HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9621  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2009, 2:33 AM
T-Mac's Avatar
T-Mac T-Mac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 1,163
I was also interested Orpheum. In fact I watched them all and have passed the link on to others.
     
     
  #9622  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2009, 3:51 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmonkey View Post
I think those SSLPD cruisers are a flagrant, wanton abuse of public funds. Whatever shallow, contrived reasons they came up with to excuse their purchase are beyond the pale. One of the thousand reasons why South Salt Lake is the idiocy capital of the planet.
They all have tiny units.

Last edited by Viperlord; Apr 11, 2009 at 8:28 AM.
     
     
  #9623  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2009, 3:42 AM
jmonkey's Avatar
jmonkey jmonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,034
You crack me up, Comrade.

     
     
  #9624  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2009, 11:58 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,604
Come back to urban core, planner exhorts

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705296700/Come-back-to-urban-core-planner-exhorts.html

Keith Bartholomew has felt a little like John the Baptist in the desert as of late.

The urban planning professor's message to the suburbs: "Repent."

Amid the picket fences and two-car garages, a deluge of "for sale" signs and foreclosures highlights the failure of "the real estate machine" and the redefinition of the American Dream, Bartholomew said.

And as the country looks to resuscitate its housing market, the University of Utah academic hopes Americans will return to the urban core, swapping a love affair with the car and the cul-de-sac for mass transit and mixed-use developments...


..
     
     
  #9625  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2009, 12:05 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,604
Stalled projects: Salt Lake City

Deseret News
Aaron Falk


The corner coffee shop and kitschy boutiques were demolished, but the high-end apartments and shops promised in their stead were never built.

Instead, Craig Mecham's blighted property in the heart of Sugar House has served as one of Salt Lake City's most visible reminders of the current credit crunch.

The Salt Lake developer planned to build a mix of upscale office, retail and residential space only to see funding for the project dry up.

After months of negotiating with the city, Mecham filled the hole on the corner of Highland Drive and 2100 South with dirt last month. Frank Gray, Salt Lake's community and economic development director, said the city has talked with Mecham about using the property for a farmers market.

Mecham has kept in contact with city leaders, Gray said, and he remains optimistic the project will be able to move forward "in the next year."

"He's the victim of the same thing as everybody else," Gray said. "He's actively working with financial institutions to get the project up and under way."



An architectural drawing of the stalled Sugar House project. (Laura Seitz, Deseret News)
.
     
     
  #9626  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2009, 6:20 PM
TANGELD_SLC's Avatar
TANGELD_SLC TANGELD_SLC is offline
The World Is Welcome Here
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 883


We should count our lucky stars that these projects are only stalled rather than outright canceled.
That would suck.
__________________
Espavo!

Plyg, Metrosexual, & AVENian
     
     
  #9627  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2009, 7:24 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,623
Well the first stage of canceled is always stalled.

It doesn't mean all stalled projects inevitably are canceled, but don't get too excited until the foundation is set and the beams are rising.
     
     
  #9628  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 3:46 AM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120
Here is a photo I took today:



with Towers 1, 2, and 5:


Last edited by urbanboy; Apr 13, 2009 at 4:01 AM.
     
     
  #9629  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 4:02 AM
WeST's Avatar
WeST WeST is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Murray
Posts: 340
Very good. It is a great angle to show all of the progress from the City Creek project. Taking pictures on a slow Sunday... great time!
     
     
  #9630  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 7:54 AM
TANGELD_SLC's Avatar
TANGELD_SLC TANGELD_SLC is offline
The World Is Welcome Here
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 883
Great photos, urby!
__________________
Espavo!

Plyg, Metrosexual, & AVENian
     
     
  #9631  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 3:29 PM
Future Mayor's Avatar
Future Mayor Future Mayor is offline
Vote for me in 2019!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,803
Moved from CCC thread, regarding height and development along 400 S.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
I completely disagree. While I don't advocate a ton of towers on the eastern edge of downtown, I don't like the idea of having a height limit for that area.

Eastern downtown could be a more vibrant area with a few high-rise residential towers to create population density outside of the core, which I think could be a selling point for many residents.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald-Dregan View Post
I agree with comrade, I think some Eastward growth would better suite the overall core. Nothing to big, but some 20 story compact residential would really be appealing to our overall goal. I also think we should spread West a bit to make a more centrifugal downtown appearence. That being said I think our number one concern is in-fill around main and North Temple.
I agree with comrade and rd. With Trax running up University Blvd (400 S) and with east downtown already being a very vibrant neighborhood, adding some height, anywhere from 5-20 stories along 400 S would be a great idea. Not only residential but some commercial as well. There is already such a great residential presence along there it will only add to the mix and vibrancy to have even more compact development along there. I would not only enhance our skyline, but it would continue the vibrancy of streets such as 300 S. and would create an even greater usage of our ever expanding transit system. With the combination of Trax and future street cars, many of the intersections along 400 S will be very viable neighborhood commercial and residential cores.

I wouldn't suggest anything over 5-10 stories north of 350 S or south of 450 S but the immediate half block lining 400 S would be a great place for some additional height. I know it's been talked about to include a pedestrian corridor along 350 S, adding this height along 400 S with new development would be a great opportunity to include that corridor in the development of these new projects.
     
     
  #9632  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 5:44 PM
cololi cololi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
Along 400 S, the permitted height is 75 feet, and you can go up to 125 with a conditional use and if the aditional height is for residential. The rest of the east downtown area has a varied height limit ranging between 35 feet and 125. I think something along the lines of the Metro is appropriate in this area. maybe 1-2 stories taller, but then you get into differnent construction methods that cost more and make it difficult to make a project pencil.

Some things to consider about height in this area are view sheds of important historic structures. There is an existing one east of the City and County Building and another south of the Catherdral of the Madeleine. The central City and South Temple historic districts also limit the height to basically a height that is consistent with the block face.
     
     
  #9633  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 6:18 PM
scottharding scottharding is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,681
Off topic a bit, but I've got to say it today. I've lived a lot of places, and none of them are more beautiful in bloom than SLC. I love this place. What a gorgeous day.
     
     
  #9634  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 6:23 PM
Justnslcsugarhood.'s Avatar
Justnslcsugarhood. Justnslcsugarhood. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottharding View Post
Off topic a bit, but I've got to say it today. I've lived a lot of places, and none of them are more beautiful in bloom than SLC. I love this place. What a gorgeous day.
fo so fo so
     
     
  #9635  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 7:58 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,623
Yeah, well, it's raping my sinuses.
     
     
  #9636  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 8:28 PM
utahboozer's Avatar
utahboozer utahboozer is offline
Lurking in a wigwam
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
Yeah, well, it's raping my sinuses.
Generic Zyrtec ftw
__________________
Loves me some Jazz.
     
     
  #9637  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2009, 11:24 PM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120
     
     
  #9638  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2009, 4:05 AM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120
I thought this was a pretty nice shot:



Photo by: swilsonmc

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=h...%3D63%26um%3D1&ei=BAvkSYqcOpjItAOdpdD_Cg
     
     
  #9639  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2009, 6:00 AM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
Wow, that's a awesome shot of the Wells Fargo Building.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
     
     
  #9640  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2009, 6:11 AM
Urban_logic's Avatar
Urban_logic Urban_logic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sandy, UT
Posts: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
Well the first stage of canceled is always stalled.

It doesn't mean all stalled projects inevitably are canceled, but don't get too excited until the foundation is set and the beams are rising.
I don't know, didn't the Triad Tower have beams onsight when it was cancelled? Then you look at the few developments around the area that have been half-way constructed and are stalled

In happier news, it looks like Target is coming to Salt Lake!!!



I found this article, but I think it is a little out of date - it's hard to tell seeing as it doesn't have a date on it. Real professional journalism right there

Quote:
"The project is a retail services and goods establishment consisting of multiple proposed development pads and it's anchored by a large retail store, which currently has been preliminarily identified as a potential site for Target."

Maloy says Miller Weingarten Realty does not have a signed agreement with Target, but has been asked to secure preliminary planning approvals given the size of store the retailer might want to build at 1120 South and 300 W. Maloy reports that earlier this week, a developer's representative attended a planning open house and said that the project would most likely include a 137,000 square foot Target store:

"Although it wasn't a Super Target, [...] it would have more food items in this particular Target store than we've seen in other Targets that have food items."

http://kcpw.org/article/4797
The reason that I think this is out of date is because Target already has this store on its system - a clear indication that this is not just an open-ended proposal anymore. If you look at Target's store locator from its website, you can clearly see a target symbol over SLC where there is deffinately no Target currently. You see the 5 clustered to the southern end of the valley - Ft Union, Sandy, South Jordan, West Jordan, West Jordan SW (Jordan Landing) - then there's a 6th one right over the down town area.

http://sites.target.com/site/en/spot/sea...57513902712&mapHeight=100.59262344720318

Plus, as a Target insider, I can tell you that our system we use to look up items at nearby stores shows a "Salt Lake City" Target Store that is shaded grey and says N/A on the on-hand count because the store doesn't exist yet. It won't let you open it up like you can with other stores to view store info, backroom locations, sales floor locations, etc. It also has a store number. I will double check tomorow to be sure, but I believe it was something like store 2641 or 2642

It looks like this will be the site for the new Target Store:



Trust me Salt Lakers, you will love Target! We already have 2 of them here in West Jordan with a 3rd just over the souther border in South Jordan. I was hoping yours would be an urban store like they have in big cities like San Francisco, Minneapolis, etc. and would be located in the CBD somewhere. Judging by the site location, it will be your average suburban-style Target store. According to the article, it will be larger than a regular store, but smaller than a Super. Maybe this is a good time to introduce Utah to Target Grateland

It is also nice to see that the store will only be a block or two away from the Ballpark TRAX Station and can be acessed by two freeway on/off ramps. One can take the 9th South exit, turn left onto 9th South, turn left onto 3rd West, then turn right into the development. Or, one can get of at 13th South, turn left onto 3rd West, then turn left into the development. I imagine TRAX riders will frequent this store.

Shhh! *wispers* I hear rumor that Target is exploring new stores in Park City and Provo. Cross your fingers

Last edited by Urban_logic; Apr 14, 2009 at 6:35 AM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:45 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.