HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 7:17 AM
johnjimbc johnjimbc is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 766
I'm not sure of the exact language, but most contracts and disclosures include some type of time-frame by which the unit must be completed for the purchaser. In the US contracts for new development are required to have a 24-month limit. I don't know if Canada has the same law, but I believe there is something similar.

They started marketing the Jameson project over 3 years ago at this point, and the sales center has existed almost that long. So I'd be surprised if some buyers don't already have some legal grounds to demand their deposits back. If not, I wouldn't be surprised if there are lawsuits.

And, as someone else mentioned, I cannot imagine that there isn't going to be some type of disclosure amendment at some point, which a buyer who wants to get out could just immediately reject.

My guess is if the project has any chance financially of moving forward, the developer - or new developer - will have to court the existing potential buyers a bit, perhaps a price adjustment and new contracts. They may lose some buyers in the process, but if they can hold on to part of them, then everyone - buyers and the developer - can start with a clean slate. This is the type of project that might well attract buyers who want a truly unique space in a one-of-a-kind iconic building. So one might be surprised how many stay with the developer - IF they are convinced the project can succeed - even with all the negatives in the air right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2009, 5:17 PM
thefly thefly is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnjimbc View Post
I'm not sure of the exact language, but most contracts and disclosures include some type of time-frame by which the unit must be completed for the purchaser. In the US contracts for new development are required to have a 24-month limit. I don't know if Canada has the same law, but I believe there is something similar.

They started marketing the Jameson project over 3 years ago at this point, and the sales center has existed almost that long. So I'd be surprised if some buyers don't already have some legal grounds to demand their deposits back. If not, I wouldn't be surprised if there are lawsuits.

And, as someone else mentioned, I cannot imagine that there isn't going to be some type of disclosure amendment at some point, which a buyer who wants to get out could just immediately reject.

My guess is if the project has any chance financially of moving forward, the developer - or new developer - will have to court the existing potential buyers a bit, perhaps a price adjustment and new contracts. They may lose some buyers in the process, but if they can hold on to part of them, then everyone - buyers and the developer - can start with a clean slate. This is the type of project that might well attract buyers who want a truly unique space in a one-of-a-kind iconic building. So one might be surprised how many stay with the developer - IF they are convinced the project can succeed - even with all the negatives in the air right now.

I have not seen this particular disclosure statement, but if there were a new developer appointed (or a change in control of the current developer) etc. that would be a material change requiring either a new DS or an amended DS to be filed with FICOM. This would bring with it rescission rights to parties who have already purchased.

Depending on the scope of the works etc. a change in the contractor may or may not be a material change. It would still require an amended DS but not all amendments give rise to rescission rights.

As for the purchase contracts - there would have to be a drop dead dead whereby the contract comes to an end otherwise it could be held to be void for uncertainty. Usually to be safe these drop dead dates are way beyond the likely closing dates - but as you mention this has been dragging for so long that these dates may be in play.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 11:05 PM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,395
RIP Jameson!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 11:08 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,041
Why, what happened? they were not able to work out new financing or are you just basing that last statement off of nothing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2009, 11:16 PM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Why, what happened? they were not able to work out new financing or are you just basing that last statement off of nothing?
just starting to doubt this puppy will ever start back up in its current form
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2009, 4:22 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,432
I disagree I think that there might be chance. what wrong with being more optimistic im so sick of everything being fukin doom and gloom
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2009, 2:43 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
I'm fairly optimistic that this project will go ahead, but very pessimistic that it will be in it's current form. I'm always happy to be proven wrong though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2009, 5:31 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
On that note the crane is coming down this Sunday Mar 29th.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2009, 6:48 PM
sono65 sono65 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
On that note the crane is coming down this Sunday Mar 29th.
Ouch, so could that mean that all parties have given up? Or is there still hope for a revival/redesign in the near future?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2009, 7:00 PM
rather_draconian rather_draconian is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 192
Aw..how do you know that, jlousa?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2009, 12:41 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by rather_draconian View Post
Aw..how do you know that, jlousa?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus

same first letter in the name....see where I'm going with this?

ALL HAIL OUR LORD JESUS-LOUSA!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2009, 1:21 AM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,907
Thought Jesus's last name was Christ.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2009, 4:38 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
In real life I'm a very likable guy that has lots of very important friends that tell me things. A lesson I learned a long time ago, it's not what you know it's who you know, being popular pays better then being a know it all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2009, 5:02 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
here's the offical release by the COV.

Quote:
There will be crews removing a crane from the Jameson House site on Sunday, March 29th. The traffic restrictions and closures are as follows...

- Full closure of W. Hastings between Howe Street and Hornby Street
- Local traffic only on W. Hastings between Burrard Street and Hornby Street
- Closure will be in effect at 4:00am, Sunday March 29 and will be out no later than 6:00am, Monday March 30
- No stopping restrictions will be required on the north side of W. Hastings between Howe Street and Hornby Street during the above stated hours

In preparation for the work, Valley Traffic will make application for a noise variance required to facilitate the scheduled work. The sequencing will be as follows...

- 5:30am to 7:00am Valley Traffic on site to set up closure
- 7:00am to 8:30am Kansen on-site to set up mobile crane
- 8:30am to 6:30pm Kansen tears down and ships out tower crane
- 6:30pm to 8:00pm Kansen tears down mobile crane and demobilizes
- 8:00pm to 10:00pm Valley Traffic tears down closure

Traffic delays are expected and motorists are advised to use alternate routes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2009, 5:21 AM
phesto phesto is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,699
So did Bosa drop it? or was the crane removal planned all along? (ie. this is not an indication of the course of current negotiations)

Sometimes it's hard to tell whether people on here are being secretive or purely speculative.

btw, I haven't heard either way...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2009, 5:22 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,041
So what is the plan then with the site? Just to leave those heritage building literally on the edge for years. And what about the work that has already been done on the foundation?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2009, 6:22 AM
vansky vansky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 928
the automatic parking car thing is what's more important, i hope they have more towers having this later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2009, 6:33 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,041
Quote:
So did Bosa drop it? or was the crane removal planned all along? (ie. this is not an indication of the course of current negotiations)

Sometimes it's hard to tell whether people on here are being secretive or purely speculative.

btw, I haven't heard either way...
Haha, i know how you feel. Right now a small part of me is wishing to hear that they are taking down this crane because they believe they would be better off using a tower crane from now on. One can dream.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2009, 1:29 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Definitely lots of activity on this project right now.

As per the city, the crane is coming down on the 28th. See above post.
Well now as per the city a crane installation will take place on the 4th and 5th of April.

Quote:
Project 3095 Overview

TOTAL CLOSURE - 800 W. HASTINGS
Community Area: Downtown

Status: Road Closure

Location: W HASTINGS ST Hornby to Howe

Project Start:2009/04/04
Expected Completion: 2009/04/05

City Contact: Alan Reese 604-873-7423

Description: On Saturday April 4th and Sunday April 5th the 800 blk of W. Hastings will be closed for crane installation.
Traffic delays are expected and motorists are advised to use alternate routes.
It's almost as if Ellis Don has been asked to leave the site and a new contractor is coming in and bringing their own equipment...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2009, 1:55 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,487
^ What the hell would SSPVancouver be without you man........
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:22 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.