HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


    Evolve in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Surrey Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted May 14, 2009, 3:38 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
thanks for the pics whalleyboy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted May 14, 2009, 4:04 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
welcome

I try to get out and do my walk around central as much as possible. I've got a regular route i take to get pictures of all these building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted May 15, 2009, 12:16 AM
BattleAxe BattleAxe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 19
Quote:
jlousa

Love the form and the density, the quality looks lackluster though.
Looks lackluster compared to what? I've been down there and compared to most 4 storey buildings the quality is top notch from the outside.

I love the large 14' high glass in lobby areas aswell the stained wood accents along some of the soffet areas and the light colored brick work around 1st and 2nd floor patio and balcony areas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted May 15, 2009, 5:07 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
If you study the pics you can see some generally bad design principals. I'm not a fan of the overhang on the corner but that's a mute point, the siding is low quality, the exhaust fan outlets are placed terribly in some locations, directly below an overhang where the warm air will raise and condense leaving a spot for mould to grow in the future. Don't get me wrong I like the development it just doesn't appear on the same level as the Quattro ones. I'm not invested or involved in either just my opinion.

Last edited by jlousa; May 15, 2009 at 6:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted May 15, 2009, 5:16 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
i do agree with you on these not being up to the quattro development. But you gotta remember this development site is being more focused in on its tower part. Not its low rise apartments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted May 15, 2009, 3:10 PM
Volksboi's Avatar
Volksboi Volksboi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
If you study the pics you can see some generally bad design principals. I'm not a fan of the overhang on the corner but that's a mute point, the siding is low quality, the exhaust fan outlets are placed terribly in some locations, directly below an overhang where the warm air will raise and condense leaving a spot for mould to grow in the future. Don't get me wrong I like the development it just doesn't appear on the same level as the Quattro ones. I'm not invested or involved in either just my opinion.

Each to there own, but then again your opinion is based on looking at pictures.. Not sure how you can say the exterior finishing is a lower quality then Quattro when they are basically using the same finishings. I prefer Agenda over Quattro and not because I have invested into the Urban Village development. As an investor I know I will be better off with my investment in my Urban Village condos, then some friends who purchased in Quattro.... Take a look at the Urban Village website for some pics of there furnished show suite. www.urbanvillageliving.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted May 15, 2009, 7:22 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
I'll reserve my judgement until everything is complete. People seem to miss the fact that 'finishing' is typically what makes a place look slick and higher quality. In all those photos, finishing isn't done or even started in most areas so you can't really judge quality. If you've ever seen a multi-million dollar house being renovated, you'd understand that even those monster high-class houses look fairly basic and substandard when you have the crown moldings off, the tiles pulled up, and the wiring exposed.

I'm sure it will look very nice when the finishing is there including landscaping.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted May 15, 2009, 9:02 PM
Volksboi's Avatar
Volksboi Volksboi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
Could not have said that better myself...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted May 15, 2009, 9:22 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whalleyboy View Post
i do agree with you on these not being up to the quattro development. But you gotta remember this development site is being more focused in on its tower part. Not its low rise apartments.

How far we have come!!! Periods!!! We need to work on the commas.

Thank you whalleyboy.
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2009, 12:38 AM
Diet Butcher Diet Butcher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 159
Dale Regehr - President of WestStone:

"We have our occupancy permit for the 135 unit Agenda project by SFU and closing 7 a day for most of June"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2009, 3:46 AM
Volksboi's Avatar
Volksboi Volksboi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
Yea I move in on the 23rd of June, my friend is moving into her place this coming Sat.....Pretty excited...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2009, 2:45 AM
Blake Blake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by surrey1 View Post
the only tower that went on sale was ultra, but unfortunately because of the downturn it is probably delayed. i believe this project was introduced in 2005 or early 2006, but they decided to build the 2 four story condos first and spent the boom years working on those.

the city needs to stop allowing these 4 story condos from being built as the first phase of large scale projects. they should force the developers to build the towers first, and after that thay can build these 4 story jokes all they want. so many projects have been delayed for years because of these ridiculous 4 story condos. look at 'd'cor .. it was first introduced back in 2002 or 2003 i believe, they spent years making 2 four story condos, and only now are they completing a 20 story tower 6 or 7 yeas after it was announced. and they cancelled the remaining tower plans and sold the land to the city.

had these developers built ultra first back in 07 it would probably be complete by now. instead we got to wait for many years for these projects to be built because the city keeps allowing these shitty 4 story waste of prime real estate condos to be built.
From a developer's perspective, towers are a much bigger risk and larger capital requirement than a 4 story wood frame. For developers building a master planned community with both, selling and completing a 4 story prior to any towers provides them the immediate cashflow to make it easier to follow through with constructing a tower. If they are unable to build a tower, at least they can exit the project with some profit or breaking even.

It simply makes good business sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2009, 3:26 PM
jdguru jdguru is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5
Hi
There is a new amendment in Agenda and they have offered to refund the deposit. Looking at the current market prices (which are going lower every month) is it not the opportunity to take the deposit back for now and buy later?
Just my thoughts.
Thanks
jdguru
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2009, 4:19 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
prices are actually not going lower every month. they actually saw increases for april and i suspect we will see increases for may as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2009, 9:04 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,068
i do ads for some real estate things and the last week i have noticed some projects are asking for higher prices in their ads - one went from the $170,000's to $180,000's
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2009, 3:18 PM
Diet Butcher Diet Butcher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volksboi View Post
Yea I move in on the 23rd of June, my friend is moving into her place this coming Sat.....Pretty excited...
How did your friend's move in go? How is the landscaping in the place looking, is it all cleaned up now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2009, 4:29 AM
Volksboi's Avatar
Volksboi Volksboi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
She moved in today and it went great...They have not finished the landscaping yet...should be done in the next couple weeks, but shes really happy with everything. I just cant wait to get in there now!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2009, 6:16 PM
metroXpress's Avatar
metroXpress metroXpress is offline
(||||||-||||-||||||)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 2,220
Can't wait to check it out again!
__________________
"Think simple…reduce the whole
of its parts into the simplest terms,
Getting back to first principles"


~ FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2009, 6:08 AM
theQ theQ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 145
I walked by this past weekend, and they're putting in a little round-a-bout right beside the Agenda (and Ethical Gardens and Olympic Court). I think it'll make the street look quite attractive once it's finished. I just wish that they would also improve the side walk on the South side of the road as well. The side with the Agenda and Element will look all new and modern, but the south side looks old and tired.

We're moving into the Fuse (1 block away) in 2 weeks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2009, 8:00 AM
CoryHolmes CoryHolmes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,031
I took a walk thought both Agenda and Fuse, and I gotta say that they were both nifty.

Fuse I thought was gypped because the two-level townhome starts off on the second level above a one-floor flat. Getting in with an armful of groceries only to climb up another flight of stairs? Yuck. Although I did think it was neat that the parking garage elevator came up in the middle of the plaza's courtyard (even though it was slow as molasses).

Both Agenda and Fuse were decked out in the standard finishes used in new construction, so they at least looked like they would be worth the asking prices
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:12 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.