HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2009, 10:57 PM
bigguy1231 bigguy1231 is offline
Concerned Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,348
I just read through this whole thread and I don't see any name other than Terry Cooke who has what it takes to move this city forward.

The current crew at city hall are just too inept to lead this city. Not one of them has what it takes to be a councillor let alone mayor. We need intelligent, thoughtful leadership, something this city has been lacking for years.

As for Chris Ecklund, Bah ha ha ha, enough said.

Right now, other than Terry Cooke I don't see any possible candidate that I could vote for. But you never know someone may come along.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 11:21 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Will the real mayor please stand up?

April 06, 2009
Andrew Dreschel
The Hamilton Spectator
http://www.thespec.com/Opinions/article/543830

I swear, sometimes you'd almost think Councillor Tom Jackson was the mayor of this city and not Fred Eisenberger.

For whatever reason, Jackson just seems to have a more finely tuned sense of occasion and decorum.

Case in point:

While council was putting the budget to bed last week, Jackson came out of the gate, comprehensively casting the 1.7 per cent increase in a positive light.

After banging his upbeat drum, he concluded by praising the good work of Eisenberger and senior staffers and, lastly, city clerk Mary Gallagher for her professionalism throughout the exhausting budget process.

By contrast, virtually the first words out of the mayor's mouth had Gallagher dissolving in tears.

Eisenberger began by referring to a "couple of stumbles" in the final budget document, but noted Gallagher doesn't often make mistakes.

That backhanded compliment came on the heels of similar criticisms from councillors Lloyd Ferguson and Brad Clark, though neither mentioned Gallagher by name.

Eisenberger, apparently unaware of the weeping he had sparked, launched into his own praise-the-budget spiel.

But it was landing on a distracted audience.

The room's attention was suddenly focused on the visibly upset Gallagher, who spun her chair around to hide her face from view.

One of the other clerks went to find a box of tissues for her.

Another one poured her a glass of water.

And senior managers, who respect Gallagher as a highly skilled workhorse, exchanged concerned glances over Eisenberger's faux pas.

To cap it off, while Eisenberger was blithely gabbing on, Jackson rose from the council table and approached the clerk' s station, where he sank to his heels and whispered comforting words in Gallagher's ear.

In response to the incident, the next day chief clerk Kevin Christenson sent a firmly-worded e-mail to council.

He pointed out that Gallagher is one of the city's "finest employees" and didn't deserve the criticisms, that any mistakes in the report were minor and not her fault, and criticizing staff in public doesn't help attract and retain good people.

Clearly, Eisenberger, Ferguson and Clark need to be reminded of former mayor Larry Di Ianni's principle to praise in public, criticize in private.

On the other hand, Jackson's sensitive show of support for Gallagher was characteristic.

Jackson, who has represented Ward 6 on the east Mountain for 20 years, routinely leads applause and acknowledges work well done.

To be sure, he can be awfully sugary and eager to please.

But he consistently asks some of the most probing questions on council and is seldom, if ever, less than fair or reasonable.

During the unsteady early days of Eisenberger's term, he clearly took upon himself a leadership role, trying to guide and provide stability and direction to a council that seemed at sea.

Does this suggest that Jackson may be casting an eye on the mayor's chair?

"From time to time, I have people encouraging me to consider it, but at this time I'm just happy doing the work that I'm doing for the people of Ward 6," he says.

Translation? I suspect he's giving it serious consideration.

But Jackson was badly bruised in 2004 when he ran and lost for the federal Conservatives on Hamilton Mountain.

It's doubtful he'll take that kind of gamble again, particularly since defeat would mean losing his safe seat on council.

Still, he has a lot of time to go before he needs to make up his mind about throwing his hat in the 2010 mayor's race.

In the meantime, he's doing a pretty fair job of acting the part.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 12:57 PM
highwater highwater is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,555
Gag me. Dreschel's like a schoolgirl with his crushes and his dissing. He even managed to work some simpering praise for DiIanni in there, as if anyone had anything to learn about interpersonal skills from him. If DiIanni had a 'principle', it was praise staff in public, and criticize the public in public.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 1:04 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
I think Tom Jackson will run for Mayor. Plus he could defeat Eisenberger. I'm sure there's a lot of support for Tom Jackson.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2009, 3:35 PM
ryan_mcgreal's Avatar
ryan_mcgreal ryan_mcgreal is offline
Raising the Hammer
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by highwater View Post
Gag me. Dreschel's like a schoolgirl with his crushes and his dissing.
QFT. He delights in muckraking at its most superficial and catty, and you can't read his stuff without tripping over his personal allegiances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2009, 11:11 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Quote:
Originally Posted by markbarbera View Post
I'm putting my money on Sheila returning to federal politics. I predict seat redistribution will see Hamilton Centre split into two ridings east/west, effectively restoring the old Hamilton East riding. Hamilton West will be the remainder of the old Hamilton Centre riding (west mountain), plus Westdale, and Dundas. Sheila will run in one of these, likely Hamilton East.
Copps: been there, done that

April 23, 2009
Daniel Nolan
The Hamilton Spectator
http://www.thespec.com/News/Local/article/553217

The Liberal party is courting Sheila Copps to run in the next federal election.

Michael Ignatieff's chief of staff broached the subject with her 10 days ago over lunch in Ottawa. Paul Zed is the most powerful of many Liberal colleagues who have contacted the former Hamilton East MP about running again for the party she represented in the House of Commons for two decades.

The former deputy prime minister has spurned all advances, but told The Spectator that if she ever did run again "it would be in my hometown and nowhere else."

Copps, 56, was ousted from the party in 2004 after a divisive nomination battle with former cabinet minister Tony Valeri. The party has since made its peace with her, and Zed, a former MP, was one of the organizers of a tribute to Copps at the King Edward Hotel in Toronto in 2007.

Copps said she appreciates the calls but insisted she was done with politics and is enjoying life with her husband Austin and their families.

"If I came down, I don't think it would be the same," she said. "When a door closes, a window opens. I've turned the page and I'm enjoying life."

She writes for The Hill Times, a weekly that covers federal politics, appears as a guest on CTV's political show Power Play and is working on turning a "great Hamilton" historical story into a TV movie.

Copps said the approach by Zed never got beyond talking. "I told him I was not interested in running in the election, but it was nice to have lunch with him," she said. "He was just broaching the subject. We didn't get into details."

She said they did not talk about when the Liberals aim to bring down the minority Conservative government, but said she expects an election "earlier than later. They're getting organized."

Copps said she does not expect the Liberals to give up trying to recruit her. "When you're in politics, you never give up."

The Liberals once held every seat between Oakville and Niagara Falls prior to the 2004 election.

Copps never lost a federal election and defeated two challenges from NDP candidate Wayne Marston. He has been MP for Hamilton East-Stoney Creek since 2006.

Marston said yesterday he doesn't foresee Copps returning to politics, but said he's not worried.

"If she were to run against me, I would do the same thing as any other candidate," he said. "I would present the work I have been doing, get on with the election and let the people decide."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2009, 2:15 PM
astroblaster's Avatar
astroblaster astroblaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 404
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelTown View Post
She writes for The Hill Times, a weekly that covers federal politics, appears as a guest on CTV's political show Power Play and is working on turning a "great Hamilton" historical story into a TV movie.
hey now!

this peeked my interest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted May 1, 2009, 11:24 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Eisenberger asleep at the festival switch

May 01, 2009
Andrew Dreschel
The Hamilton Spectator
http://www.thespec.com/Opinions/article/558165

It's up to city investigators to determine whether the Festival of Friends flap involves a serious case of graft, a moonlighting employee, or perhaps some kind of spectacular misunderstanding.

But in the meantime, Mayor Fred Eisenberger needs to have his feet held to the fire for the way he handled the allegation that a city staffer improperly accepted money.

At the very least, Eisenberger was slow off the mark and lackadaisical.

Perhaps even worse, he now appears to be indulging in whitewashing and blameshifting.

Eisenberger claims that he took two steps last September when festival manager Loren Lieberman suggested during a private meeting that a city staffer had improperly accepted payment for some work.

First, he offered Lieberman the opportunity to take his allegation to the city manager, an offer reportedly declined.

Second, Eisenberger says he pro-actively raised the matter with then acting city manger Joe Rinaldo.

"I shared with him (Rinaldo) what Loren had shared with me," Eisenberger says.

Problem is, the now retired Rinaldo doesn't recall Eisenberger ever bringing the matter to his attention.

He says the only festival issue the mayor mentioned concerned city grants.

"I know there was an issue in terms of the flow of the grants ... but that was the only issue I ever dealt with on that."

Rinaldo says if the allegation had been raised, he would have taken it seriously and immediately launched an investigation.

Yes, that's one person's word against another's.

But the balance of credibility shifts heavily against Eisenberger when he makes the same claim about informing new city manager Chris Murray and gets the same response.

Eisenberger says he told Murray about Lieberman's assertions a couple of weeks back, though he's not sure that Murray "picked up" on what he was saying.

"I'm not so sure he got the full picture at that point in time or understood the full picture," Eisenberger says.

According to Murray, there was no partial or full picture to get.

He neither recalls Eisenberger raising the issue at their April 20 meeting nor is it reflected in his notes.

If it had been raised, Murray says he would have noted it and taken follow-up action by contacting the city's legal and human resources departments.

"It would be one of those things that would be significant enough that I would think I would react to."

Murray says he first heard of the allegation when Lieberman dropped the bomb at Wednesday's committee meeting.

Frankly, it's hard to believe that two city managers can suffer from memory lapse over the same issue. But the mayor stands by his assertion that he told them.

"I'm 100 per cent confident that I did that," Eisenberger says.

For Eisenberger to suggest they were informed but took no action amounts to a broadside against their professionalism.

But it also deflects attention from the mayor's own responsibility.

If you accept his account, where was his follow-up?

He is, after all, the city's chief magistrate. Why did the matter simply fall off his radar for months?

To be fair, Eisenberger says when Lieberman first made the accusation, it was delivered cryptically and without details.

Eisenberger also notes that "folks say lots of things on many occasions" to him.

In other words, unsubstantiated allegations are as loose as small change in this town.

That's true enough. But Eisenberger also acknowledges he was troubled from the get-go and wanted to get to the bottom of it.

So why did nothing happen for eight long months?

That question may dog Eisenberger long after the case itself is put to bed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted May 1, 2009, 6:13 PM
highwater highwater is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,555
Shorter Andrew Dreschel:

The question may dog Eisenberger long after the case itself is put to bed, because I'll make damn sure it does.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted May 1, 2009, 6:44 PM
astroblaster's Avatar
astroblaster astroblaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 404
Quote:
Originally Posted by highwater View Post
Shorter Andrew Dreschel:

The question may dog Eisenberger long after the case itself is put to bed, because I'll make damn sure it does.
LOL

that article was ridiculous
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted May 11, 2009, 5:12 PM
MacAttack's Avatar
MacAttack MacAttack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3
Though it may be grasping at straws, this could be interpreted one of two ways...either Whitehead is just trying to make a name for himself, or he's trying to add more wins to his resume so that he looks good for a mayoral run?

Dreschel has mused about Whitehead taking a stab at the seat before...


Political spat over NHL bragging rights

May 11, 2009
ANDREW DRESCHEL
THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR
(May 11, 2009)
Bettman versus Balsillie isn't the only NHL feud raging right now.

Check out the Eisenberger and Whitehead rivalry.

As Hamilton waits with bated breath for the outcome of Jim Balsillie's attempts to bring an NHL team to Copps, Mayor Fred Eisenberger and Councillor Terry Whitehead are locked in a tug-of- war over potential bragging rights for making it happen.

For more than five years, Whitehead has been the principal puck-carrier for bringing the NHL to Hamilton.

Now, with the city arguably closer than ever before, Eisenberger has deftly elbowed Whitehead off the puck and appointed himself the go-to media guy.

Unfortunately, that's setting the stage for the kind of political infighting that plays into the stereotype of council as a refugee camp for circus clowns.

And that's the last thing we need as hockey czars from across North America turn their gaze our way.

Eisenberger took the unusual step of staking out his position as NHL pointman at last week's media conference.

At first, Whitehead seemed to accept the new arrangement by telling local news media that "for the time being" all NHL questions should be directed to the mayor.

But you didn't have to be a detective to figure out Whitehead's "for the time being" meant his nose was seriously out of joint.

That became clear last Friday when Whitehead hastily tried to convene the dormant NHL steering committee, which he chairs, in order to get a briefing from the city's legal department on the proposed agreement with Balsillie.

Besides Whitehead and Eisenberger, the committee is made up of Tom Jackson, Lloyd Ferguson, Bob Bratina and Scott Duvall.

Because of logistical difficulties, that meeting is now expected to take place tomorrow.

Whitehead says he has no problem with Eisenberger taking over the spokesperson role, he just wants the mayor to follow proper process.

And that means bringing the proposed agreement to his committee for vetting and recommendations before sending it on to council.

"I'm not getting into a pissing contest nor do I plan to with the mayor at this point in time," says Whitehead.

"No one's ego should be put in front of important issues like this."

Wise words.

But they fly in the face of what is plainly a nasty continuation of the personalty clashes and sniping that characterizes Eisenberger's and Whitehead's relationship at the best of times.

By asserting the authority of his NHL committee, Whitehead is catapulting himself back into a spokesperson role and making sure Eisenberger doesn't hog the limelight on what could be a huge political win.

All in all, it's not surprising Whitehead is feeling shafted.

He stayed on top of the NHL file when most councillors wrote it off as a forlorn hope.

He stickhandled the initial 2004 agreement that gave Balsillie exclusive rights to Copps and he played a key role in activating subsequent extensions.

And it's no secret that in 2007, when Balsillie was trying to bring the Nashville Predators to Hamilton, Eisenberger unsuccessfully tried to usurp Whitehead's position as NHL committee chair.

Still, let's not forget that this time Balsillie's people contacted the mayor's office first.

And, as mayor, Eisenberger has a rightful claim to be the primary voice for the city and council.

Frankly, he also makes a better spokesperson than Whitehead.

The fact is, though, if Hamilton does land an NHL team this time out, it won't be because of anything either Eisenberger or Whitehead did or said.

It will be because Balsillie pulled off a coup and dropped the spoils in their laps.

Andrew Dreschel's commentary appears Monday, Wednesday and Friday. [email protected] 905-526-3495
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted May 11, 2009, 9:56 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,800
As long as it happens, who freaking cares?
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 5:36 PM
MacAttack's Avatar
MacAttack MacAttack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3
An interesting mistake in a recent article by the Mountain News...haha!

Quote:
“I will never say no to a philanthropist like Chris Ecklund,” said Mayor Whitehead.
http://www.hamiltonmountainnews.com/news/article/175966
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 5:45 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
hahaha
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 8:43 PM
realcity's Avatar
realcity realcity is offline
Bruatalism gets no respec
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Williamsville NY
Posts: 4,059
Eckland is so annoying
__________________
Height restrictions and Set-backs are for Nimbys and the suburbs.

Last edited by realcity; May 27, 2009 at 10:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 8:45 PM
realcity's Avatar
realcity realcity is offline
Bruatalism gets no respec
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Williamsville NY
Posts: 4,059
eg

When Mr. Ecklund visited Auchmar on May 25, 2007, he drove his car up the circular driveway that had once been used by the carriages of such Canadian notables as Lord and Lady Dufferin and Sir John A. Macdonald. 150 years ago, he would have seen dignified servants hovering in the doorway, waiting to greet incoming guests. Although those days are long gone, Mr. Ecklund was still struck by the elegance and splendor projected Auchmar continues to embody. Click to enlarge.
__________________
Height restrictions and Set-backs are for Nimbys and the suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 8:51 PM
realcity's Avatar
realcity realcity is offline
Bruatalism gets no respec
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Williamsville NY
Posts: 4,059
^ that's from his own Auchmar site. He wrote it himself.

Mr. Eckland do you own a black mercedes? o there it is...


"Mr. Ecklund visited Auchmar for his first time during "Open Doors" Hamilton, on May 6th, and was astonished by the grand beauty of the property and manor house.

Approached by a local reporter who knew Mr.Ecklund and had covered him in the past of different events, it became clear to Mr.Ecklund that something needed to be done to educate Hamiltonians about what they had right here in their own backyard."

*rubbing my eyes*
__________________
Height restrictions and Set-backs are for Nimbys and the suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 8:56 PM
highwater highwater is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,555
Hysterical!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 8:58 PM
highwater highwater is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,555
Ok. Now I'm thinking I know who you are too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted May 27, 2009, 10:20 PM
realcity's Avatar
realcity realcity is offline
Bruatalism gets no respec
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Williamsville NY
Posts: 4,059
i haven't been made yet..... witness protection program.
__________________
Height restrictions and Set-backs are for Nimbys and the suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.