke: hard to subsidize anything when you have no money.
The city still has redevelopment money left correct? They haven't used that 25M they put out there a short time ago for a housing project.

I know they have stated on more than one occasion they would like the money to used on JKL, but from your impression, did they seem willing to use it for a project on Capitol Mall?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3916  
Old Posted May 7, 2009, 10:55 PM
arod74's Avatar
arod74 arod74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: east Sac
Posts: 358
Yeah I think your right sugit. From what I can recall the city hasn't completely burned through the proceeds from the sale of the Sheraton yet. Those are seperate from the general fund of the city I believe and so aren't affected by the current city deficit.
__________________
Damn you Robert Horry!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3917  
Old Posted May 7, 2009, 11:53 PM
sugit sugit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DT Sacramento
Posts: 3,076
Correct. There are still Sheraton funds available. I believe there is also money left over from the redevelopment bonds the city sold a few years ago. There is at least 25M left there as well.

Last edited by sugit; May 8, 2009 at 12:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3918  
Old Posted May 18, 2009, 3:24 PM
SacDTRes SacDTRes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
500 Cm

Does anyone know who or what is going into 500 CM? The parking garage is open and security is staffing the building 24/7 now, but it still seems to be mostly empty, and I haven't heard any news about tenants.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3919  
Old Posted May 19, 2009, 4:16 AM
arod74's Avatar
arod74 arod74 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: east Sac
Posts: 358
Quote:
Originally Posted by SacDTRes View Post
Does anyone know who or what is going into 500 CM? The parking garage is open and security is staffing the building 24/7 now, but it still seems to be mostly empty, and I haven't heard any news about tenants.
Welcome to the forum SacDTRes. There isn't an adundance of info available but I would point you toward the 500 Capitol Mall thread started by innov8 http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=116260&page=9 in addition to LandofFrost http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=136014 and the developers website http://www.500capitolmall.com/. Looks like the latest is that McDonough Holland & Allen, PC, Attorneys at Law has signed a letter of intent to occupy space in the building...
__________________
Damn you Robert Horry!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3920  
Old Posted May 19, 2009, 11:32 PM
SacDTRes SacDTRes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6
Thanks for the info. I was hoping to hear about the restaurant or who is going to occupy the first floor, but it seems like it is unknown or just not happening right now.

At night, the lights in the upper middle floors are on, so that must be the law firm. The rest appears empty. There is no lack of empty office space in downtown now!

The American Flag on the top of the building they added last week is a nice touch.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.