April 9, 2009
Wrong time to replace Alabama State House
Alabama legislative leaders who want new offices and meeting space are starting to get that same gleam in their eyes people get who are itching to buy a new car.
As any car salesman can attest, the first step in making a sale is to get someone on the lot and looking at new vehicles. Legislative leaders are figuratively there already, in essence kicking the tires on a costly new State House.
The leaders of a committee looking at building a new meeting place for the Alabama Legislature are proposing adding a wing to the back of the Capitol.
Rep. Richard Laird, chairman of the Legislative Building Authority, and Sen. Roger Bedford, the vice chairman, have introduced bills that would set the stage for the authority to build new legislative chambers and offices at the rear of the Capitol.
"I don't anticipate any problem in the House or Senate because it has widespread support," Laird, D-Roanoke, told the Associated Press. It may have widespread support in the Legislature, but we doubt if it does among the state's taxpayers.
Lots of people who want new cars can't afford to buy them in current economic conditions. And like those everyday citizens, the Legislature needs to put off any serious consideration of new facilities until the economy turns around - and that means fully around.
We are not saying that a replacement for the aging State House is not needed - it is. But now is not the time for legislators to be spending - or even setting the stage to spend - hundreds of millions of dollars on new offices and meeting space for themselves.
Frankly, we prefer a proposal to replace the existing State House behind the Capitol with an all-new building at the opposite end of Dexter Avenue from the Capitol. It could be more costly, but Montgomery city and county officials have indicated a tentative willingness to contribute to a new State House there.
Such a move could make the city's downtown renovation an overwhelming success. It would be likely that the empty storefronts that line parts of Dexter would fill quickly with government-related associations and lobbying groups. The Retirement Systems of Alabama office building now under construction would be a natural fit. The state Supreme Court building is already on Dexter.
But regardless of where it goes, no significant state or local funds should be expended on this project until it is clear that the state's economy has turned a corner.
The current State House was created in 1986 by remodeling an existing state office building to create meeting spaces for the House of Representatives and Senate. Prior to that, the Legislature met in completely inadequate space in the Capitol.
From the beginning, the remodeled former office building, originally built in the early 1960s, was never well-suited for the Legislature. Meeting space for each chamber is cramped, and structural columns that cannot be removed make viewing difficult. There is not enough seating available for the public. Narrow hallways are crowded during sessions, making security difficult to enforce. There aren't enough committee meeting rooms, especially with space for the public. The roof leaks periodically and there are moisture problems on lower floors.
Further attempts to renovate and upgrade the existing State House would be throwing good money after bad. Architects have indicated that it would cost more to renovate the existing building than to construct a new one.
Legislative leaders, of course, say
they do not intend to begin work on a new facility immediately. But lots of people go to car dealerships "just to look," and end up driving away in a shiny - and expensive - new car.
The Legislature needs a new facility. But the one they have will do until the state's economy has fully recovered, hiring and pay raise freezes for state employees are ended, unemployment is down to reasonable levels, and Alabama taxpayers - who will have to foot the bill - feel much more comfortable economically.