Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa
I'm very pro-bike but I'm just not in favour of the burrard st bridge lane relocation, i'd much rather prefer a passerrelle built instead. Anyways we now know the planned date for the beginning of the trial, you heard it hear first.
The city is requesting a total of 855 cement barriers.
|
A passerrelle would be fantastic. However it would take years to design, plan, fund and build. A decently looking one would cost at least $100 million dollars. It also may not be possible to site one close enough to Burrard Bridge to serve as an alternative to the bridge. While it would generate additional cycling and walking trips, it is not apparent that it would solve the safety and capacity on Burrard Bridge.
In many cities around the world including London, Copenhagen and Lyon, they provide good cycling facilities on general traffic bridges AND building bike and ped only bridges.
In 1995, Portland reallocated a lane of traffic on the Burnside Bridge. Some people of course were predicting traffic chaos. Surprisingly enough, everything was fine. Portland, in the meantime, has increased cycling dramatically, surpassing Vancouver.
It is only a trial. Before spending millions of dollars on new bridges or widening the bridge, it makes sense to see if it works. If it doesn't, we are in trouble, because, compared to the traffic disruption that will be caused by street closures during the Olympics, the lane reallocation on Burrard Bridge is nothing.
Have faith that people are resourceful enough to figure out how to get around with having four lanes on Burrard. Compared to the other challenges that people overcome in their lives, the trial is really minor.
Just have an open mind and give it a chance. Take the opportunity to enjoy walking, running or cycling over the bridge. It will be really fantastic.